Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (1937)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1054)
- Supreme Court of the United States (701)
- Law and Race (575)
- Criminal Procedure (572)
-
- Criminal Law (543)
- State and Local Government Law (510)
- Courts (496)
- First Amendment (488)
- Law and Society (481)
- Law and Gender (441)
- Legal History (428)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (427)
- Legislation (395)
- Jurisprudence (389)
- Education Law (376)
- Fourth Amendment (347)
- Human Rights Law (347)
- Law and Politics (337)
- Family Law (329)
- Judges (324)
- Election Law (321)
- Sexuality and the Law (314)
- Health Law and Policy (308)
- Immigration Law (303)
- Administrative Law (292)
- Labor and Employment Law (292)
- Juvenile Law (289)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (488)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (266)
- Seattle University School of Law (240)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (221)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (155)
-
- William & Mary Law School (138)
- Pepperdine University (76)
- UIC School of Law (71)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (67)
- The University of Akron (63)
- Cleveland State University (57)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (57)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (54)
- University of Georgia School of Law (48)
- St. John's University School of Law (47)
- University of Washington School of Law (44)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (37)
- Fordham Law School (36)
- Florida State University College of Law (35)
- Notre Dame Law School (35)
- University of Colorado Law School (33)
- University of Richmond (31)
- Brigham Young University Law School (29)
- Brooklyn Law School (29)
- Columbia Law School (29)
- New York Law School (29)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (27)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (27)
- Cornell University Law School (25)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (25)
- Keyword
-
- Fourteenth Amendment (424)
- Due process (286)
- Equal protection (257)
- Equal Protection Clause (201)
- Supreme Court (177)
-
- Fourteenth amendment (175)
- Constitution (136)
- Discrimination (130)
- Constitutional law (117)
- United States Supreme Court (107)
- Due Process Clause (106)
- Capital punishment sentencing (102)
- Due Process (102)
- United States Constitution 14th Amendment (101)
- Fifth Amendment (87)
- Equal Protection (79)
- First Amendment (75)
- Constitutional Law (74)
- Race (73)
- Affirmative action (70)
- Abortion (68)
- New York (60)
- Race and law (60)
- Segregation (53)
- Federal (52)
- Federalism (52)
- 14th Amendment (51)
- Civil rights (51)
- Brown v. Board of Education (50)
- Congress (47)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Michigan Law Review (361)
- Seattle University Law Review (199)
- Touro Law Review (181)
- Capital Defense Journal (137)
- Faculty Scholarship (112)
-
- Articles (89)
- UIC Law Review (65)
- Pepperdine Law Review (64)
- Cardozo Law Review (60)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (53)
- Akron Law Review (49)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (46)
- Maryland Law Review (41)
- Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice (40)
- Faculty Publications (40)
- Cleveland State Law Review (39)
- Scholarly Works (38)
- Supreme Court Case Files (38)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (37)
- The Catholic Lawyer (36)
- William & Mary Law Review (36)
- Indiana Law Journal (35)
- Publications (33)
- Washington Law Review (33)
- Journal of Race, Gender, and Equality (29)
- Scholarly Articles (29)
- Florida State University Law Review (28)
- Seattle Journal for Social Justice (27)
- Faculty Articles (26)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (25)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1831 - 1860 of 3186
Full-Text Articles in Fourteenth Amendment
A Reply To Professor Johnson, Marci A. Hamilton
Winner, Best Appellate Brief In The 2005 Native American Law Student Association Moot Court Competition, Brian Mcclatchey, Paul Porter
Winner, Best Appellate Brief In The 2005 Native American Law Student Association Moot Court Competition, Brian Mcclatchey, Paul Porter
American Indian Law Review
No abstract provided.
