Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (275)
- UIC School of Law (196)
- Seattle University School of Law (193)
- Santa Clara Law (130)
- Southern Methodist University (126)
-
- DePaul University (108)
- University of Washington School of Law (78)
- University of Richmond (38)
- BLR (33)
- National Law School of India University (29)
- University of Michigan Law School (26)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (22)
- University of South Florida (20)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (19)
- American University Washington College of Law (18)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (17)
- Brooklyn Law School (15)
- Columbia Law School (13)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (13)
- University of Baltimore Law (12)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (12)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (10)
- Duke Law (9)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (9)
- University of Georgia School of Law (9)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (8)
- Pepperdine University (7)
- Brigham Young University Law School (6)
- Cleveland State University (6)
- Cornell University Law School (6)
- Keyword
-
- Google (104)
- Copyright (91)
- Adwords (80)
- Trademark (59)
- Software (49)
-
- Rosetta Stone (47)
- Intellectual property (46)
- Intellectual Property Law (43)
- Computer Law (40)
- Internet (38)
- Technology (35)
- Artificial intelligence (34)
- Copyright law (32)
- Rosetta (28)
- AI (26)
- Law and Technology (24)
- Intellectual Property (22)
- Privacy (22)
- Science and Technology (22)
- Consumer confusion (19)
- Fair use (19)
- Cybersecurity (18)
- Patent (18)
- Patent law (18)
- Antitrust (16)
- Law (16)
- DMCA (15)
- PIPEDA (15)
- Patents (15)
- International Law (14)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Canadian Journal of Law and Technology (269)
- Seattle University Law Review (189)
- UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law (138)
- Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix) (129)
- SMU Science and Technology Law Review (124)
-
- DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law (82)
- Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts (62)
- Richmond Journal of Law & Technology (35)
- ExpressO (33)
- UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law (30)
- Indian Journal of Law and Technology (29)
- Faculty Scholarship (27)
- DePaul Business & Commercial Law Journal (26)
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (20)
- Military Cyber Affairs (20)
- UIC Law Review (20)
- The University of Cincinnati Intellectual Property and Computer Law Journal (18)
- All Faculty Scholarship (13)
- Articles (12)
- Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review (11)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (10)
- Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology (9)
- Duke Law & Technology Review (8)
- Georgia Journal of Law & Technology (8)
- UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship (8)
- Cybaris® (7)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (7)
- Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law (6)
- FIU Law Review (6)
- IP Theory (6)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 211 - 240 of 1592
Full-Text Articles in Intellectual Property Law
Retail Innovation Through Ai: Benefits And Liabilities, W. Michael Schuster, Simon E. Corrigan
Retail Innovation Through Ai: Benefits And Liabilities, W. Michael Schuster, Simon E. Corrigan
SMU Science and Technology Law Review
This article investigates the transformative capabilities of artificial intelligence (AI) within the retail industry. We highlight significant opportunities for product customization, innovation, and enhanced supply chain efficiency, while also examining complex legal challenges associated with AI-generated content. In particular, concerns in the copyright realm are highlighted— including documented biases against AI-produced works. Recognizing these issues, retailers should adopt proactive legal strategies, ensure transparency, and consider hybrid human-AI collaborative approaches. Strategically addressing these issues will help maximize consumer and business benefits while mitigating legal exposure.
Robot Regulators, Brian L. Frye
Robot Regulators, Brian L. Frye
SMU Science and Technology Law Review
No abstract provided.
Visual Legal Rhetoric In The Age Of Generative Ai And Deepfakes: Renaissance Or Dark Ages?, Michael D. Murray
Visual Legal Rhetoric In The Age Of Generative Ai And Deepfakes: Renaissance Or Dark Ages?, Michael D. Murray
SMU Science and Technology Law Review
The paradoxical development of visual generative AI tools, such as OpenAI’s DALL-E 3, Midjourney, and Stable Diffusion, simultaneously signals a renaissance and a potential dark age in visual rhetoric and communication. On the one hand, these tools democratize the creation of visual content, empowering attorneys and others to become artists and illustrators of their legal communications without needing to learn how to draw. These AI systems can simplify complex legal concepts, bridge language barriers, and enhance advocacy. But on the other hand, the proliferation of deepfakes presents significant challenges for visual rhetoric. Deepfakes can quickly and easily create realistic but …
Willful Ignorance Or Embracing Ai To Find Prior Art? Uspto Misses The Mark, Henry H. Perritt Jr.
