Immigration Law Commons^™

Pardoning Immigrants, Peter L. Markowitz, Lindsay Nash

Articles

In the waning days of the Obama Administration, with Trump’s promised immigration crackdown looming, over one hundred advocacy organizations joined forces to urge President Obama to permanently protect hundreds of thousands of immigrants from deportation by pardoning their breaches of civil immigration law. That pardon never materialized and, as expected, the Trump enforcement regime is sowing terror and devastation in immigrant communities nationwide. While it seems unfathomable that the current president would use his pardon power to mitigate even the most extreme applications of our nation’s immigration laws, there is unfortunately no indication that the harshest aspects of the immigration …

Complicated-But Not Too Complicated: The Sunset Of E.U. Law In The U.K. After Brexit, Maimon Schwarzschild

Cardozo Law Review

The article examines the complexities of Brexit, focusing on the integration of EU law into UK law and the challenges of disentangling the two legal systems post-Brexit. It explores key areas such as free movement, environmental law, and the forms of EU law, highlighting the interconnectedness of EU and UK legal frameworks. The author suggests a "sunset clause" approach to manage the transition, allowing EU laws to expire unless explicitly retained, to align with the UK's newfound independence and regulatory autonomy.

Biased Damages Awards: Gender And Race Discrimination In Tort Trials, Goran Dominioni

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

Current U.S. tort law incentivizes potential tortfeasors to target members of underprivileged social groups by using gender and race-based statistical tables life expectancy; work-life expectancy and average wage) to award damages. Legal scholars have long criticized this practice from the point of view of distributive justice but supported it on welfarist grounds. Recent research in law and economics has however cast doubts on the efficiency of this practice. On this basis, some propose abandoning it in favor of gender and race neutral tables. In this article, I contribute to this debate by analyzing from a behavioral law and economics perspective …

The Violence Against Women Act, Implicit Bias, And Judicial Training, Lorena Espino-Piepp

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The note argues that the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) must be amended to include implicit bias training for Family Court judges and staff to address the systemic barriers faced by undocumented Latina immigrant women in accessing justice. These women often face compounded discrimination based on race, ethnicity, and immigration status, which undermines their ability to obtain immigration relief through VAWA protections. The author contends that without such training, the judicial system perpetuates inequities, as judges and court personnel rely on stereotypes that disproportionately harm women of color.

Life After Daca: Immigration Reform In The Age Of Trump, Hasan Shafiqullah, Martin Batalla, Michael Wildes, Anthony Enriquez, Javeria Ahmed

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The symposium examines the revocation of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program by the Trump administration, its legal challenges, and the ongoing debate over immigration reform. It highlights the impact on approximately 900,000 DACA recipients and the lawsuits arguing the revocation was arbitrary, capricious, and motivated by racial discrimination. The analysis emphasizes the need for comprehensive immigration reform, advocating for a "clean" Dream Act to provide a pathway to citizenship without compromising the rights of other immigrants or increasing enforcement measures. The discussion also underscores the historical and cultural significance of immigration in the U.S., urging collective action …

No Parents Allowed: The Problem With Special Immigrant Juvenile Status, Javeria Ahmed

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The note critically examines the Special Immigrant Juvenile Status (SIJS) provision, highlighting its unintended consequences that undermine family unity and harm children's well-being. While SIJS aims to protect children from abusive, neglectful, or abandoning parents, its current interpretation penalizes all natural parents, raising Equal Protection concerns and causing emotional and financial strain on families. The ntoe advocates for a more nuanced approach to SIJS, aligning it with humanitarian goals and child welfare principles.

Alternatives To Immigration Detention, Fatma E. Marouf

Cardozo Law Review

The United States places over 440,000 people each year in immigration detention, far more than any other country in the world. This Article argues that there are compelling humanitarian and financial reasons to utilize more alternatives to detention. It examines the strengths and limitations of existing alternatives, including the need to develop more community-based case management programs and to rely less on electronic monitoring. The Article then sets forth several legal arguments under the Constitution, Rehabilitation Act, and international human rights law for requiring greater consideration of alternatives to detention.

Anchoring More Than Babies: Children's Rights After Obergefell V. Hodges, Susan Hazeldean

Cardozo Law Review

The Supreme Court's recent decision upholding a constitutional right to samesex marriage in Obergefell v. Hodges was a huge advance not just for LGBT Americans, but also for children. Obergefefl suggests children have a fundamental right to be raised by their parents without being demeaned or marginalized by the state. This has important implications for other vulnerable children, including U.S. citizen children with undocumented parents. This Article argues that deporting these children's parents contravenes their fundamental right to be raised by a loving parent, to equal protection of the law, and to remain in the United States as U.S. citizens. …

Introduction: Immigration Crackdown: Examining The Impact Of “Enforcement First” Immigration Policies, Kristina Aragon

Cardozo Law Review de•novo

Cardozo Law Review de•novo’s online symposium, Immigration Crackdown: Examining the Impact of Enforcement First Immigration Policies, provides an analysis of the current immigration landscape in the U.S.; specifically, the enforcement mechanisms used on undocumented immigrants.

