Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (199)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (103)
- Law and Society (94)
- Religion Law (88)
- Supreme Court of the United States (88)
-
- Law and Race (83)
- Education Law (81)
- Internet Law (80)
- Law and Politics (80)
- Courts (79)
- Criminal Law (78)
- Fourteenth Amendment (78)
- Law and Gender (78)
- Science and Technology Law (76)
- Jurisprudence (75)
- Legislation (75)
- Disability Law (74)
- Communications Law (73)
- Criminal Procedure (73)
- Intellectual Property Law (73)
- Fourth Amendment (71)
- Human Rights Law (71)
- Labor and Employment Law (71)
- Other Law (71)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (70)
- Privacy Law (70)
- Second Amendment (69)
- State and Local Government Law (69)
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (59)
- William & Mary Law School (15)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (12)
- University of Nebraska - Lincoln (12)
- Notre Dame Law School (10)
-
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (10)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (9)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (9)
- University of Maine School of Law (8)
- University of Washington School of Law (8)
- Brigham Young University Law School (7)
- St. John's University School of Law (7)
- University of Colorado Law School (7)
- University of Kentucky (7)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (7)
- Fordham Law School (6)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (6)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (6)
- Florida International University College of Law (5)
- University of Miami Law School (5)
- Cleveland State University (4)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (4)
- Pepperdine University (4)
- University of Minnesota Law School (4)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (4)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (4)
- Brooklyn Law School (3)
- DePaul University (3)
- Marquette University Law School (3)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (3)
- Keyword
-
- First Amendment (70)
- Free speech (18)
- Constitutional Law (17)
- First amendment (17)
- Freedom of Religion (12)
-
- Social media (12)
- United States Constitution 1st Amendment (12)
- Constitution (11)
- Antisemitism (9)
- Freedom of speech (9)
- Artificial intelligence (8)
- Discrimination (7)
- Free Speech (7)
- Education (6)
- Privacy (6)
- Public health (6)
- Speech (6)
- Supreme Court (6)
- Addiction (5)
- Censorship (5)
- Constitutional law (5)
- Freedom of the press (5)
- Regulation (5)
- Securities and exchange commission (5)
- Academic freedom (4)
- Compelled speech (4)
- Content moderation (4)
- ESG (4)
- Fourth Amendment (4)
- Free Exercise Clause (4)
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (58)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (12)
- Nebraska Journal on Advancing Justice (12)
- Articles (8)
- Maine Law Review (8)
-
- BYU Law Review (7)
- Court Briefs (7)
- Faculty Publications (7)
- Kentucky Law Journal (7)
- Publications (7)
- Touro Law Review (7)
- Faculty Articles (6)
- Fordham Law Review (6)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (6)
- Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology (5)
- FIU Law Review (5)
- Faculty Scholarship (5)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (5)
- Catholic University Law Review (4)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (4)
- Northwestern University Law Review (4)
- Popular Media (4)
- St. John's Law Review (4)
- DePaul Business & Commercial Law Journal (3)
- Scholarly Articles (3)
- Washington Law Review (3)
- Amicus Briefs (2)
- Appellate Briefs (2)
- Buffalo Law Review (2)
- Cleveland State Law Review (2)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 301
Full-Text Articles in First Amendment
Ny Times Co. V. Dist. Ct. (Doe 1 Trust), 141 Nev. Adv. Op. 71 (Dec. 23, 2025), Randolph Anderson
Ny Times Co. V. Dist. Ct. (Doe 1 Trust), 141 Nev. Adv. Op. 71 (Dec. 23, 2025), Randolph Anderson
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
Certain trust related documents can be sealed provisionally, if supported by nonspeculative findings that the interests overcome the presumption of openness and warrant continued closure.
Status, Conduct, Belief, And Message: The Wedding Vendor Cases, Mark L. Movsesian
Status, Conduct, Belief, And Message: The Wedding Vendor Cases, Mark L. Movsesian
Chicago-Kent Law Review
No abstract provided.
Catholic Institutions And The Religion Clauses: Faith In A Liberal Democracy, Angela C. Carmella
Catholic Institutions And The Religion Clauses: Faith In A Liberal Democracy, Angela C. Carmella
Chicago-Kent Law Review
No abstract provided.
Can First Amendment "History And Tradition" Protect Both Sides In Polarized America?, Thomas C. Berg
Can First Amendment "History And Tradition" Protect Both Sides In Polarized America?, Thomas C. Berg
Chicago-Kent Law Review
No abstract provided.
