Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (191)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (87)
- University of Michigan Law School (50)
- UIC School of Law (40)
- DePaul University (25)
-
- University of Georgia School of Law (24)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (21)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (20)
- American University Washington College of Law (15)
- BLR (15)
- University of Baltimore Law (12)
- Marquette University Law School (10)
- New York Law School (8)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (8)
- Wayne State University (8)
- Fordham Law School (7)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (7)
- Boston University School of Law (6)
- Georgetown University Law Center (6)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (6)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (6)
- University of Richmond (6)
- Notre Dame Law School (5)
- University of Colorado Law School (5)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (5)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (5)
- William & Mary Law School (5)
- Winthrop University (5)
- Brooklyn Law School (4)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (4)
- Keyword
-
- Antitrust (115)
- Intellectual property (47)
- Patent (36)
- Competition (34)
- Patents (32)
-
- Copyright (31)
- Patent law (30)
- Intellectual Property Law (29)
- Trade Regulation (22)
- Sherman Act (19)
- Antitrust law (18)
- Law (18)
- Trademark (17)
- Federal Trade Commission (13)
- Monopoly (13)
- Regulation (13)
- Jurisdiction (12)
- Drugs (11)
- Economics (11)
- Law and Economics (11)
- Licensing (11)
- Microsoft (11)
- Technology (11)
- Intellectual Property (10)
- Trademarks (10)
- Corporations (9)
- Courts (9)
- International Law (9)
- International Trade (9)
- Monopolization (9)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (191)
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (54)
- Michigan Law Review (33)
- Faculty Scholarship (26)
- DePaul Business & Commercial Law Journal (25)
-
- All Faculty Scholarship (18)
- UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law (18)
- ExpressO (15)
- Articles (13)
- Cardozo Law Review (12)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (11)
- UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship (9)
- UIC Law Review (9)
- Federal Communications Law Journal (8)
- Georgia Journal of Law & Technology (8)
- Law Faculty Research Publications (8)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law (8)
- Faculty Scholarly Works (7)
- Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review (7)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law (7)
- Articles & Chapters (6)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (6)
- Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review (6)
- Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business (6)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (6)
- American University Law Review (5)
- Faculty Publications (5)
- IP Theory (5)
- Publications (5)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (5)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 361 - 390 of 705
Full-Text Articles in Intellectual Property Law
A Brave Attempt: Can The National Collegiate Athletic Association Sanction Colleges And Universities With Native American Mascots?, Kenneth B. Franklin
A Brave Attempt: Can The National Collegiate Athletic Association Sanction Colleges And Universities With Native American Mascots?, Kenneth B. Franklin
Georgia Journal of Law & Technology
No abstract provided.
Do Patent Challenges Increase Competition?, Stephen Yelderman
Do Patent Challenges Increase Competition?, Stephen Yelderman
Journal Articles
This Article is the first to seriously scrutinize the claim that patent challenges lead to increased competition. It identifies a number of conditions that must hold for a patent challenge to provide this particular benefit, and evaluates the reasonableness of assuming that the pro-competitive benefits of patent challenges are generally available. As it turns out, there are a number of ways these conditions can and regularly do fail. This Article synthesizes legal doctrine, recent empirical scholarship, and several novel case studies to identify categories of challenges in which the potential benefits for competition are smaller than previously thought or, in …
A Priate's Treasure?: Heightened Pleadings Standard For Copyright Infringement Complaints After Bell Atlantic Corp. V. Twombly, Benjamin W. Cheesbro
A Priate's Treasure?: Heightened Pleadings Standard For Copyright Infringement Complaints After Bell Atlantic Corp. V. Twombly, Benjamin W. Cheesbro
Georgia Journal of Law & Technology
No abstract provided.
Patent Privateers And Antitrust Fears, Matthew Sipe
Patent Privateers And Antitrust Fears, Matthew Sipe
Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review
Patent trolls are categorically demonized as threatening American innovation and industry. But whether they are a threat that antitrust law is equipped to deal with is a complex question that depends on the particular type of patent troll and activities they engage in. This Article looks specifically at privateer patent trolls: entities that acquire their patents from operating entities and assert them against other industry members. In the particular context of privateering, antitrust law is almost certainly not the proper legal solution. Privateering does raise significant issues: circumventing litigation constraints, evading licensing obligations, and raising the cost and frequency of …
Mannington Mills, Inc. V. Congoleum Corp.: A Perfect Storm Of Extraterritoriality In Patent And Antitrust Law, Benjamin Holt
Mannington Mills, Inc. V. Congoleum Corp.: A Perfect Storm Of Extraterritoriality In Patent And Antitrust Law, Benjamin Holt
Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies
The invention of chemically embossed cushioned vinyl flooring revolutionized the flooring industry in the mid-1900s, and the patents on this technology became the basis for large-scale litigation between two of the industry's leaders. This is the story of Mannington Mills, Inc. v. Congoleum Corp.-a case that implicated foreign patent rights and the territorial nature of patent law, the extraterritorial scope of U.S. antitrust law (at a time when this scope was changing and uncertain), competing doctrines of jurisdiction and abstention, and emerging international comity concerns. These legal issues combined to create a perfect storm of extraterritoriality by presenting unique, complex …
First Steps In Building An Intellectual Property Program And Portfolio, Jeffrey D. Sullivan
First Steps In Building An Intellectual Property Program And Portfolio, Jeffrey D. Sullivan
Georgia Journal of Law & Technology
No abstract provided.
