Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Natural Resources Law (1425)
- Environmental Law (1210)
- Water Law (1095)
- Administrative Law (815)
- Land Use Law (814)
-
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (798)
- Energy and Utilities Law (719)
- Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law (601)
- State and Local Government Law (590)
- Property Law and Real Estate (588)
- Constitutional Law (587)
- Law and Race (582)
- International Law (543)
- Agriculture Law (539)
- Physical Sciences and Mathematics (526)
- Environmental Sciences (524)
- Human Rights Law (507)
- Natural Resources Management and Policy (492)
- Animal Law (486)
- Legislation (455)
- Legal History (454)
- Litigation (453)
- Cultural Heritage Law (450)
- Law and Politics (446)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (429)
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (427)
- Courts (423)
- Water Resource Management (418)
- Institution
-
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (9364)
- University of Colorado Law School (682)
- University of New Mexico (562)
- University of Washington School of Law (452)
- Seattle University School of Law (428)
-
- University of Montana (421)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (172)
- University of North Dakota (164)
- University of Michigan Law School (132)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (128)
- University of Richmond (74)
- American University Washington College of Law (71)
- St. John Fisher University (58)
- St. Thomas University College of Law (56)
- University of South Dakota (46)
- Brigham Young University Law School (44)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (42)
- The Peter A. Allard School of Law (41)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (40)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (39)
- SJ Quinney College of Law, University of Utah (34)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (32)
- William & Mary Law School (30)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (28)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (27)
- UIC School of Law (27)
- University of Maine School of Law (27)
- UIdaho Law (26)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (25)
- University of Connecticut (24)
- Keyword
-
- Native Americans (253)
- Tribal sovereignty (200)
- United States (182)
- Claims and Pensions, Indian War - Seminole Wars (158)
- Claims and Pensions, Indian War - Florida (147)
-
- Indigenous peoples (143)
- Sovereignty (130)
- Jurisdiction (122)
- Law (121)
- Mandan (117)
- Hidatsa (116)
- Nueta (115)
- Arikara (109)
- Claims and Pensions, Indian War - Black Hawk War (109)
- Indian tribes (109)
- Sahnish (108)
- Claims and Pensions, Indian War - Creek (106)
- Indian law (105)
- The Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation (103)
- Groundwater (100)
- Mandan Hidatsa and Arikara Nation (100)
- Claims - Listed (99)
- Water (98)
- President of the United States, Annual Messages (97)
- State of the Union (97)
- Colorado (88)
- Canada (87)
- Irrigation (83)
- Reservation (81)
- Tribe (81)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- American Indian and Alaskan Native Documents in the Congressional Serial Set: 1817-1899 (8590)
- American Indian Law Review (732)
- Publications (257)
- Public Land & Resources Law Review (206)
- Seattle University Law Review (205)
-
- American Indian Law Journal (186)
- Faculty Scholarship (181)
- US Government Documents Related to Indigenous Nations (162)
- Court Decisions (158)
- Native American Water Rights Settlement Project (111)
- Articles (99)
- Tribal Law Journal (93)
- Washington Law Review (89)
- Articles & Book Chapters (87)
- Faculty Publications (78)
- Sandia Pueblo Mountain Claim (60)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (58)
- St. Thomas Law Review (55)
- Jepson School of Leadership Studies articles, book chapters and other publications (53)
- Resource Law Notes: The Newsletter of the Natural Resources Law Center (1984-2002) (53)
- Dalhousie Law Journal (43)
- Series III: Legal files; Subseries D: Six Nations of the Grand River, 1920-1929 - Appeal to the League of Nations (42)
- All Faculty Publications (40)
- Law of the Rio Grande (38)
- Faculty Articles (34)
- University of Colorado Law Review (33)
- Osgoode Hall Law Journal (32)
- Water Matters! (32)
- Faculty Law Review Articles (31)
- Michigan Journal of Race and Law (31)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 5041 - 5070 of 13878
Full-Text Articles in Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law
The Cheyenne-Arapaho And Alcoholism: Does The Tribe Have A Legal Right To A Medical Remedy?, Robert A. Fairbanks
The Cheyenne-Arapaho And Alcoholism: Does The Tribe Have A Legal Right To A Medical Remedy?, Robert A. Fairbanks
American Indian Law Review
No abstract provided.
Hunting And Fishing Rights, A Reprint From New York Law Forum
Hunting And Fishing Rights, A Reprint From New York Law Forum
American Indian Law Review
No abstract provided.
