Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Health Law and Policy (31)
- Constitutional Law (10)
- Contracts (10)
- Torts (9)
- Legislation (8)
-
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (8)
- Medical Jurisprudence (7)
- Health Policy (6)
- Legal Remedies (6)
- Litigation (6)
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (6)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (5)
- Jurisprudence (5)
- Law and Economics (5)
- Law and Society (5)
- Business Organizations Law (4)
- Civil Procedure (4)
- Commercial Law (4)
- Consumer Protection Law (4)
- Jurisdiction (4)
- Medicine and Health Sciences (4)
- Banking and Finance Law (3)
- Civil Law (3)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (3)
- Courts (3)
- Human Rights Law (3)
- Law and Politics (3)
- Law and Psychology (3)
- Institution
-
- Pepperdine University (11)
- Georgetown University Law Center (9)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (6)
- Duke Law (5)
- University of Michigan Law School (4)
-
- UIC School of Law (3)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (3)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (3)
- University of Montana (3)
- Boston University School of Law (2)
- Brooklyn Law School (2)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (2)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (2)
- University of Connecticut (2)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Brigham Young University Law School (1)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- Columbia Law School (1)
- Cornell University Law School (1)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- Mercer University School of Law (1)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (1)
- Pace University (1)
- Singapore Management University (1)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (1)
- University of Maine School of Law (1)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (1)
- University of Miami Law School (1)
- Keyword
-
- Health insurance (13)
- Insurance (11)
- Affordable Care Act (9)
- Health care (8)
- Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (7)
-
- Supreme Court (6)
- Insurance law (5)
- Insurance Law (4)
- Liability (4)
- Medicaid (4)
- ACA (3)
- Health law (3)
- Arbitration Clauses (2)
- Bad faith (2)
- Behavior (2)
- CGL (2)
- Commercial Law (2)
- Comprehensive General Liability (2)
- Consumers (2)
- Contract (2)
- Contracts (2)
- Corporations (2)
- Cost of medical care (2)
- Coverage (2)
- Damages (2)
- Doctors (2)
- Due Process (2)
- ERISA (2)
- Ensuing loss (2)
- Federalism (2)
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (16)
- Pepperdine Law Review (8)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (6)
- Scholarly Works (4)
- Faculty Journal Articles & Other Writings (3)
-
- Faculty Works (3)
- O'Neill Institute Papers (3)
- Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal (3)
- UIC Law Review (3)
- Articles (2)
- Faculty Publications (2)
- UF Law Faculty Publications (2)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform Caveat (2)
- Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law (1)
- Buffalo Human Rights Law Review (1)
- Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution (1)
- Connecticut Insurance Law Journal (1)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Articles and Papers (1)
- Florida Law Review (1)
- IP Theory (1)
- Journal of Law and Health (1)
- Journal of Law and Practice (1)
- Legislation and Policy Brief (1)
- Mercer Law Review (1)
- Michigan Law Review (1)
- Nevada Law Journal (1)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (1)
- Pace International Law Review Online Companion (1)
- Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 61 - 78 of 78
Full-Text Articles in Insurance Law
The “Ensuing Loss” Clause In Insurance Policies: The Forgotten And Misunderstood Antidote To Anti-Concurrent Causation Exclusions, Chris French
Faculty Scholarship
As a result of the 1906 earthquake and fire in San Francisco which destroyed the city, a clause known as the “ensuing loss” clause was created to address concurrent causation situations in which a loss follows both a covered peril and an excluded peril. Ensuing loss clauses appear in the exclusions section of such policies and in essence they provide that coverage for a loss caused by an excluded peril is nonetheless covered if the loss “ensues” from a covered peril. Today, ensuing loss clauses are found in “all risk” property and homeowners policies, which cover all losses except for …
Debunking The Myth That Insurance Coverage Is Not Available Or Allowed For Intentional Torts Or Damages, Christopher French
Debunking The Myth That Insurance Coverage Is Not Available Or Allowed For Intentional Torts Or Damages, Christopher French
Faculty Scholarship
Over the years, a myth has developed that insurance coverage is not available or allowed for intentional injuries or damage. This myth has two primary bases: one, the “fortuity” doctrine, which provides that insurance should only cover losses that happen by chance; and two, public policy, which allegedly disfavors allowing insurance for intentional injuries or damage. This article dispels that myth. Many types of liability insurance policies expressly cover intentional torts including trademark infringement, copyright infringement, invasion of privacy, defamation, disparagement, and improper employment practices such as discrimination. In addition, punitive damages, which typically are awarded for intentional misconduct, are …
Concentration In Health Care Markets: Chronic Problems And Better Solutions, Barak D. Richman
Concentration In Health Care Markets: Chronic Problems And Better Solutions, Barak D. Richman
Faculty Scholarship
Health care providers with market power enjoy substantially more pricing freedom than monopolists in other markets, for a reason not generally recognized: US-style health insurance. Consequently, monopolies in health care cause undesirable redistribution of wealth and inefficient allocation of resources, both of which burden consumers at levels beyond those of other monopolists. The unusual costliness of monopoly power in health care markets demands far more policy attention than it has received. For starters, the health sector needs a more aggressive antitrust policy that effectively prevents the creation of new provider market power through mergers, alliances, or government immunity. An immediate …
Some Thoughts On Health Care Exchanges: Choice, Defaults, And The Unconnected, Brendan Maher
Some Thoughts On Health Care Exchanges: Choice, Defaults, And The Unconnected, Brendan Maher
Faculty Articles and Papers
One feature of the ACA that appealed to observers across the political spectrum was the creation of health insurance “exchanges.” Among other things, exchanges are intended to aid consumers in making simple and transparent choices regarding the purchase of health insurance. This Article considers how exchanges might benefit from the use of “default” options — both online and off. Given the significant number of Americans that have limited or no Internet access, offline defaults may be an attractive way to promote coverage of the “unconnected.”
