Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (185)
- Georgetown University Law Center (7)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (5)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (4)
- Roger Williams University (4)
-
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (4)
- William & Mary Law School (4)
- University of Michigan Law School (3)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (3)
- Brooklyn Law School (2)
- Pepperdine University (2)
- UIC School of Law (2)
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (2)
- University of Colorado Law School (2)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (2)
- University of Richmond (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Bemidji State University (1)
- Brigham Young University Law School (1)
- Columbia Law School (1)
- Duke Law (1)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- Georgia State University College of Law (1)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (1)
- North Carolina Central University School of Law (1)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (1)
- Notre Dame Law School (1)
- Southern Methodist University (1)
- St. Mary's University (1)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (1)
- Keyword
-
- Fourth Amendment (19)
- Surveillance (16)
- Privacy (15)
- Law (14)
- National security (12)
-
- Technology (9)
- Fourth amendment (7)
- SFFA (7)
- Affirmative Action (6)
- ESG (6)
- FISA (6)
- First Amendment (6)
- Diversity (5)
- Search (5)
- Section 702 (5)
- Securities and exchange commission (5)
- Supreme Court (5)
- Addiction (4)
- Artificial intelligence (4)
- Constitution (4)
- Constitutional law (4)
- Data (4)
- Discrimination (4)
- Intelligence (4)
- NSA (4)
- National Security (4)
- National Security Agency (4)
- Public health (4)
- Regulation (4)
- SEC (4)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (184)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (7)
- Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology (4)
- Faculty Scholarship (4)
- Faculty Articles (3)
-
- Law Faculty Scholarship (3)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (3)
- Arkansas Law Review (2)
- Articles (2)
- Federal Communications Law Journal (2)
- Pepperdine Law Review (2)
- Publications (2)
- Scholarly Articles (2)
- UF Law Faculty Publications (2)
- UIC Law Review (2)
- University of Richmond Law Review (2)
- American University National Security Law Brief (1)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- BYU Law Review (1)
- Brooklyn Journal of International Law (1)
- Brooklyn Law Review (1)
- Buffalo Public Interest Law Journal (1)
- Catholic University Law Review (1)
- Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters (1)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (1)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (1)
- Georgia State University Law Review (1)
- Indiana Law Journal (1)
- Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences (1)
- Michigan Journal of Race and Law (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 211 - 240 of 255
Full-Text Articles in Fourth Amendment
Time To Rethink Cybersecurity Reform: The Opm Data Breach And The Case For Centralized Cybersecurity Infrastructure, Zachary Figueroa
Time To Rethink Cybersecurity Reform: The Opm Data Breach And The Case For Centralized Cybersecurity Infrastructure, Zachary Figueroa
Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology
No abstract provided.
Decrypting Our Security: A Bipartisan Argument For A Rational Solution To The Encryption Challenge, Jamil N. Jaffer, Daniel J. Rosenthal
Decrypting Our Security: A Bipartisan Argument For A Rational Solution To The Encryption Challenge, Jamil N. Jaffer, Daniel J. Rosenthal
Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology
No abstract provided.
Madison At Fort Meade: Checks, Balances, And The Nsa, Peter Margulies
Madison At Fort Meade: Checks, Balances, And The Nsa, Peter Margulies
Law Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Quasi-Constitutional Protections And Government Surveillance, Emily Berman
Quasi-Constitutional Protections And Government Surveillance, Emily Berman
BYU Law Review
The post-Edward Snowden debate over government surveillance has been vigorous. One aspect of that debate has been widespread criticism of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC), alleging that the FISC served as a rubber stamp for the government, consistently accepting implausible interpretations of existing law that served to expand government surveillance authority; engaging in tortured analyses of statutory language; and ignoring fundamental Fourth Amendment principles. This Article argues that these critiques have entirely overlooked critical aspects of the FISC’s jurisprudence. A close look at that jurisprudence reveals a court that did, in fact, vigorously defend the interests customarily protected by …
13th Annual Diversity Symposium Dinner 04-07-2016, Roger Williams University School Of Law
13th Annual Diversity Symposium Dinner 04-07-2016, Roger Williams University School Of Law
School of Law Conferences, Lectures & Events
No abstract provided.