Taxation; Indian Country; Criminal Law; Damages
Taxation; Indian Country; Criminal Law; Damages
American Indian Law Review
No abstract provided.
Law And The American Indian: Readings, Notes And Cases, Monroe E. Price, Drew L. Kershen
Law And The American Indian: Readings, Notes And Cases, Monroe E. Price, Drew L. Kershen
American Indian Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Law Of Blood: The Primitive Law Of The Cherokee Nation, John Phillip Reid, Elmer M. Million
A Law Of Blood: The Primitive Law Of The Cherokee Nation, John Phillip Reid, Elmer M. Million
American Indian Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Four Corners Power Complex: Pollution On The Reservation, Laurence A. Mchugh
The Four Corners Power Complex: Pollution On The Reservation, Laurence A. Mchugh
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Tribal Self-Government And The Indian Reorganization Act Of 1934, Michigan Law Review
Tribal Self-Government And The Indian Reorganization Act Of 1934, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
The Indian Reorganization (Wheeler-Howard) Act of 1934 (IRA) was, by all accounts, one of the most significant single pieces of legislation directly affecting Indians ever enacted by the Congress of the United States. It has been "equalled in scope and significance only by the legislation of June 30, 1834, and the General Allotment Act of February 8, 1887." A major reversal of governmental policy and approach toward Indian affairs was effectuated by the IRA. This Comment will be concerned with the IRA as it affected the concept of tribal self-government, and primarily with those sections providing for adoption of tribal …
The States Versus Indian Off-Reservation Fishing: A United States Supreme Court Error, Ralph W. Johnson
The States Versus Indian Off-Reservation Fishing: A United States Supreme Court Error, Ralph W. Johnson
Washington Law Review
Pacific Northwest Indian tribes signed treaties with the United States in the mid-1850's which guaranteed them the permanent right to fish at their usual and accustomed fishing sites off the reservations. The Indians believe these treaties mean that those states which did not exist in 1855 have no power to regulate Indian off-reservation fishing under any circumstances. State officials, on the other hand, have consistently argued that Indian off-reservation fishing is subject to the same state regulation as non-Indian fishing. The United States Supreme Court has basically accepted the states' position, holding that states can regulate off-reservation fishing when "necessary …
The States Versus Indian Off-Reservation Fishing: A United States Supreme Court Error, Ralph W. Johnson
The States Versus Indian Off-Reservation Fishing: A United States Supreme Court Error, Ralph W. Johnson
Articles
Pacific Northwest Indian tribes signed treaties with the United States in the mid-1850's which guaranteed them the permanent right to fish at their usual and accustomed fishing sites off the reservations. The Indians believe these treaties mean that those states which did not exist in 1855 have no power to regulate Indian off-reservation fishing under any circumstances. State officials, on the other hand, have consistently argued that Indian off-reservation fishing is subject to the same state regulation as non-Indian fishing. The United States Supreme Court has basically accepted the states' position, holding that states can regulate off-reservation fishing when "necessary …
The City Of New Town, North Dakota V. U.S, United States Court Of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
The City Of New Town, North Dakota V. U.S, United States Court Of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
US Government Documents Related to Indigenous Nations
This court case, decided on January 17, 1972, established that the act of 1910 which allowed for the sale of “surplus” lands on the Fort Berthold Reservation after allotment did not change the jurisdictional boundaries of the reservation, meaning that the reservation proper still includes the northeast quadrant.
Puritan, Indian, And Agrarian: A Critical Essay On The History Of Law, Environmental Values, And Rhetorical Strategy., Rennard Strickland
Puritan, Indian, And Agrarian: A Critical Essay On The History Of Law, Environmental Values, And Rhetorical Strategy., Rennard Strickland
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Too Little Land, Too Many Heirs—The Indian Heirship Land Problem, Ethel J. Williams
Too Little Land, Too Many Heirs—The Indian Heirship Land Problem, Ethel J. Williams
Washington Law Review
The poverty of the American Indian has been intensified by a number of long-established federal land policies which have resulted in the progressive fractionation of land ownership so that much Indian land cannot be used effectively. This comment describes the origins and present dimensions of the Indian land heirship problem and the existing laws concerning the devolution of Indian land, and concludes with an analysis of the various statutory solutions which have been proposed to alleviate the problem.
