First Amendment Commons^™

Conscientious Objection: The Constitutional Questions, Howard R. Lurie

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Law--Flag Desecration As Symbolic Speech, Robert R. Skinner

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Law--Obscenity--The Right To An Adversary Hearing On The Issue Of Obscenity Prior To The Seizure Of Furtively Distributed Films, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

This Note will discuss the procedural safeguards that must be provided when allegedly obscene materials are seized prior to distribution. The discussion will emphasize a consideration of the question whether the procedural requirements with respect to the seizure of printed materials are also applicable to the seizure of films, particularly those films that are being or are intended to be furtively distributed.

The First Amendment In Theory And Practice, Robert Allen Sedler

Law Faculty Research Publications

No abstract provided.

Labor Law--Picketing--Constitutional Law--First Amendment Challenges By Federal Employees To The Broad Labor Picketing Proscription Of Executive Order 11491, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

This Note will consider the constitutional validity of section 19(b)(4)'s broad prohibition against federal-employee labor picketing. However, before the first amendment questions are considered, two preliminary issues should be discussed.

The Principle Of Nondivisiveness And The Constitutionality Of Public Aid To Parochial Schools, C. Ronald Ellington

Scholarly Works

The establishment clause issues in the three cases now before the Supreme Court [Tilton v. Richardson, Lemon v. Kurtzman, DiCenso v. Robinison] will be explored in this article in the light of a postulate and three derivative maxims which, it is suggested, are implicit in the Court's earlier religion clause cases, particularly Walz v. Tax Commission. It is the author's view that the establishment clause intends that government no be a divisive force in matters of religion and that analysis grounded in such a premise provides the surest delineation of the interests at stake in …

Due Process Of Law--Welfare Recipient's Right To Pre-Termination Hearing, Michael A. Albert

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Legal Controversy As It Relates To Correctional Institutions - A Prison Administrator's View, Joseph R. Brierley

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Prisoners' Rights And The Correctional Scheme: The Legal Controversy And Problems Of Implementation, Joseph R. Brierley, Victor Rabinowitz, Edmund B. Spaeth Jr., James D. Crawford

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Obscenity, 1971: The Rejuvination Of State Power And The Return To Roth, Dwight L. Teeter Jr., Don R. Pember

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Further Limits On Libel Actions - Extension Of The New York Times Rule To Libels Arising From Discussion Of Public Issues, W. H. Flamm Jr.

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Prisoner's Rights And The Correctional Scheme: The Legal Controversy And Problems Of Implementation - A Symposium - Introduction, Donald W. Dowd

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Freedom To Hear: A Political Justification Of The First Amendment, John M. Steel

Washington Law Review

Historical analysis of the first amendment reveals that it was adopted primarily to safeguard and promote self-government through the communication of political ideas and attitudes among citizens. The author argues that these political underpinnings support the recognition of a freedom to hear corresponding to the freedoms of speech and press. Implementation of this freedom, recognizing its political basis, would eliminate many infringements on activity the Framers intended to protect. A freedom to hear would also provide a useful analytic tool in alleviating much of the repressive influence on political activity exerted by the private sector.

Free Speech, Social Change And The Politics Of Law In The United States (Interview), Robert Allen Sedler

Law Faculty Research Publications

No abstract provided.

Gregory Hess Vs. State Of Indiana (Brief Of Appellant) In The Supreme Court Of Indiana, F. Thomas Schornhorst, David Colman

Historic Documents

Appeal from the Monroe Superior Court

The Honorable James M. Dixon, Judge

No. 1271-S372

Brief of the Appellant

Gregory Hess Vs. State Of Indiana (Brief Of Appellee) In The Supreme Court Of Indiana, Theodore L. Sendak, Darrel K. Diamond

Historic Documents

Appeal from the Monroe Superior Court

The Honorable James M Dixon, Judge

No. 1271 S 372

Brief of Appellee

Bringing The Vagueness Doctrine On Campus, George A. Bermann, Ballard Jamieson Jr.