Don't Be A Drag, It's Not Obscene: Examining The Use Of The Word "Obscene" To Ban Drag Shows, Stephanie Perez
Don't Be A Drag, It's Not Obscene: Examining The Use Of The Word "Obscene" To Ban Drag Shows, Stephanie Perez
Chicago-Kent Law Review
No abstract provided.
"Simple Accommodation": A Solution For Conflicts Between Religious Claims And Secular Law?, Laura S. Underkuffler
"Simple Accommodation": A Solution For Conflicts Between Religious Claims And Secular Law?, Laura S. Underkuffler
Chicago-Kent Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Ten Commandments In Louisiana Public Schools: A Study In The Survival Of Establishment Norms, Ira C. Lupu, Robert W. Tuttle
The Ten Commandments In Louisiana Public Schools: A Study In The Survival Of Establishment Norms, Ira C. Lupu, Robert W. Tuttle
Chicago-Kent Law Review
No abstract provided.
Religious Liberty And The Constitution, Steven J. Heyman
Religious Liberty And The Constitution, Steven J. Heyman
Chicago-Kent Law Review
No abstract provided.
Introduction To Symposium — In Search Of Common Ground: Religion And Secularism In A Liberal Democratic Society, Kathleen A. Brady, Steven J. Heyman
Introduction To Symposium — In Search Of Common Ground: Religion And Secularism In A Liberal Democratic Society, Kathleen A. Brady, Steven J. Heyman
Chicago-Kent Law Review
No abstract provided.
History, Tradition, And Finding Common Ground: The Establishment Clause And Religious Expression By The State, Kathleen A. Brady
History, Tradition, And Finding Common Ground: The Establishment Clause And Religious Expression By The State, Kathleen A. Brady
Chicago-Kent Law Review
No abstract provided.
Jurisdictional Diversity, Tradition, And The Religion Clauses, Steven D. Smith
Jurisdictional Diversity, Tradition, And The Religion Clauses, Steven D. Smith
Chicago-Kent Law Review
No abstract provided.
Attempting To Protect The Liberty And Equality Of Minority Faiths And Nonreligious Individuals When The Surpreme Court Will Not Do So, Alan Brownstein
Attempting To Protect The Liberty And Equality Of Minority Faiths And Nonreligious Individuals When The Surpreme Court Will Not Do So, Alan Brownstein
Chicago-Kent Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Supreme Court's Gay Rights-Religious Liberty Contortions, Andrew Koppelman
The Supreme Court's Gay Rights-Religious Liberty Contortions, Andrew Koppelman
Chicago-Kent Law Review
No abstract provided.
Religious Employment And The Tensions Between Liberty And Equality, R. Shawn Gunnarson, James C. Phillips, Christopher A. Bates
Religious Employment And The Tensions Between Liberty And Equality, R. Shawn Gunnarson, James C. Phillips, Christopher A. Bates
BYU Law Review
Located in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is an exemption for religious employers that is often misunderstood. Often courts and commentators mischaracterize it as a narrow privilege for religious employers to hire people of the same religion. But the statute’s text says otherwise. This article resolves interpretive debates about the meaning and application of the religious employer exemption through a close textualist reading that discovers a new understanding of the structure of Title VII. Our approach applies the tools of textualism, the prevailing theory of statutory interpretation. Paying attention to the text and structure of Title …
Did Anderson V. Tiktok Get It Right? Holding Social Media Providers Accountable For Harm To Adolescents, Allison Mitton
Did Anderson V. Tiktok Get It Right? Holding Social Media Providers Accountable For Harm To Adolescents, Allison Mitton
BYU Law Review
When dangerous social media challenges go viral and cause harm to adolescents and young children, should the platform be held liable for pushing that content? As it currently stands, Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1934 prevents this from happening. However, Anderson v. TikTok—a recent suit brought on behalf of a ten-year-old girl who died after asphyxiating herself while participating in the viral “Blackout Challenge”—seeks to change that.
