Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (185)
- Georgetown University Law Center (7)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (5)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (4)
- Roger Williams University (4)
-
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (4)
- William & Mary Law School (4)
- University of Michigan Law School (3)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (3)
- Brooklyn Law School (2)
- Pepperdine University (2)
- UIC School of Law (2)
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (2)
- University of Colorado Law School (2)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (2)
- University of Richmond (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Bemidji State University (1)
- Brigham Young University Law School (1)
- Columbia Law School (1)
- Duke Law (1)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- Georgia State University College of Law (1)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (1)
- North Carolina Central University School of Law (1)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (1)
- Notre Dame Law School (1)
- Southern Methodist University (1)
- St. Mary's University (1)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (1)
- Keyword
-
- Fourth Amendment (19)
- Surveillance (16)
- Privacy (15)
- Law (14)
- National security (12)
-
- Technology (9)
- Fourth amendment (7)
- SFFA (7)
- Affirmative Action (6)
- ESG (6)
- FISA (6)
- First Amendment (6)
- Diversity (5)
- Search (5)
- Section 702 (5)
- Securities and exchange commission (5)
- Supreme Court (5)
- Addiction (4)
- Artificial intelligence (4)
- Constitution (4)
- Constitutional law (4)
- Data (4)
- Discrimination (4)
- Intelligence (4)
- NSA (4)
- National Security (4)
- National Security Agency (4)
- Public health (4)
- Regulation (4)
- SEC (4)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (184)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (7)
- Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology (4)
- Faculty Scholarship (4)
- Faculty Articles (3)
-
- Law Faculty Scholarship (3)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (3)
- Arkansas Law Review (2)
- Articles (2)
- Federal Communications Law Journal (2)
- Pepperdine Law Review (2)
- Publications (2)
- Scholarly Articles (2)
- UF Law Faculty Publications (2)
- UIC Law Review (2)
- University of Richmond Law Review (2)
- American University National Security Law Brief (1)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- BYU Law Review (1)
- Brooklyn Journal of International Law (1)
- Brooklyn Law Review (1)
- Buffalo Public Interest Law Journal (1)
- Catholic University Law Review (1)
- Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters (1)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (1)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (1)
- Georgia State University Law Review (1)
- Indiana Law Journal (1)
- Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences (1)
- Michigan Journal of Race and Law (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 241 - 255 of 255
Full-Text Articles in Fourth Amendment
The Case For Stewart Over Harlan On 24/7 Physical Surveillance, Afsheen John Radsan
The Case For Stewart Over Harlan On 24/7 Physical Surveillance, Afsheen John Radsan
Faculty Scholarship
This Article explains why the government’s physical surveillance can reach a point in terms of duration and intensity that it becomes a “search” under the Fourth Amendment. As references, Katz v. United States and Kyllo v. United States stand out from the canon. Katz, decided in 1967, swept away a prior emphasis on property rights and trespass laws to hold that the electronic monitoring of a phone booth was a search. Since then, the two-part test from Justice Harlan’s concurring opinion has received as much attention as the totality-of-the-circumstances test in Justice Stewart’s majority opinion. Kyllo, decided just months before …
Do We Need A New Fourth Amendment?, Orin S. Kerr
Do We Need A New Fourth Amendment?, Orin S. Kerr
Michigan Law Review
Slobogin's book offers a new conceptualization of the Fourth Amendment rooted in what he calls the proportionality principle: An investigative technique should be permitted under the Constitution only if the strength of the government's justification for the technique is roughly proportionate to the level of intrusion it causes . Slobogin roots this principle in Terry v. Ohio and its pragmatic balancing of law-enforcement and privacy interests. To determine how much justification the Fourth Amendment requires, Slobogin argues, courts should assess the intrusiveness of the investigatory technique and then set a proportionate threshold of proof that the government must show. The …
National Security, Policing, And The Fourth Amendment: A New Perspective On Hiibel, Evan N. Turgeon
National Security, Policing, And The Fourth Amendment: A New Perspective On Hiibel, Evan N. Turgeon
Buffalo Public Interest Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Chains Of The Constitution And Legal Process In The Library: A Post-Usa Patriot Reauthorization Act Assessment, Susan Nevelow Mart
The Chains Of The Constitution And Legal Process In The Library: A Post-Usa Patriot Reauthorization Act Assessment, Susan Nevelow Mart
Publications
Since the Patriot Act was passed in 2001, controversy has raged over nearly every provision. The controversy has been particularly intense over provisions that affect the patrons of libraries. This article follows those Patriot Act provisions that affect libraries, and reviews how they have been interpreted, how the Patriot Reauthorization Acts have changed them, and what government audits and court affidavits reveal about the use and misuse of the Patriot Act. The efforts of librarians and others opposed to the Patriot Act have had an effect, both legislatively and judicially, in changing and challenging the Patriot Act. Because libraries are …
Echelon's Effect: The Obsolescence Of The U.S. Foreign Intelligence Legal Regime, Matt Bedan
Echelon's Effect: The Obsolescence Of The U.S. Foreign Intelligence Legal Regime, Matt Bedan
Federal Communications Law Journal
The technological progress of the past thirty years has vastly increased the surveillance capabilities of the global intelligence community. At the same time, the law governing the use of this technology and its consequent information has remained largely static. This lack of adjustment, for better or worse, has rendered federal foreign intelligence surveillance law irrelevant in many respects.