Indians—Criminal Procedure: Habeas Corpus As An Enforcement Procedure Under The Indian Civil Rights Act Of 1968, 25 U.S.C. §§ 1302-1303, Anon
Washington Law Review
The Indian Civil Rights Act, Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, extended portions of the Bill of Rights to individual Indians as against their tribal governments and provided federal habeas corpus relief to review alleged violations of these rights. The Indian Bill of Rights marked the culmination of a complete reversal in federal recognition of Indian constitutional rights. Until 1965 federal courts had recognized Indian tribes as quasi-sovereign entities. Individual Indians were guaranteed their constitutional rights in relations with federal and state governments, but not with their tribal governments. The only rights Indian governments recognized when dealing …
An Historical Analysis Of The 1968 Indian Civil Rights Act, Donald L. Burnett Jr.
An Historical Analysis Of The 1968 Indian Civil Rights Act, Donald L. Burnett Jr.
Articles
No abstract provided.
An Historical Analysis Of The 1968 Indian Civil Rights Act, Donald L. Burnett Jr.
An Historical Analysis Of The 1968 Indian Civil Rights Act, Donald L. Burnett Jr.
Articles
No abstract provided.
Economic Development Of Indian Lands, Roger L. Tuttle
Economic Development Of Indian Lands, Roger L. Tuttle
University of Richmond Law Review
If anything be true of the United States in the second half of the Twentieth Century, it is the rise of humanism and social consciousness on the part of most Americans. The near-universal test applied today to one's personal or group relationships is whether justice is served. The salient examples of the fruit of this concern are the achievements which have been made toward bringing "first class citizenship" to the Negro-American through school desegregation, establishment of uniform nondiscriminatory voting requirements, abolition of separate rest rooms and waiting rooms, and the opening of housing and transportation facilities equally to all. The …
Book Review, David Getches
Minot Extension, Garrison Diversion Unit, Missouri River Basin Project, North Dakota. Communication From The Assistant Secretary Of The Interior Transmitting A Report On The Minot Extension, Garrison Diversion Unit, Missouri River Basin Project, North Dakota, Pursuant To The Provisions Section 9(A) Of The Reclamation Project Act Of 1939, United States Congress, Us House Of Representatives
Minot Extension, Garrison Diversion Unit, Missouri River Basin Project, North Dakota. Communication From The Assistant Secretary Of The Interior Transmitting A Report On The Minot Extension, Garrison Diversion Unit, Missouri River Basin Project, North Dakota, Pursuant To The Provisions Section 9(A) Of The Reclamation Project Act Of 1939, United States Congress, Us House Of Representatives
US Government Documents Related to Indigenous Nations
This communication, dated June 8, 1970, from the United States (US) Assistant Secretary of the Interior provides details on the proposed Garrison Diversion Unit extension in Minot, North Dakota (ND). The proposed Minot Extension would provide municipal and industrial water supply to the city of Minot, ND which, at the time of the report, did not have adequate supply to meet its long-term needs. The extension would also provide enhancement for outdoor recreational uses. This communication indicates that a report on the Minot Extension was sent to the president and to all impacted US states for review. The communication contains …
Authorizing The Mortgaging Of Tribal Lands On The Fort Berthold Reservation For Certain Purposes, United States Congress, Us Senate
Authorizing The Mortgaging Of Tribal Lands On The Fort Berthold Reservation For Certain Purposes, United States Congress, Us Senate
US Government Documents Related to Indigenous Nations
This report from the United States (US) Senate Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs, dated May 7, 1970, was written to accompany US Senate Bill 774 which sought to authorize the US Government to mortgage tribal lands in order to provide more economic stability for the tribes. The report indicates that the tribe had still not recovered from the economic collapse that occurred after they were forced to move from their lands due to the construction of the Garrison Dam.
Indian Hunting, Fishing And Trapping Rights: The Record And The Controversy, Donald L. Burnett Jr.
Indian Hunting, Fishing And Trapping Rights: The Record And The Controversy, Donald L. Burnett Jr.
Articles
No abstract provided.
An Act To Declare That The United States Shall Hold Certain Land In Trust For The Three Affiliated Tribes Of The Fort Berthold Reservation, North Dakota, United States Congress
An Act To Declare That The United States Shall Hold Certain Land In Trust For The Three Affiliated Tribes Of The Fort Berthold Reservation, North Dakota, United States Congress
US Government Documents Related to Indigenous Nations
This United States (US) Public Law, also known as US Public Law 91-100, passed on October 30, 1969 provides that all lands on the Fort Berthold Reservation in North Dakota deemed to be in excess to the needs of the Bureau of Indian Affairs will be held in trust for the Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation by the United States. The law outlines the parameters of the lands and specifies that this act must operate in accordance with the Act of August 13, 1946 (60 Stat. 1050).
