Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- St. Mary's University (826)
- Seattle University School of Law (209)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (10)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (9)
- Roger Williams University (7)
-
- Texas A&M University School of Law (6)
- University of Michigan Law School (5)
- UIC School of Law (4)
- American University Washington College of Law (3)
- BLR (3)
- Boston University School of Law (3)
- Georgetown University Law Center (3)
- University of Georgia School of Law (3)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (3)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (3)
- University of Washington School of Law (3)
- American Dental Association (2)
- Brooklyn Law School (2)
- Claremont Colleges (2)
- Columbia Law School (2)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (2)
- New York Law School (2)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (2)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (2)
- University of Richmond (2)
- Asbury Theological Seminary (1)
- California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo (1)
- City University of New York (CUNY) (1)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- Cornell University Law School (1)
- Keyword
-
- St. Mary’s Law Journal (395)
- St. Mary’s University School of Law (385)
- Inc. (73)
- Student comment (46)
- Texas (40)
-
- Texas Supreme Court (34)
- Immigration (33)
- Fourteenth Amendment (23)
- Negligence (20)
- First Amendment (19)
- Jr. (19)
- Texas Constitution (19)
- Due Process Clause (18)
- Equal Protection Clause (17)
- Legal malpractice (16)
- Sixth Amendment (16)
- Criminal law (15)
- Due process (14)
- Law (14)
- Constitutional law (13)
- U.S. Const. amend. XIV (13)
- United States Supreme Court (13)
- Constitution (12)
- Model Rules of Professional Conduct (12)
- St. Mary’s School of Law (12)
- Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct (12)
- § 1 (12)
- Legislation (11)
- Liability (11)
- North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) (11)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- St. Mary's Law Journal (826)
- Seattle University Law Review (183)
- Seattle Journal for Social Justice (25)
- Faculty Scholarship (9)
- Faculty Scholarly Works (8)
-
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (5)
- Faculty Articles (4)
- Scholarly Works (4)
- Articles (3)
- Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution (3)
- ExpressO (3)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (3)
- Journal of Health Care Law and Policy (3)
- Michigan Law Review (3)
- Advocacy in Action letters (2)
- Faculty White Papers (2)
- Public Interest Law Reporter (2)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (2)
- Washington Law Review (2)
- 2021–2022 Flyers (1)
- 2023–2024 Flyers (1)
- 2024–2025 Flyers (1)
- Agribusiness (1)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (1)
- Bibliographies (1)
- Brooklyn Journal of International Law (1)
- Buffalo Human Rights Law Review (1)
- Buffalo Journal of Gender, Law & Social Policy (1)
- CMC Senior Theses (1)
- Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice (1)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 931 - 960 of 1148
Full-Text Articles in Immigration Law
Hazardous Chemicals In The Workplace: The Employer's Obligation To Inform Employees And The Community., Nelson A. Clare
Hazardous Chemicals In The Workplace: The Employer's Obligation To Inform Employees And The Community., Nelson A. Clare
St. Mary's Law Journal
Significant changes have recently occurred in reporting requirements for employers who have hazardous chemicals in their workplaces. The amended Federal Hazard Communication Standard requires private employers, engaged in a business using hazardous chemicals, to communicate to employees the potential hazards. The Standard requires employers to use: 1) a Hazard Communication Program, 2) labels and other forms of warning, 3) material safety data sheets, and 4) information and training about hazardous chemicals. Local and state governments must compare and reconcile the various and complex provisions relating to the Standard to ensure compliance with all requirements of the respective laws. The Texas …
Private Retirement Benefits Earned During Marriage Characterized As Community Property And Do Not Automatically Remain Property Of Surviving Spouse., Darryl J. Silvera
Private Retirement Benefits Earned During Marriage Characterized As Community Property And Do Not Automatically Remain Property Of Surviving Spouse., Darryl J. Silvera
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Should Your Spouse Be Compensated For Putting You Through School - Texas Says No; Is That Just And Right., Darryl J. Silvera
Should Your Spouse Be Compensated For Putting You Through School - Texas Says No; Is That Just And Right., Darryl J. Silvera
St. Mary's Law Journal
No abstract provided.