Show Me The Warrant: Protection Of Stored Electronic Communications In New York State, Kaitlin G. Klamann
Show Me The Warrant: Protection Of Stored Electronic Communications In New York State, Kaitlin G. Klamann
Fordham Urban Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Gags As Guidance: Expanding Notice Of National Security Letter Investigations To Targets And The Public, Rebecca Wexler
Gags As Guidance: Expanding Notice Of National Security Letter Investigations To Targets And The Public, Rebecca Wexler
Faculty Scholarship
National Security Letters (NSLs) are administrative subpoenas that the FBI uses to demand information from Internet service providers without prior judicial approval. They almost always include nondisclosure orders, commonly called “gags,” which prohibit the recipient from discussing the letter’s contents or even its mere existence. Courts and commentators have expressed concern that these gags may be overbroad prior restraints that violate the First Amendment and shroud government surveillance in undue secrecy. On November 30, 2015, an NSL gag order was lifted in full for the first time after a federal district judge found no “good reason” to retain it.
This …
Fourth Amendment Time Machines (And What They Might Say About Police Body Cameras), Stephen E. Henderson
Fourth Amendment Time Machines (And What They Might Say About Police Body Cameras), Stephen E. Henderson
Faculty Articles
When it comes to criminal investigation, time travel is increasingly possible. Despite longstanding roots in traditional investigation, science is today providing something fundamentally different in the form of remarkably complete digital records. And those big data records not only store our past, but thanks to data mining they are in many circumstances eerily good at predicting our future. So, now that we stand on the threshold of investigatory time travel, how should the Fourth Amendment and legislation respond? How should we approach bulk government capture, such as by a solar-powered drone employing wide-area persistent stare technology? Is it meaningfully different …
Submarine Cables, Cybersecurity And International Law: An Intersectional Analysis, Tara Davenport
Submarine Cables, Cybersecurity And International Law: An Intersectional Analysis, Tara Davenport
Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology
No abstract provided.
Regulating Drones Under The First And Fourth Amendments, Marc Jonathan Blitz, James Grimsley, Stephen E. Henderson, Joseph Thai
Regulating Drones Under The First And Fourth Amendments, Marc Jonathan Blitz, James Grimsley, Stephen E. Henderson, Joseph Thai
William & Mary Law Review
The FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 requires the Federal Aviation Administration to integrate unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), or drones, into the national airspace system by September 2015. Yet perhaps because of their chilling accuracy in targeted killings abroad, perhaps because of an increasing consciousness of diminishing privacy more generally, and perhaps simply because of a fear of the unknown, divergent UAV-restrictive legislation has been proposed in Congress and enacted in a number of states. Given UAV utility and cost-effectiveness over a vast range of tasks, however, widespread commercial use ultimately seems certain. Consequently, it is imperative to understand …
Drones: Updating The Fourth Amendment And The Technological Trespass Doctrine, S. Alex Spelman
Drones: Updating The Fourth Amendment And The Technological Trespass Doctrine, S. Alex Spelman
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Small Data Surveillance V. Big Data Cybersurveillance, Margaret Hu
Small Data Surveillance V. Big Data Cybersurveillance, Margaret Hu
Pepperdine Law Review
This Article highlights some of the critical distinctions between small data surveillance and big data cybersurveillance as methods of intelligence gathering. Specifically, in the intelligence context, it appears that “collect-it-all” tools in a big data world can now potentially facilitate the construction, by the intelligence community, of other individuals' digital avatars. The digital avatar can be understood as a virtual representation of our digital selves and may serve as a potential proxy for an actual person. This construction may be enabled through processes such as the data fusion of biometric and biographic data, or the digital data fusion of the …
The Snowden Effect: The Conflict In A Free Society, Who Values Privacy Versus Who Values Security?, Matthew C. Blake
The Snowden Effect: The Conflict In A Free Society, Who Values Privacy Versus Who Values Security?, Matthew C. Blake
Political Science Theses and Capstones
The Obama Administration has come under scrutiny by both the public and Congress, since former National Security Agency (NSA) contractor Edward Snowden made known the scope of government surveillance programs being utilized by the U.S. government to gather intelligence on domestic citizens. Snowden’s disclosures about the government’s surveillance practices to the mainstream media began in June 2013. I focus on how public opinion towards the government’s surveillance practices and an individual’s reasonable right to privacy has shifted after revelations made by Edward Snowden on the practices of the NSA. Individuals may show support for more government surveillance in the name …
Section 702 And The Collection Of International Telephone And Internet Content, Laura K. Donohue
Section 702 And The Collection Of International Telephone And Internet Content, Laura K. Donohue