Confusion Codified: Why Trademark Remedies Make No Sense, Mark A. Thurmon
Confusion Codified: Why Trademark Remedies Make No Sense, Mark A. Thurmon
Georgia Journal of Law & Technology
No abstract provided.
Deterring Innovation: New York V. Actavis And The Duty To Subsidize Competitors' Market Theory, Joanna M. Shepherd
Deterring Innovation: New York V. Actavis And The Duty To Subsidize Competitors' Market Theory, Joanna M. Shepherd
Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology
No abstract provided.
Network Effects In Technology Markets: Applying The Lessons Of Intel And Microsoft To Future Clashes Between Antitrust And Intellectual Property, John T. Soma, Kevin B. Davis
Network Effects In Technology Markets: Applying The Lessons Of Intel And Microsoft To Future Clashes Between Antitrust And Intellectual Property, John T. Soma, Kevin B. Davis
Georgia Journal of Law & Technology
No abstract provided.
Copyright Misuse And The Limits Of The Intellectual Property Monopoly, Aaron Xavier Fellmeth
Copyright Misuse And The Limits Of The Intellectual Property Monopoly, Aaron Xavier Fellmeth
Georgia Journal of Law & Technology
No abstract provided.
"If That's The Way It Must Be, Okay": Campbell V. Acuff-Rose On Rewind
"If That's The Way It Must Be, Okay": Campbell V. Acuff-Rose On Rewind
Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review
The 1994 Supreme Court case Campbell v. Acuff-Rose established broad protections for parody in U.S. copyright law. While the case is well known, the facts behind the case are not. None of the three courts that heard the case were told that the alleged parody by 2 Live Crew appeared only on a “sanitized” version of the group’s controversial album. Thus the work had a heightened commercial purpose: filling up a meager album so that album could serve as a market stopgap for its controversial cousin. Although commercial purpose is a key factor in the fair use calculus, no court …
1995 Antitrust Guidelines For The Licensing Of Intellectual Property: Harmonizing The Commercial Use Of Legal Monopolies With The Prohibitions Of Antitrust Law, Thomas L. Hayslett Iii
1995 Antitrust Guidelines For The Licensing Of Intellectual Property: Harmonizing The Commercial Use Of Legal Monopolies With The Prohibitions Of Antitrust Law, Thomas L. Hayslett Iii
Georgia Journal of Law & Technology
No abstract provided.
Intersection Between The Patent System And Antitrust Laws: Patents Speeding, Antitrust Yielding, Innovation Bleeding!, Stijepko Tokic
Intersection Between The Patent System And Antitrust Laws: Patents Speeding, Antitrust Yielding, Innovation Bleeding!, Stijepko Tokic
Akron Intellectual Property Journal
In this article, I explain the interaction between the two laws and describe the ways in which these two extremely important areas of government regulation are and are not in tension. I argue that the conflict between the two laws is overstated, but the proper balance is far from being found. The reason for that is a notion that the current state of the patent system is more of a hindrance than a spur to innovation and competition due to overprotection and broadening of patent rights, lowering of standards to grant patents, chronic inefficiency of the Patent and Trademark Office …
Permissible Product Hopping: Why A Per Se Legal Rule Barring Antitrust Liability Is Necessary To Protect Future Innovation In The Pharmaceutical Industry, Michelle L. Ethier
Permissible Product Hopping: Why A Per Se Legal Rule Barring Antitrust Liability Is Necessary To Protect Future Innovation In The Pharmaceutical Industry, Michelle L. Ethier
Akron Intellectual Property Journal
Pharmaceutical product hopping is a relatively new phenomenon in which a brand-name pharmaceutical company tactically reformulates a drug and patents the reformulation in an attempt to avoid competition by a generic competitor. When viewed in the context of the HatchWaxman framework, product hopping can effectively eliminate generic competitors from the market, thereby implicating § 2 of the Sherman Act. In addressing antitrust liability, this Note advocates a per se legal approach to product hopping so long as the hop is supported by a valid patent. Although some have argued that deference to the United States Patent and Trademark Office and …
Antitrust Limits On Targeted Patent Aggregation, Alan Devlin
Antitrust Limits On Targeted Patent Aggregation, Alan Devlin
Florida Law Review
Patent-assertion entities (PAEs) are non-technology-practicing companies that aggregate and license patents under threat of suit. Their activities have drawn fire, including presidential condemnation, and spurred proposed legislation to protect operating firms against them. PAEs leverage flaws in the patent system to extort firms that independently invent and sell technological goods to consumers. Since PAEs tax innovators and appear to restrict rather than facilitate wealth transfer to original patentees, their worst rent-seeking practices almost certainly reduce net incentives to innovate and harm consumers. This result is more likely if the principal desirable incentive that PAEs create is to file patents rather …