Incarcerated Men And Women, The Equal Protection Clause, And The Requirement Of “Similarly Situated”, Natasha L. Carroll-Ferrary
Incarcerated Men And Women, The Equal Protection Clause, And The Requirement Of “Similarly Situated”, Natasha L. Carroll-Ferrary
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
Headscarves In German Public Schools: Religious Minorities Are Welcome In Germany, Unless — God Forbid — They Are Religious, Ruben Seth Fogel
Headscarves In German Public Schools: Religious Minorities Are Welcome In Germany, Unless — God Forbid — They Are Religious, Ruben Seth Fogel
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Toll For Traveling Students: Durational-Residence Requirements For In-State Tuition After Saenz V. Roe, Douglas R. Chartier
The Toll For Traveling Students: Durational-Residence Requirements For In-State Tuition After Saenz V. Roe, Douglas R. Chartier
Michigan Law Review
After the excitement of getting into the college of her choice wears off, a student may soon wonder how she will pay for her newfound prize. Though higher education is almost always a sound investment given its potentially tremendous return and importance in getting a good job, the cost is daunting- sometimes even prohibitive-for many students. Public undergraduate and graduate schools are an attractive option for many students because of lower tuitions. Yet state universities deny many students the full measure of this benefit. Public universities usually charge significantly higher tuition rates to out-of-state students than in-state students. A nonresident …
Taking The Stand: The Lessons Of The Three Men Who Took The Japanese American Internment To Court, Lorraine K. Bannai
Taking The Stand: The Lessons Of The Three Men Who Took The Japanese American Internment To Court, Lorraine K. Bannai
Seattle Journal for Social Justice
No abstract provided.
Comparative And Noncomparative Justice: Some Guidelines For Constitutional Adjudication, Raleigh Hannah Levine, Russell Pannier
Comparative And Noncomparative Justice: Some Guidelines For Constitutional Adjudication, Raleigh Hannah Levine, Russell Pannier
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Privatizing Due Process, Paul R. Verkuil
Privatizing Due Process, Paul R. Verkuil
Articles
The article explores the concept of "private due process," arguing that while traditional due process protections under the Constitution require state action, privatization of government functions creates gaps in procedural safeguards. It examines how state laws, federal regulations, and alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms can fill these gaps and proposes a "Private Administrative Procedure Act" (PAPA) to ensure procedural fairness when government functions are delegated to private entities.
Lessons From Small Cases: Reflections On Dodson V. Arkansas Activities Association, Polly J. Price
Lessons From Small Cases: Reflections On Dodson V. Arkansas Activities Association, Polly J. Price
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Richard Sheppard Arnold: A Distinguished Jurist, A Loyal Colleague And A Good Friend, Gerald W. Heaney
Richard Sheppard Arnold: A Distinguished Jurist, A Loyal Colleague And A Good Friend, Gerald W. Heaney
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Affirmative Action And The Decline Of Intellectual Culture, Charles W. Collier
Affirmative Action And The Decline Of Intellectual Culture, Charles W. Collier
Journal of Legal Education
No abstract provided.
Humphries V. Ozmint No. 03-14, 2005 Wl 267962, At *1 (4th Cir. Feb. 4, 2005)
Humphries V. Ozmint No. 03-14, 2005 Wl 267962, At *1 (4th Cir. Feb. 4, 2005)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Certifying Mandatory Punitive Damages Classes In A Post-Ortiz And State Farm World, Aileen L. Nagy
Certifying Mandatory Punitive Damages Classes In A Post-Ortiz And State Farm World, Aileen L. Nagy
Vanderbilt Law Review
Punitive damages are a civil penalty "aimed at deterrence and retribution" that further the state's interest in punishing unlawful conduct.' They are meant to "sting" and should be imposed proportionally according to the "egregiousness of the harm and the wealth of the transgressor." While compensatory damages are intended to compensate plaintiffs for their concrete losses, punitive damages use the plaintiff as an instrument for "visiting [] punishment upon [the] extreme tortious misdeeds" of defendants. As such, it is well settled that no individual plaintiff is entitled to punitive damages; however, "it is equally true that no transgressor is entitled to …
"Under Color Of"- What Does It Mean?, Richard H. W. Maloy
"Under Color Of"- What Does It Mean?, Richard H. W. Maloy
Mercer Law Review
After reading the cases dealt with in this Article, I am reminded of the story of the old lady who lived on a hammock in the Everglades. Two census takers rowed out to her abode one day to obtain her statistics. When she asked them why they were there, they answered that they were trying to find out how many people live in the United States. 'You've come to the wrong place," she declared. "Why do you say that?" they asked. "Cause I don't know," was her response. If one is reading this article to find out the meaning of …
Adam And Steve And Eve: Why Sexuality Segregation In Assisted Reproduction In Virginia Is No Longer Acceptable, Brooke D. Rodgers-Miller
Adam And Steve And Eve: Why Sexuality Segregation In Assisted Reproduction In Virginia Is No Longer Acceptable, Brooke D. Rodgers-Miller
William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice
No abstract provided.