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) authorizes the NSA to collect the electronic communications of non-U.S. targets located overseas. Recent media reports and declassified documents reveal a more extensive program than publicly understood. The article begins by considering the origins of the current programs and the relevant authorities, particularly the transfer of part of the post-9/11 President’s Surveillance Program to FISA. It outlines the contours of the 2007 Protect America Act, before its replacement in 2008 by the FISA Amendments Act (FAA). The section ends with a brief discussion of the current state of foreign intelligence collection …
Qualified Immunity, Constitutional Stagnation, And The Global War On Terror, Sarah L. Lochner
Qualified Immunity, Constitutional Stagnation, And The Global War On Terror, Sarah L. Lochner
Northwestern University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Consequence, Weapons Of Mass Destruction, And The Fourth Amendment's "No-Win" Scenario, Scott J. Glick
Consequence, Weapons Of Mass Destruction, And The Fourth Amendment's "No-Win" Scenario, Scott J. Glick
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Regulating Drones Under The First And Fourth Amendments, Marc Blitz, James Grimsley, Stephen E. Henderson, Joseph Thai
Regulating Drones Under The First And Fourth Amendments, Marc Blitz, James Grimsley, Stephen E. Henderson, Joseph Thai
Faculty Articles
The FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 requires the Federal Aviation Administration to integrate unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), or drones, into the national airspace system by September of this year. Yet perhaps because of their chilling accuracy in targeted killings abroad, perhaps because of an increasing consciousness of diminishing privacy more generally, and perhaps simply because of a fear of the unknown, divergent UAV-restrictive legislation has been proposed in Congress and enacted in a number of states. Ultimately, given UAV utility and cost effectiveness over a vast range of tasks, widespread commercial use seems certain. So it is imperative …
Widening The Aperture On Fourth Amendment Interests: A Comment On Orin Kerr's The Fourth Amendment And The Global Internet, David G. Delaney
Widening The Aperture On Fourth Amendment Interests: A Comment On Orin Kerr's The Fourth Amendment And The Global Internet, David G. Delaney
Articles by Maurer Faculty
Physical-world law may not be suitable for cyberspace. For example, the Supreme Court's "sufficient connection" test in U.S. v. Verdugo-Urquidez (1990) is inconsistent with the century-long trend for courts to find greater constitutional protections for those subject to U.S. jurisdiction outside the United States. Courts must maintain flexibility to conceive of a Fourth Amendment that does not depend exclusively on territory to fulfill its twin aims of ordering government and enabling redress of liberty infringements. Federal and state courts and legislatures addressing searches, seizures, and surveillance in cyberspace should seek simple rules that can easily adapt as cyberspace and government …
High Technology, Consumer Privacy, And U.S. National Security, Laura K. Donohue
High Technology, Consumer Privacy, And U.S. National Security, Laura K. Donohue
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Documents released over the past year detailing the National Security Agency’s (“NSA”) telephony metadata collection program and interception of international content under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) implicated U.S. high technology companies in government surveillance. The result was an immediate, and detrimental, impact on U.S. corporations, the economy, and U.S. national security.
The first Snowden documents, printed on June 5, 2013, revealed that the government had served orders on Verizon, directing the company to turn over telephony metadata under Section 215 of the USA PATRIOT Act. The following day, The Guardian published classified slides detailing how the NSA had …
Redefining The Right To Be Let Alone: Privacy Rights And The Constitutionality Of Technical Surveillance Measures In Germany And The United States, Nicole Jacoby
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Yale Symposium: Unpacking Nsa's Global Problem, Peter Margulies
Yale Symposium: Unpacking Nsa's Global Problem, Peter Margulies
Law Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Post-Tsa Airport: A Constitution Free Zone?, Daniel S. Harawa
The Post-Tsa Airport: A Constitution Free Zone?, Daniel S. Harawa
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Bulk Metadata Collection: Statutory And Constitutional Considerations, Laura K. Donohue
Bulk Metadata Collection: Statutory And Constitutional Considerations, Laura K. Donohue
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The National Security Agency’s bulk collection of telephony metadata runs contrary to Congress’s intent in enacting the 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. The program also violates the statute in three ways: the requirement that records sought be “relevant to an authorized investigation;” the requirement that information could be obtained via subpoena duces tecum; and the steps required for use of pen registers and trap and trace devices. Additionally, the program gives rise to serious constitutional concerns. Efforts by the government to save the program on grounds of third party doctrine are unpersuasive in light of the unique circumstances of …
Who Should Be The ‘Decider’ On Keeping Our Secrets?, Stephen Henderson
Who Should Be The ‘Decider’ On Keeping Our Secrets?, Stephen Henderson
Other Faculty Publications
An invited essay for Constitution Day, also available here: http://blogs.law.widener.edu/constitution2013/2013-essay-authors/stephen-henderson/It addresses the national security surveillance disclosed by Edward Snowden and others, and asks whether a fundamental shift would be prudent in the era of Big Data.
