Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (3436)
- Religion Law (1016)
- Supreme Court of the United States (955)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (805)
- Communications Law (801)
-
- Internet Law (737)
- Education Law (651)
- Law and Society (626)
- Intellectual Property Law (601)
- Law and Politics (560)
- Courts (542)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (528)
- Privacy Law (509)
- Legislation (505)
- Criminal Law (499)
- Science and Technology Law (490)
- Fourteenth Amendment (487)
- State and Local Government Law (486)
- Jurisprudence (483)
- Labor and Employment Law (456)
- Law and Gender (413)
- Legal History (394)
- Torts (394)
- Election Law (372)
- Administrative Law (371)
- Human Rights Law (371)
- Computer Law (362)
- Criminal Procedure (355)
- Institution
-
- William & Mary Law School (553)
- University of Michigan Law School (422)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (391)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (262)
- Seattle University School of Law (249)
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (242)
- University of North Carolina School of Law (242)
- Brigham Young University Law School (223)
- Notre Dame Law School (209)
- Pepperdine University (203)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (194)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (177)
- University of Colorado Law School (160)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (153)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (152)
- St. John's University School of Law (150)
- Cleveland State University (149)
- UIC School of Law (145)
- University of Georgia School of Law (144)
- University of Miami Law School (134)
- Brooklyn Law School (129)
- Fordham Law School (120)
- University of Richmond (119)
- Columbia Law School (113)
- New York Law School (111)
- Roger Williams University (101)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (98)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (96)
- University of Washington School of Law (95)
- West Virginia University (95)
- Keyword
-
- First Amendment (1730)
- Freedom of speech (601)
- First amendment (563)
- Free speech (521)
- United States Constitution 1st Amendment (334)
-
- Freedom of Speech (298)
- Supreme Court (263)
- Constitutional law (255)
- Establishment Clause (214)
- Constitutional Law (206)
- Religion (206)
- Constitution (165)
- Privacy (160)
- Free Speech (159)
- United States Supreme Court (156)
- Speech (149)
- Censorship (141)
- Freedom of the press (138)
- Internet (130)
- Establishment clause (126)
- Social media (123)
- Defamation (121)
- Obscenity (119)
- Freedom of religion (112)
- Freedom of expression (110)
- Commercial speech (103)
- Religious freedom (102)
- Discrimination (98)
- Free Exercise Clause (98)
- Zick works (94)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (378)
- Michigan Law Review (265)
- Faculty Publications (239)
- First Amendment Law Review (238)
- Seattle University Law Review (220)
-
- Touro Law Review (202)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (193)
- Articles (168)
- Pepperdine Law Review (167)
- BYU Law Review (147)
- Publications (129)
- Scholarly Works (128)
- Journal Articles (125)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (124)
- Cardozo Law Review (123)
- William & Mary Law Review (122)
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (120)
- Scholarly Articles (107)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (98)
- Popular Media (97)
- UIC Law Review (94)
- Indiana Law Journal (93)
- West Virginia Law Review (92)
- Federal Communications Law Journal (89)
- Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology (82)
- Cleveland State Law Review (82)
- Akron Law Review (81)
- The Catholic Lawyer (75)
- Kentucky Law Journal (74)
- All Faculty Scholarship (72)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 7321 - 7350 of 7933
Full-Text Articles in First Amendment
Fighting Words As Free Speech, Stephen W. Gard
Fighting Words As Free Speech, Stephen W. Gard
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
It is now settled that "above all else, the first amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Despite the universal acceptance of this general principle, the United States Supreme Court has created several exceptions. In appropriate cases libel, obscenity, commercial speech, and offensive language may be censored without contravention of the first amendment guarantee of freedom of expression. The source of each of these exceptions to the general principle of governmental neutrality regarding the content of expression is Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire.
Book Review, Stephen W. Gard
Book Review, Stephen W. Gard
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
The author reviews Justice Hugo Black and the First Amendment, edited by Everette E. Dennis, Donald M. Gillmor and David L. Grey.
