Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law Commons^™

Joint Amicus Curiae Brief Of Columbia River Tribes - United States V. Washington, Docket No. 84-3769 (774 F.2d 1470 (9th Cir. 1985))

United States v. Washington, Docket No. 84-3769 (774 F.2d 1470 (9th Cir. 1985))

No abstract provided.

United States V. Dann, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

Kerr-Mcgee Corporation V. Navajo Tribe Of Indians, Lewis F. Powell, Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

Declaring That The Mineral Rights In Certain Lands Acquired By The United States In Connection With The Garrison Dam And Reservoir Project Are Held In Trust For The Three Affiliated Tribes Of The Fort Berthold Reservation, And For Other Purposes., United States Congress, Us Senate

US Government Documents Related to Indigenous Nations

This report from the Select Committee on Indian Affairs, dated September 18, 1984, was written to accompany United States (US) Senate Bill 2480 which puts the mineral rights of certain lands acquired by the United States for the Garrison Dam project in trust for the Three Affiliated Tribes. This report contains correspondences regarding US Senate Bill 2480 and proposed amendments for the bill. Various US government entities here debate whether the Three Affiliated Tribes have rights to the mineral interests on land that was taken for the Garrison Dam project. The bill summarizes that when the Three Affiliated Tribes accepted …

Brief For Appellee United States Of America - United States V. Washington, Docket No. 84-3769 (774 F.2d 1470 (9th Cir. 1985))

United States v. Washington, Docket No. 84-3769 (774 F.2d 1470 (9th Cir. 1985))

No abstract provided.

Resource Law Notes Newsletter, No. 3, Sept. 1984, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center

Resource Law Notes: The Newsletter of the Natural Resources Law Center (1984-2002)

No abstract provided.

Brief Of Appellee Tribes - United States V. Washington, Docket No. 84-3769 (774 F.2d 1470 (9th Cir. 1985))

United States v. Washington, Docket No. 84-3769 (774 F.2d 1470 (9th Cir. 1985))

No abstract provided.

Appellants' Reply Brief - United States V. Washington, Docket No. No. 84-3571 (761 F.2d 1404 (9th Cir. 1985))

United States v. Washington, Docket No. No. 84-3571 (761 F.2d 1404 (9th Cir. 1985))

No abstract provided.

Defendant-Appellants' Reply/Answering Brief - United States V. Sohappy, Nos. 84-3032 To 84-3044, 83-3063 To 83-3065, 83-3070, 83-3072 To 83-3079, 83-3084 (770 F.2d 816 (9th Cir. 1985))

United States v. Sohappy, Nos. 84-3032 to 84-3044, 83-3063 to 83-3065, 83-3070, 83-3072 to 83-3079, 83-3084 (770 F.2d 816 (9th Cir. 1985))

No abstract provided.

Brief For Appellee United States Of America - United States V. Washington, Docket No. No. 84-3571 (761 F.2d 1404 (9th Cir. 1985))

United States v. Washington, Docket No. No. 84-3571 (761 F.2d 1404 (9th Cir. 1985))

No abstract provided.

Appellants' Opening Brief - United States V. Washington, Docket No. 84-3769 (774 F.2d 1470 (9th Cir. 1985))

United States v. Washington, Docket No. 84-3769 (774 F.2d 1470 (9th Cir. 1985))

No abstract provided.

Money Damages For Breach Of The Federal-Indian Trust Relationship After Mitchell Ii—United States V. Mitchell, 103 S. Ct. 2961 (1983), Kimberly T. Ellwanger

Washington Law Review

Recently, plaintiffs have relied upon the federal-Indian trust relationship more often to provide a legal basis for holding the federal government liable in money damages for breach of its trust duties. In United States v. Mitchell (Mitchell II) the Supreme Court affirmed a Court of Claims decision holding the United States accountable in money damages for breach of fiduciary duties in its management of forest resources on allotted lands of the Quinault Reservation. Although it had rejected a similar claim by the same plaintiffs based on the General Allotment Act, the Court found that timber management statutes and regulations created …

Brief Of Appellee Tribes - United States V. Washington, Docket No. No. 84-3571 (761 F.2d 1404 (9th Cir. 1985))

United States v. Washington, Docket No. No. 84-3571 (761 F.2d 1404 (9th Cir. 1985))

No abstract provided.

