Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Discipline
Institution
Keyword
Publication Year
Publication
Publication Type
File Type

Articles 4741 - 4770 of 13878

Full-Text Articles in Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law

Native Law: Law And Order Among Eighteenth-Century Cherokee, Great Plains, Central Prairie, And Woodland Indians, Ken Traisman Jan 1981

Native Law: Law And Order Among Eighteenth-Century Cherokee, Great Plains, Central Prairie, And Woodland Indians, Ken Traisman

American Indian Law Review

No abstract provided.


Sovereignty: Tribal Sovereign Immunity And The Claims Of Non-Indians Under The Indian Civil Rights Act, Stephen Lafferty Jan 1981

Sovereignty: Tribal Sovereign Immunity And The Claims Of Non-Indians Under The Indian Civil Rights Act, Stephen Lafferty

American Indian Law Review

No abstract provided.


Tribal Resources: Federal Trust Responsibility: United States Energy Development Versus Trust Responsibilities To Indian Tribes, Winifred T. Gross Jan 1981

Tribal Resources: Federal Trust Responsibility: United States Energy Development Versus Trust Responsibilities To Indian Tribes, Winifred T. Gross

American Indian Law Review

No abstract provided.


Federal Recent Developments Jan 1981

Federal Recent Developments

American Indian Law Review

No abstract provided.


Brief For Appellee - United States V. Baker, Docket Nos. 80-1085, 80-1086, 80-1088, 80-1116, 80-1117, 80-1118, 80-1206, 80-1219, 80-1208, 80-1205, 80-1214 (641 F.2d 1311 (9th Cir. 1981)) Oct 1980

Brief For Appellee - United States V. Baker, Docket Nos. 80-1085, 80-1086, 80-1088, 80-1116, 80-1117, 80-1118, 80-1206, 80-1219, 80-1208, 80-1205, 80-1214 (641 F.2d 1311 (9th Cir. 1981))

United States v. Baker, Docket Nos. 80-1085, 80-1086, 80-1088, 80-1116, 80-1117, 80-1118, 80-1206, 80-1219, 80-1208, 80-1205, 80-1214 (641 F.2d 1311 (9th Cir. 1981))

No abstract provided.


Opening Brief Of Appellant - United States V. Baker, Docket Nos. 80-1085, 80-1086, 80-1088, 80-1116, 80-1117, 80-1118, 80-1206, 80-1219, 80-1208, 80-1205, 80-1214 (641 F.2d 1311 (9th Cir. 1981)) Oct 1980

Opening Brief Of Appellant - United States V. Baker, Docket Nos. 80-1085, 80-1086, 80-1088, 80-1116, 80-1117, 80-1118, 80-1206, 80-1219, 80-1208, 80-1205, 80-1214 (641 F.2d 1311 (9th Cir. 1981))

United States v. Baker, Docket Nos. 80-1085, 80-1086, 80-1088, 80-1116, 80-1117, 80-1118, 80-1206, 80-1219, 80-1208, 80-1205, 80-1214 (641 F.2d 1311 (9th Cir. 1981))

No abstract provided.


Montana V. United States, Lewis F. Powell Jr. Oct 1980

Montana V. United States, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.


Brief Of Appellee State Of Washington - United States V. Washington, Docket No. 90-35355 (935 F.2d 1059 (9th Cir. 1991)) Sep 1980

Brief Of Appellee State Of Washington - United States V. Washington, Docket No. 90-35355 (935 F.2d 1059 (9th Cir. 1991))

United States v. Washington, Docket No. 90-35355 (935 F.2d 1059 (9th Cir. 1991))

No abstract provided.


Reply Brief Of Appellants - United States V. Baker, Docket Nos. 80-1085, 80-1086, 80-1088, 80-1116, 80-1117, 80-1118, 80-1206, 80-1219, 80-1208, 80-1205, 80-1214 (641 F.2d 1311 (9th Cir. 1981)) Jul 1980

Reply Brief Of Appellants - United States V. Baker, Docket Nos. 80-1085, 80-1086, 80-1088, 80-1116, 80-1117, 80-1118, 80-1206, 80-1219, 80-1208, 80-1205, 80-1214 (641 F.2d 1311 (9th Cir. 1981))

United States v. Baker, Docket Nos. 80-1085, 80-1086, 80-1088, 80-1116, 80-1117, 80-1118, 80-1206, 80-1219, 80-1208, 80-1205, 80-1214 (641 F.2d 1311 (9th Cir. 1981))

No abstract provided.


