Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Health Law and Policy (33)
- Labor and Employment Law (22)
- Legislation (21)
- Legal Remedies (20)
- Administrative Law (19)
-
- Banking and Finance Law (19)
- Commercial Law (19)
- Consumer Protection Law (19)
- Securities Law (19)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (19)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (18)
- Family Law (18)
- Intellectual Property Law (18)
- Legal History (18)
- Social Welfare Law (18)
- Water Law (18)
- Arts and Humanities (17)
- Constitutional Law (17)
- Immigration Law (17)
- Law and Gender (17)
- Natural Resources Law (17)
- Other Law (17)
- Privacy Law (17)
- Property Law and Real Estate (17)
- Transnational Law (17)
- Agriculture Law (16)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (16)
- Criminal Law (16)
- Institution
-
- Pepperdine University (18)
- Seattle University School of Law (17)
- University of Michigan Law School (7)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (5)
- Georgetown University Law Center (3)
-
- University of Connecticut (3)
- University of New Hampshire (3)
- Cleveland State University (2)
- UIC School of Law (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Barry University School of Law (1)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Cornell University Law School (1)
- Georgia State University College of Law (1)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (1)
- Mercer University School of Law (1)
- Pace University (1)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (1)
- SJ Quinney College of Law, University of Utah (1)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (1)
- Singapore Management University (1)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (1)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (1)
- University of Georgia School of Law (1)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (1)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (1)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (1)
- University of Tulsa College of Law (1)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (1)
- William & Mary Law School (1)
- Keyword
-
- Insurance (14)
- Health insurance (7)
- California (5)
- Health care (4)
- Insurance Law (4)
-
- ACA (3)
- Congress (3)
- Contract (3)
- McCarran-Ferguson Act (3)
- Obamacare (3)
- Affordable Care Act (2)
- Bad faith (2)
- Claims (2)
- Commerce Clause (2)
- Compensation (2)
- Damages (2)
- Healthcare (2)
- Insurance companies (2)
- Insurance law (2)
- Law reform (2)
- Liability (2)
- Liability insurance (2)
- Policy (2)
- Regulation (2)
- Supreme Court (2)
- United States Supreme Court (2)
- Adhesion contracts (1)
- Adjustment of claims (1)
- Administrative Procedures Act (1)
- Administrative agencies (1)
- Publication
-
- Seattle Journal for Social Justice (16)
- Pepperdine Law Review (12)
- Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary (5)
- Law & Economics Working Papers (4)
- Faculty Articles and Papers (3)
-
- Faculty Scholarship (3)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (3)
- Articles (2)
- Journal of Law and Health (2)
- The University of New Hampshire Law Review (2)
- UIC Law Review (2)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (2)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (1)
- Articles, Chapters in Books and Other Contributions to Scholarly Works (1)
- Barry Law Review (1)
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (1)
- Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution (1)
- Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice (1)
- Cardozo Law Review (1)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Student Publications (1)
- Faculty Publications By Year (1)
- Faculty Works (1)
- Georgia Law Review (1)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Legal History Publications (1)
- Mercer Law Review (1)
- Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal (1)
- Public Interest Law Reporter (1)
- Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 60 of 81
Full-Text Articles in Insurance Law
The Benefits Of Mortality Risk Reduction: Happiness Surveys Vs. The Value Of A Statistical Life, W. Kip Viscusi
The Benefits Of Mortality Risk Reduction: Happiness Surveys Vs. The Value Of A Statistical Life, W. Kip Viscusi
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
A principal component of many benefit-cost analyses (BCAs) of health, safety, and environmental regulations is the valuation of the fatality risk effects of the underlying policy. Government agencies currently value these expected effects using estimates of the value of a statistical life (VSL), that is, the tradeoff rate between money and very small risks of death. This measure corresponds to BCA's theoretically appropriate benefits measure, which is society's willingness to pay for the risk reduction. Here, I will review the VSL approach, compare it to suggested alternatives that use happiness measures of well-being, and address some of the misunderstandings that …
The Iowa Unemployment Appeals Telephone Hearing Process, Bruce Graham
The Iowa Unemployment Appeals Telephone Hearing Process, Bruce Graham
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Workers' Compensation: Alternatives Are Limited, Irvin Stander
Workers' Compensation: Alternatives Are Limited, Irvin Stander
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Financing Unemployment Insurance Appeals, M. S. Cerstvik
Financing Unemployment Insurance Appeals, M. S. Cerstvik
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
A Broke(N) System: Comment On The Supreme Court's Decision To Rule On The Equal Access Provision In Douglas V. Independent Living Center, And Its Potential Impact On The Affordable Care Act, Megan Waugh
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
This comment first provides a historical and legal backdrop of the Medicaid system, the Equal Access Provision and private individuals' enforcement of the Equal Access Provision through litigation in order to analyze the outcome of Douglas in light of the Supreme Court's decision in the Affordable Care Act Case. Then taking that analysis, this article recommends an approach to handle either a cause of action or no cause of action under the Supremacy Clause upon the implementation of PPACA.
