Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (1244)
- Criminal Procedure (919)
- Criminal Law (703)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (582)
- Privacy Law (571)
-
- Supreme Court of the United States (472)
- Evidence (391)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (384)
- Science and Technology Law (369)
- Courts (347)
- Fourteenth Amendment (347)
- State and Local Government Law (339)
- Law and Race (319)
- Law and Society (314)
- First Amendment (304)
- Jurisprudence (281)
- Internet Law (280)
- Judges (256)
- National Security Law (255)
- Legislation (251)
- Computer Law (249)
- Communications Law (238)
- Legal History (238)
- Law and Gender (229)
- Other Law (228)
- Education Law (226)
- Human Rights Law (225)
- Litigation (221)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (220)
- Seattle University School of Law (204)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (198)
- William & Mary Law School (138)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (94)
-
- Vanderbilt University Law School (87)
- UIC School of Law (67)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (65)
- University of Richmond (59)
- University of Washington School of Law (54)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (45)
- Brigham Young University Law School (43)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (43)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (41)
- American University Washington College of Law (37)
- West Virginia University (37)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (34)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (34)
- The University of Akron (33)
- University of Kentucky (32)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (31)
- Boston University School of Law (28)
- Cleveland State University (28)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (27)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (26)
- Notre Dame Law School (25)
- University of Nebraska - Lincoln (25)
- Roger Williams University (24)
- St. John's University School of Law (23)
- University of Georgia School of Law (23)
- Keyword
-
- Fourth Amendment (597)
- Fourth amendment (266)
- Privacy (261)
- Search and seizure (196)
- Police (183)
-
- Probable cause (125)
- Supreme Court (119)
- Search and Seizure (116)
- Searches (109)
- Exclusionary rule (104)
- Search (96)
- United States Supreme Court (89)
- Surveillance (86)
- United States Constitution 4th Amendment (86)
- Searches and Seizures (84)
- Warrant (82)
- Constitutional Law (75)
- Evidence (68)
- Criminal procedure (66)
- Reasonable suspicion (66)
- Constitutional law (65)
- Seizure (61)
- Seizures (60)
- Technology (60)
- Constitution (59)
- Law enforcement (58)
- Fifth Amendment (49)
- Arrest (46)
- Law (45)
- Warrants (45)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (198)
- Touro Law Review (191)
- Faculty Scholarship (129)
- Michigan Law Review (117)
- Articles (71)
-
- Faculty Publications (64)
- UIC Law Review (59)
- Faculty Articles (42)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (42)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (39)
- Supreme Court Case Files (38)
- William & Mary Law Review (36)
- West Virginia Law Review (35)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (32)
- Kentucky Law Journal (31)
- Washington Law Review (31)
- UF Law Faculty Publications (30)
- Akron Law Review (28)
- Oklahoma Law Review (27)
- Scholarly Articles (27)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (27)
- BYU Law Review (25)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (25)
- University of Richmond Law Review (24)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (23)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (23)
- Nebraska Journal on Advancing Justice (22)
- Maine Law Review (21)
- Mercer Law Review (20)
- Cardozo Law Review (19)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 2221 - 2250 of 2493
Full-Text Articles in Fourth Amendment
The Exclusionary Rule In Germany, Craig M. Bradley
The Exclusionary Rule In Germany, Craig M. Bradley
Articles by Maurer Faculty
The exclusionary rule that the Supreme Court has fashioned to suppress evidence obtained unconstitutionally is directed at least in part toward deterring police conduct that violates constitutional norms. Since the inception of the rule, the value and efficacy of a prescript that excludes otherwise relevant and probative evidence in a factfinding proceeding has been a subject of heated debate. In this Article, Professor Bradley examines the rather different exclusionary rules used in Germany. He argues that a comparison of exclusionary rules in Germany and the United States suggests that a number of different policies of a criminal justice system could …
Warrantless Vehicle Searches And The Fourth Amendment: The Burger Court Attacks The Exclusionary Rule, Steven D. Clymer
Warrantless Vehicle Searches And The Fourth Amendment: The Burger Court Attacks The Exclusionary Rule, Steven D. Clymer
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Illinois V. Lafayette, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Illinois V. Lafayette, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
United States V. Place, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
United States V. Place, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
United States V. Knotts, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
United States V. Knotts, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Florida V. Royer, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Texas V. Brown, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Illinois V. Gates, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
United States V. Ross And The Container Cases -- Another Chapter In The Police Manual On Search And Seizure, Vincent G. Torpy, Jr.