The Third Circuit court in Anderson held that social media algorithms should be considered first-party speech, or the platform’s own expressive activity, rather than third-party speech, displaying its users’ expressive …
Insider Trading & Unconstitutionally Compelled Speech, Steven J. Cleveland
Insider Trading & Unconstitutionally Compelled Speech, Steven J. Cleveland
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Can’T Blaine A State For Trying: Writing A Constitutional Blaine Amendment After Carson V. Makin, Ry Stratton
Can’T Blaine A State For Trying: Writing A Constitutional Blaine Amendment After Carson V. Makin, Ry Stratton
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Disregarding Severability, Kevin C. Walsh
Disregarding Severability, Kevin C. Walsh
Catholic University Law Review
The infirmities of severability doctrine have elicited increased attention at the Supreme Court. In his application of severability doctrine for a five-Justice majority in United States v. Arthrex, Inc., Chief Justice Roberts began to reformulate the doctrine in a way that can free the Court from the misleading mental imagery conjured by the conception of courts as “severing” provisions from a statute. Roberts's reformulation more properly depicts the relevant judicial activity to be judicial disregard of statutory rules to avoid unconstitutional applications of law rather than judicial severance of textual provisions to fix a problem that inheres in the …
Brief Of The Notre Dame Education Law Project, Islam And Religious Freedom Action Team, Jewish Coalition For Religious Liberty, And Manhattan Institute As Amici Curiae In Support Of Petitioners, John A. Meiser, Meredith Holland Kessler, Domenic Canonico
Brief Of The Notre Dame Education Law Project, Islam And Religious Freedom Action Team, Jewish Coalition For Religious Liberty, And Manhattan Institute As Amici Curiae In Support Of Petitioners, John A. Meiser, Meredith Holland Kessler, Domenic Canonico
Court Briefs
No. 25-581
St. Mary Catholic Parish v. Lisa Roy
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
From the Summary of Argument
Three times in the last eight years, this Court has struck down efforts to exclude religious institutions from otherwise available funding programs. Each time, opponents of the Court’s decisions have sought to riddle them with holes, requiring the Court to intervene to prevent its rulings—and the First Amendment’s command against religious discrimination—from being so easily evaded. Regrettably, this Court must step in again, as some states, like Colorado, still …
From Sidewalks, Streets, And Parks To Social Media: How Should Courts Apply The Public Forum Doctrine In The Digital Age?, Laurel Wanger
From Sidewalks, Streets, And Parks To Social Media: How Should Courts Apply The Public Forum Doctrine In The Digital Age?, Laurel Wanger
St. John's Law Review
(Excerpt)
This Note examines the circuit split over whether government officials’ social media pages constitute public forums and analyzes how the Supreme Court settled the doctrinal uncertainty in Lindke v. Freed. Part I presents context for this issue by explaining the origins of the public forum doctrine, the ways in which government officials use social media as a means of interacting with their constituents, and the circuit split regarding the proper test to be used when deciding these issues. Part II provides an overview of the majority test used by the Second, Fourth, Eighth, Ninth, and Eleventh Circuits, and …
New Yorkers Training, Mobilizing To Protect Immigrants As Federal Crackdown Intensifies, Cristina Ledra, Andrew Serulneck
New Yorkers Training, Mobilizing To Protect Immigrants As Federal Crackdown Intensifies, Cristina Ledra, Andrew Serulneck
Capstones
As the Trump administration escalates deportation efforts nationwide, New York City is bracing for increased enforcement, with advocates warning that fear of deportation raids is already reshaping daily life for immigrant communities. New York protesters have not yet faced the most severe federal charges following high-profile confrontations, as protesters have in other states around the country. And the federal cases are largely falling apart and not resulting in trials or convictions. Despite the legal threat, some advocates see the moment as galvanizing.
Diplomacy Derailed: Discrimination’S Detour On Route 40, Gage A. Kivlen
Diplomacy Derailed: Discrimination’S Detour On Route 40, Gage A. Kivlen
Masters Theses, 2020-current
The 1961 Route 40 campaign in Maryland became a critical battleground where three competing approaches to addressing racial segregation revealed deep contradictions in Cold War America. Route 40, a major highway between Washington D.C. and New York, became an international embarrassment when African diplomats from newly independent nations were repeatedly refused service at restaurants and hotels. This crisis prompted responses from three distinct actors: the Congress of Racial Equality (CORE), which employed grassroots organizing and direct action; the State Department's Special Protocol Service Section (SPSS), which pursued top-down diplomatic solutions; and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), which conducted extensive …
Disclosures, Disclaimers, And Disinformation Advertising, Areeb Asif
Disclosures, Disclaimers, And Disinformation Advertising, Areeb Asif
Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy
Every regular internet user in the United States has been exposed to fake news at some point. Most of them, if not all, would agree that this problem needs a solution. Nevertheless, even as fake news has taken on unforeseen prominence in recent years, very little concrete action has been taken to curb its impact on American society. Some scholars have chalked this up to the Supreme Court’s expansive conception of the First Amendment, which makes it incredibly challenging to regulate political speech. Others posit that the problem is Section 230, which allows platforms to profit from fake news without …
Greenhat’S Greenlight To The Cftc: The Case For A Jurisdictional Shift Of Financial Transmission Rights From The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission To The Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Timothy K. Shaw Ii
DePaul Business & Commercial Law Journal
Regional Transmission Organizations and Independent System Operators are a relatively new platform to buy and sell wholesale electricity and transmission service of that electricity. These groundbreaking organizations have been around since 1996 after the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) issued Order 888. FERC regulates the physical electricity wholesale sale and transmission service market managed by a Regional Transmission Organization (“RTO”) or Independent System Operator (“ISO”),through its Federal Power Act mandate. Many RTOs and ISOs offer a product called a Financial Transmission Right (“FTR”). Traditionally, FTRs assist the holder by providing price certainty, or a hedge, in the capacity market. This …
Choosing The Best Entity For Investments Trading After Understanding The Tax Limitations And Restrictions, Ray A. Knight, Joseph Lakatos
Choosing The Best Entity For Investments Trading After Understanding The Tax Limitations And Restrictions, Ray A. Knight, Joseph Lakatos
DePaul Business & Commercial Law Journal
The trading of various securities is subject to market rules. However, when securities trading is completed within a business entity, the entity is subject to tax limitations and restrictions. The tax benefits cannot be the dominant purpose for the entity structure; economic substance including profit motive and business purpose for each transaction must be able to be shown.