A Proposal To Protect Injured Workers From Employers' Shield Of Immunity., Catherine A. Hale
A Proposal To Protect Injured Workers From Employers' Shield Of Immunity., Catherine A. Hale
St. Mary's Law Journal
The current workers’ compensation system shields negligent employers from liability and fails to encourage compliance with safety standards. A practical solution is to broaden the judicial definition of intentional conduct and reinstate a common-law negligence action in workers’ compensation statutes. The Texas Workers’ Compensation Act awards compensation to employees for accidental injuries sustained in the course of employment. The Act bars an employee who accepts these benefits from bringing a common-law suit for damages against the employer. The exclusive nature of the workers’ compensation remedy thus leaves employers immune from common-law negligence actions by employees who accept the plan. An …
Judicial Rulemakers Held To Have Produced Federal Sentencing Guidelines Within Permissible Twilight Area In Which Branches Of Government Merge., Janis Hillman
St. Mary's Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Asserting And Defending Claims Involving An Fslic Relationship., Joe Phillips
Asserting And Defending Claims Involving An Fslic Relationship., Joe Phillips
St. Mary's Law Journal
No abstract provided.
$500,000 Cap On Non-Economic Damages For Medical Malpractice Inconsistent With Open Courts Guarantee In Texas Constitution., Kathryn Kase
$500,000 Cap On Non-Economic Damages For Medical Malpractice Inconsistent With Open Courts Guarantee In Texas Constitution., Kathryn Kase
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Government Action Does Not Violate Free Exercise Clause Of First Amendment When It Neither Coerces Action Contrary To Religious Beliefs Nor Prohibits Access To Practice Those Beliefs, But Merely Imposes An Incidental Burden On Religious Practice., Joani S. Harrison
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Merger Doctrine No Defense To Deceptive Trade Practices Suit For Breach Of Express Warranty., Robert Carl Jones
Merger Doctrine No Defense To Deceptive Trade Practices Suit For Breach Of Express Warranty., Robert Carl Jones
St. Mary's Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Avoiding The Issue Of Whether Implied Warranties Extend To Professional Services By Defining Horse Training As A Modification Of An Existing Tangible Good., Wendy Hunkele
St. Mary's Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Toxic Waste: Who Pays The Piper - A Private Party's Federal And Texas Rights To Recovery Of Voluntary Cleanup Costs Of Toxic Waste., Barbara Hanson Nellermoe
Toxic Waste: Who Pays The Piper - A Private Party's Federal And Texas Rights To Recovery Of Voluntary Cleanup Costs Of Toxic Waste., Barbara Hanson Nellermoe
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
In Pari Delicto Defense May Bar Recovery In Section 12(1) Action Under Securities Act Of 1933., G. Barton Chucker
In Pari Delicto Defense May Bar Recovery In Section 12(1) Action Under Securities Act Of 1933., G. Barton Chucker
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
A Consumer Update: Recent Developments Under The Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act., Richard M. Alderman, Melanie P. Rosenthal
A Consumer Update: Recent Developments Under The Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act., Richard M. Alderman, Melanie P. Rosenthal
St. Mary's Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Aspects Of Defending A Texas Deceptive Trade Practices - Consumer Protection Act Claim., Andy A. Tschoepe Ii, Stanley E. Crawford Jr., David Jed Williams
Aspects Of Defending A Texas Deceptive Trade Practices - Consumer Protection Act Claim., Andy A. Tschoepe Ii, Stanley E. Crawford Jr., David Jed Williams
St. Mary's Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Document Destruction In Business Litigation From A Practitioner's Point-Of-View: The Ethical Rules Vs. Practical Realities., Ricardo G. Cedillo, David Lopez
Document Destruction In Business Litigation From A Practitioner's Point-Of-View: The Ethical Rules Vs. Practical Realities., Ricardo G. Cedillo, David Lopez
St. Mary's Law Journal
No abstract provided.