Dueling Monologues On The Public Domain: What Digital Copyright Can Learn From Antitrust, Timothy K. Armstrong
Dueling Monologues On The Public Domain: What Digital Copyright Can Learn From Antitrust, Timothy K. Armstrong
The University of Cincinnati Intellectual Property and Computer Law Journal
This article, written for the inaugural volume of the University of Cincinnati Intellectual Property and Computer Law Journal, explores the disconnect between contemporary United States intellectual property law and the often quite different consensus views of disinterested expert opinion. Questions concerning how copyright law treats the public domain (that is, uncopyrighted material) supply a lens for comparing the law as it stands with the law as scholars have suggested it should be. The ultimate goal is to understand why a quarter century of predominantly critical scholarship on intellectual property seems to have exerted such limited influence on Congress and …
The Protection Of Pioneer Innovations – Lessons Learnt From The Semiconductor Chip Industry And Its Ip Law Framework, 32 J. Marshall J. Info. Tech. & Privacy L. 151 (2016), Thomas Hoeren
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
In the second half of the 20th century, semiconductor technology as integrated circuits (IC), commonly known as microchips, became more and more dominating in our lives. Microchips are the control center of simple things like toasters as well as of complex high-tech machines for medical use. Of course, they also define the hearts of each computer. With the invention of semiconductor technology, a whole new economic sector began its rise and soon played a major role in the economies of the large industrial countries like the U.S., Japan and the EC. Especially, it stands out for its innovational power and …
Protecting Trade Secrets Under International Investment Law: What Secrets Investors Should Not Tell States, 15 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 228 (2016), Daria Kim
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
The article addresses specifics of trade secret protection under international investment law. As a particular example, it analyzes protection of pharmaceutical regulatory data against the background of the growing public policy campaign for broader access to clinical trial data and the recent unprecedented practice of the European Medicines Agency of disclosing clinical dossiers submitted for drug marketing approval. Given the significant role of foreign direct investment in the global pharmaceutical industry and substantial, exponentially increasing costs incurred by drug originator companies in conducting clinical trials, the prospect of investor-state dispute over data disclosure does not appear purely hypothetical. The question …
The Examination Effect: A Comparison Of The Outcome Of Patent Examination In The Us, Europe And Australia, 16 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 21 (2016), Andrew Christie, Chris Dent, John Liddicoat
The Examination Effect: A Comparison Of The Outcome Of Patent Examination In The Us, Europe And Australia, 16 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 21 (2016), Andrew Christie, Chris Dent, John Liddicoat
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
The article provides an answer to a question that, rather surprisingly, has not been addressed in the academic literature to date: What is the practical effect of patent examination? It does so by undertaking an empirical analysis of the examination of nearly 500 patent applications, filed in identical form, in three patent offices: the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), the European Patent Office (EPO), and the Australian Patent Office (APO). By comparing the form of claim 1 as granted with claim 1 in the patent application, we can identify whether there is any meaningful difference between the two …
Panel 1: Issues In The U.S. For Chinese Businesses, Cindy Yang, Jamie D. Underwood, Mark Cohen
Panel 1: Issues In The U.S. For Chinese Businesses, Cindy Yang, Jamie D. Underwood, Mark Cohen
Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law
The symposium examines the bidirectional intellectual property (IP) challenges between the U.S. and China, highlighting that while Chinese businesses face significant IP issues in the U.S., American companies also encounter complexities in China. The discussion emphasizes the evolving nature of IP litigation in both countries, with a focus on fashion and brand protection. Panelists provide insights into strategies for navigating these challenges, including the use of design patents, trademarks, and trade dress, as well as the role of administrative bodies like the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC).
