Insurance Law Commons^™

Private Dollars For Public Litigation: An Introduction, Anthony J. Sebok

Articles

The article argues that litigation investment—where third-party funders provide capital for lawsuits in exchange for a share of potential recoveries—should be extended to public litigation. It contends that the economic rationale for litigation investment applies equally to public entities, such as state Attorneys General, as it does to private litigants. The author highlights the funding gap in public litigation, particularly in large-scale cases against well-resourced defendants, and suggests that litigation investment could address this gap more effectively than contingent fee arrangements with private attorneys.

Judicial Deregulation Of Consumer Markets, Max N. Helveston

Cardozo Law Review

The dangers posed by insufficiently regulated consumer markets are both real and monumental. While the rights of consumers expanded drastically in the mid- to late twentieth century, these protections have weakened in the new millennium. One of the forces driving this change has been the judiciary, where an anti-consumer jurisprudence has taken root. This is surprising, given the courts' history of defending individuals' commercial rights and combating unfair market practices.

Despite the significant ramifications that the removal of consumer protections has for every individual, the evolution of anti-consumerism in the courts has received scarce attention from the academy. This Article …

Should The Law Preserve Party Control? Litigation Investment, Insurance Law, And Double Standards, Anthony J. Sebok

Articles

Litigation investment, sometimes known as litigation finance, is increasingly accepted around the world. Once prohibited as champerty, litigation investment is now embraced in England, Canada, and Australia, as well as in many civil law nations. In the United States, the development of a robust market for investment in litigation has been met by various objections. One objection is that litigation investment interferes with the autonomy of lawyers. A second objection is that it promotes frivolous litigation.

This Article takes up a popular argument against litigation investment: the legal system should not encourage parties to sell their control over litigation that …

Goveille V. Liberty Mutual: An Opportunity To Correct The Problems Of Erisa Preemption, Edward A. Zelinsky

Articles

No abstract provided.

A Tribute To Eva Hanks, Matthew Diller

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

What America Can Learn From Canada's Progressive Decision In Commercial General Liability Policy Coverage Litigation Over Construction Defects, Qifu Li

Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law

The note advocates for a more consistent approach in the United States for determining Commercial General Liability (CGL) insurance coverage of construction defects, drawing inspiration from Canada's jurisprudence. It critiques the current jurisdictional split in the U.S., where some states cover such defects while others do not, and argues that adopting a uniform approach similar to Canada's three-step framework would reduce legal disputes and align policies with the reasonable expectations of insured parties.

A Fiduciary Theory Of Health Entitlements, Margaux J. Hall

Cardozo Law Review

The Affordable Care Act's "contraceptive mandate" continues to generate controversy in courts and academic literature. While a growing body of scholarship analyzes the merits of employers' religious freedom claims, claims presently before the Supreme Court, academics and commentators have overlooked a more fundamental tension illuminated by the Act but predating its enactment: Historically, the law has empowered employers to make almost all decisions relating to the cost, quality, and accessibility of health insurance on behalf of employees with virtually unlimited discretion, even when those decisions have subverted employees' interests. While contraceptives are the current source of controversy, tensions exist around …

What Do We Talk About When We Talk About Control, Anthony J. Sebok

Articles

Despite the recent rejection by the ABA of attempts to weaken the limitations on the sharing of fees with non-lawyers, pressure to allow laypersons to invest in lawsuits remains. This article looks at one argument against lay investment in litigation, which is that laypersons should not be able to control how litigation is conducted.

Litigation Investment And Legal Ethics: What Are The Real Issues?, Anthony J. Sebok

Articles

One of the foundational principles of legal ethics is that the lawyer owes an obligation of undivided loyalty to the client, and no other interests or relationships can be permitted to interfere with the lawyer's exercise of independent professional judgment on behalf of the client. The strongest objections to litigation investment by third parties is that it may compromise a lawyer's independence. This article examines this objection in the context of a recent report from the Ethics Committee of the Commercial and Federal Litigation Section of the New York State Bar Association and argues that it misses the real legal …

Success And Failure In Adr: A Dialogue Between Partners, Lela P. Love, Joseph B. Stulberg

Articles

Love and Stulberg critically discuss policy, scholarly, and practice developments in four areas of program development in the area historically referenced as alternative dispute resolution (ADR): the range of process options; the impact of court procedures on ADR program development and practice; the nature of ADR scholarship and training; and the general public's receptiveness to or rejection of the normative principles that structure ADR collaborative processes. Their concluding remarks suggest that the promise of ADR, particularly of the mediation process, remains inspiring to many, even if its effective implementation remains uneven.

