Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (40)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (25)
- Law and Society (12)
- Family Law (11)
- Courts (10)
-
- Law and Gender (10)
- Criminal Law (9)
- Legal History (8)
- First Amendment (7)
- Criminal Procedure (6)
- Judges (6)
- Human Rights Law (5)
- Law and Politics (5)
- Litigation (5)
- Sexuality and the Law (5)
- State and Local Government Law (5)
- Education Law (4)
- Election Law (4)
- Legal Remedies (4)
- Legislation (4)
- Religion Law (4)
- Torts (4)
- Evidence (3)
- Immigration Law (3)
- Jurisprudence (3)
- Juvenile Law (3)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (3)
- Law and Economics (3)
- Institution
-
- Pepperdine University (26)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (8)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (7)
- University of Michigan Law School (4)
- William & Mary Law School (4)
-
- Columbia Law School (3)
- Florida A&M University College of Law (3)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (2)
- UIC School of Law (2)
- University of Georgia School of Law (2)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (2)
- Barry University School of Law (1)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (1)
- Claremont Colleges (1)
- Cornell University Law School (1)
- Duke Law (1)
- Florida State University College of Law (1)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (1)
- St. Thomas University College of Law (1)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (1)
- University of Miami Law School (1)
- University of Missouri School of Law (1)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (1)
- University of Richmond (1)
- University of Washington School of Law (1)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (1)
- Keyword
-
- Fourteenth Amendment (21)
- Constitution (11)
- Due process (11)
- Supreme Court (11)
- Equal protection (7)
-
- Discrimination (6)
- Liability (6)
- Civil Rights (5)
- Constitutional Law (5)
- Due Process (5)
- Federalism (5)
- First Amendment (5)
- Constitutional law (4)
- Due Process Clause (4)
- Due process of law (4)
- Originalism (4)
- Religion (4)
- Same-sex marriage (4)
- United States Constitution 14th Amendment (4)
- Election law (3)
- Equality before the law (3)
- Liberty (3)
- Marriage (3)
- Murder (3)
- Police (3)
- Tort (3)
- Violence (3)
- 14th Amendment (2)
- Abortion (2)
- Apportionment (2)
- Publication
-
- Pepperdine Law Review (25)
- Faculty Scholarship (7)
- Touro Law Review (6)
- Scholarly Works (4)
- Articles (3)
-
- Florida A & M University Law Review (3)
- Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice (2)
- Cardozo Law Review (2)
- Michigan Journal of Gender & Law (2)
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Appellate and Supreme Court Clinic (1)
- CMC Senior Theses (1)
- Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law (1)
- Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal (1)
- Catholic University Law Review (1)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Publications (1)
- Law & Economics Working Papers (1)
- Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Michigan Law Review (1)
- NULR Online (1)
- Oklahoma Law Review (1)
- Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal (1)
- Popular Media (1)
- Scholarly Articles (1)
- Scholarly Publications (1)
- St. Thomas Law Review (1)
- Supreme Court Preview (1)
- UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship (1)
- UIC Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 79
Full-Text Articles in Fourteenth Amendment
Mary D. Branch, Plaintiff-Appellant, V. Officer Timothy Gorman, Et Al., Defandants-Appellants: Brief Of Appellant, Patricia E. Roberts, Pamela Palmer, Alexa Roggenkamp, Tillman J. Breckenridge, Robert M. Luck Iii
Mary D. Branch, Plaintiff-Appellant, V. Officer Timothy Gorman, Et Al., Defandants-Appellants: Brief Of Appellant, Patricia E. Roberts, Pamela Palmer, Alexa Roggenkamp, Tillman J. Breckenridge, Robert M. Luck Iii
Appellate and Supreme Court Clinic
No abstract provided.