Model-Based Pricing In Hurricane Insurance: A Case Study For Judicial Reform Of The Mccarran-Freguson Act, Benjamin Holland Able
Model-Based Pricing In Hurricane Insurance: A Case Study For Judicial Reform Of The Mccarran-Freguson Act, Benjamin Holland Able
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
The McCarran-Ferguson Act (MFA) exempts various aspects of state insurance operations from federal antitrust enforcement. This exemption is a source of longstanding controversy, due in part to its potentially harmful effect on consumers in product pricing. In hurricane insurance, there is a burgeoning debate concerning insurers' use of predictive computer models rather than shared loss data to set premiums for the industry. By using these models in hurricane-prone states, insurers have increased the price of hurricane insurance dramatically. Where these new prediction methods are used, MFA exemption may facilitate supracompetitive pricing in ways its architects could not have foreseen. This …
Chief Justice John “Marshall” Roberts—How The Chief Justice’S Majority Opinion Upholding The Federal Patient Protection And Affordable Care Act Of 2010 Evokes Chief Justice Marshall’S Decision In Marbury V. Madison, Akram Faizer
The University of New Hampshire Law Review
[Excerpt] “The United States Supreme Court sustained the Federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 based on Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr.’s majority opinion in National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius. The decision was feted by President Obama, liberal politicians, activists, and citizens who feared the Supreme Court would use its judicial review powers to invalidate the signature achievement of the United States’ forty-fourth President. Unsurprisingly, the decision disappointed many conservatives, who expected the Court to exercise its judicial review power to invalidate what is arguably the most important and ambitious piece of federal social welfare …
Understanding Insurance Anti-Discrimination Laws, Ronen Avraham, Kyle D. Logue, Daniel Benjamin Schwarcz
Understanding Insurance Anti-Discrimination Laws, Ronen Avraham, Kyle D. Logue, Daniel Benjamin Schwarcz
Law & Economics Working Papers
Insurance companies are in the business of discrimination. Insurers attempt to segregate insureds into separate risk pools based on their differences in risk profiles, first, so that they can charge different premiums to the different groups based on their risk and, second, to incentivize risk reduction by insureds. This is why we let insurers discriminate. There are, however, limits to the types of discrimination we will allow insurers to engage in. But what exactly are those limits and how are they justified? To answer these questions, this Article articulates the leading fairness and efficiency arguments for and against limiting insurers’ …
The Independent Medicare Advisory Committee: Death Panel Or Smart Governing?, Robert Coleman
The Independent Medicare Advisory Committee: Death Panel Or Smart Governing?, Robert Coleman
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Enough About The Constitution: How States Can Regulate Health Insurance Under The Aca, Brendan S. Maher, Radha A. Pathak
Enough About The Constitution: How States Can Regulate Health Insurance Under The Aca, Brendan S. Maher, Radha A. Pathak
Faculty Scholarship
Last term, the United States Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act in a landmark decision. It is a forceful reminder that America’s oldest question — how power should be shared between federal and state sovereigns — retains powerful political salience. Critics have reflexively attacked the decision as an assault on states’ rights, while supporters have celebrated the result. Regrettably, insufficient attention has been paid to how, in actuality, health care regulatory authority has been and will be divided between federal and state governments. In this Article, we fill that gap. To do so, we apply “federalism-in-fact,” …
Extending The Liability Of Insurers For Bad Faith Acts: Royal Globe Insurance Company V. Superior Court, Michael Tancredi
Extending The Liability Of Insurers For Bad Faith Acts: Royal Globe Insurance Company V. Superior Court, Michael Tancredi
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Group Life And Health Ins. V. Royal Drug Co.: The Narrowing Exemption Of The Business Of Insurance From Federal Antitrust Scrutiny , Stanley K. Yamada Jr.
Group Life And Health Ins. V. Royal Drug Co.: The Narrowing Exemption Of The Business Of Insurance From Federal Antitrust Scrutiny , Stanley K. Yamada Jr.