Regulation Of Treaty Indian Fishing, Anon
Regulation Of Treaty Indian Fishing, Anon
Washington Law Review
On December 26, 1854, the Treaty of Medicine Creek was concluded between the United States and nine western Washington Indian tribes. The Indians ceded to the United States all rights in a large portion of their tribal lands, but reserved the "right of taking fish, at all usual and accustomed grounds and stations ... in common with all citizens of the Territory." Whatever the representatives of the United States or the Indian chiefs meant by this clause has been lost in antiquity. It is certain that they could not have foreseen the acrimony or the legal battles that it would …
Regulation Of Treaty Indian Fishing, Anon
Regulation Of Treaty Indian Fishing, Anon
Washington Law Review
On December 26, 1854, the Treaty of Medicine Creek was concluded between the United States and nine western Washington Indian tribes. The Indians ceded to the United States all rights in a large portion of their tribal lands, but reserved the "right of taking fish, at all usual and accustomed grounds and stations ... in common with all citizens of the Territory." Whatever the representatives of the United States or the Indian chiefs meant by this clause has been lost in antiquity. It is certain that they could not have foreseen the acrimony or the legal battles that it would …
Brief Of The Association On American Indian Affairs, Amicus Curiae - Department Of Game V. Puyallup Tribe, Inc., Docket No. 38611 (70 Wash. 2d 245 (Jan. 1967))
Department of Game v. Puyallup Tribe, Inc., Docket No. 38611 (70 Wash. 2d 245 (Jan. 1967))
No abstract provided.
Brief Of The United States, Amicus Curiae - Department Of Game V. Puyallup Tribe, Inc., Docket No. 38611 (70 Wash. 2d 245 (Jan. 1967))
Department of Game v. Puyallup Tribe, Inc., Docket No. 38611 (70 Wash. 2d 245 (Jan. 1967))
No abstract provided.
Brief Of Respondent - Department Of Game V. Puyallup Tribe, Inc., Docket No. 38611 (70 Wash. 2d 245 (Jan. 1967))
Department of Game v. Puyallup Tribe, Inc., Docket No. 38611 (70 Wash. 2d 245 (Jan. 1967))
No abstract provided.
Brief Of Amici Curiae, American Civil Liberties Union Of Washington - Department Of Game V. Puyallup Tribe, Inc., Docket No. 38611 (70 Wash. 2d 245 (Jan. 1967))
Department of Game v. Puyallup Tribe, Inc., Docket No. 38611 (70 Wash. 2d 245 (Jan. 1967))
No abstract provided.
Brief Of Amicus Curiae On Behalf Of The State Of Idaho Fish And Game Department - Department Of Game V. Puyallup Tribe, Inc., Docket No. 38611 (70 Wash. 2d 245 (Jan. 1967))
Department of Game v. Puyallup Tribe, Inc., Docket No. 38611 (70 Wash. 2d 245 (Jan. 1967))
No abstract provided.
Brief Of Appellants - Department Of Game V. Puyallup Tribe, Inc., Docket No. 38611 (70 Wash. 2d 245 (Jan. 1967))
Department of Game v. Puyallup Tribe, Inc., Docket No. 38611 (70 Wash. 2d 245 (Jan. 1967))
No abstract provided.
River Basin Surveys Papers, No. 39: An Interpretation Of Mandan Culture And History, W. Raymond Wood, Smithsonian Institution, Bureau Of American Ethnology
River Basin Surveys Papers, No. 39: An Interpretation Of Mandan Culture And History, W. Raymond Wood, Smithsonian Institution, Bureau Of American Ethnology
US Government Documents Related to Indigenous Nations
Published as a series sponsored by the Smithsonian Institution Bureau of American Ethnology, the “River Basin Surveys Papers” are a collection of archeological investigations focused on areas now flooded by the completion of various dam projects in the United States. The River Basin Surveys Papers (numbered 1-39) were mostly published in bundles, with 5-6 papers in each bundle. In collaboration with the United States (US) National Park Service and the US Bureau of Reclamation, the US Department of the Interior, and the US Army Corps of Engineers, the Smithsonian Institution pulled archeological and paleontological remains from several sites prior to …