Wetlands Preservation And The Protection Of Endangered Species As Limits On Western Water Development, A. Dan Tarlock

The Federal Impact on State Water Rights (Summer Conference, June 11-13)

25 pages.

[Section] 404 Panel Discussion, Gregory J. Hobbs, Jr.

The Federal Impact on State Water Rights (Summer Conference, June 11-13)

5 pages.

Supplemental materials. Includes proposed bill language for Department of the Interior appropriations bill. Outline of key events and dates in the history of water law.

Panel: Section 404 Of The Clean Water Act And Section 7 Of The Endangered Species Act: Potential Impacts On Water Supplies [Supplemental Materials], Wendy C. Weiss

The Federal Impact on State Water Rights (Summer Conference, June 11-13)

57 pages.

Supplemental materials. Includes text of Riverside Irrigation District v. Andrews, 568 F.Supp 563 and Opening Brief of Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellants in Riverside Irrigation District v. Andrews, Cases No. 83-2114, 83-2115, 83-2119, 83-2230, April 3, 1984.

Groundwater Control Programs Affecting Water Development, Arthur L. Littleworth

The Federal Impact on State Water Rights (Summer Conference, June 11-13)

19 pages.

Ferc, Purpa And The Federal Power Act, Lawrence J. Wolfe

The Federal Impact on State Water Rights (Summer Conference, June 11-13)

62 pages.

Contains references.

Brief For The United States - United States V. Sohappy, Nos. 84-3032 To 84-3044, 83-3063 To 83-3065, 83-3070, 83-3072 To 83-3079, 83-3084 (770 F.2d 816 (9th Cir. 1985))

United States v. Sohappy, Nos. 84-3032 to 84-3044, 83-3063 to 83-3065, 83-3070, 83-3072 to 83-3079, 83-3084 (770 F.2d 816 (9th Cir. 1985))

No abstract provided.

The Case For A Legislative Solution To Indian Water Claims, James M. Bush

The Federal Impact on State Water Rights (Summer Conference, June 11-13)

57 pages.

Reserved Water Rights Of Indian Allotments, Richard B. Collins

The Federal Impact on State Water Rights (Summer Conference, June 11-13)

10 pages.

Contains references.

Instream Flows As Reserved Rights On Federal Reservations After United States V. New Mexico, Hank Meshorer

The Federal Impact on State Water Rights (Summer Conference, June 11-13)

10 pages.

Effects Of The Clean Water Act On Water Availability And Development, Paula C. Phillips

The Federal Impact on State Water Rights (Summer Conference, June 11-13)

12 pages.

Introduction To Reserved Water Rights, Ralph W. Johnson

The Federal Impact on State Water Rights (Summer Conference, June 11-13)

16 pages.

Indian Water Rights In The Supreme Court: A Review And Preview, Louis F. Claiborne

The Federal Impact on State Water Rights (Summer Conference, June 11-13)

12 pages.

Agenda: The Federal Impact On State Water Rights, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center

The Federal Impact on State Water Rights (Summer Conference, June 11-13)

Conference organizers and/or speakers included University of Colorado School of Law professors James N. Corbridge, Jr., David H. Getches, Lawrence J. MacDonnell and Richard B. Collins.

In general, water rights are a matter of state law. However, the availability and development of water are affected by important federal rights, policies and programs. In this conference, an outstanding group of private practitioners, government representatives and academics consider this important topic.

Developments In Federal Water Policies And Programs, Harold W. Furman Ii

The Federal Impact on State Water Rights (Summer Conference, June 11-13)

14 pages.

Role Of The State Courts In Adjudicating Indian Water Rights, Jon L. Kyl

The Federal Impact on State Water Rights (Summer Conference, June 11-13)

39 pages.

Negotiation As A Means Of Quantifying Indian Water Rights, Joseph R. Membrino

The Federal Impact on State Water Rights (Summer Conference, June 11-13)

88 pages.

Contains attachments.

Defendant-Appellants' Consolidated Opening Brief - United States V. Sohappy, Nos. 84-3032 To 84-3044, 83-3063 To 83-3065, 83-3070, 83-3072 To 83-3079, 83-3084 (770 F.2d 816 (9th Cir. 1985))

United States v. Sohappy, Nos. 84-3032 to 84-3044, 83-3063 to 83-3065, 83-3070, 83-3072 to 83-3079, 83-3084 (770 F.2d 816 (9th Cir. 1985))

No abstract provided.