Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (3430)
- Religion Law (1016)
- Supreme Court of the United States (953)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (804)
- Communications Law (799)
-
- Internet Law (736)
- Education Law (650)
- Law and Society (623)
- Intellectual Property Law (600)
- Law and Politics (557)
- Courts (539)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (528)
- Privacy Law (507)
- Legislation (503)
- Criminal Law (497)
- Science and Technology Law (489)
- Fourteenth Amendment (487)
- State and Local Government Law (483)
- Jurisprudence (482)
- Labor and Employment Law (456)
- Law and Gender (412)
- Torts (394)
- Legal History (393)
- Human Rights Law (371)
- Administrative Law (370)
- Election Law (370)
- Computer Law (362)
- Criminal Procedure (354)
- Institution
-
- William & Mary Law School (553)
- University of Michigan Law School (422)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (389)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (262)
- Seattle University School of Law (249)
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (242)
- University of North Carolina School of Law (242)
- Brigham Young University Law School (223)
- Notre Dame Law School (209)
- Pepperdine University (203)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (194)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (177)
- University of Colorado Law School (160)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (153)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (152)
- St. John's University School of Law (150)
- Cleveland State University (149)
- UIC School of Law (145)
- University of Georgia School of Law (144)
- University of Miami Law School (134)
- Brooklyn Law School (129)
- University of Richmond (119)
- Fordham Law School (116)
- Columbia Law School (113)
- New York Law School (111)
- Roger Williams University (101)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (98)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (96)
- University of Washington School of Law (95)
- West Virginia University (95)
- Keyword
-
- First Amendment (1729)
- Freedom of speech (601)
- First amendment (562)
- Free speech (521)
- United States Constitution 1st Amendment (334)
-
- Freedom of Speech (298)
- Supreme Court (263)
- Constitutional law (255)
- Establishment Clause (214)
- Constitutional Law (206)
- Religion (206)
- Constitution (165)
- Free Speech (160)
- Privacy (160)
- United States Supreme Court (156)
- Speech (149)
- Censorship (141)
- Freedom of the press (138)
- Internet (130)
- Establishment clause (126)
- Social media (123)
- Defamation (121)
- Obscenity (118)
- Freedom of religion (112)
- Freedom of expression (110)
- Commercial speech (103)
- Religious freedom (102)
- Discrimination (98)
- Free Exercise Clause (98)
- Law (88)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (377)
- Michigan Law Review (265)
- Faculty Publications (239)
- First Amendment Law Review (238)
- Seattle University Law Review (220)
-
- Touro Law Review (202)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (193)
- Pepperdine Law Review (167)
- Articles (166)
- BYU Law Review (147)
- Publications (129)
- Scholarly Works (128)
- Journal Articles (125)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (124)
- Cardozo Law Review (123)
- William & Mary Law Review (122)
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (120)
- Scholarly Articles (107)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (98)
- Popular Media (97)
- UIC Law Review (94)
- Indiana Law Journal (93)
- West Virginia Law Review (92)
- Federal Communications Law Journal (89)
- Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology (82)
- Cleveland State Law Review (82)
- Akron Law Review (81)
- The Catholic Lawyer (75)
- Kentucky Law Journal (74)
- All Faculty Scholarship (72)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 4441 - 4470 of 7924
Full-Text Articles in First Amendment
Snyder V. Phelps: A Hard Case That Did Not Make Bad Law, Paul E. Salamanca
Snyder V. Phelps: A Hard Case That Did Not Make Bad Law, Paul E. Salamanca
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
In Snyder v. Phelps, the Court stood by the First Amendment in hard times. A religious group conducted a protest some 1,000 feet from a fallen marine's funeral, holding such pickets as “God Hates the USA,” “Thank God for Dead Soldiers,” and “You're Going to Hell.” Despite the empathy that virtually anyone would feel for the marine's grieving father, the Court held by a vote of eight to one that his action for intentional infliction of emotional distress and intrusion upon seclusion could not survive, owing largely to the public nature of the issues the protesters had raised. “Hard …
Secular Not Secularist America, Michael Scaperlanda
Secular Not Secularist America, Michael Scaperlanda
Campbell Law Review
Other contributors to this symposium see "liberalism"' as the problem and "God" as the solution.' To a large extent, Ithink they have it backwards. "God" is the problem to which "liberalism" provides a particularly creative solution. Power hates a rival,' and God - or allegiance to an all-embracing monotheistic God - poses a significant threat to power because the wild faith of the martyr cannot be tamed by civil authority.