Willful Ignorance Or Embracing Ai To Find Prior Art? Uspto Misses The Mark, Henry H. Perritt Jr.
SMU Science and Technology Law Review
Artificial intelligence (AI) is frequently in the news. Policymakers and business executives must decide whether it is a revolutionary phenomenon, likely to overturn established enterprises and practices, or if it is a mere modest advancement in decades-old natural language capability over-advertised by Silicon Valley seeking the “next big thing” and hyped by reporters eager for the next byline. The patent office and the patent bar are not immune from the turmoil. The USPTO has issued several policies and inquiries related to the impact of AI on various aspects of patent prosecution. Most recent is a Request for Comments on the …
Disenchanting Consent, Ruifeng Song
Disenchanting Consent, Ruifeng Song
SMU Science and Technology Law Review
Despite being criticized as a flawed mechanism for data protection, con- sent has witnessed a revival in the recent wave of state privacy statutes. One factor that contributed to the revival may be the widely held belief that con- sent constitutes the “cornerstone” of data privacy laws. This Article conducts a comparative historical survey to examine the validity of this belief. The findings are twofold. First, contrary to what many believe, consent has been playing a limited role in global data privacy laws. Second, consent is an inherently defective mechanism for data protection. Some of its problems have existed since …
Transportation Security Administration Use Of Facial Recognition Technology: Turbulence Surrounding Traveler Rights, Mckenly Redmon
Transportation Security Administration Use Of Facial Recognition Technology: Turbulence Surrounding Traveler Rights, Mckenly Redmon
SMU Science and Technology Law Review
Facial recognition technology has been employed by law enforcement agencies and private companies for decades. This technology promises safer and more efficient processes to identify individuals in the name of safety. However, not everyone approves of their biometric data being collected. This Article provides an overview of the current use of facial recognition technology by the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) in airport security checkpoints. It begins by explaining the underlying technology behind facial recognition and explores the safety and security concerns behind it. Building on this foundation, this Article then evaluates how the TSA’s use of facial recognition influences science …
The Sky’S Not The Limit: Navigating Starlink’S Impact On Global Connectivity And Regulation, Michael N. Hillebrand
The Sky’S Not The Limit: Navigating Starlink’S Impact On Global Connectivity And Regulation, Michael N. Hillebrand
SMU Science and Technology Law Review
This case note examines the governance implications arising from the onset of accelerated satellite internet expansion and explores potential regulatory solutions for effective governmental oversight. Due to the interconnected nature of the internet and its global network, international organizations and treaties play a crucial role in content and data regulation, and rapid technological evolution presents increasing difficulties for these regulatory frameworks to keep pace. These challenges are particularly evident in satellite-based broadband internet services, with SpaceX’s Starlink emerging as the most prominent and currently relevant service in this domain. Proponents of this technology emphasize its ability to provide internet access …
Debugging The Trademark Laws Part Ii: Criminal Penalties For Trafficking In Counterfeit Microelectronics, Patricia E. Campbell
Debugging The Trademark Laws Part Ii: Criminal Penalties For Trafficking In Counterfeit Microelectronics, Patricia E. Campbell
SMU Science and Technology Law Review
Counterfeit microelectronics have been a persistent problem in government and industry supply chains for many years. Counterfeit electronic parts (e.g., integrated circuits, transistors, capacitors) pose serious risks to human health and safety, harm the economy, and jeopardize national security. Trafficking in counterfeit goods and services was first criminalized in 1984, and Congress has acted on several occasions to increase the corresponding penalties. Nevertheless, the trade in counterfeit microelectronics continues to evolve to meet market demands, and relatively few criminal cases have been brought for trafficking in counterfeit microelectronics. While several factors may contribute to this apparent lack of enforcement, the …