The trading of investment securities must be housed in the right entity to gain the best economic results as well as to minimize the tax burden. The entity selection process must first consider the characteristics and nature of the securities (e.g., currencies, …
Volume 23 - Front Matter
DePaul Business & Commercial Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Who Counts As A "Reasonable Employee"? The Third Circuit's Bungling Of Section 8(A)(1) Violations, Ben Milstein
Who Counts As A "Reasonable Employee"? The Third Circuit's Bungling Of Section 8(A)(1) Violations, Ben Milstein
Washington Law Review
The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) protects private employees’ right to unionize and collectively bargain with their employers. Section 7 of the NLRA guarantees employees the right to self-organize labor unions, while section 8 outlines numerous unfair labor practices. Specifically, section 8(a)(1) bans employer interference, coercion, or restraint of any section 7 rights. In a 2022 case, FDRLST Media v. NLRB, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) finding that FDRLST Media’s executive officer’s tweet constituted a section 8(a)(1) violation. This Comment examines the history of section 8(a)(1) violations, specifically discussing the widely …
From The Bench To The Feed: Conflict Between Public Official Accounts And The First Amendment, Betty Yu
From The Bench To The Feed: Conflict Between Public Official Accounts And The First Amendment, Betty Yu
Washington Law Review
Imagine one day waking up, opening Facebook, and discovering that the official White House account blocked you because you left a comment expressing a viewpoint. In this case, your First Amendment right to free speech would most likely be violated. However, what happens if your local official blocks you or deletes your comments? Are your First Amendment rights violated? Well, it depends.
Historically, public officials have used public forums such as town halls to meet with citizens and answer questions. However, as social media platforms like X and Facebook have become increasingly crucial tools for communication, the distinction between personal …
Divine Detachment: Beachy V. Assemblies Of God And A New Interpretation Of The Ecclesiastical Abstention Doctrine, Juarez Mcleod Johnson
Divine Detachment: Beachy V. Assemblies Of God And A New Interpretation Of The Ecclesiastical Abstention Doctrine, Juarez Mcleod Johnson
MC Law Review
In the landmark case of Beachy v. Mississippi District Council for Assemblies of God, the Mississippi Supreme Court redefined its interpretation of the ecclesiastical abstention doctrine—marking a pivotal shift in church-state jurisprudence. Traditionally, this doctrine instructed courts to defer to the highest internal authority of a church when deciding disputes within hierarchical religious organizations. However, the court’s decision in Beachy significantly departed from this principle by designating the local pastor and congregation as the supreme authority over local church affairs, even within a hierarchical structure.
This Casenote explores the profound implications of the Supreme Court’s ruling, focusing on its …
A True Fact Should Not Be Controversial: Analyzing The Zauderer Standard And Defining “Uncontroversial”, Edina Hartstein
A True Fact Should Not Be Controversial: Analyzing The Zauderer Standard And Defining “Uncontroversial”, Edina Hartstein
Fordham Law Review
In Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel, the U.S. Supreme Court recognized an exception to the compelled speech doctrine that allowed the government to regulate commercial speech if it was “purely factual and uncontroversial.” However, the Court failed to define what it meant for a disclosure to be “purely factual” or what it meant to be “uncontroversial.” This lack of clarity led to lower courts inconsistently applying the Zauderer standard. In 2018, the Supreme Court decided National Institute for Family Life & Advocates v. Becerra (NIFLA), which held that the Zauderer standard cannot apply when the disclosure …