Fifteen Years Of Fame: The Declining Relevance Of Domain Names In The Enduring Conflict Between Trademark And Free Speech Rights, 11 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 1 (2011), Jude A. Thomas
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
Domain name disputes have been the subject of substantial litigation, legislative action, and scholarly debate over the course of the past fifteen years. Much of the debate is the product of disagreement concerning whether trademark rights naturally extend into the domain name space and to what extent those rights are limited by principles of free speech. Gripe sites are paradigmatic examples of this debate. Society’s investment in defining these rights continues to grow, even as the relevance of domain names may be declining, due to: (1) changes in the way users locate content on the Internet; (2) the growth of …
Golan V. Holder: Copyright In The Image Of The First Amendment, 11 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 83 (2011), David L. Lange, Risa J. Weaver, Shiveh Roxana Reed
Golan V. Holder: Copyright In The Image Of The First Amendment, 11 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 83 (2011), David L. Lange, Risa J. Weaver, Shiveh Roxana Reed
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
Does copyright violate the First Amendment? Professor Melville Nimmer asked this question forty years ago, and then answered it by concluding that copyright itself is affirmatively speech protective. Despite ample reason to doubt Nimmer’s response, the Supreme Court has avoided an independent, thoughtful, plenary review of the question. Copyright has come to enjoy an all-but-categorical immunity to First Amendment constraints. Now, however, the Court faces a new challenge to its back-of-the-hand treatment of this vital conflict. In Golan v. Holder the Tenth Circuit considered legislation (enacted pursuant to the Berne Convention and TRIPS) “restoring” copyright protection to millions of foreign …
Employment, Sexual Orientation And Religious Beliefs: Do Religious Educational Institutions Have A Protected Right To Discriminate In The Selection And Discharge Of Employees?, Ralph D. Mawdsley
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
The life blood of religious educational institutions is their doctrinal statements and codes of conduct that set standards for employee and student life. The purpose of this paper is to examine the freedom of religious educational institutions to make employment decisions related to three homosexuality related areas: sexual orientation, same-sex sexual activity outside marriage, and same-sex marriage. At the core of the discussion is the basic question whether religious educational institutions have a protected right to enforce doctrinal statements or codes of conduct addressing one or more of these areas.
This paper will examine legal issues related to the ability …
Take One Step Forward: Federal Courts Continue To Find That Volunteers Are Shielded From Retaliation Based On Protected Speech Under The First Amendment, David A. Grenardo
Take One Step Forward: Federal Courts Continue To Find That Volunteers Are Shielded From Retaliation Based On Protected Speech Under The First Amendment, David A. Grenardo
Faculty Articles
As an issue of first impression in the Fifth Circuit's jurisdiction, a United States district court in Texas considered whether it is impossible to state a claim for speech retaliation which involves the loss of a plaintiff's volunteer ministry rights and credentials. The court, in line with decisions from other federal courts and analogous Supreme Court cases, determined that being a volunteer is the type of governmental benefit or privilege the deprivation of which triggers First Amendment scrutiny, and it held that the volunteer chaplain stated a valid claim for retaliation. This article summarizes the law concerning retaliation against volunteers …
(Re)Complexioning A Simple Tale: Race, Speech, And Colored Leadership, Angela Mae Kupenda
(Re)Complexioning A Simple Tale: Race, Speech, And Colored Leadership, Angela Mae Kupenda
Journal Articles
Rather than acting as a whitening agent, the law should reflect the natural (re)complexioning of society and adapt to the melting pot that is America. The term "(re)complexioning" is used because the idea that the complexion of America was white at the beginning is false. Prior to the "discovery" of America, native citizens were indeed more deeply complexioned than Whites. Any (re)complexioning of the law since, to reflect the colors of America, then, is just to resort to the recognition of factual premises unjustly rejected when America was usurped from those of color and denied to others of color after …