Brief For Appellee - United States V. Baker, Docket Nos. 80-1085, 80-1086, 80-1088, 80-1116, 80-1117, 80-1118, 80-1206, 80-1219, 80-1208, 80-1205, 80-1214 (641 F.2d 1311 (9th Cir. 1981)) Jul 1980

Brief For Appellee - United States V. Baker, Docket Nos. 80-1085, 80-1086, 80-1088, 80-1116, 80-1117, 80-1118, 80-1206, 80-1219, 80-1208, 80-1205, 80-1214 (641 F.2d 1311 (9th Cir. 1981))

United States v. Baker, Docket Nos. 80-1085, 80-1086, 80-1088, 80-1116, 80-1117, 80-1118, 80-1206, 80-1219, 80-1208, 80-1205, 80-1214 (641 F.2d 1311 (9th Cir. 1981))

No abstract provided.


Brief For Appellee - United States V. Baker, Docket Nos. 80-1085, 80-1086, 80-1088, 80-1116, 80-1117, 80-1118, 80-1206, 80-1219, 80-1208, 80-1205, 80-1214 (641 F.2d 1311 (9th Cir. 1981)) Jul 1980

Brief For Appellee - United States V. Baker, Docket Nos. 80-1085, 80-1086, 80-1088, 80-1116, 80-1117, 80-1118, 80-1206, 80-1219, 80-1208, 80-1205, 80-1214 (641 F.2d 1311 (9th Cir. 1981))

United States v. Baker, Docket Nos. 80-1085, 80-1086, 80-1088, 80-1116, 80-1117, 80-1118, 80-1206, 80-1219, 80-1208, 80-1205, 80-1214 (641 F.2d 1311 (9th Cir. 1981))

No abstract provided.


Authorizing The Assiniboine Tribe To File In The U.S. Court Of Claims Any Claims Against The United States For Damages For Delay In Payment Of Lands Claimed To Be Taken In Violation Of The U.S. Constitution, And For Other Purposes, United States Congress, Us Senate Jun 1980

Authorizing The Assiniboine Tribe To File In The U.S. Court Of Claims Any Claims Against The United States For Damages For Delay In Payment Of Lands Claimed To Be Taken In Violation Of The U.S. Constitution, And For Other Purposes, United States Congress, Us Senate

US Government Documents Related to Indigenous Nations

This report from the United States (US) Select Committee on Indian Affairs and the Committee on the Judiciary, dated June 25, 1980 was written to accompany US Senate Bill 1796 which authorized the Assiniboine tribe to seek damages for US constitutional violations and the delay of payment for taken lands. This report includes recommendations from the US assistant attorney general and proposed amendments for the bill. US Senate Bill 1796 became US Public Law 96-434 on October 10, 1980.


Authorizing The Blackfeet And Gros Ventre Tribes To File In The U.S. Court Of Claims Any Claims Against The United States For Damages For Delay In Payment Of Lands Claimed To Be Taken In Violation Of The U.S. Constitution, And For Other Purposes, United States Congress, Us Senate Jun 1980

Authorizing The Blackfeet And Gros Ventre Tribes To File In The U.S. Court Of Claims Any Claims Against The United States For Damages For Delay In Payment Of Lands Claimed To Be Taken In Violation Of The U.S. Constitution, And For Other Purposes, United States Congress, Us Senate

US Government Documents Related to Indigenous Nations

This report from the United States (US) Senate Select Committee on Indian Affairs and the Committee on the Judiciary, dated June 25, 1980 was written to accompany US Senate Bill 1795 which authorized the Blackfeet and Gros Ventre tribes to seek damages for US Constitutional violations and the delay of payment for taken lands. This report recommends an amendment to the language of US Senate Bill 1795. US Senate Bill 1795 became US Public Law 96-405 on October, 9, 1980.


Appellants' Opening Brief - United States V. Baker, Docket Nos. 80-1085, 80-1086, 80-1088, 80-1116, 80-1117, 80-1118, 80-1206, 80-1219, 80-1208, 80-1205, 80-1214 (641 F.2d 1311 (9th Cir. 1981)) Jun 1980

Appellants' Opening Brief - United States V. Baker, Docket Nos. 80-1085, 80-1086, 80-1088, 80-1116, 80-1117, 80-1118, 80-1206, 80-1219, 80-1208, 80-1205, 80-1214 (641 F.2d 1311 (9th Cir. 1981))

United States v. Baker, Docket Nos. 80-1085, 80-1086, 80-1088, 80-1116, 80-1117, 80-1118, 80-1206, 80-1219, 80-1208, 80-1205, 80-1214 (641 F.2d 1311 (9th Cir. 1981))

No abstract provided.