Court Of Appeals Of New York - People V. White, Rosalinde Casalini
Court Of Appeals Of New York - People V. White, Rosalinde Casalini
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Appellate Division, First Department - People V. Boyd, Joseph M. D'Amico
Appellate Division, First Department - People V. Boyd, Joseph M. D'Amico
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Appellate Division, Fourth Department - People V. Buchanan, Jacqulyn Vann
Appellate Division, Fourth Department - People V. Buchanan, Jacqulyn Vann
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Court Of Appeals Of New York - People V. Luciano, Natasha Shishov
Court Of Appeals Of New York - People V. Luciano, Natasha Shishov
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Do You Hear What I Hear?: The Right Of Prospective Parents To Use Pgd To Intentionally Implant An Embryo Containing The Gene For Deafness, Sarah Aviles
William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice
No abstract provided.
National Collegiate Athletic Association V. Tarkanian: Supreme Court Upholds Ncaa's Private Status Under The Fourteenth Amendment, Repelling Shark's Attack On Ncaa's Disciplinary Powers, Michael G. Dawson
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
An Incompetent's Right To Withdraw From Treatment: Cruzan V. Missouri Department Of Health , Mary A. Watson
An Incompetent's Right To Withdraw From Treatment: Cruzan V. Missouri Department Of Health , Mary A. Watson
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Constitutional Right To Safe Foster Care - Time For The Supreme Court To Pay Its I.O.U., Daniel L. Skoler
A Constitutional Right To Safe Foster Care - Time For The Supreme Court To Pay Its I.O.U., Daniel L. Skoler
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Contraception Mandate, Caroline Mala Corbin
Rethinking Principals Of Comparative Fault In Light Of California's Proposition 51, James A. Gash
Rethinking Principals Of Comparative Fault In Light Of California's Proposition 51, James A. Gash
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Big Business Beware: Punitive Damages Do Not Violate Fourteenth Amendment According To Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co. V. Haslip, Christopher V. Carlyle
Big Business Beware: Punitive Damages Do Not Violate Fourteenth Amendment According To Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co. V. Haslip, Christopher V. Carlyle
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Private Club Exemption From Civil Rights Legislation - Sanctioned Discrimination Or Justified Protection Of Right To Associate, Margaret E. Koppen
The Private Club Exemption From Civil Rights Legislation - Sanctioned Discrimination Or Justified Protection Of Right To Associate, Margaret E. Koppen
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Sexual Harassment Of Employees By Non-Employees: When Does The Employer Become Liable?, Robert J. Aalberts, Lorne H. Seidman
Sexual Harassment Of Employees By Non-Employees: When Does The Employer Become Liable?, Robert J. Aalberts, Lorne H. Seidman
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Dismantling Of Mcdonnell Douglas V. Green: The High Court Muddies The Evidentiary Waters In Circumstantial Discrimination Cases, Melissa A. Essary
The Dismantling Of Mcdonnell Douglas V. Green: The High Court Muddies The Evidentiary Waters In Circumstantial Discrimination Cases, Melissa A. Essary
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Children Of A Lesser God: Should The Fourteenth Amendment Be Altered Or Repealed To Deny Automatic Citizenship Rights And Privileges To American Born Children Of Illegal Aliens?, Robert J. Shulman
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Death Of The Voting Rights Act Or An Exercise In Geometry?--Shaw V. Reno Provides More Questions Than Answers, Michael J. Moffatt
The Death Of The Voting Rights Act Or An Exercise In Geometry?--Shaw V. Reno Provides More Questions Than Answers, Michael J. Moffatt
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Could The Best Of Tightrope Walkers Manage To Walk The Line Between Race-Consciousness And Race-Predominance? An Analysis Of Race-Based Districting In Light Of Miller V. Johnson, Sean Simpson
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Gender Classification And United States V. Virginia: Muddying The Waters Of Equal Protection , Brent L. Caslin
Gender Classification And United States V. Virginia: Muddying The Waters Of Equal Protection , Brent L. Caslin
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Is The United States V. Olin Decision Full Of Sound And Fury Signifying Nothing?: The Future Of Retroactive Liability Of The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, And Liability Act, Kevin J. Slattum
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Criminalization Of Maternal Substance Abuse: A Quick Fix To A Complex Problem, Carol Jean Sovinski
The Criminalization Of Maternal Substance Abuse: A Quick Fix To A Complex Problem, Carol Jean Sovinski
