Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Discipline
Institution
Keyword
Publication Year
Publication
Publication Type
File Type

Articles 3481 - 3510 of 13877

Full-Text Articles in Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law

Agenda: Strategies In Western Water Law And Policy: Courts, Coercion And Collaboration, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center, University Of Colorado Boulder. Center Of The American West Jun 1999

Agenda: Strategies In Western Water Law And Policy: Courts, Coercion And Collaboration, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center, University Of Colorado Boulder. Center Of The American West

Strategies in Western Water Law and Policy: Courts, Coercion and Collaboration (Summer Conference, June 8-11)

1 v. (various pagings) : ill., maps, charts ; 29 cm

Conference organizers, session moderators and/or speakers included University of Colorado School of Law professors Gary C. Bryner, James N. Corbridge, Jr., David H. Getches, Douglas S. Kenney, Lawrence J. MacDonnell, Kathryn M. Mutz and Charles F. Wilkinson

Includes bibliographical references

The event will examine the principal problem-solving strategies in western water law and policy: courts, coercion and collaboration. In addressing this broad range of strategies, the program will focus on national, west-wide and Colorado-specific issues.

Conference activities will commence with a free public program cosponsored by the Center of …


Resource Law Notes Newsletter, No. 46, Spring Issue, 1999, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center Apr 1999

Resource Law Notes Newsletter, No. 46, Spring Issue, 1999, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center

Resource Law Notes: The Newsletter of the Natural Resources Law Center (1984-2002)

No abstract provided.


Of Provinces And S.35 Rights, Kerry Wilkins Apr 1999

Of Provinces And S.35 Rights, Kerry Wilkins

Dalhousie Law Journal

It is now well established that federal law and regulatory activity may interfere with the exercise of aboriginal peoples' existing treaty and aboriginal rights, despite s. 35(1) of the Constitution Act, 1982, whenever the federal government can justify the interference. It is not yet clear, though, what power, if any, Canada's provinces have to regulate, even in justified ways, such rights and their exercise. This article argues that the provinces, as a general rule, have no such authority. Except in certain very specific and isolated circumstances, they have no power, even apart from s. 35, to regulate the exercise of …


The General Allotment Act "Eligibility" Hoax: Distortions Of Law, Policy, And History In Derogation Of Indian Tribes, John P. Lavelle Apr 1999

The General Allotment Act "Eligibility" Hoax: Distortions Of Law, Policy, And History In Derogation Of Indian Tribes, John P. Lavelle

Faculty Scholarship

A review of the essay, "Federal Indian Identification Policy: A Usurption of Indigenous Sovereignty in Native North America," in the collection of essays, The State of Native America, by M. Annette Jaimes.


San Carlos Apache Tribe Water Rights Settlement Agreement Of 1999, San Carlos Apache Tribe Et Al Mar 1999

San Carlos Apache Tribe Water Rights Settlement Agreement Of 1999, San Carlos Apache Tribe Et Al

Native American Water Rights Settlement Project

Settlement Agreement: San Carlos Apache Tribe Water Rights Settlement Agreement (Mar. 30, 1999) Parties: San Carlos Apache Tribe, US, AZ, Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District, Salt River Valley Water Users Assn., Roosevelt Water Conservation District, Buckeye Irrigation District, Buckeye Water Conservation and Drainage District, Tempe, Chandler, Mesa, Glendale, Scottsdale, Gilbert and Central AZ Water Conservation District. This Settlement Agreement resolves the water rights as between these parties in the Gila Water Rights Adjudication of AZ. Other claims remain to be resolved. Neighboring non-Indian communities will relinquish to approximately 58,735 a/f of surface water to the Tribe, provide …


Puget Sound Shellfish Growers' Brief In Reply - Washington V. United States, Puget Sound Shellfish Growers V. United States, Alexander V. United States, 26 Tideland And Upland Private Property Owners V. United States, Docket Nos. 98-1028, 98-1026, 98-1039, 98-1052 (526 U.S. 1060 (1999)) Mar 1999

Puget Sound Shellfish Growers' Brief In Reply - Washington V. United States, Puget Sound Shellfish Growers V. United States, Alexander V. United States, 26 Tideland And Upland Private Property Owners V. United States, Docket Nos. 98-1028, 98-1026, 98-1039, 98-1052 (526 U.S. 1060 (1999))

Washington v. United States, Puget Sound Shellfish Growers v. United States, Alexander v. United States, 26 Tideland and Upland Private Property Owners v. United States, Docket Nos. 98-1028, 98-1026, 98-1039, 98-1052 (526 U.S. 1060 (1999))

No abstract provided.