A Shattered Looking Glass: The Pitfalls And Potential Of The Mosaic Theory Of Fourth Amendment Privacy, David C. Gray, Danielle Keats Citron
A Shattered Looking Glass: The Pitfalls And Potential Of The Mosaic Theory Of Fourth Amendment Privacy, David C. Gray, Danielle Keats Citron
Faculty Scholarship
On January 23, 2012, the Supreme Court issued a landmark non-decision in United States v. Jones. In that case, officers used a GPS-enabled device to track a suspect’s public movements for four weeks, amassing a considerable amount of data in the process. Although ultimately resolved on narrow grounds, five Justices joined concurring opinions in Jones expressing sympathy for some version of the “mosaic theory” of Fourth Amendment privacy. This theory holds that we maintain reasonable expectations of privacy in certain quantities of information even if we do not have such expectations in the constituent parts. This Article examines and …
Preserving Privacy In A Digital Age: Lessons Of Comparative Constitutionalism, David Cole
Preserving Privacy In A Digital Age: Lessons Of Comparative Constitutionalism, David Cole
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
In the modern age, we increasingly live our lives through, and accompanied by, digital media. Virtually every transaction or communication that uses such media, as well as every move of mobile phone owners, is recorded. Computers are able to store, transmit, and analyze the data as never before, drawing on multiple sources to construct an intimate picture of our interests, contacts, travels and desires. Private data-mining services, most often used for commercial advertising purposes, can determine: what we read, listen to, and look at; where we travel to, shop, and dine; and with whom we speak or associate. Meanwhile, social …
Biometric Id Cybersurveillance, Margaret Hu
Biometric Id Cybersurveillance, Margaret Hu
Faculty Scholarship
The implementation of a universal digitalized biometric ID system risks normalizing and integrating mass cybersurveillance into the daily lives of ordinary citizens. ID documents such as driver’s licenses in some states and all U.S. passports are now implanted with radio frequency identification (RFID) technology. In recent proposals, Congress has considered implementing a digitalized biometric identification card—such as a biometric-based, “high-tech” Social Security Card—which may eventually lead to the development of a universal multimodal biometric database (e.g., the collection of the digital photos, fingerprints, iris scans, and/or DNA of all citizens and noncitizens). Such “hightech” IDs, once merged with GPS-RFID tracking …
Revisiting "Special Needs" Theory Via Airport Searches, Alexander A. Reinert
Revisiting "Special Needs" Theory Via Airport Searches, Alexander A. Reinert
Articles
Controversy has raged since the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) introduced Advanced Imaging Technology, capable of producing detailed images of travelers' bodies, and "enhanced" pat frisks as part of everyday airport travel. In the face of challenges in the courts and in public discourse, the TSA has justified the heightened security measures as a necessary means to prevent terrorist attacks. The purpose of this Essay is to situate the Fourth Amendment implications of the new regime within a broader historical context. Most germane, after the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) introduced sweeping new screening of air travelers in the 1960s and 1970s …
Due Process In American Military Tribunals After September 11, 2001, Gary Shaw
Due Process In American Military Tribunals After September 11, 2001, Gary Shaw
Touro Law Review
The Authorization for Use of Military Force ("AUMF") provides broad powers for a president after September 11, 2001. President Bush, under the AUMF, claimed he had the power to hold "enemy combatants" without due process. This gave rise to two questions that the article addresses: "Could they be held indefinitely without charges or proceedings being initiated? If proceedings had to be initiated, what process was due to the defendants?"
Technological Leap, Statutory Gap, And Constitutional Abyss: Remote Biometric Identification Comes Of Age, Laura K. Donohue
Technological Leap, Statutory Gap, And Constitutional Abyss: Remote Biometric Identification Comes Of Age, Laura K. Donohue
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Federal interest in using facial recognition technology (“FRT”) to collect, analyze, and use biometric information is rapidly growing. Despite the swift movement of agencies and contractors into this realm, however, Congress has been virtually silent on the current and potential uses of FRT. No laws directly address facial recognition—much less the pairing of facial recognition with video surveillance—in criminal law. Limits placed on the collection of personally identifiable information, moreover, do not apply. The absence of a statutory framework is a cause for concern. FRT represents the first of a series of next generation biometrics, such as hand geometry, iris, …