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Inevitable Collision: Affirmative Action And The Constitution, Jennifer Moore
The Inevitable Collision: Affirmative Action And The Constitution, Jennifer Moore
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Disentangling Symmetries: Speech, Association, Parenthood, Laurence H. Tribe
Disentangling Symmetries: Speech, Association, Parenthood, Laurence H. Tribe
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Substance And Method In The Year 2000, Akhil Reed Amar
Substance And Method In The Year 2000, Akhil Reed Amar
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Due Process And The Post-Padilla Landscape: Balancing The Severity Of Deportation As A Collateral Consequence With A Court's Traditionally Narrow Obligation In Accepting A Plea, Orrie A. Levy
Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal
The article examines the implications of the Supreme Court's decision in Padilla v. Kentucky, which established that defense attorneys must inform defendants of the immigration consequences of a guilty plea under the Sixth Amendment. It explores the tension between the Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel and the Fifth Amendment due process obligations of trial courts, highlighting that while Padilla mandates attorney advice on immigration consequences, courts are not required to inform defendants of such consequences. The article argues against extending due process obligations to include severe collateral consequences, emphasizing the impracticality of requiring courts to foresee …
How To Choose The Least Unconstitutional Option: Lessons For The President (And Others) From The Debt Ceiling Standoff, Neil H. Buchanan, Michael C. Dorf
How To Choose The Least Unconstitutional Option: Lessons For The President (And Others) From The Debt Ceiling Standoff, Neil H. Buchanan, Michael C. Dorf
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
The federal statute known as the “debt ceiling” limits total borrowing by the United States. Congress has repeatedly raised the ceiling to authorize necessary borrowing, but a political standoff in 2011 nearly made it impossible to borrow funds to meet obligations that Congress had affirmed earlier that very year. Some commentators urged President Obama to ignore the debt ceiling, while others responded that such borrowing would violate the separation of powers and therefore that the president should refuse to spend appropriated funds.
This Article analyzes the choice the president nearly faced in summer 2011, and which he or a successor …
Section 1: Moot Court: Fisher V. University Of Texas At Austin, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 1: Moot Court: Fisher V. University Of Texas At Austin, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Putting Buck V. Bell In Scientific And Historical Context: A Response To Victoria Nourse , Edward J. Larson
Putting Buck V. Bell In Scientific And Historical Context: A Response To Victoria Nourse , Edward J. Larson
Pepperdine Law Review
In this article written for a law-review symposium in response to a presentation on the infamous 1927 U.S. Supreme Court opinion in Buck v. Bell, Edward J. Larson argues that, at the time that the case was decided, eugenics was on the incline, not the decline. In the 1920s, the American scientific and medical community broadly backed eugenic remedies for various forms of mental illness and retardation. Legislatures, lawyers, and jurists took their cue from this scientific and medical consensus. Absent any question that the statute at issue in Buck v. Bell was validly passed by the Virginia legislature or …
Buck V. Bell: A Constitutional Tragedy From A Lost World, Victoria Nourse
Buck V. Bell: A Constitutional Tragedy From A Lost World, Victoria Nourse
Pepperdine Law Review
The article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court case Buck v. Bell, which dealt with the forced sterilization of people deemed unfit, such as intellectually disabled or mentally retarded individuals. Topics include the enforceability of unconstitutional judicial decisions, eugenic sterilization, and the application of substantive due process.
A Fatal Loss Of Balance: Dred Scott Revisited , Daniel A. Farber
A Fatal Loss Of Balance: Dred Scott Revisited , Daniel A. Farber
Pepperdine Law Review
This essay focuses on three aspects of the Dred Scott opinion: its effort to ensure that blacks could never be citizens, let alone equal ones; its deployment of a "limited government" argument for a narrow interpretation of Congress's enumerated power over the territories; and its path-breaking defense of property rights against government regulation. These constitutional tropes of racism, narrowing of federal power, and protection of property were to remain dominant for another seventy-five years. Apart from the failings of the opinion itself, Dred Scott also represents an extraordinary case of presidential tampering with the judicial process and a breakdown in …