First Amendment Commons^™

Legislating Against Hate In New York: Bias Crimes And The Lesbian And Gay Community, Martin S. Zwerling

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Supreme Court's Land Use Decisions, Hon. Leon D. Lazer

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

Employment Discrimination: Recent Developments In The Supreme Court, Eileen Kaufman

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

Sexual Harassment On Campus: Does The Accused Have Any Rights?, Richard C. Cahn

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

New York's Son Of Sam Law: Alive And Well Today, Steven P. Vargas

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

Double Jeopardy

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

Frreedom Of Religion

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

Freedom Of Speech And Press

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

Freedom Of Speech And Press

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

United States V. National Treasury Employees Union And The Constitutionality Of The Honoraria Ban: Protecting The First Amendment Rights Of Public Employees, Judy M. Lin

University of Richmond Law Review

During the 1980s, government ethics were brought into the spotlight as the public's confidence in the integrity of government officials eroded. In an attempt to curb actual and perceived improprieties by government employees, and to reinforce the standards of integrity within the federal government, President Bush signed into law the Ethics Reform Act of 1989.

Association Of National Advertisers, Inc. V. Lungren: Green Marketing And Its First Amendment Implications: An Honest Approach, Christine Gower Mooney

Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - )

No abstract provided.

Controlling Expression: The Stagnant Policy Of The Centers For Disease Control In The Second Decade Of Aids, Jessica M. Tourk

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

A Future Without Formalities, Irwin Karp

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Introduction, Jamey Gambrell

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Converging First Amendment Principles For Converging Communications Media, Thomas G. Krattenmaker, L. A. Powe Jr.

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Winner, Best Appellate Brief In The 1995 Native American Law Student Association Moot Court Competition, Daniel L. Cheyette, Andrew J. Bobzien

American Indian Law Review

No abstract provided.

Equality And Freedom Of Speech (Eighteenth Annual Law Review Symposium: Demise Of The First Amendment? Focus On Rico And Hate Crime Litigation), Terrance Sandalow

Other Publications

The editors responsible for today's symposium have posed an alarming question: whether we are witnessing the demise of the First Amendment. I want to dispel at the outset any anxiety the question may have aroused. The First Amendment is alive and well; indeed, it is thriving. I believe, though I cannot prove, that public respect for the values it expresses has never been greater than it has been in recent years. Whether or not I am correct in that belief, however, it is certain that constitutional protections against governmental efforts to limit speech and other forms of expressive activity are …

Authors, Editors, And Uncommon Carriers: Identifying The "Speaker" Within The New Media, Michael I. Meyerson

All Faculty Scholarship

First Amendment analysis has historically depended on whether a party is a speaker, an editor, or a carrier. With communications technology rapidly evolving, determining which category is appropriate becomes increasingly complex, and ascertaining the First Amendment protections that are applied to various actors in the process of diffusing ideas becomes difficult. This article looks to the historical treatment of the First Amendment rights of speakers, editors, and distributors. This article traces the Supreme Court’s treatment of speech regulations on new technologies, from telegraph and telephone regulations to the seminal Turner Broadcast System, Inc. v. FCC case that created rules for …

N.O.W. V. Scheidler: Rico Meets The First Amendment, Craig M. Bradley

Articles by Maurer Faculty

A look at the controversial N.O.W. v. Scheidler case.

Censorship By Media Elites Will Ultimately Threaten The Republic, Michael E. Bailey

Federal Communications Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Sensitive Society, James F. Fitzpatrick

Federal Communications Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Information Superhighway Or Technological Sewer: What Will It Be?, Robert W. Peters

Federal Communications Law Journal

No abstract provided.

A Law Antecedent And Paramount, Fred H. Cate

Federal Communications Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Second Chance, Newton N. Minow

Federal Communications Law Journal

No abstract provided.

In The Battle Over Tv Violence, The Communications Act Should Be Cheered, Not Changed!, Carl R. Ramey

Federal Communications Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Student Religious Expression In School: Is It Religion Or Speech, And Does It Matter, Gilbert A. Holmes

University of Miami Law Review

No abstract provided.

Warning: Television Violence May Be Harmful To Children; But The First Amendment May Foil Congressional Attempts To Legislate Against It, Laura B. Schneider

University of Miami Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Market For Loyalties: Electronic Media And The Global Competition For Allegiances, Monroe E. Price

Articles

The article critiques the traditional "marketplace of ideas" metaphor in First Amendment jurisprudence and proposes a more accurate framework: the "market for loyalties." This model highlights how powerful entities, including governments and private actors, use communication regulation to shape identities and allegiances. The First Amendment, under this interpretation, functions as a regulatory allocation among these entities rather than a guarantee of unfettered speech. The rise of global communication technologies and competing loyalties challenges the nation-state's ability to control this market, reshaping the role of law and governance in identity formation.

Racist Speech, Outsider Jurisprudence, And The Meaning Of America, Steven H. Shiffrin

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

Section 6: First Amendment, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School

Supreme Court Preview

No abstract provided.