In The Wake Of Gratz V. Bollinger: Standing On Thin Ice, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1037 (2005), Zubaida Qazi
In The Wake Of Gratz V. Bollinger: Standing On Thin Ice, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1037 (2005), Zubaida Qazi
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Preventing "You've Got Mail"™ From Meaning "You've Been Served": How Service Of Process By E-Mail Does Not Meet Constitutional Procedure Due Process Requirements, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1121 (2005), Matthew R. Schreck
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Hands Off Policy: Equal Protection And The Contact Sports Exemption Of Title Ix, Jamal Greene
Hands Off Policy: Equal Protection And The Contact Sports Exemption Of Title Ix, Jamal Greene
Michigan Journal of Gender & Law
The disparity between what the Constitution permits of public schools and what Title IX permits of private ones is unquestionably stark. This Article calls this disparity into question. First, it asks under what circumstances, if any, allowance for sex discrimination in athletics may be justified under constitutional standards. Then, it considers the practical relevance of the disparity between how a school may lawfully discriminate under Title IX and how it may do so under the Equal Protection Clause. Finally, it offers a prescription for bringing into balance the gender equity messages sent by Title IX and the Constitution.
Lifting The Pall Of Orthodoxy: The Need For Hearing A Multitude Of Tongues In And Beyond The Sexual Education Curricula At Public High Schools, Carlo A. Pedrioli
Lifting The Pall Of Orthodoxy: The Need For Hearing A Multitude Of Tongues In And Beyond The Sexual Education Curricula At Public High Schools, Carlo A. Pedrioli
Faculty Scholarship
When public high schools promote heterosexuality at the cost of denying sexual minority youth the opportunity to learn about minority sexualities, these schools contribute to the disastrous situation in which many sexual minority high school students find themselves. This approach, which many public high schools take, is unnecessarily destructive and warrants prompt change. Instead of helping to perpetuate many of the challenges that sexual minority students face in high school, public high schools can and need to help address these challenges. To establish the case for such a position, this article begins by presenting the plight of many sexual minority …
How The Border Crossed Us: Filling The Gap Between Plume V. Seward And The Dispossession Of Mexican Landowners In California After 1848, 52 Clev. St. L. Rev. 297 (2005), Kim D. Chanbonpin
How The Border Crossed Us: Filling The Gap Between Plume V. Seward And The Dispossession Of Mexican Landowners In California After 1848, 52 Clev. St. L. Rev. 297 (2005), Kim D. Chanbonpin
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Justifying The Disparate Impact Standard Under A Theory Of Equal Citizenship, Rebecca S. Giltner
Justifying The Disparate Impact Standard Under A Theory Of Equal Citizenship, Rebecca S. Giltner
Michigan Journal of Race and Law
Part I of this Note outlines the limitations on congressional power under Section V and their implications for justifying the constitutionality of the disparate impact standard. Part II explores the prohibition of intentional discrimination as a justification for the disparate impact standard and argues that justifying the disparate impact standard through this theory, as some courts currently do, may eventually narrow disparate impact doctrine and thus constrain the possibilities for substantive equality in employment. This Part also analogizes the limits of using an intentional discrimination rationale to justify the disparate impact standard to the limits of using the diversity rationale …
The Majoritarian Difficulty: Affirmative Action, Sodomy, And Supreme Court Politics, Darren Lenard Hutchinson
The Majoritarian Difficulty: Affirmative Action, Sodomy, And Supreme Court Politics, Darren Lenard Hutchinson
UF Law Faculty Publications
Contemporary debates over recent Court decisions provide a rich context to weigh claims of judicial countermajoritarianism against the work of constitutional theorists, critical legal scholars, and political scientists who view the Court as a majoritarian body. In particular, the Court's decisions in Lawrence v. Texas, Gratz v. Bollinger, and Grutter v. Bollinger have reignited arguments concerning the propriety of judicial review. Prominent judicial commentators have described the decisions as important, and unexpected, civil rights victories from a markedly conservative Court. Liberal and conservative scholars and activists seem to agree with this description: mainline civil rights organizations and liberal scholars view …
Data Matching, Data Mining, And Due Process, Daniel J. Steinbock
Data Matching, Data Mining, And Due Process, Daniel J. Steinbock
Georgia Law Review
The Article concerns the governmental use of computerized data matching (comparison of records) and data mining (profiling),which increasingly are aimed at locating potential terrorists. The most striking aspect of virtually all anti-terrorist data matching and data mining decisions is the total absence of even the most rudimentary procedures for notice, hearing, or other opportunities for meaningful participation before, or even after, the deprivation is imposed. The Article evaluates under Fourth Amendment and due process standards a variety of law enforcement activities data matching or data mining might instigate. After reviewing these activities' potential effects on private, governmental, and accuracy interests, …
Schiavo And Klein (Symposium), Evan H. Caminker
Schiavo And Klein (Symposium), Evan H. Caminker
Articles
When teaching federal courts, I sometimes find that students are slow to care about legal issues that initially seem picayune, hyper-technical, and unrelated to real-world concerns. It takes hard work to engage students in discussion of United States v. Klein,1 notwithstanding its apparent articulation of a foundational separation of powers principle that Congress may not dictate a "rule of decision" governing a case in federal court. A Civil War-era decision about the distribution of war spoils, one the Supreme Court has hardly ever cited since and then only to distinguish it, in cases involving takings and spotted owls? Yawn.