Upow's Reply Briefs In Opposition - Washington V. United States, Puget Sound Shellfish Growers V. United States, Alexander V. United States, 26 Tideland And Upland Private Property Owners V. United States, Docket Nos. 98-1028, 98-1026, 98-1039, 98-1052 (526 U.S. 1060 (1999)) Mar 1999

Upow's Reply Briefs In Opposition - Washington V. United States, Puget Sound Shellfish Growers V. United States, Alexander V. United States, 26 Tideland And Upland Private Property Owners V. United States, Docket Nos. 98-1028, 98-1026, 98-1039, 98-1052 (526 U.S. 1060 (1999))

Washington v. United States, Puget Sound Shellfish Growers v. United States, Alexander v. United States, 26 Tideland and Upland Private Property Owners v. United States, Docket Nos. 98-1028, 98-1026, 98-1039, 98-1052 (526 U.S. 1060 (1999))

No abstract provided.


Private Owners' Reply To Brief In Opposition - Washington V. United States, Puget Sound Shellfish Growers V. United States, Alexander V. United States, 26 Tideland And Upland Private Property Owners V. United States, Docket Nos. 98-1028, 98-1026, 98-1039, 98-1052 (526 U.S. 1060 (1999)) Mar 1999

Private Owners' Reply To Brief In Opposition - Washington V. United States, Puget Sound Shellfish Growers V. United States, Alexander V. United States, 26 Tideland And Upland Private Property Owners V. United States, Docket Nos. 98-1028, 98-1026, 98-1039, 98-1052 (526 U.S. 1060 (1999))

Washington v. United States, Puget Sound Shellfish Growers v. United States, Alexander v. United States, 26 Tideland and Upland Private Property Owners v. United States, Docket Nos. 98-1028, 98-1026, 98-1039, 98-1052 (526 U.S. 1060 (1999))

No abstract provided.


Brief For The United States In Opposition - Washington V. United States, Puget Sound Shellfish Growers V. United States, Alexander V. United States, 26 Tideland And Upland Private Property Owners V. United States, Docket Nos. 98-1028, 98-1026, 98-1039, 98-1052 (526 U.S. 1060 (1999)) Mar 1999

Brief For The United States In Opposition - Washington V. United States, Puget Sound Shellfish Growers V. United States, Alexander V. United States, 26 Tideland And Upland Private Property Owners V. United States, Docket Nos. 98-1028, 98-1026, 98-1039, 98-1052 (526 U.S. 1060 (1999))

Washington v. United States, Puget Sound Shellfish Growers v. United States, Alexander v. United States, 26 Tideland and Upland Private Property Owners v. United States, Docket Nos. 98-1028, 98-1026, 98-1039, 98-1052 (526 U.S. 1060 (1999))

No abstract provided.


Brief Amici Curiae Of Inner Sound Crab Association, Joe Verdoes, And Washington Dungeness Crab Fishermen's Association, Tom Kelley, In Support Of Petitioner, State Of Washington - Washington V. United States, Puget Sound Shellfish Growers V. United States, Alexander V. United States, 26 Tideland And Upland Private Property Owners V. United States, Docket Nos. 98-1028, 98-1026, 98-1039, 98-1052 (526 U.S. 1060 (1999)) Mar 1999

Brief Amici Curiae Of Inner Sound Crab Association, Joe Verdoes, And Washington Dungeness Crab Fishermen's Association, Tom Kelley, In Support Of Petitioner, State Of Washington - Washington V. United States, Puget Sound Shellfish Growers V. United States, Alexander V. United States, 26 Tideland And Upland Private Property Owners V. United States, Docket Nos. 98-1028, 98-1026, 98-1039, 98-1052 (526 U.S. 1060 (1999))

Washington v. United States, Puget Sound Shellfish Growers v. United States, Alexander v. United States, 26 Tideland and Upland Private Property Owners v. United States, Docket Nos. 98-1028, 98-1026, 98-1039, 98-1052 (526 U.S. 1060 (1999))

No abstract provided.


Reply Brief Of Defendant- Appellant Lummi Nation - United States V. Lummi Indian Tribe, Docket No. 98-35964 (235 F.3d 443 (9th Cir. 2000)) Mar 1999

Reply Brief Of Defendant- Appellant Lummi Nation - United States V. Lummi Indian Tribe, Docket No. 98-35964 (235 F.3d 443 (9th Cir. 2000))

United States v. Lummi Indian Tribe, Docket No. 98-35964 (235 F.3d 443 (9th Cir. 2000))

No abstract provided.