Anti-Cyber Bullying Statutes: Threat To Student Free Speech, John O. Hayward
Anti-Cyber Bullying Statutes: Threat To Student Free Speech, John O. Hayward
Cleveland State Law Review
On October 17, 2006, Megan Meier, a thirteen-year-old girl in Dardenne Prairie, Missouri, who had been diagnosed with attention deficit disorder and depression, committed suicide because of postings on MySpace, an Internet social networking site, saying she was a bad person whom everyone hated and the world would be better off without. As a result, the state revised its harassment and stalking statutes to prohibit using electronic means to knowingly "frighten, intimidate, or cause emotional distress to another person."' At the time of this writing, twenty-one states have passed similar legislation with others sure to follow. Many of these statutes …
Tweaking Tinker: Redefining An Outdated Standard For The Internet Era, Shannon M. Raley
Tweaking Tinker: Redefining An Outdated Standard For The Internet Era, Shannon M. Raley
Cleveland State Law Review
This Note argues that the Tinker standard needs to be reevaluated to encompass Internet-related cases both by eliminating the “on-campus” requirement and by further defining what constitutes a “substantial disruption.” The “on-campus” requirement should be eliminated for the following reasons: 1) lower federal courts already disregard this condition for Internet-related cases; 2) it leads students to abuse their First Amendment rights; and 3) this requirement threatens the safety of teachers, students, and other school personnel. Additionally, Tinker's “substantial disruption” prong would be better understood as a factors test. This ensures that schools utilize the same criteria in determining whether a …
To Secure These Rights: The Supreme Court And Snyder V. Phelps, Ethan Fishman
To Secure These Rights: The Supreme Court And Snyder V. Phelps, Ethan Fishman
St. Thomas Law Review
Historically, the United States Supreme Court has taken a morally neutral approach towards issues involving freedom of expression. Instead of evaluating the content or substance of the views being expressed, the Court has relied primarily upon formalistic time, place, and manner considerations to guide its judgment in such cases. The rationale, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of this judicial approach are vividly illustrated in Snyder v. Phelps-the Court's March 2011 ruling that patently hateful protests at military funerals are protected by the First Amendment of the Constitution. Matthew Snyder was a heterosexual twenty-year-old, Marine Corps Lance Corporal who …
Flawed Assumptions: A Corporate Law Analysis Of Free Speech And Corporate Personhood In Citizens United, Anne M. Tucker
Flawed Assumptions: A Corporate Law Analysis Of Free Speech And Corporate Personhood In Citizens United, Anne M. Tucker
Faculty Publications By Year
In the wake of the January, 2010 Supreme Court decision in Citizens United, special interest groups, citizens, and politicians alike have engaged in a rigorous debate about the role of corporate speech within our democratic process. The First Amendment issues raised in Citizens United - to that extent do corporations have a constitutionally protected right to participate in and influence our elections through expenditures - evoke larger questions about the roles, rights, and responsibilities of corporations within our society. This article concludes that the Supreme Court did not reference corporate law principles when analyzing the fundamental First Amendment debate in …
The Myth Of Church-State Separation, David E. Steinberg
The Myth Of Church-State Separation, David E. Steinberg
Cleveland State Law Review
This article asserts that the church-state separation interpretation of Establishment Clause history is simply wrong. The framers were focused on the first five words of the amendment, which read: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof . . . .” The original Establishment Clause was a guarantee that the federal government would not interfere in state regulation of religion-whatever form that state regulation took. Rather than enacting the Establishment Clause to mandate a separation of church and state, the framers adopted the clause to protect divergent state practices-including state establishment of …
Virtual Child Pornography Laws And The Constraints Imposed By The First Amendment, Paula Bird
Virtual Child Pornography Laws And The Constraints Imposed By The First Amendment, Paula Bird
Barry Law Review