United States V. Ross And The Container Cases -- Another Chapter In The Police Manual On Search And Seizure, Vincent G. Torpy, Jr.
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Fourth Amendment And Statutory Limitations On Entry And Inspection Of Commercial Property In Environmental Enforcement, Steven A.G. Davison
Fourth Amendment And Statutory Limitations On Entry And Inspection Of Commercial Property In Environmental Enforcement, Steven A.G. Davison
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Dimensions Of Seizure: The Concepts Of "Stop" And "Arrest", Richard A. Williamson
The Dimensions Of Seizure: The Concepts Of "Stop" And "Arrest", Richard A. Williamson
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Stone V. Powell And The Effective Assistance Of Counsel, Michigan Law Review
Stone V. Powell And The Effective Assistance Of Counsel, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
Part I briefly identifies the considerations underlying the Stone Court's decision to limit habeas corpus review of fourth amendment claims. Part II then argues against applying Stone to the sixth amendment claim. After establishing the analytic difference between the two constitutional claims and examining Stone's "opportunity for full and fair litigation" standard, it concludes that Stone is fully consistent with free review of habeas corpus petitions alleging incompetent handling of fourth amendment questions. Finally, responding to a popular interpretation of Stone, Part II demonstrates that the possibility that ineffectiveness claims may not further the determination of a defendant's …
The Erosion Of Probable Cause, Frederick D. Unger
The Erosion Of Probable Cause, Frederick D. Unger
North Carolina Central Law Review
No abstract provided.
Colloquy, Mr. Wiseman, Professor Uviller, Ms. Rosen, Professor Zeisel, Professor Reiss, Mr. Washington, Mr/ Carrington, Ms. Collins, Professor Tonry, Mr. Hishta
Colloquy, Mr. Wiseman, Professor Uviller, Ms. Rosen, Professor Zeisel, Professor Reiss, Mr. Washington, Mr/ Carrington, Ms. Collins, Professor Tonry, Mr. Hishta
Vanderbilt Law Review
At present, our system of criminal law administration has a considerable Rube Goldberg quality to it. Once the system decides to imprison a particular defendant--if we except from the generalization the couple of states that recently changed their laws in fundamental respects--the judge naturally asks himself what will happen when this man goes to prison. The answer is that the convicted offender will sit in prison for as long as the parole board wants him to. The judge must next consider whether any constraints exist on the parole board's decisions on when to release people from prison. In a third …
United States V. Ross: The Supreme Court Redefines The Scope Of Warrantless Searches Under The Automobile Exception, Mary C. Gilhooly
United States V. Ross: The Supreme Court Redefines The Scope Of Warrantless Searches Under The Automobile Exception, Mary C. Gilhooly
Loyola University Chicago Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Involuntary Commitment: The Move Toward Dangerousness, 15 J. Marshall L. Rev. 83 (1982), Robert Weissbourd
Involuntary Commitment: The Move Toward Dangerousness, 15 J. Marshall L. Rev. 83 (1982), Robert Weissbourd
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Search And Seizure Of America: The Case For Keeping The Exclusionary Rule, Yale Kamisar
Search And Seizure Of America: The Case For Keeping The Exclusionary Rule, Yale Kamisar
Articles
Twenty years ago, concurring in Mapp v. Ohio (1961), Justice William 0. Douglas looked back on Wolf v. Colorado (1949) (which had held that the Fourth Amendment's substantive protection against "unreasonable search and seizure" was binding on the states through the due process clause, but that the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule was not) and recalled that the Wolf case had evoked "a storm of controversy which only today finds its end." But, of course, in the twenty years since Justice Douglas made that observation the storm of controversy has only intensified, and it has engulfed the exclusionary rule in federal …
How We Got The Fourth Amendment Exclusionary Rule And Why We Need It, Yale Kamisar
How We Got The Fourth Amendment Exclusionary Rule And Why We Need It, Yale Kamisar
Articles
Why the continuing storm of controversy over the exclusionary rule? Why the deep and widespread hostility to it? I think a recent law office search case, because it arose in a setting so unlike the typical search and seizure case, furnishes a clue. In O'Connor v. Johnson, St. Paul police obtained a warrant to search an attorney's office for business records of a client suspected of making false written statements in applying for a liquor license. The attorney happened to be present when the police arrived. Holding on to his work product file, which contained some of the records sought, …
Unrecorded Oral Testimony In Support Of A Search Warrant: Is It Admissible? Is It Advisable?, Paul Benjamin Linton
Unrecorded Oral Testimony In Support Of A Search Warrant: Is It Admissible? Is It Advisable?, Paul Benjamin Linton
Loyola University Chicago Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Coast Guard Boardings Of Suspected Drug Smuggling Vessels On The High Seas And The Fourth Amendment: United States V. Streifel, Roger A. Stetter
Coast Guard Boardings Of Suspected Drug Smuggling Vessels On The High Seas And The Fourth Amendment: United States V. Streifel, Roger A. Stetter
Cardozo Law Review
Report and Recommendation to the New York State Bar Association by the Committee on Federal Constitution
The Exclusionary Rule Revisited: Good Faith In Fourth Amendment Search And Seizure, Holly Martin Stone
The Exclusionary Rule Revisited: Good Faith In Fourth Amendment Search And Seizure, Holly Martin Stone
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Assaults On The Exclusionary Rule: Good Faith Limitations And Damage Remedies, Pierre J. Schlag
Assaults On The Exclusionary Rule: Good Faith Limitations And Damage Remedies, Pierre J. Schlag
Publications
No abstract provided.