Stoney Road Out Of Eden: The Struggle To Recover Insurance For Armenian Genocide Deaths And Its Implications For The Future Of State Authority, Contract Rights, And Human Rights, Jeffrey W. Stempel, Sarig Armenian, David Mcclure
Stoney Road Out Of Eden: The Struggle To Recover Insurance For Armenian Genocide Deaths And Its Implications For The Future Of State Authority, Contract Rights, And Human Rights, Jeffrey W. Stempel, Sarig Armenian, David Mcclure
Scholarly Works
The Armenian Genocide during the waning days of the Ottoman Empire continues to represent one of history’s underappreciated atrocities. Comparatively few people even know about the 1.5 million deaths or the government-sponsored extermination attempt that provided Hitler with a blueprint for the Nazi Holocaust. Unlike the Holocaust, however, there was never any accounting demanded of those responsible for the Armenian Genocide. In the aftermath of both tragedies, insurers seized upon the resulting disarray and victimization to deny life insurance benefits owed as a result of the killings. American-based litigation to vindicate rights under the Armenian polices faced substantial legal and …
Further Support For Mental Health Parity Law And Mandatory Mental Health And Substance Use Disorder Benefits, Stacey A. Tovino
Further Support For Mental Health Parity Law And Mandatory Mental Health And Substance Use Disorder Benefits, Stacey A. Tovino
Scholarly Works
In this Article, I provide additional support for my recent proposal* to extend federal mental health parity law and mandatory mental health and substance use disorder benefits to all public healthcare program beneficiaries and private health plan members. I begin by examining health-related doctrine outside the context of mental health insurance law, including disability discrimination law, civil rights and human rights law, health information confidentiality law, healthcare reform law, and child and adult health and welfare law, and I find that not one of these laws provides inferior legal protections or benefits for individuals with mental illness. I also analyze …
The Insured's Right To Settle When The Insurer Is Defending Under Reservation Of Rights, Greg Munro
The Insured's Right To Settle When The Insurer Is Defending Under Reservation Of Rights, Greg Munro
Faculty Journal Articles & Other Writings
This article examines the insured's right to settle when the insurer purports to fully defend, but does so under reservation of rights with the express intention of not indemnifying. The article specifically addresses the extent to which the insured may settle the case and assign his rights against the insurer in return for a covenant when the insurer is defending but refusing indemnity.
Insurance And Cultural Perspectives On Katrina, Jeffrey E. Thomas
Insurance And Cultural Perspectives On Katrina, Jeffrey E. Thomas
Faculty Works
No abstract provided.
Consequences Of An Insurer's Breach Of The Duty To Defend: Columbia Casualty Co. V. Hiar Holdings, Llc In The Context Of The Ali Restatement Of The Law Of Liability Insurance, Jeffrey E. Thomas
Faculty Works
An insurer's duty to defend in connection with liability insurance policies is well-established and reasonably well understood. The consequences for the breach of that duty, however, are much less clear. On one hand, one might argue that this duty is a contractual duty giving rise to contractual remedies. The insured provides its own defense and, if the insurer wrongfully failed to provide a defense, the insured is entitled to reimbursement of its defense costs. On the other hand, this remedy seems insufficient; the value on an insurer's participation in the defense of a case goes beyond well merely paying the …
Affordable Care Act Litigation: The Supreme Court And The Future Of Health Care Reform, Lawrence O. Gostin, Kelli K. Garcia
Affordable Care Act Litigation: The Supreme Court And The Future Of Health Care Reform, Lawrence O. Gostin, Kelli K. Garcia
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
In Florida v. HHS, a lawsuit brought on behalf of 26 states challenging the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), the Supreme Court will determine the future direction of health care reform in the United States. During the unprecedented 5-1/2 hours of oral arguments, the Court will hear 4 issues: the individual purchase mandate, severability, the Medicaid expansion and the Anti-Injunction Act.
The states challenging the ACA maintain that the purchase mandate uniquely penalizes individuals for failing to purchase insurance. Uninsured individuals, however, rarely do nothing. Instead, they self-insure, rely on family, and cost-shift to …
Public-Private Approaches To Mass Tort Victim Compensation: Some Thoughts On The Gulf Coast Claims Facility, Myriam E. Gilles
Public-Private Approaches To Mass Tort Victim Compensation: Some Thoughts On The Gulf Coast Claims Facility, Myriam E. Gilles
Articles
No abstract provided.