Local Police Entanglement With Immigration Enforcement In Georgia, Azadeh Shahshahani

Cardozo Law Review de•novo

The federal government has encouraged local police to assist in apprehending, detaining, and removing undocumented immigrants living in the United States ever since the 1980s. State governments, by themselves, do not have the authority to directly regulate immigrants’ presence or immigration; that power belongs to the federal government pursuant to Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution’s Commerce Clause, among other sources. However, federal officials have permitted—sometimes even coerced—states to “cooperate” in reporting undocumented immigrants and aiding in “identification, apprehension, detention, or removal” of these immigrants.

The Costs Of Trumped-Up Immigration Enforcement Measures, Kari Hong

Cardozo Law Review de•novo

Currently, our country spends $18 billion each year on immigration enforcement, which is nearly $4 billion more than the combined budgets of the FBI, DEA, Secret Service, and ATF. President Trump hopes to substantially increase that annual number with his proposed heightened enforcement measures that result in more arrests, more ICE officers roaming our streets, airports, and courtrooms, more detentions, more deportations, and more wall. This essay begins by examining each of these measures that were outlined in the new executive orders and concludes that all are expensive, ineffective, unnecessary, and inhumane.

The Institutional Case For Partisan Gerrymandering Claims, G. Michael Parsons

Cardozo Law Review de•novo

For voters hoping the Supreme Court’s 2017 Term brings relief from partisan gerrymandering, the end of the 2016 Term was inauspicious. In Cooper v. Harris, the majority assumed the legitimacy of “partisan advantage” arguments while the dissent—including Justice Kennedy—warned about the “serious institutional and federalism implications” of judicial intervention in the redistricting process. If past is prologue, this concern for institutional and structural interests does not bode well.

Fast-Track To Injustice: Rapidly Deporting The Mentally Ill, Aimee L. Mayer-Salins

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

No abstract provided.

2016 Cardozo Public Law, Policy, And Ethics Journal Symposium

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

No abstract provided.

Whole Other Story: Applying Narrative Mediation To The Immigration Beat, Carol Pauli

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

If Donald Trump, in kicking off his campaign for the White House, was saying "what everyone is thinking" about illegal immigration, it must be that his message mirrored a narrative that already existed in the minds of his audience. That fearful story of criminals invading the U.S. borders has long been a dominant theme in the mainstream news immigration story. Like all news stories, this one focuses attention on some facts at the expense of others. Like many news stories, it draws its power from earlier, well-known tales-some as old as The Flood. This article reconsiders news stories-and the storytelling …

Class Warfare: The Disappearance Of Low-Income Litigants From The Civil Docket, Myriam Gilles

Articles

In recent years, much attention has been paid to the startling disparities in income and wealth in contemporary U.S. society. The enormous concentration of economic power in the top 1% is the culmination of decades of significant income and wealth gains for the top, combined with stagnant or decreasing growth for the majority - a trend that continues apace. But nowhere is the gap more glaring than in the civil docket, where class actions brought by or on behalf of low-income consumers and employees are on the verge of disappearing.

To be sure, the decline in class actions is only …

Panel I: Fleeing Violence From Latin America, Olga Byrne, Elizabeth Carlson, Walter Ewing, Alice Farmer, Tiffany Nelms, Teresa Woods

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

No abstract provided.

Rectifying A Wrongful Reaction: Policy Alternatives To Family Detention And Expedited Migration Proceedings Without Representation For Unaccompanied Minors And Other Migrants Seeking Asylum, Noquel A. Matos

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The note critiques the U.S. government's response to the 2014 surge in unaccompanied minors and family units fleeing violence in Central America, arguing that policies such as detention and expedited deportations violated legal and moral obligations. It highlights the Flores v. Johnson case as a pivotal moment in addressing inhumane detention conditions and advocates for policy reforms to restore the U.S. commitment to protecting asylum seekers.

Regional Protection Of The Right To A Nationality, Jonathan Bialosky

Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law

The article argues that the concept of nationality, traditionally within the discretion of sovereign states, has evolved into a fundamental human right protected by international and regional human rights bodies. These bodies have developed robust jurisprudence to limit state discretion, emphasizing the importance of nationality for the enjoyment of other rights and advocating for procedural safeguards against arbitrary deprivation or denial of nationality.

Choice As Political Opinion: Women's Reproductive Healthcare As A Viable Ground For Asylum Protection, Andrew Christoffel

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

No abstract provided.