Appellants' Opening Brief - United States V. Baker, Docket Nos. 80-1085, 80-1086, 80-1088, 80-1116, 80-1117, 80-1118, 80-1206, 80-1219, 80-1208, 80-1205, 80-1214 (641 F.2d 1311 (9th Cir. 1981)) Jun 1980

Appellants' Opening Brief - United States V. Baker, Docket Nos. 80-1085, 80-1086, 80-1088, 80-1116, 80-1117, 80-1118, 80-1206, 80-1219, 80-1208, 80-1205, 80-1214 (641 F.2d 1311 (9th Cir. 1981))

United States v. Baker, Docket Nos. 80-1085, 80-1086, 80-1088, 80-1116, 80-1117, 80-1118, 80-1206, 80-1219, 80-1208, 80-1205, 80-1214 (641 F.2d 1311 (9th Cir. 1981))

No abstract provided.


Brief Of Defendant/Appellant - United States V. Baker, Docket Nos. 80-1085, 80-1086, 80-1088, 80-1116, 80-1117, 80-1118, 80-1206, 80-1219, 80-1208, 80-1205, 80-1214 (641 F.2d 1311 (9th Cir. 1981)) May 1980

Brief Of Defendant/Appellant - United States V. Baker, Docket Nos. 80-1085, 80-1086, 80-1088, 80-1116, 80-1117, 80-1118, 80-1206, 80-1219, 80-1208, 80-1205, 80-1214 (641 F.2d 1311 (9th Cir. 1981))

United States v. Baker, Docket Nos. 80-1085, 80-1086, 80-1088, 80-1116, 80-1117, 80-1118, 80-1206, 80-1219, 80-1208, 80-1205, 80-1214 (641 F.2d 1311 (9th Cir. 1981))

No abstract provided.


Agreement: Procedures For The Storage And Release Of Indian Water Entitlements Of The Six Middle Rio Grande Pueblos, Six Middle Rio Grande Pueblos Irrigation Committee, Secretary Of Interior's Designated Engineer, Bureau Of Indian Affairs Area Director, Bureau Of Indian Affairs Southern Pueblos Agency, Bureau Of Reclamation Mar 1980

Agreement: Procedures For The Storage And Release Of Indian Water Entitlements Of The Six Middle Rio Grande Pueblos, Six Middle Rio Grande Pueblos Irrigation Committee, Secretary Of Interior's Designated Engineer, Bureau Of Indian Affairs Area Director, Bureau Of Indian Affairs Southern Pueblos Agency, Bureau Of Reclamation

Law of the Rio Grande

Section 11 of the March 17, 1980 Agreement between the United States Government by the Secretary of the Interior and the Middle Rio Grande Conservancy District (MRGCD) provides for a quantity of water to be stored in the El Vado Reservoir in order to ensure the prior and paramount water rights of 8,847 acres of land as designated of the Six Middle Rio Grande Pueblos (SMRCP) of Cochiti, Santo Domingo, San Felipe, Santa Ana, Sandia and Isleta located within the exterior boundaries of the MRGCD.


Brief Of Plaintiff-Intervenor/Appellees Lummi, Makah And Quileute Indian Tribes - United States V. Washington, Docket Nos. Nos. 79-4447, 79-4472 (641 F.2d 1368 (9th Cir. 1981)) Feb 1980

Brief Of Plaintiff-Intervenor/Appellees Lummi, Makah And Quileute Indian Tribes - United States V. Washington, Docket Nos. Nos. 79-4447, 79-4472 (641 F.2d 1368 (9th Cir. 1981))

United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. Nos. 79-4447, 79-4472 (641 F.2d 1368 (9th Cir. 1981))

No abstract provided.


Brief Of Plaintiff-Intervenor/Appellee Tulalip Tribes - United States V. Washington, Docket Nos. Nos. 79-4447, 79-4472 (641 F.2d 1368 (9th Cir. 1981)) Feb 1980

Brief Of Plaintiff-Intervenor/Appellee Tulalip Tribes - United States V. Washington, Docket Nos. Nos. 79-4447, 79-4472 (641 F.2d 1368 (9th Cir. 1981))

United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. Nos. 79-4447, 79-4472 (641 F.2d 1368 (9th Cir. 1981))

No abstract provided.