Using Principles And Policies Of Maritime Arbitration To Guide Responsible Parties In Oil Spill Claims Resolution, Lucy Martucci
Using Principles And Policies Of Maritime Arbitration To Guide Responsible Parties In Oil Spill Claims Resolution, Lucy Martucci
Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution
This Note will: 1) provide an introduction to maritime arbitration, 2) discuss an example of a challenged arbitration award in the maritime context, 3) provide a background on OPA 90 and the National Pollution Funds Center ("NPFC"), 4) discuss the claims procedure under OPA 90, 5) discuss an example of a challenged NPFC decision, 6) discuss the problems with the GCCF, and 7) propose amendments to OPA 90. This Note will argue that in order to avoid the complex litigation that ultimately dissolved the GCCF, with the goals of cost efficiency, speed and fairness in mind, amendments to OPA 90 …
Health Care And The Illegal Immigrant, Patrick J. Glen
Health Care And The Illegal Immigrant, Patrick J. Glen
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The question of whether illegal immigrants should be entitled to some form of health coverage in the United States sits at the uneasy intersection of two contentious debates: health reform and immigration reform. Befitting this place, the rhetoric surrounding the issue has been exponentially heightened by the multiplying effects of combining two vitriolic debates. On one side, it is argued that the United States has a moral obligation to provide health care to all those within its borders needing such assistance. On the other, it is argued with equal force that those illegally present in this country should not be …
Confronting Financial Crisis: Dodd-Frank's Dangers And The Case For A Systemic Emergency Insurance Fund, Jeffrey N. Gordon, Christopher Muller
Confronting Financial Crisis: Dodd-Frank's Dangers And The Case For A Systemic Emergency Insurance Fund, Jeffrey N. Gordon, Christopher Muller
Faculty Scholarship
Inherent tensions in the financial sector mean that episodes of extreme stress are inevitable, if unpredictable. This is true even when financial regulatory and supervisory regimes are effective in many respects. The government's capacity to intervene may determine whether distress is confined to the financial sector or breaks out into the real economy Although adequate resolution authority to address a failing financial firm is a necessary objective of the current regulatory reforms, a firm-by-firm approach cannot address a major systemic failure. Major blows to the financial system, such as the financial crisis of 2007-2009, may require capital support of the …
Hidden Costs? Malpractice Allegations And Defensive Medicine Among Cardiac Surgeons, Barak D. Richman, Marco Huesch
Hidden Costs? Malpractice Allegations And Defensive Medicine Among Cardiac Surgeons, Barak D. Richman, Marco Huesch
Faculty Scholarship
This article evaluates the impact of private allegations of malpractice against cardiac surgeons on their patients’ outcomes and characteristics. While tort law may impact observable physician costs, malpractice allegations also impose hidden costs that could also affect physician behavior. We employ a large and multi-year panel dataset and patient-level analysis to ascertain whether malpractice allegations influence a surgeon’s practicing behavior. Using a generalized difference-in-difference model that controls for unobserved patient heterogeneity, clustering of patients within surgeon offices, contemporaneous expected risk, and other patient variables, we measure whether an allegation of malpractices affects a physician’s service intensity and use of healthcare …
Overbilling And Informed Financial Consent — A Contractual Solution, Barak D. Richman, Mark A. Hall, Kevin A. Schulman
Overbilling And Informed Financial Consent — A Contractual Solution, Barak D. Richman, Mark A. Hall, Kevin A. Schulman
Faculty Scholarship
U.S. hospitals and physicians regularly charge uninsured patients and patients receiving care outside their health-plan networks far more what most health insurers pay and far more than their actual costs. Such practices have triggered over 100 lawsuits and prompted calls for pricing transparency in Congress and price regulation in several states. This Perspective argues that the theory of implied contracts, a foundation in most first-year courses in contract law, offers a useful legal and ethical mechanism for handling these troubling problems in health care billing.
All Illnesses Are (Not) Created Equal: Reforming Federal Mental Health Insurance Law, Stacey A. Tovino
All Illnesses Are (Not) Created Equal: Reforming Federal Mental Health Insurance Law, Stacey A. Tovino
Scholarly Works
This Article is the second, and most important, installment in a three-part series that presents a comprehensive challenge to lingering legal distinctions between physical and mental illness. The basic impetus for this historical, medical, and legal project is a belief that there exists no rational or consistent method of distinguishing physical and mental illness in the context of health insurance law. The first installment in this series narrowly inquired as to whether a particular set of disorders, the postpartum mood disorders, are or should be classified as physical or mental illnesses in a range of health law contexts.* This second …
On Teaching Conflicts And Why I Dislike Allstate Insurance Co. V. Hague, Thomas O. Main
On Teaching Conflicts And Why I Dislike Allstate Insurance Co. V. Hague, Thomas O. Main
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.