Respondent Indian Tribes' Brief In Opposition - Washington V. United States, Puget Sound Shellfish Growers V. United States, Alexander V. United States, 26 Tideland And Upland Private Property Owners V. United States, Docket Nos. 98-1028, 98-1026, 98-1039, 98-1052 (526 U.S. 1060 (1999)) Mar 1999

Respondent Indian Tribes' Brief In Opposition - Washington V. United States, Puget Sound Shellfish Growers V. United States, Alexander V. United States, 26 Tideland And Upland Private Property Owners V. United States, Docket Nos. 98-1028, 98-1026, 98-1039, 98-1052 (526 U.S. 1060 (1999))

Washington v. United States, Puget Sound Shellfish Growers v. United States, Alexander v. United States, 26 Tideland and Upland Private Property Owners v. United States, Docket Nos. 98-1028, 98-1026, 98-1039, 98-1052 (526 U.S. 1060 (1999))

No abstract provided.


Deborah Bird Rose's Review Of Trevor Graham's Mabo: Life Of An Island Man, Deborah Bird Rose Mar 1999

Deborah Bird Rose's Review Of Trevor Graham's Mabo: Life Of An Island Man, Deborah Bird Rose

Pacific Studies

No abstract provided.


Opening Brief Of Interested Party- Appellees The Tulalip Tribes Of Washington - United States V. Lummi Indian Tribe, Docket No. 98-35964 (235 F.3d 443 (9th Cir. 2000)) Feb 1999

Opening Brief Of Interested Party- Appellees The Tulalip Tribes Of Washington - United States V. Lummi Indian Tribe, Docket No. 98-35964 (235 F.3d 443 (9th Cir. 2000))

United States v. Lummi Indian Tribe, Docket No. 98-35964 (235 F.3d 443 (9th Cir. 2000))

No abstract provided.


Brief Of Plaintiff-Intervenor/Appellee Muckleshoot Indian Tribe - United States V. Lummi Indian Tribe, Docket No. 98-35964 (235 F.3d 443 (9th Cir. 2000)) Feb 1999

Brief Of Plaintiff-Intervenor/Appellee Muckleshoot Indian Tribe - United States V. Lummi Indian Tribe, Docket No. 98-35964 (235 F.3d 443 (9th Cir. 2000))

United States v. Lummi Indian Tribe, Docket No. 98-35964 (235 F.3d 443 (9th Cir. 2000))

No abstract provided.


Opening Brief Of Plaintiff- Appellees Four Tribes - United States V. Lummi Indian Tribe, Docket No. 98-35964 (235 F.3d 443 (9th Cir. 2000)) Feb 1999

Opening Brief Of Plaintiff- Appellees Four Tribes - United States V. Lummi Indian Tribe, Docket No. 98-35964 (235 F.3d 443 (9th Cir. 2000))

United States v. Lummi Indian Tribe, Docket No. 98-35964 (235 F.3d 443 (9th Cir. 2000))

No abstract provided.


Opening Brief Of Defendant - Appellant Lummi Nation - United States V. Lummi Indian Tribe, Docket No. 98-35964 (235 F.3d 443 (9th Cir. 2000)) Jan 1999

Opening Brief Of Defendant - Appellant Lummi Nation - United States V. Lummi Indian Tribe, Docket No. 98-35964 (235 F.3d 443 (9th Cir. 2000))

United States v. Lummi Indian Tribe, Docket No. 98-35964 (235 F.3d 443 (9th Cir. 2000))

No abstract provided.


Opening Brief Of Defendant- Appellant Lummi Nation - United States V. Lummi Indian Tribe, Docket No. 98-35964 (235 F.3d 443 (9th Cir. 2000)) Jan 1999

Opening Brief Of Defendant- Appellant Lummi Nation - United States V. Lummi Indian Tribe, Docket No. 98-35964 (235 F.3d 443 (9th Cir. 2000))

United States v. Lummi Indian Tribe, Docket No. 98-35964 (235 F.3d 443 (9th Cir. 2000))

No abstract provided.


Resource Law Notes Newsletter, No. 45, Winter Issue, 1999, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center Jan 1999

Resource Law Notes Newsletter, No. 45, Winter Issue, 1999, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center

Resource Law Notes: The Newsletter of the Natural Resources Law Center (1984-2002)

No abstract provided.


From Reclamation To Sustainability: Water, Agriculture, And The Environment In The American West, Lawrence J. Macdonnell Jan 1999

From Reclamation To Sustainability: Water, Agriculture, And The Environment In The American West, Lawrence J. Macdonnell

Books, Reports, and Studies

This digital resource contains only an abstract, cover image and table of contents information from the published book.

Print copy of book is available in the University of Colorado’s Wise Law Library: http://lawpac.colorado.edu/record=b236740~S0

Contents: Introduction : Living in a land of limited water -- PART 1. THE LOWER ARKANSAS VALLEY : AFTER THE WATER IS GONE: Colorado's Arkansas River -- Watering and cultivating the prairie -- Stretching a limited water supply -- Irrigation water for sale? -- A hostile takeover? -- Looking ahead -- PART 2. THE GRAND VALLEY, COLORADO : WHERE FRUIT, FISH, AND GROWTH COLLIDE: Growing peaches in …


Fire On The Plateau: Conflict And Endurance In The American Southwest, Charles F. Wilkinson Jan 1999

Fire On The Plateau: Conflict And Endurance In The American Southwest, Charles F. Wilkinson

Books, Reports, and Studies

This digital resource contains only an abstract, cover image and table of contents information from the published book.