Eulogy For Murray I. Gurfein, Irving R. Kaufman
Eulogy For Murray I. Gurfein, Irving R. Kaufman
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judge Gurfein And The Pentagon Papers, James L. Oakes
Judge Gurfein And The Pentagon Papers, James L. Oakes
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Nathaniel Goldstein Memorial Lecture, Murray I. Gurfein
Nathaniel Goldstein Memorial Lecture, Murray I. Gurfein
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Schoolbooks, School Boards, And The Constitution [Notes], Aleta Estreicher
Schoolbooks, School Boards, And The Constitution [Notes], Aleta Estreicher
Articles & Chapters
No abstract provided.
Stone V. Graham: A Fragile Defense Of Individual Religious Autonomy, J. David Smith Jr.
Stone V. Graham: A Fragile Defense Of Individual Religious Autonomy, J. David Smith Jr.
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
General Laws, Neutral Principles, And The Free Exercise Clause, G. Michael Mccrossin
General Laws, Neutral Principles, And The Free Exercise Clause, G. Michael Mccrossin
Vanderbilt Law Review
This Note examines several recent Supreme Court decisions considering the first amendment's free exercise clause to determine whether, collectively, the decisions are results of principled decision making. During the past two decades the Court has had four significant opportunities to deal with the free exercise clause. In all but one, the Court made important statements about the constitutional protection afforded the free exercise of religious belief. In each case the basic issue was the same: was interference with the exercise of religion unconstitutional when that interference resulted from the application of a general law that promoted a valid public policy …
The Jurisprudence Of Free Speech In The United States And The Federal Republic Of Germany, Donald P. Kommers
The Jurisprudence Of Free Speech In The United States And The Federal Republic Of Germany, Donald P. Kommers
Journal Articles
This Article compares the constitutional thought of the United States Supreme Court and the West German Federal Constitutional Court in the area of free speech. The primary focus is on cases dealing with governmental restraints on speech arising out of concern for internal security' and commentary affecting the reputation of public figures. These cases reflect major lines of German and American free speech thought. The objective of this Article is to compare the concepts of free speech that have evolved in the opinions of the two tribunals and to consider the significance of the separate doctrinal paths taken by each …
Constitutional Law: Dubious Intrusions--Peynote, Drug Laws, And Religious Freedom, John T. Doyle
Constitutional Law: Dubious Intrusions--Peynote, Drug Laws, And Religious Freedom, John T. Doyle
American Indian Law Review
No abstract provided.
Reassessing The First Amendment And The Public's Right To Know In Constitutional Adjudication, David M. O'Brien
Reassessing The First Amendment And The Public's Right To Know In Constitutional Adjudication, David M. O'Brien
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
The First Amendment And The Free Press: A Comment On Some New Trends And Some Old Theories, William W. Van Alstyne
The First Amendment And The Free Press: A Comment On Some New Trends And Some Old Theories, William W. Van Alstyne
Faculty Scholarship
Responding to the trend of media rights being subjugated through the legal process, this article examines Justice Stewart's suggestion that the media should be treated with extra deference in First Amendment cases. This examination looks at the sufficiency of the press's claim of judicial harshness, whether the press should be treated differently than other speakers, and also compares press freedom in foreign nations.
Essay--Fighting For Their Lives: The Applicability Of The Fairness Doctrine To Violence In Children's Television Programming, Thomas Barton
Essay--Fighting For Their Lives: The Applicability Of The Fairness Doctrine To Violence In Children's Television Programming, Thomas Barton
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Antitrust Enforcement, Freedom Of The Press, And The "Open Market": The Supreme Court On The Structure And Conduct Of Mass Media, William E. Lee
Antitrust Enforcement, Freedom Of The Press, And The "Open Market": The Supreme Court On The Structure And Conduct Of Mass Media, William E. Lee
Vanderbilt Law Review
This Article examines the Supreme Court's attempts to foster open markets by altering either the structure or the conduct of mass media enterprises." Structure and conduct are the two main determinants of market performance. Market structure "means those characteristics of the organization of a market that seem to exercise a strategic influence on the nature of competition and pricing within the market." Some characteristics of market structure include degree of buyer concentration, degree of seller concentration, degree of product differentiation, and entry conditions. Market conduct, on the other hand, comprises the practices, policies, and devices which firms employ in adjusting …
Regulation Of Programming Content To Protect Children After Pacifica, Dabney E. Bragg
Regulation Of Programming Content To Protect Children After Pacifica, Dabney E. Bragg
Vanderbilt Law Review
This Note examines the "protect the children" rationale as justification for the regulation of program content to determine if it is likely to withstand future challenges. Initially, the Note reviews the Pacifica decisions to illustrate how the rationale recently has been employed. The Note then considers this rationale in light of traditional first amendment analysis and the interface of that analysis with the rights of children, concluding that the rationale does not justify abridgment of the first amendment. The Note then considers the effect of broadcasting's "unique characteristics" upon this analysis, concluding that this added element does not tip the …
Brown V. Glines, Lewis F. Powell, Jr.