The Majoritarian Difficulty: Affirmative Action, Sodomy, And Supreme Court Politics, Darren L. Hutchinson
The Majoritarian Difficulty: Affirmative Action, Sodomy, And Supreme Court Politics, Darren L. Hutchinson
Faculty Articles
This Article challenges liberal and conservative assessments of Lawrence, Gratz, and Grutter. Although the outcome of these cases might indeed prove helpful to the agendas of social movements for racial and sexual justice, progressive scholars and activists should not receive these cases with elation. Instead, the research of constitutional theorists, critical legal scholars, and political scientists allows for a more contextualized and guarded account of and reaction to these decisions. Instead of representing extraordinary victories for oppressed classes, these cases reflect majoritarian and moderate views concerning civil rights, and the opinions contain many doctrinal elements that reinforce, …
Brown V. Board Of Education, Footnote 11, And Multidisciplinarity, Michael Heise
Brown V. Board Of Education, Footnote 11, And Multidisciplinarity, Michael Heise
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
La Vida Considerada Como Cosa: Un Error Norteamericano Fundamental, Richard Stith
La Vida Considerada Como Cosa: Un Error Norteamericano Fundamental, Richard Stith
Law Faculty Publications
El autor explica un error fundamental que puede subyacer a la aprobación, por el Tribunal Supremo norteamericano en el año 2000, del aborto durante el parto. Este error consiste en concebir la vida física como una mera cosa, como algo que puede existir sin que haya un ser humano que la viva. En cuanto al aborto, el error radica en la confusión entre desarrollo y construcción (del feto), confusión debida en parte a ciertas creencias medievales ya superadas por la ciencia moderna. En la segunda mitad del artículo, el autor sostiene que un error semejante puede proporcionar fácilmente un argumento …
"Can I See Your Papers?" Local Police Enforcement Of Federal Immigration Law Post 9/11 And Asian American Permanent Foreignness, Mohar Ray
Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice
No abstract provided.
Out Of The O.R. And Into The Streets: Exploring The Impact Of Intersex Media Activism, Sharon E. Preves
Out Of The O.R. And Into The Streets: Exploring The Impact Of Intersex Media Activism, Sharon E. Preves
Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice
Babies are born intersexed, with ambiguous genitalia or other reproductive anatomical features, every day. Physical sexual ambiguity occurs frequently, affecting approximately one in 2000 births. Most infants born intersexed are surgically and hormonally altered to reflect the sexual anatomy associated with "standard" female or male sex assignment. This article explores the mobilization and methods of intersex individuals and their allies to destigmatize intersexuality and to alter the medical treatment they receive. I explore the intersex movement's use of mass media as a strategic activist tool and the implications of this mobilization for cultural and medical reform, arguing that media attention …
Two "Wrongs" Do/Can Make A Right: Remembering Mathematics, Physics, & Various Legal Analogies (Two Negatives Make A Positive; Are Remedies Wrong?) The Law Has Made Him Equal, But Man Has Not, John C. Duncan Jr
Journal Publications
This article demonstrates the incomplete logic and inconsistent legal reasoning used in the argument against affirmative action. The phrase "two wrongs don't make a right" is often heard in addressing various attempts to equalize, to balance, and to correct the acknowledged wrongs of slavery and segregation and their derivative effects. Yet, "two wrongs do/can make a right" has a positive connotation. This article reviews the history of societal and judicial wrongs against Blacks, as well as the evolution of the narrowing in legal reasoning concerning discrimination against minorities, including Blacks. Next, the legal reasoning behind legacy programs will be reviewed …