The Bush Administration's Terrorist Surveillance Program And The Fourth Amendment's Warrant Requirement: Lessons From Justice Powell And The Keith Case, Tracey Maclin
UF Law Faculty Publications
This article was written for a symposium issue of the University of California at Davis Law Review on the fortieth anniversary of Katz v. United States. The article analyzes the Bush Administration's claim that the President has the authority to order warrant less electronic surveillance of communications between American citizens and persons abroad suspected of having connections with foreign terrorists groups. When evaluating this claim, my article focuses on a case that could be characterized as more constitutionally robust and stronger Katz. That case is United States v. United States District Court, also known as Keith. The Keith ruling held …
Down To The Wire: Assessing The Constitutionality Of The National Security Agency's Warrantless Wiretapping Program: Exit The Rule Of Law, Fletcher N. Baldwin Jr., Robert B. Shaw
Down To The Wire: Assessing The Constitutionality Of The National Security Agency's Warrantless Wiretapping Program: Exit The Rule Of Law, Fletcher N. Baldwin Jr., Robert B. Shaw
UF Law Faculty Publications
The article discusses the constitutionality of warrantless wiretapping surveillance by the National Security Agency (NSA) on U.S. citizens. The wiretapping program existed weeks after the September 11, 2001 attacks, on the justification that Congress authorized the president to wiretap U.S. citizens without a warrant, and that the president had inherent authority as commander-in-chief. But it is argued that Congress did not expressly authorize the president to conduct warrantless wiretapping and that he does not have such inherent authority.
We intend this Article to be a commentary on the constitutionality of the NSA wiretapping program solely as it relates to the …
Providing Material Support To Violate The Constitution: The Usa Patriot Act And Its Assault On The 4th Amendment, Christopher Metzler
Providing Material Support To Violate The Constitution: The Usa Patriot Act And Its Assault On The 4th Amendment, Christopher Metzler
North Carolina Central Law Review
No abstract provided.
Navigating Communications Regulation In The Wake Of 9/11, Jamie S. Gorelick, John H. Harwood Ii, Heather Zachary
Navigating Communications Regulation In The Wake Of 9/11, Jamie S. Gorelick, John H. Harwood Ii, Heather Zachary
Federal Communications Law Journal
In no industry has the impact of the events of September 11, 2001 ("9/11") been felt more strongly than in the communications industry. After 9/11, as the American people demanded a greater sense of security, Congress and the executive branch agencies reacted with new laws, new regulations, and new practices designed to protect our nation's critical communications infrastructure and enhance the ability of law enforcement and intelligence agencies to investigate those who would do us harm. The U.S. communications providers could do so consistent with their responsibilities to customers and to shareholders. That partnership, based upon rules developed over decades, …
Protecting The Lady From Toledo: Post-Usa Patriot Act Electronic Surveillance At The Library, Susan Nevelow Mart
Protecting The Lady From Toledo: Post-Usa Patriot Act Electronic Surveillance At The Library, Susan Nevelow Mart
Publications
Library patrons are worried about the government looking over their shoulder while they read and surf the Internet. Because of the broad provisions of the USA PATRIOT Act, the lack of judicial and legislative oversight, the potential for content overcollection, and the ease with which applications for pen register, section 215 orders, or national security letters can be obtained, these fears cannot be dismissed.
Bête Noire: How Race-Based Policing Threatens National Security, Lenese C. Herbert
Bête Noire: How Race-Based Policing Threatens National Security, Lenese C. Herbert
Michigan Journal of Race and Law
This Article asserts that race-based policing, enabled and exacerbated by race-blind judicial review, creates an ire with a purpose that promises, especially after September 11, to make us all less safe. The illegitimate marginalization of American citizens aggravates an already alienated population and primes them for cooperation with those who seek to harm the United States. Race-based policing guts the expectation of fair-dealing, legitimacy, and justice in the criminal justice system, creating marginalized populations, especially of African Americans. Lack of judicial redress in the face of such policing irrevocably stains already beleaguered African Americans (and others so policed) as inferior …
Marking Carnivore's Territory: Rethinking Pen Registers On The Internet, Anthony E. Orr
Marking Carnivore's Territory: Rethinking Pen Registers On The Internet, Anthony E. Orr
Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review
"Carnivore" entered the online world's collective consciousness in June 2000 when the Federal Bureau of Investigation unveiled the Internet surveillance software program to telecommunications industry specialists. The FBI claims the program allows agents to scan the traffic of an Internet Service Provider (ISP) for messages or commands to or from a criminal suspect and then intercept only those messages, capturing copies of e-mails, web site downloads and other file transfers[...] A central issue in the controversy surrounding Carnivore is whether current law permits the FBI to employ the program in the Internet context. Bureau officials claim statutory authority for deployments …
Passenger Profiling: A Greater Terror Than Terrorism Itself, 32 J. Marshall L. Rev. 167 (1998), Donna Smith
Passenger Profiling: A Greater Terror Than Terrorism Itself, 32 J. Marshall L. Rev. 167 (1998), Donna Smith
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Buck Stops Here: Illinois Criminalizes Support For International Terrorism, 30 J. Marshall L. Rev. 871 (1997), Victoria Meyerov
The Buck Stops Here: Illinois Criminalizes Support For International Terrorism, 30 J. Marshall L. Rev. 871 (1997), Victoria Meyerov
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law - Fourth Amendment - Conduct Of An Effective Foreign Policy Demands That Presidential Power To Conduct Electronic Surveillance For Foreign Affaris Purposes Not Be Subjected To Warrant Requirement, And That Subsequent Judicial Review Be Limited, Mark R. Cuker
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.