It Is Our Flaws That Make Us Humane: How Technology Ruined Judicial Craft, Shai Dothan, Gregor Maučec
It Is Our Flaws That Make Us Humane: How Technology Ruined Judicial Craft, Shai Dothan, Gregor Maučec
SMU Science and Technology Law Review
There is ample evidence that people are not completely rational. They suffer from a series of biases that limit their abilities to make the best decisions and to stick to them. Judges are a unique group of people. They go through many years of training that counter some of these biases, but not all of them. In fact, there is a whole field of research dedicated to predicting how judges, with their human flaws, are going to behave. But today, judges can use an increasing number of artificial intelligence (AI) tools to assist with their craft, particularly with research and …
Regulation To Reinforce The Evidentiary-Science Base Of U.S. Medicine In The Age Of "Omics", Michael J. Malinowski
Regulation To Reinforce The Evidentiary-Science Base Of U.S. Medicine In The Age Of "Omics", Michael J. Malinowski
SMU Science and Technology Law Review
United States’ technology transfer law and policy (TTLP) integrates government, academia, and industry—a “triple-threat” research and development (R&D) methodology—and harnesses commercial incentives to stimulate market application of federal government-funded invention. TTLP, which has proven a potent catalyst for remarkably prolific biomedical R&D since Congress enacted its cornerstone legislation in 1980, is transforming U.S. medicine to molecular medicine—to personal genome medicine (PGM)—in real time. A genomics (gene function in the context of an organism’s entire genome, meaning its full set of genetic instructions) complement to the Human Genome Project (HGP) emerged in the 1990s. Genomics has given rise to a portfolio …
The Artificial Intelligence Trolley Problem: Governance In The Post-Chevron World, James M. Cooper, Kashyap Kompella
The Artificial Intelligence Trolley Problem: Governance In The Post-Chevron World, James M. Cooper, Kashyap Kompella
SMU Science and Technology Law Review
This Essay addresses a growing Constitutional challenge in public governance: the increasing delegation of consequential decisions to algorithmic systems that encode value trade-offs between liberty and security, equity and efficiency, and expression and control, without visibility, legal justification, or institutional oversight. We view this hidden normative choice an example of the “Artificial Intelligence (AI) Trolley Problem.” Like the classic moral dilemma, it involves unavoidable sacrifices among competing goods. Unlike its philosophical counterpart, however, algorithmic trade-offs occur silently. They are embedded in data proxies, optimization logic, and model design, and insulated from scrutiny by claims of technical neutrality. This Essay argues …
Top Ten Biotechnology Patent Cases Of 2024: Loper Bright, Federal Circuit Turmoil, Patent Term Adjustment, And Naturally Occurring Nucleic Acids, Kevin E. Noonan, Andrew W. Torrance
Top Ten Biotechnology Patent Cases Of 2024: Loper Bright, Federal Circuit Turmoil, Patent Term Adjustment, And Naturally Occurring Nucleic Acids, Kevin E. Noonan, Andrew W. Torrance
SMU Science and Technology Law Review
A pivotal year for biotechnology patent law, 2024 was marked by consequential court rulings and evolving legal frameworks. This article surveys the ten most significant judicial decisions impacting biotech patents, highlighting major themes and trends in policy, litigation, and regulation. Courts at all levels grappled with core patentability requirements in the life sciences, from the Supreme Court’s continued laissez-faire stance on subject-matter eligibility to the Federal Circuit’s stringent enforcement of disclosure sufficiency rules.
Artificial Intelligence And Intellectual Property, Part Iii: Ip Protection For Ai-Assisted Inventions And Creative Works, Joshua Landau
Artificial Intelligence And Intellectual Property, Part Iii: Ip Protection For Ai-Assisted Inventions And Creative Works, Joshua Landau
American University Business Law Review
Chairman Darrell Issa, Ranking Member Hank Johnson, distinguished members of the Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet ("Subcommittee") of the Committee on the Judiciary ("Judiciary Committee"), on behalf of the Computer and Communications Industry Association (CCIA) and its members, thank you for this opportunity to share our views on intellectual property (IP) protection for artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted works and inventions.
