Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

2024

Discipline
Institution
Keyword
Publication
Publication Type

Articles 181 - 194 of 194

Full-Text Articles in Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law

A Note On Navajo Nation V. Urban Outfitters, Inc., Brantly J. Stockton Jan 2024

A Note On Navajo Nation V. Urban Outfitters, Inc., Brantly J. Stockton

American Indian Law Review

No abstract provided.


Unprincipled Preemption: Why The Supreme Court Was Wrong In Oklahoma V. Castro-Huerta To Abandon Exclusive Federal Jurisdiction Over Crimes By Non-Indians Against Indians In Indian Country, Eric Ramoutar Jan 2024

Unprincipled Preemption: Why The Supreme Court Was Wrong In Oklahoma V. Castro-Huerta To Abandon Exclusive Federal Jurisdiction Over Crimes By Non-Indians Against Indians In Indian Country, Eric Ramoutar

American Indian Law Review

No abstract provided.


Removing The Stain Without Undermining Military Awards: Revoking Medals Earned At Wounded Knee Creek In 1890, Dwight S. Mears Jan 2024

Removing The Stain Without Undermining Military Awards: Revoking Medals Earned At Wounded Knee Creek In 1890, Dwight S. Mears

American Indian Law Review

No abstract provided.


Front Pages Jan 2024

Front Pages

American Indian Law Review

No abstract provided.


How Poor Is Poor Enough? How Jurisdictional Differences In Implementing The Right To Counsel Affect Indigent Native Americans, J. Santana Spangler-Day Jan 2024

How Poor Is Poor Enough? How Jurisdictional Differences In Implementing The Right To Counsel Affect Indigent Native Americans, J. Santana Spangler-Day

American Indian Law Review

No abstract provided.


Benefit Corporations—A Tool For Economic Development And Fostering Sovereignty In Tribal Business Structures, Madelynn M. Dancer Jan 2024

Benefit Corporations—A Tool For Economic Development And Fostering Sovereignty In Tribal Business Structures, Madelynn M. Dancer

American Indian Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Amplified Federal Obligation: Why Dobbs V. Jackson Women’S Health Organization Amplifies The Federal Government’S Obligation To Provide Comprehensive Reproductive Health Care In Native American Communities, Rebecca M. Kamp Jan 2024

The Amplified Federal Obligation: Why Dobbs V. Jackson Women’S Health Organization Amplifies The Federal Government’S Obligation To Provide Comprehensive Reproductive Health Care In Native American Communities, Rebecca M. Kamp

American Indian Law Review

No abstract provided.


Oklahoma V. Castro-Huerta—Using Sentencing Inequities To Address The Oliphant In The Room, Dillon M. Sullivan Jan 2024

Oklahoma V. Castro-Huerta—Using Sentencing Inequities To Address The Oliphant In The Room, Dillon M. Sullivan

American Indian Law Review

No abstract provided.


A Tribal Court Blueprint For The Choctaw Freedmen: Effect Of Cherokee Nation V. Nash, Leeann Littlejohn Jan 2024

A Tribal Court Blueprint For The Choctaw Freedmen: Effect Of Cherokee Nation V. Nash, Leeann Littlejohn

American Indian Law Review

No abstract provided.


State Taxing Power Over Tribal Leasing Activity: Balancing Bracker With The Call To Modernize, Caitlyn Lindstrom Jan 2024

State Taxing Power Over Tribal Leasing Activity: Balancing Bracker With The Call To Modernize, Caitlyn Lindstrom

American University Business Law Review

Federal law operates on the premise that state jurisdiction does not interfere with American Indian jurisdiction, and it is generally accepted that states may not tax Indian entities or members. However, the Supreme Court held that there are circumstances in which states may extend taxation onto non-Indians residing on tribal lands. In cases where Indians believe that states are violating legislation or regulations prohibiting state taxation, the Court follows the Bracker balancing test, an interest balancing test that weighs state, federal, and tribal interests. As with most balancing tests, this test lacks strict guidance on how to properly weigh certain …


The Significance Of The Un Declaration On The Rights Of Indigenous Peoples, S. James Anaya Jan 2024

The Significance Of The Un Declaration On The Rights Of Indigenous Peoples, S. James Anaya

Publications

No abstract provided.


Dissenting Opinion?, Richard B. Collins Jan 2024

Dissenting Opinion?, Richard B. Collins

Publications

Johnson v. M'Intosh is important for its extensive description of the racist Doctrine of Discovery. But its holding had no bearing on legal rights of American Indian nations. The opinion's articulation of tribal rights to land ownership and retained sovereignty were correctly stated.


Mainstream Media Portrayal Of Banishment And Nation-Imposed Punishment, Keely Ormond Jan 2024

Mainstream Media Portrayal Of Banishment And Nation-Imposed Punishment, Keely Ormond

Theses and Dissertations (Comprehensive)

“In a traditional village, we wouldn’t have a teepee with no door on it and throw somebody in there. We wouldn’t cast them out, because banishment meant death. What we had to do was restore relationships” – Ryan Beardy (Thorpe, 2022).

The following project examines the representation of Indigenous traditions, customs, and issues in Canadian mainstream media. Specifically, this project is interested in the portrayal of banishment as an Indigenous practice in Canadian mainstream news outlets. This project is based on an interpretive paradigm informed by grounded theory and concepts of media framing, postcolonialism, settler colonialism and restorative justice. Nineteen …


Revising The Indian Plenary Power Doctrine, M. Henry Ishitani, Alexandra Fay Jan 2024

Revising The Indian Plenary Power Doctrine, M. Henry Ishitani, Alexandra Fay

Michigan Journal of Race and Law

The federal Indian law doctrine of Congressional plenary power is long overdue for an overhaul. Since its troubling nineteenth-century origins in Kagama v. United States (1886), plenary power has justified invasive Congressional interventions and undermined Tribal sovereignty. The doctrine's legal basis remains a constitutional conundrum. This Article considers the Court's recent engagement with plenary power in Haaland v. Brackeen (2023). It argues that the Brackeen opinions may signal judicial readiness to reevaluate the doctrine. The Article takes ahold of Justice Gorsuch's critical assessment and runs with it, ultimately proposing a method for cleaning up this destructive and constitutionally dubious line …