Why The Buffett-Gates Giving Pledge Requires Limitation Of The Estate Tax Charitable Deduction, Edward A. Zelinsky

Articles

The Buffett-Gates Giving Pledge, under which wealthy individuals promise to leave a majority of their assets to charity, is an admirable effort to encourage philanthropy. However, the Pledge requires us to confront the paradox that the federal estate tax charitable deduction is unlimited while the federal income tax charitable deduction is capped. If a Giving Pledger leaves his wealth to charity, the federal fisc loses significant revenue since the Pledger thereby avoids federal estate taxation as charitable bequests are deductible without limit for federal estate tax purposes. Despite its laudable qualities, the Giving Pledge is a systematic (albeit inadvertent) threat …

Health Exchange Federalism: Striking The Balance Between State Flexibility And Consumer Protection In Aca Implementation, Sam Solomon

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Role Of Mediation And Insurance In Bet The Company Litigation, Jed Melnick

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

When most of us graduate from law school, we are not able to read or understand our own car insurance policy, and yet the resolution of most commercial litigation would not happen without the involvement of insurance. The reality is that, in the context of class actions and "bet the company" litigation, insurance is usually the sole source of funds used to resolve the dispute. What follows is the transcript from a panel discussion that took place on February 9, 2012 at Cardozo Law School entitled, "The Role of Mediation and Insurance in Bet the Company Litigation." The idea behind …

Refashioning The Right Of Publicity: Protecting The Right To Lfse Your Name After Selling A Personal Name Trademark, Francesca M. Montalvo

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Sex Matters: Considering Gender In Consumer Contracting, Amy J. Schmitz

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

We hear about the so-called "War on Women" and persisting salary gaps between men and women in the popular media, but contracts scholars and policymakers rarely discuss gender. Instead, dominant voices in the contracts field often reflect classical and economics-driven theories built on assumptions of gender neutral and economically rational actors. Furthermore, many mistakenly assume that market competition and antidiscrimination legislation address any improper biases in contracting. This Article therefore aims to shed light on gender's importance by distilling data from my own e-survey of Colorado consumers along with others' research regarding gender differences in contract outcomes, interests and behaviors. …

California Dreaming: The California Secure Choice Retirement Savings Trust Act, Edward A. Zelinsky

Articles

Half of American workers are not covered by employer-sponsored retirement arrangements. The recently passed California Secure Choice Retirement Savings Trust Act seeks to solve this problem by mandating retirement savings arrangements for California employers, coupled with a public investment vehicle for investing these private retirement savings. The Act is important because of California’s size and status as a trendsetter for other states.

This Article is the first to examine the important legal questions the Act raises under the Internal Revenue Code and ERISA. Contrary to the drafters’ intent, the savings accounts authorized under the Act do not qualify as individual …

Public-Private Approaches To Mass Tort Victim Compensation: Some Thoughts On The Gulf Coast Claims Facility, Myriam E. Gilles

Articles

No abstract provided.

Using Principles And Policies Of Maritime Arbitration To Guide Responsible Parties In Oil Spill Claims Resolution, Lucy Martucci

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

This Note will: 1) provide an introduction to maritime arbitration, 2) discuss an example of a challenged arbitration award in the maritime context, 3) provide a background on OPA 90 and the National Pollution Funds Center ("NPFC"), 4) discuss the claims procedure under OPA 90, 5) discuss an example of a challenged NPFC decision, 6) discuss the problems with the GCCF, and 7) propose amendments to OPA 90. This Note will argue that in order to avoid the complex litigation that ultimately dissolved the GCCF, with the goals of cost efficiency, speed and fairness in mind, amendments to OPA 90 …

What Is Wrong About Wrongdoing, Anthony J. Sebok

Articles

This short article, which was prepared for a conference on civil recourse theory at Florida State University School of Law, asks whether Blackstone’s rejection of maintenance is inconsistent with the theoretical commitments of modern civil recourse theory. Blackstone strongly believed that third parties should not help victims of wrongdoing discover that they have been wronged, this article asks whether modern civil recourse theory is committed to the position (now in retreat throughout common law nations) that third parties who help strangers’ lawsuits are acting against the public interest (or, as Blackstone put it, are “pests of society . . . …

Disability Rights, Welfare Law, Mark C. Weber

Cardozo Law Review

This Article asks how disability rights ideas can be reconciled with - and might transform - the law of public assistance. The social model of disability forms the basis of most disability rights thinking. This model recognizes that impairments do not by themselves disable, but disability instead arises from a dynamic between a person's physical and mental conditions and society's environmental and attitudinal barriers: Paraplegia does not cause disability but for stairs, curbs, and human attitudes that limit accessibility. The social model focuses on changing the environment; its close corollary, the civil rights approach to disability, looks to anti-discrimination law …

Stoli And Intent: The Feeling's Mutual, But It's Starting Not To Matter Anyway, Franklin G. Monsour Jr.

Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law

The article examines the legal debate surrounding Stranger-Originated Life Insurance (STOLI), advocating for the adoption of the mutual intent standard over the unilateral intent standard to determine the legality of such policies. It argues that the mutual intent standard, supported by historical cases and recent legislation, provides a more robust framework to prevent sham transactions and uphold the insurable interest rule.

The Inauthentic Claim, Anthony J. Sebok

Articles

This Article takes a critical look at the persistence of legal doctrines that prohibit or limit property rights in litigation. The Article focuses on prohibitions on assignment and maintenance. Assignment of personal injury tort claims is prohibited throughout the United States, while the assignment of other claims, such as fraud and professional malpractice, is prohibited in a large number of states. Maintenance, in which a stranger provides something of value to a litigant in order to support or promote the litigation, is prohibited in varying degrees in the United States.

These doctrines might seem quite independent of each other at …

Betting On Tort Suits After The Event: From Champerty To Insurance, Anthony J. Sebok

Articles

The article challenges the notion that champerty, a form of third-party litigation funding, is a form of gambling. It argues that champerty serves a functional purpose similar to insurance by transferring risk, thereby providing a legitimate form of "after the event" insurance for plaintiffs. The author, Anthony Sebok, contends that while champerty involves contingent outcomes, it should be recognized for its role in risk management rather than being dismissed as speculative gambling.

Misclassifying The Insurance Policy: The Unforced Errors Of Unilateral Contract Characterization, Hazel Beh, Jeffrey W. Stempel

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Rethinking Trust Law Reform: How Prudent Is Modern Prudent Investor Doctrine?, Stewart E. Sterk

Articles

During the 1990s, modern portfolio theory provided the theoretical foundation for significant reforms in trust investment doctrine-reforms that freed trustees from a legal regime in which they faced potential liability for making "speculative" investments. The reforms enabled trustees to pursue investment policies that protected beneficiaries against inflation risk. But the reforms worked too well; they encouraged trustees to invest a higher percentage of trust assets in equities just in time for a decade that has seen two precipitous stock market declines. Although no sensible investment strategy would have avoided losses during these periods of market turmoil, the doctrinal reforms endorsed …

The “Licentiousness” In Religious Organizations And Why It Is Not Protected Under Religious Liberty Constitutional Provisions, Marci A. Hamilton

Articles

No abstract provided.

"Cover My Pills": Contraceptive Equity And Religious Liberty In Catholic Charities V. Dinallo, Ayelet S. Lebovicz

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The note  examines the tension between the New York Womens Health and Wellness Act's (WHWA) goal of promoting women's health through contraceptive access and its burden on the First Amendment rights of religious employers. It argues that while the WHWA advances significant public health interests, its contraceptive mandate imposes substantial burdens on religious freedom and free speech, necessitating strict scrutiny. The analysis critiques the New York Court of Appeals' decision for failing to fully consider the plaintiffs' hybrid-rights claims under Supreme Court precedent, highlighting the need for lawmakers to balance competing interests while adhering to constitutional protections.

Barriers To Financing: Is European Union Indirect Discrimination Law The Answer For Female Entrepreneurs?, Adam G. Panopoulos

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The note explores whether European Union indirect discrimination law, particularly Directive 2004/113/EC, can address the barriers female entrepreneurs face in accessing financing. It examines the application of indirect discrimination principles to financial services, analyzing ECJ case law and advocating for the integration of gender mainstreaming to enhance gender equality in entrepreneurship.

Boaron V. National Labour Court, Esther Hayut, Edmond E. Levy, Dorit Beinisch, Eliezer Rivlin, Ayala Procaccia, Hanan Melcer, Edna Arbel

Translated Opinions

Facts: Four widows who had each been receiving either a dependents allowance or a survivors allowance in accordance with the provisions of the National Insurance Law [Consolidated Version], 5755-1995, received notices from the National Insurance Institute indicating that their allowances had been discontinued — as of the time that the Institute had determined that each had begun living together with a new partner in a common-law marriage. After the relevant regional labour courts ruled in favor of the petitioners, the National Labour Court upheld the discontinuation of the allowances for all of them.

Held: The National Labour Court’s decision involved …

Freedom And Faith - Foundations Of Freedom Of Religion, Matthias Mahlmann

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.