Volume 48 Masthead, Seattle University Law Review
Volume 48 Masthead, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Volume 48 Masthead
Corporate Scenarios: Drawing Lessons From History, Madison Condon
Corporate Scenarios: Drawing Lessons From History, Madison Condon
Seattle University Law Review
As corporations are increasingly pressed to reveal information about their exposure to climate-related risks, they are often asked to undertake and disclose the outcome of “scenario analysis.” In this exercise, corporations, including financial institutions, examine how their business would fare under different pathways the future may take. One oft-used scenario, for example, is the International Energy Agency’s “Net-Zero by 2050: A Roadmap for the Energy Sector.” This Essay presents a history of the use of scenarios as a corporate planning tool, particularly in the oil industry, arguing that it is key for understanding our present moment and the role of …
Dark Accounting Matter, Colleen Honigsberg
Dark Accounting Matter, Colleen Honigsberg
Seattle University Law Review
Physicists calculate that approximately 85% of the matter in the universe is composed of “dark matter” that “does not absorb, reflect, or emit electromagnetic radiation and is therefore difficult to detect.” The S&P 500 currently trades at a price-to-book value of 4.2, suggesting that book value accounts for less than 20% of the S&P 500’s market value. The remaining 80% appears nowhere in these firms’ balance sheets—it is invisible to contemporary accounting techniques and constitutes “dark accounting matter.”
Some “dark accounting matter” is composed of factors commonly described as components of “ESG.” Human capital, for example, is an intangible asset …
Volume 48 Masthead, Seattle University Law Review
Volume 48 Masthead, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Volume 48 Masthead
Patching The Cfaa So Researchers No Longer Pay, Joshua Baker
Patching The Cfaa So Researchers No Longer Pay, Joshua Baker
Cybaris®
No abstract provided.
Regenerating Justice: Chatgpt And The Legal Minefield Of Generative Ai, Katie Szilagyi
Regenerating Justice: Chatgpt And The Legal Minefield Of Generative Ai, Katie Szilagyi
Canadian Journal of Law and Technology
This paper adopts an automation bias lens to cast doubt on the growing claims that GenAI is a transformational tool for legal industry. In this context, automation bias refers to the well-known psychological phenomenon in which human decision-makers unwittingly defer to automated processes, flowing from overreliance on the accuracy of the automation. Even well-meaning individuals aiming to keep a “human-in-the-loop” of any automated decision can fall prey to this well-documented phenomenon, trusting the technology more than it deserves to be trusted. Champions for current GenAI technologies often do acknowledge limitations within the existing landscape of tools, like GenAI’s tendency to …
The Employees’ Dilemma: Balancing Internal Reporting, Whistleblowing, And Insider Trading Risks, Geeyoung Min
The Employees’ Dilemma: Balancing Internal Reporting, Whistleblowing, And Insider Trading Risks, Geeyoung Min
Seattle University Law Review
The Essay examines how recent developments in insider trading regulations and whistleblower reward programs can lead to unintended and counterproductive results of discouraging employees from using internal reporting channels within corporate compliance programs. While the presence of a robust and well-functioning corporate compliance program is a critical factor both in mitigating the level of public enforcement actions against companies and in protecting corporate managers from liability in private litigation, these programs often provide little incentive for employees to report potential misconduct internally.
Corporate compliance programs are designed to promote the upward information flow within the company, which is essential for …
Understanding The Big Three’S Wavering Support Of Environmental And Social Shareholder Proposals, Jeff Schwartz, Jefferson Jensen
Understanding The Big Three’S Wavering Support Of Environmental And Social Shareholder Proposals, Jeff Schwartz, Jefferson Jensen
Seattle University Law Review
Because of their substantial equity portfolios, BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street (the Big 3) are central players in corporate governance. It is, therefore, critical to understand how they vote. One puzzle is that their support for shareholder proposals on environmental and social matters appears to waiver. In 2020, for instance, BlackRock supported 11.1% of environmental proposals at S&P 500 firms. In 2021, it seemingly reversed course, supporting 55.2%. It then flipped again, supporting 32.1% in 2022. Such statistics suggest that the Big 3 are constantly changing their views on these topics. This Article seeks to better understand whether this is …
How The Antidiscrimination Law Of Commercial Transactions Really Works, Helen Norton
How The Antidiscrimination Law Of Commercial Transactions Really Works, Helen Norton
Seattle University Law Review
A variety of businesses now cite 303 Creative when seeking First Amendment protection for their refusal to serve certain customers based on those customers’ protected class status. How this litigation will play out remains to be seen. But future courts need not, and should not, repeat the 303 Creative Court’s misunderstanding of how the antidiscrimination law of commercial transactions actually works.