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Punitive Damages And The Drunken Driver, William C. Cooper
Punitive Damages And The Drunken Driver, William C. Cooper
Pepperdine Law Review
A discussion of the history and theory of punitive damages which results in advocating their application in a drunk driving context after giving due consideration to the pros and cons of such a sanction. An analysis of case law will reveal the underlying rationale that has motivated certain jurisdictions in applying this severe penal approach in an attempt to deter and curtail the senseless destruction on our nation's highways as well as exploring the impetus behind those other jurisdictions that do not utilize the remedy of punitive damages. The culminating focus is on California's position in this regard. Finally, there …
When "Yes" Means "No": Mccarran-Ferguson, The New York Convention, And The Limits Of Congressional Assent, Aaron L. Wells
When "Yes" Means "No": Mccarran-Ferguson, The New York Convention, And The Limits Of Congressional Assent, Aaron L. Wells
Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal
The article focuses on the awards and arbitration of the resolution of the international commercial disputes with respect to the cross-border contracts and agreements. The enactment of the McCarran-Ferguson Act of the U.S. was for the prevention of the general applicability of the federal legislation in the authority of the states for the purpose of regulating the insurance industry. Information on the decision of the Supreme Court of the U.S. regarding this issue is also presented.
Liability Cure-All For Insidious Disease Claims, Susan Frankewich
Liability Cure-All For Insidious Disease Claims, Susan Frankewich
Pepperdine Law Review
Recent decisions handed down in various circuits have created virtual chaos in predicting the liability and damage amounts of insidious disease claims. At least three substantially divergent theories have been adopted to impute liability to the manufacturers of the disease catalysts. Additionally, a new trust fund concept has been used on a limited basis to reconcile differences in court decisions. The trust fund approach is relatively flexible and simple to apply in apportioning damages for insidious disease claims. The author examines and analyzes these three liability theories. In conclusion, the adoption of the trust fund concept is recommended.
Antitrust And California's New Preferred Provider Organization Legislation: A New Alternative In Health Care Cost Containment , Carol A. Woo
Antitrust And California's New Preferred Provider Organization Legislation: A New Alternative In Health Care Cost Containment , Carol A. Woo
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Reasonable Expectations: Seeking A Principled Application, William A. Mayhew
Reasonable Expectations: Seeking A Principled Application, William A. Mayhew
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Interpreting The Recently Enacted California Underinsurance Provisions Of The Uninsured Motorist Statute, Linda M. Schmidt
Interpreting The Recently Enacted California Underinsurance Provisions Of The Uninsured Motorist Statute, Linda M. Schmidt
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Overruling Of Royal Globe: A "Royal Bonanza" For Insurance Companies, But What Happens Now?, Michael J. Gainer
The Overruling Of Royal Globe: A "Royal Bonanza" For Insurance Companies, But What Happens Now?, Michael J. Gainer
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
It Hertz To Be Number One: The Collision Damage Waiver Is Being Attacked On Multiple Fronts , Michael G. Dawson
It Hertz To Be Number One: The Collision Damage Waiver Is Being Attacked On Multiple Fronts , Michael G. Dawson
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Issues Of Delay & Deviation In Marine Insurance: A Case Study Of Oliver V. The Maryland Insurance Company, 7 Cranach 487 (1813), Kyle Hildreth
Issues Of Delay & Deviation In Marine Insurance: A Case Study Of Oliver V. The Maryland Insurance Company, 7 Cranach 487 (1813), Kyle Hildreth
Legal History Publications
An examination of the case Oliver v. The Maryland Insurance Company, 7 Cranch 487 (1813). In Oliver, Robert Oliver, the plaintiff, sued the Maryland Insurance Company, the defendant, in an attempt to recover on an insurance policy he had purchased for a shipment of goods aboard the snow Comet. The Comet was seized by a British ship on its return from Spain, and was condemned under the Orders in Council of 1807. The Court affirmed a lower court judgment that Oliver was not entitled to recover, because the Comet had engaged in an unreasonable delay and deviation …
Intellectual Property And Public Health – A White Paper, Ryan G. Vacca, James Ming Chen, Jay Dratler Jr., Thomas Folsom, Timothy S. Hall, Yaniv Heled, Frank A. Pasquale Iii, Elizabeth A. Reilly, Jeffrey Samuels, Katherine J. Strandburg, Kara W. Swanson, Andrew W. Torrance, Katharine A. Van Tassel
Intellectual Property And Public Health – A White Paper, Ryan G. Vacca, James Ming Chen, Jay Dratler Jr., Thomas Folsom, Timothy S. Hall, Yaniv Heled, Frank A. Pasquale Iii, Elizabeth A. Reilly, Jeffrey Samuels, Katherine J. Strandburg, Kara W. Swanson, Andrew W. Torrance, Katharine A. Van Tassel
Law Faculty Scholarship
On October 26, 2012, the University of Akron School of Law’s Center for Intellectual Property and Technology hosted its Sixth Annual IP Scholars Forum. In attendance were thirteen legal scholars with expertise and an interest in IP and public health who met to discuss problems and potential solutions at the intersection of these fields. This report summarizes this discussion by describing the problems raised, areas of agreement and disagreement between the participants, suggestions and solutions made by participants and the subsequent evaluations of these suggestions and solutions. Led by the moderator, participants at the Forum focused generally on three broad …
Amendments To Federal Removal Statutes: Curtailing Adjudication Of Diversity Cases Or Bad Faith Causes Of Action?, Brooke M. Gaffney
Amendments To Federal Removal Statutes: Curtailing Adjudication Of Diversity Cases Or Bad Faith Causes Of Action?, Brooke M. Gaffney
Barry Law Review
This student comment explores the problem facing Florida insurers preventing them from exercising their right to litigate bad faith causes of action in federal court. This article demonstrates how the federal removal statutes, and amendments thereto, have potentially precluded insurers from removing some bad faith actions from state to federal court under diversity jurisdiction. This article details the divergence in opinion among Florida’s Southern and Middle District Courts in interpreting the federal removal statutes and concludes with a prediction of how the split may be resolved by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals.