Brief For The Federal Appellees - United States V. Washington, Docket Nos. Nos. 79-4447, 79-4472 (641 F.2d 1368 (9th Cir. 1981)) Feb 1980

Brief For The Federal Appellees - United States V. Washington, Docket Nos. Nos. 79-4447, 79-4472 (641 F.2d 1368 (9th Cir. 1981))

United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. Nos. 79-4447, 79-4472 (641 F.2d 1368 (9th Cir. 1981))

No abstract provided.


Ute Indian Water Compact, Utah, Ute Indian Tribe Of The Uintah And Ouray Reservations, Us Jan 1980

Ute Indian Water Compact, Utah, Ute Indian Tribe Of The Uintah And Ouray Reservations, Us

Native American Water Rights Settlement Project

Settlement Agreement/State Legislation: Approval of Ute Indian Water Compact, Utah Code 73-21-1 (1980). Parties: Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservations, UT, and US. Unsigned. The purpose of this Compact is resolve the claims of the Ute Tribe over the quantification, distribution, and use of all waters claimed. The Compact apportions, confirms, and recognizes the rights of the Tribe from the waters apportioned to UT from the Colorado River System. The right of the Tribe and others includes the depletion in the amount of 248,943 acre-feet per annum, and the diversion requirement of 471,035 acre-feet per annum, from …


Brief Of Plaintiff-Intervenor/Appellants Samish, Snohomish, Snoqualmie, And Steilacoom Indian Tribes - United States V. Washington, Docket Nos. Nos. 79-4447, 79-4472 (641 F.2d 1368 (9th Cir. 1981)) Jan 1980

Brief Of Plaintiff-Intervenor/Appellants Samish, Snohomish, Snoqualmie, And Steilacoom Indian Tribes - United States V. Washington, Docket Nos. Nos. 79-4447, 79-4472 (641 F.2d 1368 (9th Cir. 1981))

United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. Nos. 79-4447, 79-4472 (641 F.2d 1368 (9th Cir. 1981))

No abstract provided.


The Public Trust Doctrine In Public Land Law, Charles F. Wilkinson Jan 1980

The Public Trust Doctrine In Public Land Law, Charles F. Wilkinson

Publications

No abstract provided.


At The Whim Of The Sovereign: Aboriginal Title Reconsidered, Nell Jessup Newton Jan 1980

At The Whim Of The Sovereign: Aboriginal Title Reconsidered, Nell Jessup Newton

Journal Articles

Justice Reed, writing for the majority of the United States Supreme Court in Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United States, asserted the view: "Every American schoolboy knows that the savage tribes of this continent were deprived of their ancestral ranges by force and that, even when the Indians ceded millions of acres by treaty . . . it was not a sale but the conquerors' will that deprived them of their land."

Justice Reed's historical observation was a predicate to the Supreme Court's holding in Tee-Hit-Ton, one of the most significant statements by the Court on the constitutional rights of Native Americans …


The Field Of Public Land Law: Some Connecting Threads And Future Directions, Charles F. Wilkinson Jan 1980

The Field Of Public Land Law: Some Connecting Threads And Future Directions, Charles F. Wilkinson

Publications

No abstract provided.


What Is An "Indian Tribe"?--The Question Of Tribal Existence, L. R. Weatherhead Jan 1980

What Is An "Indian Tribe"?--The Question Of Tribal Existence, L. R. Weatherhead

American Indian Law Review

No abstract provided.


From Blood Revenge To The Lighthorsemen: Evolution Of Law Enforcement Institutions Among The Five Civilized Tribes To 1861, Bob L. Blackburn Jan 1980

From Blood Revenge To The Lighthorsemen: Evolution Of Law Enforcement Institutions Among The Five Civilized Tribes To 1861, Bob L. Blackburn

American Indian Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Supreme Court, Tribal Sovereignty, And Continuing Problems Of State Encroachment Into Indian Country, Clifford M. Lytle Jan 1980

The Supreme Court, Tribal Sovereignty, And Continuing Problems Of State Encroachment Into Indian Country, Clifford M. Lytle

American Indian Law Review

No abstract provided.


Constitutional Law: Dubious Intrusions--Peynote, Drug Laws, And Religious Freedom, John T. Doyle Jan 1980

Constitutional Law: Dubious Intrusions--Peynote, Drug Laws, And Religious Freedom, John T. Doyle

American Indian Law Review

No abstract provided.


Self-Determination: Indians And The United Nations--The Anomalous Status Of America's "Domestic Dependent Nations", Judith L. Andress, James E. Falkowski Jan 1980

Self-Determination: Indians And The United Nations--The Anomalous Status Of America's "Domestic Dependent Nations", Judith L. Andress, James E. Falkowski

American Indian Law Review

No abstract provided.