Part I of this Essay explains the Court’s longstanding understanding of the antidiscrimination law of commercial transactions, and then describes the Court’s failure to engage with this precedent in 303 Creative. Part II then identifies the 303 Creative decision’s …
Inventions Without Inventors: The Need To Recognize Ai Systems As Inventors, Niloufer Selvadurai
Inventions Without Inventors: The Need To Recognize Ai Systems As Inventors, Niloufer Selvadurai
Journal of Law, Technology, & the Internet
As AI systems increasingly generate innovative products and processes, a critical issue to address is the nature and extent of the patent protection that is conferred upon such outputs. The overarching objective of patent law is the support of innovation and progress. In determining applications, the clear focus of patent judgments is whether the claimed invention satisfies the required standards of inventiveness, novelty, and non-obviousness. It is hence curious that incidental references to “individuals” and “persons,” variously scattered through patent statutes, operate to deny recognition of AI inventors. This is the result of the global test litigation instigated by Dr. …
What Is Copywritable In Software?, Charles Duan
What Is Copywritable In Software?, Charles Duan
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
No abstract provided.
The Globalization Of Copyright Exceptions For Ai Training, Matthew Sag, Peter K. Yu
The Globalization Of Copyright Exceptions For Ai Training, Matthew Sag, Peter K. Yu
Faculty Scholarship
Generative AI, machine learning and other computational uses of copyrighted works pose profound questions for copyright law. This article conducts of global survey of how different countries have attempted to answer these questions in relation to the unauthorized use of copyrighted works for training. Although the world has yet to achieve international consensus on this issue, an international equilibrium is emerging. Jurisdictions with common law and civil law traditions, and with varying economic conditions, technological capabilities, political systems, and cultural backgrounds, have found ways to reconcile copyright law and AI training. In this equilibrium, countries recognize that text data mining, …
“Whoever Invents Or Discovers”: Artificial Intelligence And The Case For Joint Inventorship, Seth F. Littleford
“Whoever Invents Or Discovers”: Artificial Intelligence And The Case For Joint Inventorship, Seth F. Littleford
BYU Law Review
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly important in the modern world. Given its fidelity to—and, in some cases, its surpassing of—human performance, people rely upon AI in myriad settings. The AI era is already here, and the technological advancements to come are even more mind-boggling. The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has seen a significant increase in patent applications claiming inventions pertaining to AI, but how does the patent system handle when AI invents?
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently held in Thaler v. Vidal that the Patent Act requires inventors listed on patent applications …
Data Scraping For Generative Ai—To What Extent?, Jae Yeon Cecilia Kim
Data Scraping For Generative Ai—To What Extent?, Jae Yeon Cecilia Kim
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
Generative AI platforms are developed by scraping data from other platforms. This raises complex copyright infringement issues that are yet to be resolved. Courts have attempted to address these problems using the fair use doctrine, which evaluates four factors to determine whether a use infringes on copyright: (1) the purpose and character of the use, (2) the nature of the use, (3) the amount and substantiality of the copyrighted work’s use, and (4) the impact of the use on the market for the original work. Despite efforts to apply this long-established doctrine, challenges persist, including difficulties in identifying the copyright …
Emerging Compliance In The Generative Decentralized Era, Nizan Geslevich Packin
Emerging Compliance In The Generative Decentralized Era, Nizan Geslevich Packin
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
Is it the end of compliance as we know it? Emerging technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (“AI”), including Generative AI (“GenAI”), and blockchain are reshaping regulatory compliance in the Web 3.0 era. As machine-generated data becomes the norm, traditional models reliant on human oversight are becoming obsolete, necessitating swift adaptation from regulators and industry stakeholders. Historically, compliance was designed to be managed by humans due to the need for critical thinking, ethical considerations, and nuanced decision-making. Yet, in today’s era, this approach is no longer viable. Addressing this need, Regulatory Technology (“RegTech”) has played a key role in modernizing compliance …