United States V. Ross, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
United States V. Ross, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Washington V. Chrisman, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Washington V. Chrisman, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
The Fourth Amendment And The "Legitimate Expectation Of Privacy", Gerald G. Ashdown
The Fourth Amendment And The "Legitimate Expectation Of Privacy", Gerald G. Ashdown
Vanderbilt Law Review
This Article does not endeavor to engage in a debate over the efficacy or deterrent effect of the exclusionary rule.' Nevertheless, it should be noted that these decisions appear questionable. It seems clear that a refusal to apply the rule in cases of particular fourth amendment transgressions will produce no incremental deterrence of unlawful police conduct, and inconsistent application of the rule arguably could diminish whatever deterrent value does exist.Therefore, if deterrence is viewed as the primary--if not only-function of the exclusionary rule, that goal should be promoted through thorough and consistent application of the rule.The Supreme Court, however, has …
Fourth Amendment Finality, John R. Pagan
The Fourth Amendment Standard For Searches Of Students By School Officials: Reasonable Suspicion Or Probable Cause?, Lois Yankowski
The Fourth Amendment Standard For Searches Of Students By School Officials: Reasonable Suspicion Or Probable Cause?, Lois Yankowski
Antioch Law Journal
The fourth amendment rights of students subjected to searches by school administrators or teachers has been the subject of much legal debate and confusion.' The Supreme Court has never considered the issue of search and seizure in the schools and has never addressed even the more general question of whether fourth amendment protections apply to juveniles. The lower courts which have examined the school search issue, with one exception,2 have provided students with substantially less fourth amendment protection than adults in non-school environments enjoy. These courts have focused on the in loco parentis status of school officials and have found …
The Impact Of Smith V. Maryland On The Law Of Pen Registers, Mark Bialek
The Impact Of Smith V. Maryland On The Law Of Pen Registers, Mark Bialek
Antioch Law Journal
In Smith v. Maryland,' the Supreme Court was presented with the question of whether the installation and use of a pen register2 constitutes a "search" under the fourth amendment.3 The pen register is a device which can be used to determine the telephone numbers dialed from a phone under investigation or the number of rings on calls coming into the phone. The question was raised by petitioner Michael Lee Smith, who was convicted of robbery, at least in part, based on evidence obtained from the installation and use of a pen register.4 Smith claimed that the use of a pen …
Full Faith And Credit, More Or Less, To Judgments: Doubts About Thomas V. Washington Gas Light Co., Stewart E. Sterk
Full Faith And Credit, More Or Less, To Judgments: Doubts About Thomas V. Washington Gas Light Co., Stewart E. Sterk
Articles
Workmen's compensation awards, decrees of administrative tribunals rather than courts, present the question of how far the mandate of the full faith and credit clause should reach and whether the clause should bar a claimant from pursuing supplemental compensation in a second state. Recently, in Thomas v. Washington Gas Light Co., the Supreme Court decided that full faith and credit should not prevent a claimant from obtaining supplemental compensation. Professor Sterk criticizes the Court's analysis, demonstrating the Thomas Court's neglect of the federal interests that the clause should protect. After examining the clause and its policy underpinnings, Professor Sterk …
From The Editors: An Unpardonable Pardon, David R. Milliken
From The Editors: An Unpardonable Pardon, David R. Milliken
In the Public Interest
No abstract provided.