Protecting Products Versus Platforms, Jacob S. Sherkow
Protecting Products Versus Platforms, Jacob S. Sherkow
Articles & Chapters
Patents have long been the most important legal assets of biotech companies. Increasingly, however, biotech firms find themselves on one side of a divide: as either traditional product companies or platform companies. Given the differences between these two types of business models, the merits of intellectual property (IP) protection vary between them. This article explores how those differences relate to biotech startups and entrepreneurs seeking to protect their inventions.
Describing Drugs: A Response To Professors Allison And Ouellette, Jacob S. Sherkow
Describing Drugs: A Response To Professors Allison And Ouellette, Jacob S. Sherkow
Articles & Chapters
Profs. Allison and Ouellette’s Article, How Courts Adjudicate Patent Definiteness and Disclosure, 65 Duke L.J.609 (2015), on courts’ adjudication of certain patent disputes presents some surprising data: pharmaceutical patents litigated to judgment fare substantially worse on written-description analyses if they are not part of traditional pioneer-generic litigation. This Response engages in several hypotheses for this disparity and examines the cases that make up Allison and Ouellette’s dataset. An analysis of these cases finds that the disparity can be best explained by technological and judicial idiosyncrasies in each case, rather than larger differences among pharmaceutical patent cases. This finding contextualizes …
Offensive Linemen: How Pro Football, Inc.'S Responses To The Cancellation Of The Redskins Registrations Should Be Incorporated Into The Uspto's Future Analyses Of Disparaging Trademarks, Stella Silverstein
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Introductions, Matthew Diller
Introductions, Matthew Diller
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Biblical Fool And The Brander: The Law And Economics Of Propertization In American Trademark Law, William P. Kratzke
The Biblical Fool And The Brander: The Law And Economics Of Propertization In American Trademark Law, William P. Kratzke
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal
Isaiah 35:8, which tells of 'fools" upon a highway who shall not err, became authority for the position that the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) should protect fools from deception. This Article examines the biblical passage in context and concludes that it does not support protection of unthinking, credulous people. Ensuing FTC orders based on witnesses' speculation of how fools would construe particular claims actually harmed fools. The FTC retreated Unfortunately, the objective of protecting fools from deception has taken over § 43(a) Lanham Act jurisprudence-but now sellers speculate in competitor lawsuits how fools will construe competitors' claims and undertake to …
Patent System Manipulation: Hedge Funds Abusing Ipr, Poor Patent Quality & Pharmaceutical Monopolies, Kenneth J. Costa
Patent System Manipulation: Hedge Funds Abusing Ipr, Poor Patent Quality & Pharmaceutical Monopolies, Kenneth J. Costa
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Facilitating Competition By Remedial Regulation, Kristelia A. García
Facilitating Competition By Remedial Regulation, Kristelia A. García
Publications
In music licensing, powerful music publishers have begun—for the first time ever— to withdraw their digital copyrights from the collectives that license those rights, in order to negotiate considerably higher rates in private deals. At the beginning of the year, two of these publishers commanded a private royalty rate nearly twice that of the going collective rate. This result could be seen as a coup for the free market: Constrained by consent decrees and conflicting interests, collectives are simply not able to establish and enforce a true market rate in the new, digital age. This could also be seen as …
Who Owns Gene Editing? Patents In The Time Of Crispr, Jacob S. Sherkow
Who Owns Gene Editing? Patents In The Time Of Crispr, Jacob S. Sherkow
Other Publications
New gene-editing technologies, like CRISPR, promise revolutionary advances in biology and medicine. However, several patent disputes in the USA and UK may have complicated who can use CRISPR. What does this mean for the future of gene editing?
Roger Blair And Intellectual Property, Keith N. Hylton
Roger Blair And Intellectual Property, Keith N. Hylton
Faculty Scholarship
Although intellectual property is just a sidelight of Roger Blair's work, he has published at least seven articles and coauthored a book on this subject. Blair's work sets out robust economic models that address nearly all of the significant economic issues in intellectual property. Moreover, by using the property rules framework, he has offered a useful counterweight to the reward-to-loss theory that dominates the literature.
The Chicago School Trap In Trademark: The Co-Evolution Of Corporate, Antitrust, And Trademark Law, Deven R. Desai
The Chicago School Trap In Trademark: The Co-Evolution Of Corporate, Antitrust, And Trademark Law, Deven R. Desai
Cardozo Law Review
The central claim of this Article is that, as a descriptive matter, trademark legislation and court interpretation is a close normative match with the Chicago School approach of scholars such as Robert Bork and Richard Posner. The organizing intellectual structure of modern trademark law, as developed in the law, has been freedom of action for the owner of the mark, not minimizing search costs as repeatedly stated in academic writing. This Article thus reveals that modern trademark law is a subset of the Chicago School's approach to the firm, deference to management, and competition. That view is not interested in …