Fourth Amendment Commons^™

United States V. Salvucci, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

United States V. Payner, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Constraints On Initiative And Referendum, David J. Jordan

Vanderbilt Law Review

This Note examines possible constitutional constraints on initiative and referendum. Part II briefly discusses typical initiative and referendum procedures and contrasts these with representative legislative processes. Part III examines the constitutional significance of the differences highlighted in Part II. Finally, Part IV concludes that because of the peculiar political dynamics of initiative and referendum, which diminish normal safeguards of minority interests, courts may appropriately apply heightened due process and equal protection standards when reviewing direct legislation.

"Doing Business": Defining State Control Over Foreign Corporations, William A. Holby

Vanderbilt Law Review

This Note will attempt to analyze the present status of the term "doing business" or the substitute terminology used to define that level of activity sufficient to subject a foreign corporation to state control in a particular context.' After defining the degree of activity necessary to permit the state to exercise control in each context, this Note will analyze the accuracy and utility of using terminology such as "doing business" in describing whether corporate activity within a state is sufficient to permit state exercise of legislative or judicial jurisdiction. This Note concludes by pro-posing that use of such ambiguous language …

Fourth Amendment Standing And Expectations Of Privacy: Rakas V. Illinois And New Directions For Some Old Concepts, Richard A. Williamson

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Search And The Single Dormitory Room, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

This Note suggests that dormitory privacy should not be illusory. It argues that when a college breaches the standards of the fourth amendment in searching a student's room, the exclusionary rule should proscribe reliance on the fruits of that search to punish the student.

The argument progresses in two steps. Section I observes that the guarantees of the fourth amendment apply to searches of college students' rooms by college officials just as they apply to searches of any private dwelling by government officials. It traces the happy demise of Moore v. Student Affairs Committee, which allowed students only limited …

Rationalizing Administrative Searches, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

At the outset, this Note examines the major decisions concerning administrative searches. Specifically, it traces the development of a warrant requirement and of the corresponding lower standard of probable cause announced in the Camara and See decisions. Subsequent modifications of that seemingly absolute rule are then analyzed. To develop a framework for evaluating administrative search cases, Section II groups those principal Supreme Court cases, along with pertinent lower court opinions, into three tiers of fourth amendment protection: administrative searches that require a warrant based on a traditional criminal standard of probable cause; administrative searches that require a warrant based on …

Exclusionary Rule: Reasonable Remarks On Unreasonable Search And Seizure, Yale Kamisar

Articles

Can we live with the so-called exclusionary rule, which bars the use of illegally gained evidence in criminal trials? Can the Fourth Amendment live without it? A growing number of lawyers and judges, including Chief Justice Warren Burger, have called for abandonment of the rule, usually on the ground that it has not prevented illegal searches and seizures and on the ground that the rule has contributed significantly to the increase in crime. No one has convincingly demonstrated a causal link between the high rate of crime in America and the exclusionary rule, and I do not believe that any …

The Exclusionary Rule In Historical Perspective: The Struggle To Make The Fourth Amendment More Than 'An Empty Blessing', Yale Kamisar

Articles

In the 65 years since the Supreme Court adopted the exclusionary rule, few critics have attacked it with as much vigor and on as many fronts as did Judge Malcolm Wilkey in his recent Judicature article, "The exclusionary rule: why suppress valid evidence?" (November 1978).

A Defense Of The Exclusionary Rule, Yale Kamisar

Articles

The exclusionary rule is being flayed with increasing vigor by a number of unrelated sources and with a variety of arguments. Some critics find it unworkable and resort to empirically based arguments. Others see it as the product of a belated and unwarranted judicial interpretation. Still others, uncertain whether the rule works, are confident that in some fashion law enforcement's hands are tied. Professor Yale Kamisar, long a defender of the exclusionary rule, reviews the current attacks on the rule and offers a vigorous rebuttal. He finds it difficult to accept that there is a line for acceptable police conduct …

Case Digest, Journal Staff

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

COURT SITTING IN ADMIRALTY MAY GRANT INJUNCTIVE RELIEF TO PREVENT MARITIME INSURER FROM "BLACKLISTING" SEAMEN WITHOUT CAUSE

---------------------

EXPENSES OF JUSTICE INCLUDE ONLY THOSE STORAGE EXPENSES INCURRED AFTER THE FILING OF A FORFEITURE ACTION BY THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

--------------------

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE MAY APPEAL AN IMMIGRATION JUDGE'S DECISION TO GRANT AN ALIEN RELIEF FROM DEPORTATION UNDER SECTION 212(c) OF THE IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT

-------------------------

FOURTH AMENDMENT NO BAR TO WARRANTLESS SEARCH OF FOREIGN FISHING VESSEL AUTHORIZED BY FISHERY CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1976

-------------------------

SCOPE OF LACEY ACT IS LIMITED TO FOREIGN LAWS DESIGNED TO PROTECT …

The Fourth Amendment In Flux: The Rise And Fall Of Probable Cause, Ronald J. Bacigal

Law Faculty Publications

This article will demonstrate the Supreme Court's inability to develop an objective methodology to derive and apply fourth amendment principles under either the traditional probable cause approach or the balancing approach. A detailed analysis of traditional probable cause will reveal that its premises are ultimately subjectively derived? This examination will also show that returning to traditional probable cause would necessitate resurrecting the unrealistic premise that an individual's privacy interest is always outweighed by the government's interest in searching if the authorities meet a static standard of probable cause. The article will then discuss the advent of the balancing approach and …

Search Warrants In Newsrooms: Some Aspects Of The Impact Of Zurcher V. The Stanford Daily, Dwight L. Teeter Jr.

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Electronic Tracking Devices: Fourth Amendment Problems And Solutions, Thomas C. Marks Jr., Robert Batey

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Feedback From The Fourth Amendment: Is The Exclusionary Rule An Albatross Around The Judicial Neck?, Stephen E. Gottlieb

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Minimization Requirement In Electronic Surveillance: Title Iii, The Fourth Amendment, And The Dread Scott Decision, Clifford S. Fishman

Scholarly Articles

This article addresses the problems raised by the Title III minimization requirement with particular emphasis on the Supreme Court's decision in Scott. Section I outlines the provisions of Title III that govern the issuance of eavesdropping warrants and the use of derivative evidence. Section II discusses the minimization provision and the definitional problems it presents. Section III analyzes judicial treatment of the minimization provision in light of Scott, and factors that have been held to affect a monitoring agent's ability to minimize interceptions. Section IV discusses judicial approaches to minimization litigation with respect to the problems of standing, guidelines for …

Bell V. Wolfish, Lewis F. Powell, Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

Brown V. Texas, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

Dalia V. United States, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

Arkansas V. Sanders, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

Smith V. Maryland, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

Commonwealth Of Massachusetts V. White, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

The Right To Counsel In Police Interrogation Cases: Miranda And Williams, Mitchell Leibson Chyette

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

This article will consider some of the theoretical and practical ramifications of the Williams decision and compare its protections to the protections offered by Miranda. The article, focussing on the right to counsel, discusses the nature of the police conduct which is prohibited by each decision, the time at which the protections involved become effective, and the standard by which a waiver of the rights will be measured. The article concludes that there may be significant differences in the application of the two cases and that a uniform rule based on the sixth amendment may be superior to the …

Generic Trademarks, The Ftc, And The Lanham Act: Covering The Market With Formica, David E. Shipley

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.

Some Observations And Proposals On The Nature Of The Fourth Amendment, Ronald J. Bacigal

Law Faculty Publications

This article will analyze the fourth amendment from both the individual and limitation perspectives, and evaluate the desirability of each as a determinant of the reach of fourth amendment protection in specific situations. The individual perspective alone is an inadequate model to evaluate all interests relevant to fourth amendment problems.Conjunctive use of both perspectives, however, allows a complete and balanced analysis of the fourth amendment, and can eliminate the need to ponder such difficult questions as which expectations of privacy are socially justifiable and when an individual has waived his privacy rights. Although an accommodation between the two perspectives is …

Recent Cases, Daniel P. Smith, R. Michael Moore

Vanderbilt Law Review

Courts Split on the Necessity of Separate Authorization for a Covert Entry Under Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968

Daniel Paul Smith

Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968,' which regulates the use of electronic surveillance, was designed to protect "the privacy of wire and oral communications,"and to delineate "on a uniform basis the circumstances and conditions under which the interception of wire and oral communications may be authorized."' In general, communications may be intercepted only by law enforcement officers, who are engaged in the investigation of …

The Four Corners Requirement: A Constitutional Prerequisite To Search Warrant Validity, Patrick C. Mcginley

Law Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Pennslyvania V. Mimms: Continued Erosion Of Fourth Amendment Safeguards, 12 J. Marshall J. Prac. & Proc. 207 (1978), Christine Campbell

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

An Examination Of The Naming Requirement Of Tittle Iii In Light Of United States V. Donovan - A Case For Suppression, William D. Goldberg

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Criminal Procedure - Due Process Is Not Violated When Prosecutor Carries Out Threat To Bring Increased Charges After Defendant Refuses To Plead Guilty During Plea Bargaining Session, Catherine N. Jasons

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.