Committee For Public Education And Religious Liberty V. Regan, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Committee For Public Education And Religious Liberty V. Regan, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Pruneyard Shopping Center V. Robins, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Pruneyard Shopping Center V. Robins, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Richmond Newspapers, Inc. V. Virginia, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Richmond Newspapers, Inc. V. Virginia, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Mccall V. State, 354 So. 2d 869 (Fla. 1978), Arthur C. Beal, Jr.
Mccall V. State, 354 So. 2d 869 (Fla. 1978), Arthur C. Beal, Jr.
Florida State University Law Review
Constitutional Law-THE FINE LINE BETWEEN PROTECTED AND NON-PROTECTED SPEECH
Regulation Of Indecency In Political Broadcasting, Jonathan Golomb
Regulation Of Indecency In Political Broadcasting, Jonathan Golomb
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
The article considers both the constitutional and statutory aspects of the regulation of indecency in political broadcasting. The discussion is limited to considering "indecency," a term excluding obscenity or incitement to violence, because the government's power to regulate these types of speech is well established. Indecent speech would be protected if used in the print media, since it does not fall within the established First Amendment exceptions. The basic constitutional question, therefore, is whether the broadcast media are inherently different from the print media, so as to justify different treatment of indecent political speech. This article will contend that they …
Listeners' Rights Providing A State Action Theory In The "Company Town" Analogues, Thomas A. Clements
Listeners' Rights Providing A State Action Theory In The "Company Town" Analogues, Thomas A. Clements
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Discovery And The First Amendment, Kevin R. Vienna
Discovery And The First Amendment, Kevin R. Vienna
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Secular Control Of Non-Public Schools, Carl L. Fletcher Jr.
Secular Control Of Non-Public Schools, Carl L. Fletcher Jr.
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Insurance Advertising - Much Ado About Nothing Lawyer's Forum., Michael A. Hatchell
Insurance Advertising - Much Ado About Nothing Lawyer's Forum., Michael A. Hatchell
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Response: Pornography And The First Amendment, Frederick Schauer
Response: Pornography And The First Amendment, Frederick Schauer
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
A Dubious Neutrality: The Establishment Of Secularism In The Public Schools, Paul James Toscano
A Dubious Neutrality: The Establishment Of Secularism In The Public Schools, Paul James Toscano
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Attempt To Develop An Appropriate Standard Of Liability For The Defamation Of Public And Private People: The Supreme Court And The Federalization Of Libel Law, Howard A. Gutman
The Attempt To Develop An Appropriate Standard Of Liability For The Defamation Of Public And Private People: The Supreme Court And The Federalization Of Libel Law, Howard A. Gutman
North Carolina Central Law Review
No abstract provided.
Attorney Advertising Over The Broadcast Media, I. Terry Currie
Attorney Advertising Over The Broadcast Media, I. Terry Currie
Vanderbilt Law Review
This Note will examine the first amendment issues that broadcast attorney advertising raises. The Note will begin with a general discussion of the analytical approach adopted by the Supreme Court in freedom of speech and commercial speech cases. Next, the Note will explore the "special problems" and unique characteristics of the broadcast media as they relate to the interests affected by broadcast attorney advertising, concluding that the benefits afforded to consumers outweigh the potential risks created by such advertising. The Note will also briefly consider various regulations on broadcast advertising adopted by the bar at both the state and federal …
First Amendment Interest Balancing-Behind Bars?, Teresa L. Mussetto
First Amendment Interest Balancing-Behind Bars?, Teresa L. Mussetto
University of Miami Law Review
This casenote examines the recent decision of Houchins v. KQED; Inc., in which the Supreme Court of the United States narrowly construed the right of access afforded the news media in their coverage of penal facilities. The analysis focuses upon the first amendment methodology utilized by the Court in its decisionmaking process. The author concludes with a critical assessment of the Court's departure from accurate interest balancing technique.