Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (1937)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1054)
- Supreme Court of the United States (701)
- Law and Race (575)
- Criminal Procedure (572)
-
- Criminal Law (543)
- State and Local Government Law (510)
- Courts (496)
- First Amendment (488)
- Law and Society (481)
- Law and Gender (441)
- Legal History (428)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (427)
- Legislation (395)
- Jurisprudence (389)
- Education Law (376)
- Fourth Amendment (347)
- Human Rights Law (347)
- Law and Politics (337)
- Family Law (329)
- Judges (324)
- Election Law (321)
- Sexuality and the Law (314)
- Health Law and Policy (308)
- Immigration Law (303)
- Administrative Law (292)
- Labor and Employment Law (292)
- Juvenile Law (289)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (488)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (266)
- Seattle University School of Law (240)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (221)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (155)
-
- William & Mary Law School (138)
- Pepperdine University (76)
- UIC School of Law (71)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (67)
- The University of Akron (63)
- Cleveland State University (57)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (57)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (54)
- University of Georgia School of Law (48)
- St. John's University School of Law (47)
- University of Washington School of Law (44)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (37)
- Fordham Law School (36)
- Florida State University College of Law (35)
- Notre Dame Law School (35)
- University of Colorado Law School (33)
- University of Richmond (31)
- Brigham Young University Law School (29)
- Brooklyn Law School (29)
- Columbia Law School (29)
- New York Law School (29)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (27)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (27)
- Cornell University Law School (25)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (25)
- Keyword
-
- Fourteenth Amendment (425)
- Due process (286)
- Equal protection (257)
- Equal Protection Clause (201)
- Supreme Court (177)
-
- Fourteenth amendment (175)
- Constitution (136)
- Discrimination (130)
- Constitutional law (117)
- United States Supreme Court (107)
- Due Process Clause (106)
- Due Process (103)
- Capital punishment sentencing (102)
- United States Constitution 14th Amendment (101)
- Fifth Amendment (87)
- Equal Protection (79)
- Constitutional Law (75)
- First Amendment (75)
- Race (73)
- Affirmative action (70)
- Abortion (68)
- New York (60)
- Race and law (60)
- Segregation (53)
- Federal (52)
- Federalism (52)
- 14th Amendment (51)
- Civil rights (51)
- Brown v. Board of Education (50)
- Congress (47)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Michigan Law Review (361)
- Seattle University Law Review (199)
- Touro Law Review (181)
- Capital Defense Journal (137)
- Faculty Scholarship (112)
-
- Articles (89)
- UIC Law Review (65)
- Pepperdine Law Review (64)
- Cardozo Law Review (60)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (53)
- Akron Law Review (49)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (46)
- Maryland Law Review (41)
- Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice (40)
- Faculty Publications (40)
- Cleveland State Law Review (39)
- Scholarly Works (38)
- Supreme Court Case Files (38)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (37)
- The Catholic Lawyer (36)
- William & Mary Law Review (36)
- Indiana Law Journal (35)
- Publications (33)
- Washington Law Review (33)
- Journal of Race, Gender, and Equality (29)
- Scholarly Articles (29)
- Florida State University Law Review (28)
- Seattle Journal for Social Justice (27)
- Faculty Articles (26)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (25)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 2431 - 2460 of 3186
Full-Text Articles in Fourteenth Amendment
Cage V. Louisiana 111 S. Ct. 328 (1990)
Evans V. Muncie 916 F.2d 163 (1990)
Bassette V. Thompson 915 F.2d 932 (1990)
Bassette V. Thompson 915 F.2d 932 (1990)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Getting The Most And Giving The Least From Virginia's "Mental Mitigation Expert" Statute, Helen L. Konrad
Getting The Most And Giving The Least From Virginia's "Mental Mitigation Expert" Statute, Helen L. Konrad
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Status Of Supreme Court Case Law Helpful To Capital Defendants, Steven K. Herndon, Ginger M. Jonas
Status Of Supreme Court Case Law Helpful To Capital Defendants, Steven K. Herndon, Ginger M. Jonas
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Gaskins V. Mckellar 916 F.2d 941 (1990)
Clozza V. Murray 913 F.2d 1092 (1990)
How To Look The Virginia Gift Horse In The Mouth: Federal Due Process And Virginia's Arbitrary Abrogation Of Capital Defendant's State-Created Rights, Otto W. Konrad
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
The First Duty Of Government: Protection, Liberty And The Fourteenth Amendment, Steven J. Heyman
The First Duty Of Government: Protection, Liberty And The Fourteenth Amendment, Steven J. Heyman
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Metro Broadcasting, Inc. V Fcc: Affirmative Action At The Crossroads Of Constitutional Liberty And Equality, Michel Rosenfeld
Metro Broadcasting, Inc. V Fcc: Affirmative Action At The Crossroads Of Constitutional Liberty And Equality, Michel Rosenfeld
Articles
The article examines the Supreme Court's inconsistent approach to affirmative action, particularly through the lens of *Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. FCC*, which upheld the FCC's race-based policies to promote broadcast diversity. While the decision aligns with constitutional values of equality and free speech, the Court's opinions fail to coherently reconcile liberty and equality principles. The article argues for a more integrated framework to address the complexities of affirmative action jurisprudence and its intersection with First Amendment rights.