Longevity Insurance: Strengthening Social Security For Older Retirees, 46 J. Marshall L. Rev. 843 (2013), John A. Turner
Longevity Insurance: Strengthening Social Security For Older Retirees, 46 J. Marshall L. Rev. 843 (2013), John A. Turner
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Human Rights, Civil Rights: Prescribing Disability Discrimination Prevention In Packaging Essential Health Benefits, Anita Silvers, Leslie P. Francis
Human Rights, Civil Rights: Prescribing Disability Discrimination Prevention In Packaging Essential Health Benefits, Anita Silvers, Leslie P. Francis
Utah Law Faculty Scholarship
The promise of health care as a right has all too often proved hollow for people with disabilities. In this article, we argue that the understanding of health care as a human right, as found in the CRPD, fails to provide the theoretical machinery for responding to the pressing challenges of health care costs. These challenges are real and potentially devastating. We develop instead an account of health care as a civil right. What this right requires is dependent on the context and resources of the time, so long as all have meaningful access to the benefits provided. The ACA …
Unique Coverage Issues In Flood Losses, Wayne D. Taylor, Arthur J. Park, Sean O'Brien
Unique Coverage Issues In Flood Losses, Wayne D. Taylor, Arthur J. Park, Sean O'Brien
Faculty Works
No abstract provided.
The Role Of Mediation And Insurance In Bet The Company Litigation, Jed Melnick
The Role Of Mediation And Insurance In Bet The Company Litigation, Jed Melnick
Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution
When most of us graduate from law school, we are not able to read or understand our own car insurance policy, and yet the resolution of most commercial litigation would not happen without the involvement of insurance. The reality is that, in the context of class actions and "bet the company" litigation, insurance is usually the sole source of funds used to resolve the dispute. What follows is the transcript from a panel discussion that took place on February 9, 2012 at Cardozo Law School entitled, "The Role of Mediation and Insurance in Bet the Company Litigation." The idea behind …
Insurance And Climate Change, Peter Kochenburger, Joseph Macdougald
Insurance And Climate Change, Peter Kochenburger, Joseph Macdougald
Faculty Articles and Papers
Climate change started as a scientific theory, became the subject of environmental policy and international negotiation, and today manifests itself within the courts in a series of boundary testing cases that challenge the settled concepts of risk and redress available under both environmental and insurance law. As our climate becomes increasingly unstable and the causal link between damage from sea-level rise and severe weather events becomes ever more tangible and traceable, courts at all levels wrestle with varying avenues of legal authority, including: the limitations of legal redress through the political question doctrine the appropriateness of traditional federal and state …
Insurance And Climate Change, 47 J. Marshall L. Rev. 719 (2013), Joseph Macdougald, Peter Kochenburger
Insurance And Climate Change, 47 J. Marshall L. Rev. 719 (2013), Joseph Macdougald, Peter Kochenburger
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Employer Costs And Conflicts Under The Affordable Care Act, Peter Molk
Employer Costs And Conflicts Under The Affordable Care Act, Peter Molk
UF Law Faculty Publications
In January 2015, qualified employers must provide health care coverage under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 or face a fine. As employers actively attempt to minimize the costs that they will incur, the possibility emerges that employers will retaliate against or harass employees who seek coverage. This Essay discusses the protections for employees under the law and the possible deficiencies in the law. It shows that employers and employees often have contrasting incentives – employers to avoid coverage, and employees to take coverage – and these incentives may result in employer harassment and retaliation of employees. …