Faculty Scholarship

Although students have traditionally paid little attention to university disciplinary codes, recent campus disturbances have given these codes unprecedented significance. Those subjected to disciplinary proceedings have charged, among other things, that the provisions which regulate their behavior are too vague to inform them of what they may and may not do. Arguing that a broadly-worded code of conduct is necessary to govern, university administrators, however, have refused to make their regulations more precise.

Prison Reform In The Future - The Trend Toward Expansion Of Prisoners' Rights, Monrad G. Paulsen

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Campus Pamphleteering: The Emerging Constitutional Standards, Morton M. Rosenfeld

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

Beginning with Lovell v. City of Griffin, the Supreme Court has consistently held the distribution of handbills to be a fundamental right under the first amendment. Since Lovell, the Court has liberally construed the concept of a public forum where first amendment rights can be properly exercised. More recently, the Court has held that schools cannot arbitrarily or absolutely regulate students' constitutional rights of expression. These three principles would suggest great protection for handbilling rights on state university campuses. A further analysis of case law indicates that broad free speech standards governing such rights exist and that the …

The Courts' Responsibility For Prison Reform, Edmund B. Spaeth Jr.

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Prisoners' Rights - A Prosecutor's View, James D. Crawford

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

The Expansion Of Prisoners' Rights, Victor Rabinowitz

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

The Correctional Institution As A Rehabilitation Center - A Former Inmate's View, Victor Taylor

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

The Military Courts And Servicemen's First Amendment Rights, Edward F. Sherman

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.

Welsh Reaffirms Seeger: From A Remarkable Feat Of Judicial Surgery To A Lobotomy, Theodore F. Denno

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Libel Per Quod In Florida, Richard C. Ausness

Law Faculty Scholarly Articles

The purpose of this article is to trace the development of the rules of defamation with particular reference to extrinsic fact. A defamatory communication is one that tends to diminish the esteem, respect, good will, or confidence in which a person is held or to excite adverse, derogatory, or unpleasant feelings or opinions against him. To be actionable under the modem law, however, the defendant's statement must be capable of a defamatory meaning in the sense normally understood.

Defamation consists of the separate torts of libel and slander. Historically, these torts evolved independently of each other, and as a result …

Prior Restraints On Demonstrations, Vince Blasi

Michigan Law Review

The starting point for the analysis that follows is the belief that new constitutional doctrine--both substantive and procedural--is urgently needed. That conclusion rests on two critical assumptions--assumptions which may not be shared by others who read history differently, or who have had different personal experiences regarding prior restraints on demonstrations, or who have different behavioral impressions based on observation and conversation, or best of all, who have quantitative data on the problem.

A Requiem For Requiems: The Supreme Court At The Bar Of Reality, Stanley K. Laughlin Jr.

Michigan Law Review

It is true that the test set out in Roth v. United States is moribund. In a sense it was stillborn. While five Justices, only one of whom remains on the Court, joined in the majority opinion in Roth, that case only adumbrated certain considerations that later were forged into what has come to be known as the Roth test. No sooner did the forging process begin than the Court became fragmented on this issue, and a majority of the Justices has never since concurred in the test-certainly not in a compatible formulation of it. Today, it is not …

Book Notes, Law Review Staff

Vanderbilt Law Review

Book Notes --

The Strength of Government--By McGeorge Bundy Cambridge:Harvard University Press, 1968. Pp. xii, 107. $3.75.

Towards a Global Federalism-- By William 0. Douglas. New York: New York University Press, 1968. Pp. xi, 177, $7.95.

Democracy, Dissent, and Disorder: The Issues and the Law-- By Robert F. Drinan New York: The Seabury Press, 1969. Pp. 152,$4.95.

The End of Obscenity: The Trials of Lady Chatterly, Tropic of Cancer, and Fanny Hill --By Charles Rembar New York: Random House, Inc., 1968. Pp. xii, 528. $8.95.

Justice on Trial-- By A.L. Todd Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1964. Pp. ix, …

What Is "Right" About America, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Powell Speeches

Powell gave this speech at the Leadership Banquet of the Key Club of Thomas Jefferson High School, Richmond, Virginia.