Governmental Inaction As As Constitutional Tort: Deshaney And Its Aftermath, Thomas A. Eaton, Michael Wells
Governmental Inaction As As Constitutional Tort: Deshaney And Its Aftermath, Thomas A. Eaton, Michael Wells
Washington Law Review
DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services is the Supreme Court's first major effort to define the scope of state and local governments' affirmative obligations under the fourteenth amendment. The Court rejected liability against a county welfare agency and a caseworker for failing to prevent a father from severely beating his four-year-old son. The Court intimated that constitutional affirmative duties exist only where the plaintiff is in the state's custody. Scholarly commentary reads the case as announcing a sweeping prohibition against the imposition of affirmative duties in other contexts. Professors Eaton and Wells demonstrate that the DeShaney opinion is …
Review Of Affirmative Action After Metro Broadcasting V. Fcc: The Solution Almost Nobody Wanted, Douglas O. Linder
Review Of Affirmative Action After Metro Broadcasting V. Fcc: The Solution Almost Nobody Wanted, Douglas O. Linder
Faculty Works
No abstract provided.
Indian Reservations And The Preservation Of Tribal Culture: Beyond Wardship To Stewardship, John W. Ragsdale Jr
Indian Reservations And The Preservation Of Tribal Culture: Beyond Wardship To Stewardship, John W. Ragsdale Jr
Faculty Works
No abstract provided.
Affirmative Action, Douglas Scherer, John Dunne
Affirmative Action, Douglas Scherer, John Dunne
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Comparison Of A Mentally Ill Individual's Right To Refuse Medication Under The United States And The New York State Constitutions, William M. Brooks
A Comparison Of A Mentally Ill Individual's Right To Refuse Medication Under The United States And The New York State Constitutions, William M. Brooks
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Freedom Of Speech And The Press
Governmental Inaction As A Constitutional Tort: Deshaney And Its Aftermath, Thomas A. Eaton, Michael Wells
Governmental Inaction As A Constitutional Tort: Deshaney And Its Aftermath, Thomas A. Eaton, Michael Wells
Scholarly Works
DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services is the Supreme Court's first major effort to define the scope of state and local governments' affirmative obligations under the fourteenth amendment. The Court rejected liability against a county welfare agency and a caseworker for failing to prevent a father from severely beating his four-year-old son. The Court intimated that constitutional affirmative duties exist only where the plaintiff is in the state's custody. Scholarly commentary reads the case as announcing a sweeping prohibition against the imposition of affirmative duties in other contexts. Professors Eaton and Wells demonstrate that the DeShaney opinion is …
Section 1983 And The Parratt Doctrine After Zinermon V. Burch: Ensuring Due Process Rights Or Turning The Fourteenth Amendment Into A Font Of Tort Law, Paul F. Wingenfeld
Section 1983 And The Parratt Doctrine After Zinermon V. Burch: Ensuring Due Process Rights Or Turning The Fourteenth Amendment Into A Font Of Tort Law, Paul F. Wingenfeld
Cleveland State Law Review
Over the last thirty years, the Court has decided a number of cases which illustrate an on-going struggle to find the proper place for section 1983 in the federal court system and, consequently, what ultimately qualifies as adequate procedural due process within the context of the statute. This note will examine the history of Court decisions involving section 1983 in order to provide the proper background for examining the Court's most recent decision in Zinermon v. Burch, a case which itself has added to an already confusing field of legal study. Within this historical background, however, the Court has actually …
Section 1983 And The Parratt Doctrine After Zinermon V. Burch: Ensuring Due Process Rights Or Turning The Fourteenth Amendment Into A Font Of Tort Law, Paul F. Wingenfeld
Section 1983 And The Parratt Doctrine After Zinermon V. Burch: Ensuring Due Process Rights Or Turning The Fourteenth Amendment Into A Font Of Tort Law, Paul F. Wingenfeld
Cleveland State Law Review
Over the last thirty years, the Court has decided a number of cases which illustrate an on-going struggle to find the proper place for section 1983 in the federal court system and, consequently, what ultimately qualifies as adequate procedural due process within the context of the statute. This note will examine the history of Court decisions involving section 1983 in order to provide the proper background for examining the Court's most recent decision in Zinermon v. Burch, a case which itself has added to an already confusing field of legal study. Within this historical background, however, the Court has actually …
The Borders Of The Equal Protection Clause: Indians As Peoples, David C. Williams
The Borders Of The Equal Protection Clause: Indians As Peoples, David C. Williams
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Right-To-Die, Bruce Morton
Abortion Rights, Eileen Kaufman