Desta V. Knesset, Miriam Naor, Salim Joubran, Esther Hayut, Yoram Danziger, Zvi Zylbertal, Uzi Vogelman, Isaac Amit, Hanan Melcer, Neal Hendel

Translated Opinions

[This abstract is not part of the Court's opinion and is provided for the reader's convenience. It has been translated from a Hebrew version prepared by Nevo Press Ltd. and is used with its kind permission.]

The petition challenged the constitutionality of sec. 30A and Chapter D of the Prevention of Infiltration (Offences and Jurisdiction) Law, 5714-1954 (hereinafter: the Law) as amended by the Prevention of Infiltration and Ensuring Departure of Infiltrators from Israel (Legislative Amendments and Temporary Provisions) Law, 5775-2014, which establish that infiltrators into Israel can be detained in custody for a period of up to three months, …

Holding The Line: Customs And Border Protection's Expansion Of The Border Search Exception And The Ensuing Destruction Of Interior Fourth Amendment Rights, Hannah Robbins

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Constraints On Asylum Termination By The United States Department Of Homeland Security, Jonathan Raz

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Undocumented No More: The Power Of State Citizenship, Peter L. Markowitz

Articles

An estimated eleven million undocumented immigrants live in the United States. These individuals have become integral members of American families and vital components of the American economy. Yet repeated efforts to meaningfully reform the nation's immigration laws--to more fully integrate these individuals into American society-have failed to garner sufficient political support in Congress. The prospects for significant congressional action on immigration reform remain bleak into the foreseeable future as our nation's debate on immigration has been warped by powerful, but largely inaccurate, themes of criminality, lax border enforcement, and national security threats. These themes have been crafted and cemented in …

Infiltration Or Immigration: The Legality Of Israeli Immigration Policy Regarding African Asylum Seekers, Eliott Rimon

Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law

The note argues that while Israel has the right to control migration from Africa, its current legal framework for handling refugees and asylum seekers is inadequate and often unconstitutional. It calls for legislative reforms to ensure a just and systematic approach that balances national security with human rights, emphasizing the need for international cooperation to share the refugee burden.

Constitutional Venue, Peter L. Markowitz, Lindsay C. Nash

Articles

A foundational concept of American jurisprudence is the principle that it is unfair to allow litigants to be haled into far away tribunals when the litigants and the litigation have little or nothing to do with the location of such courts. Historically, both personal jurisdiction and venue each served this purpose in related, but distinct ways. Personal jurisdiction is, at base, a limit on the authority of the sovereign. Venue, in contrast, aims to protect parties from being forced to litigate in a location where they would be unfairly disadvantaged. The constitutional boundaries of these early principles came to be …

Fear And Failing In Family Court: Special Immigrant Juvenile Status And The State Court Problem, Jessica R. Pulitzer

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The note examines the challenges faced by immigrant children seeking Special Immigrant Juvenile Status (SIJS), highlighting how state family courts' inconsistent application of the law undermines the federal statute's intent to protect vulnerable children. It argues that while SIJS was designed to provide relief to children who have suffered abuse, abandonment, or neglect, procedural and substantive inconsistencies in family court adjudications, particularly in interpreting the "best interests of the child" principle, create barriers for eligible youth. The note advocates for reforms to ensure consistent and fair access to SIJS, emphasizing the need for standardized best interest principles and greater awareness …

Keynote: Five Omar Mualimmak, Five Omar Mualimmak

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

No abstract provided.

Do No Harm: The Dispute Over Access To Health Care Between Israel And The Palestinian Territories, Emma Glazer

Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law

The note examines the legal dispute over access to healthcare between Israel and the Palestinian Territories under International Humanitarian Law (IHL). It argues that while IHL obligates Israel to provide medical services to Palestinians injured in conflict, it does not require unrestricted access for routine healthcare. The analysis highlights the need for Israel to balance its security interests with humanitarian obligations, ensuring access to healthcare while maintaining necessary restrictions. The note also suggests that as the Palestinian Territories pursue statehood, they should develop their own advanced healthcare facilities to reduce reliance on Israeli institutions.

Tylenol And An Ice Pack: An Inadequate Prescription For Hiv/Aids In Immigration Detention Centers, Carl Kenneth Lipscombe

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

The note examines the systemic challenges in providing adequate HIV treatment to immigration detainees in U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) custody, highlighting the legal and practical barriers that prevent detainees from receiving consistent and effective medical care. It argues that the current framework, governed by non-binding standards and inconsistent enforcement, fails to ensure humane treatment under the Constitution, particularly the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment. The analysis calls for structural reforms, including codifying detention standards into enforceable regulations and improving oversight mechanisms, to address the inadequate medical care for HIV-positive detainees.