An Understanding Of Damages Recoverable Under The Dtpa., Deborah J. Bullion
An Understanding Of Damages Recoverable Under The Dtpa., Deborah J. Bullion
St. Mary's Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Relevancy Revolution In Criminal Law: A Practical Tour Through The Texas Rules Of Criminal Evidence., Cathleen C. Herasimchuk
The Relevancy Revolution In Criminal Law: A Practical Tour Through The Texas Rules Of Criminal Evidence., Cathleen C. Herasimchuk
St. Mary's Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Judiciary's Inherent Power To Compel Funding: A Tale Of Heating Stoves And Air Conditioners., Ted Z. Robertson, Christa Brown
Judiciary's Inherent Power To Compel Funding: A Tale Of Heating Stoves And Air Conditioners., Ted Z. Robertson, Christa Brown
St. Mary's Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Can Shakespeare Make You A Partner., Michael L. Richmond
Can Shakespeare Make You A Partner., Michael L. Richmond
St. Mary's Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Health Care Quality Improvement Act Of 1986: A Proposal For Interpretation Of Its Protection., Louise M. Joy
The Health Care Quality Improvement Act Of 1986: A Proposal For Interpretation Of Its Protection., Louise M. Joy
St. Mary's Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Causes Of Action Stemming From Federal Government's Negligence In Implementing Mandatory Regulations Or Statutes Are Not Barred By Discretionary Function Exception Of Federal Tort Claims Act., Irl I. Nathan
St. Mary's Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Foreword., Barbara Bader Aldave
Address., William H. Rehnquist
The Federal Courts Study Committee Begins Its Work., Joseph F. Weis Jr.
The Federal Courts Study Committee Begins Its Work., Joseph F. Weis Jr.
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Improper Use Of Removal And Its Disruptive Effect On State Court Proceedings: A Call To Reform 28 U.S.C. 1446., Ellen Bloomer Mitchell
Improper Use Of Removal And Its Disruptive Effect On State Court Proceedings: A Call To Reform 28 U.S.C. 1446., Ellen Bloomer Mitchell
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Technology Transfers: What If The Other Party Files Bankruptcy., Ann Livingston, Leif M. Clark
Technology Transfers: What If The Other Party Files Bankruptcy., Ann Livingston, Leif M. Clark
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
The New Texas Business Corporation Act Merger Provisions., Curtis W. Huff
The New Texas Business Corporation Act Merger Provisions., Curtis W. Huff
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Interference With Prospective Civil Litigation By Spollation Of Evidence: Should Texas Adopt A New Tort., Philip A. Lionberger
Interference With Prospective Civil Litigation By Spollation Of Evidence: Should Texas Adopt A New Tort., Philip A. Lionberger
St. Mary's Law Journal
Texas courts should adopt a tort for spoliation of evidence. Spoliation of evidence is the tampering with, interference with, loss of, or destruction of evidence. Spoliation of evidence is a serious legal problem because it increases a litigant’s difficulty in proving a cause of action or a defense. Evidence destruction may also increase litigation costs and cause the trial court to make factfinding errors. Texas courts should adopt the tort of spoliation of evidence because it compensates injured litigants and deters future acts of spoliation. Another reason for adopting the tort for spoliation of evidence is the inadequacy of alternative …
D.W.I. Suspects Do Not Have Right To Consult With Counsel Before Intoxilyzer Test Under Texas Constitution Because Test Is Not A Critical Stage In Proceedings., Clifford C. Herberg Jr.
D.W.I. Suspects Do Not Have Right To Consult With Counsel Before Intoxilyzer Test Under Texas Constitution Because Test Is Not A Critical Stage In Proceedings., Clifford C. Herberg Jr.
St. Mary's Law Journal
Under the Texas Constitution, D.W.I. suspects do not have a right to consult with counsel before an intoxilyzer test because the test is not considered a “critical stage” in proceedings. In Forte v. State, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals adopted the critical stage approach and held D.W.I. suspects do not have a right to counsel under the Texas Constitution until the filing of the complaint. The court reasoned because the statute implies consent to the test, and the suspect has no legal right to refuse the test, counsel’s presence would not serve to protect “any known right or safeguard,” …
Fundamental Error When Rule Against Misjoinder Violated By Charging More Than One Non-Property Offense In Same Indictment Resulting In Multiple Convictions., Virginia Coyle
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.