Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Insurance Law Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Legislation

Institution
Keyword
Publication Year
Publication
Publication Type

Articles 481 - 484 of 484

Full-Text Articles in Insurance Law

Federal Procedure-Removal Jurisdiction-Meaning Of "Separate And Independent'' As Used In The United States Judicial Code, Paul Harrison S. Ed. Jun 1951

Federal Procedure-Removal Jurisdiction-Meaning Of "Separate And Independent'' As Used In The United States Judicial Code, Paul Harrison S. Ed.

Michigan Law Review

The respondent suffered a loss by fire, and being uncertain as to which party was liable to compensate for this loss, joined the petitioner and two others as defendants in a suit asking for alternative relief. The petitioner and one of the defendants were insurance corporations with residence outside the state, while the third defendant's residence was the same as that of the respondent. The corporate defendants secured removal of the case to the federal court, and on a trial of the issues, a judgment was rendered for the respondent against the petitioner in the amount of the insurance claimed …


Book Reviews, Frank E. Horack Jr., Nathaniel L. Nathanson, Max Radin, Robert L. Taylor, Roy R. Ray, Robert H. Wettach, David R. Deener, Monrad G. Paulsen, Austin W. Scott Jun 1950

Book Reviews, Frank E. Horack Jr., Nathaniel L. Nathanson, Max Radin, Robert L. Taylor, Roy R. Ray, Robert H. Wettach, David R. Deener, Monrad G. Paulsen, Austin W. Scott

Journal of Legal Education

No abstract provided.


Insurance Jul 1947

Insurance

Indiana Law Journal

Indiana Legislation, 1947


Judgments - Declaratory Judgments - Scope Of The Federal Act, Michigan Law Review Jan 1938

Judgments - Declaratory Judgments - Scope Of The Federal Act, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

After the insured had made formal claims for total disability benefits for four years without bringing action to enforce them, the insurer, having at all times denied the total disability of the insured, brought suit in a federal district court for a declaration that it was not liable for the benefits claimed and that the policies had lapsed for non-payment of premiums. The district court granted a motion to dismiss because the insurer failed to present a "controversy" within the Federal Constitution and the Declaratory Judgments Act and because the insurer had no "rights or other legal relations" to be …