Print copy of book is available in the University of Colorado’s Wise Law Library: http://lawpac.colorado.edu/record=b235993~S0

Contents: Introduction : The Colorado Plateau -- PART ONE : BEDROCK: Route 66 -- Mexican hat -- Deseret -- Coyote -- Vishnu -- PART TWO : CONFLICTS AND CONQUESTS: Kykotsmovi -- Jack -- Uintah -- Phoenix -- Rosa -- Cretaceous -- Junction Dam -- PART THREE : ENDURANCE: Cedar Mesa Canyon -- Black Mesa -- Kachina -- Druid Arch -- Mount Blanca -- Afterword


[On The] Road Back In: Community Lawyering In Indigenous Communities, Christine Zuni Cruz Jan 1999

[On The] Road Back In: Community Lawyering In Indigenous Communities, Christine Zuni Cruz

Faculty Scholarship

The idea of professional success,especially in the elite legal profession, as being closely linked to community or having corresponding value to the community has directly affected my view of individual lawyering. Excerpts reprinted in: Social Justice: Professionals, Communities and Law, 11 (Mahoney, Calmore, Wildman, eds., 2003); Lawyers Ethics and The Pursuit of Social Justice and Ethics 201 (Susan D. Carle, ed., 2005); Clinical Anthology, Readings for Live-Client Clinics, (2d Ed., A.J. Hurder, et al., eds., 2011).


United States V. Santee Sioux Tribe Of Nebraska: The Future Of Igra And Indian Gaming In Jeopardy, Russell Lannutti Jan 1999

United States V. Santee Sioux Tribe Of Nebraska: The Future Of Igra And Indian Gaming In Jeopardy, Russell Lannutti

Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - )

No abstract provided.


Aboriginal Land Rights In Australia, Sandy Wood Jan 1999

Aboriginal Land Rights In Australia, Sandy Wood

Human Rights Brief

No abstract provided.


The World Is Their Oyster? Interpreting The Scope Of Native American Off-Reservation Shellfish Rights In Washington State, Jason W. Anderson Jan 1999

The World Is Their Oyster? Interpreting The Scope Of Native American Off-Reservation Shellfish Rights In Washington State, Jason W. Anderson

Seattle University Law Review

This Comment explores the shellfish issue in light of the Stevens Treaties and their historical context, the rules of treaty interpretation, the relevant treaty fishing cases, and the recent court decisions on the shellfish issue. Part II.A explores the magnitude of the debate, the historical background of the case, and identifies the parties involved and their diverging interests. Part II.B describes the traditional methods and rules of treaty interpretation and recognizes their application in this case. Part II.C examines the treaty fishing cases that established much of the precedent that governed the shellfish case. Part II.D outlines the relevant holdings …


Federal Indian Law: Tribal Sovereign Immunity: Why Oklahoma Businesses Should Revamp Legal Relationships With Indian Tribes After Kiowa Tribe V. Manufacturing Technologies, Inc., David B. Jordan Jan 1999

Federal Indian Law: Tribal Sovereign Immunity: Why Oklahoma Businesses Should Revamp Legal Relationships With Indian Tribes After Kiowa Tribe V. Manufacturing Technologies, Inc., David B. Jordan

Oklahoma Law Review

No abstract provided.


Grave-Digging: The Misuse Of History In Aboriginal Rights Litigation, Patricia Wallace Jan 1999

Grave-Digging: The Misuse Of History In Aboriginal Rights Litigation, Patricia Wallace

University of Miami Inter-American Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Continuing Vitality Of Tribal Sovereignty Under The Constitution, Erik M. Jensen Jan 1999

The Continuing Vitality Of Tribal Sovereignty Under The Constitution, Erik M. Jensen

Faculty Publications

This article discusses James A. Porres III's essay, The Constitution of the United States Applies to Indian Tribes.


American Indian Education: The Terror Of History And The Nation's Debt To The Indian Peoples, Raymond Cross Jan 1999

American Indian Education: The Terror Of History And The Nation's Debt To The Indian Peoples, Raymond Cross

Faculty Law Review Articles

In this article the author explains the origin of some of the deeply embedded historic, cultural and legal biases that have long frustrated attempts to reform American Indian education and suggests some strategies for mitigating, if not eliminating, their influence on Indian education.


Coyote Paradox: Some Indian Law Reflections From The Edge Of The Prairie, Frank Pommersheim Jan 1999

Coyote Paradox: Some Indian Law Reflections From The Edge Of The Prairie, Frank Pommersheim

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.