This article seeks to navigate through the complexities involved with the uncertain future of virtual child pornography laws. First, this article sets forth a brief history of the legislative actions and court rulings regarding unprotected speech and virtual child pornography, and discusses the current standing of child pornography laws. Entailed in this discussion will be a vigorous inspection of the current statutes and how they simultaneously affect law enforcement, prosecutors, and defendants. Finally, the potential future of laws regarding virtual child pornography is analyzed, including addressing the issues of how the application and interpretation of the laws are changing and …
Smith And Women's Equality, Leslie C. Griffin
The Media, The Jury, And The High-Profile Defendant: A Defense Perspective On The Media Circus, John C. Meringolo
The Media, The Jury, And The High-Profile Defendant: A Defense Perspective On The Media Circus, John C. Meringolo
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Overhyped Path From Tinker To Morse: How The Student Speech Cases Show The Limits Of Supreme Court Decisions--For The Law And For The Litigants, Scott A. Moss
Publications
Each of the Supreme Court's high school student speech cases reflected the social angst of its era. In 1965's Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, three Iowa teens broke school rules to wear armbands protesting the Vietnam War. In 1983, amidst parental and political upset about youth exposure to sexuality in the media, Bethel School District No. 403 v. Fraser and Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier allowed the censorship of an innuendo-filled student government speech and a school newspaper article on teen pregnancy and parental divorce. In 2007, Morse v. Frederick paralleled the rise of reality television …
Law School Clinics And The First Amendment, Jonathan L. Entin
Law School Clinics And The First Amendment, Jonathan L. Entin
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Have You Been Drinking Tonight Ms. Prynne - Ohio's Scarlet Letter For Ovi/Dui Offenders: A Violation Of First Amendment Protection Against Compelled Speech, William Livingston
Have You Been Drinking Tonight Ms. Prynne - Ohio's Scarlet Letter For Ovi/Dui Offenders: A Violation Of First Amendment Protection Against Compelled Speech, William Livingston
Cleveland State Law Review
This note examines the history of scarlet letter punishments. These types of sanctions raise many constitutional concerns; this Note will specifically address First Amendment compelled speech. Different standards of constitutional review for First Amendment violations and probation conditions will also be discussed. The note will also explain how Ohio's special license plate violates the First Amendment. Because the license plate is a legislative requirement that infringes upon free speech and eliminates judicial sentencing discretion, the state's interest must pass strict scrutiny. This analysis will confirm that the state's interest is legitimate but not compelling. The special license plate fails to …
The Constitutional Status Of Speech About Oneself, R. George Wright
The Constitutional Status Of Speech About Oneself, R. George Wright
Cleveland State Law Review
We have accepted above the well-established idea that speech about oneself that is also intended to convey some sort of political idea or to address some matter of public concern can typically be distinguished from speech about oneself with no such further intent. On this basis, we have argued, contrary to recent contentions, that the latter sort of speech-speech that is "merely" about the self, or about one's merely personal or private concerns-should not generally qualify for any sort of elevated free speech protection. Fundamentally, this is because such speech does not systematically promote any of the consensually recognized and …
Historical Roots Of Citizens United Vs. Fec: How Anarchists And Academics Accidentally Created Corporate Speech Rights, The General Essay, Zephyr Teachout
Historical Roots Of Citizens United Vs. Fec: How Anarchists And Academics Accidentally Created Corporate Speech Rights, The General Essay, Zephyr Teachout
Faculty Scholarship
This paper looks at how the early rhetoric around the First Amendment enabled later development of corporate political speech rights.
Cohen V. Google, Inc., Eirik Cheverud
The End Of Indecency - The Second Circuit Invalidates The Fcc's Indecency Policy In Fox Televisions Stations, Inc. V. Fcc, John V. O'Grady
The End Of Indecency - The Second Circuit Invalidates The Fcc's Indecency Policy In Fox Televisions Stations, Inc. V. Fcc, John V. O'Grady
Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - )
No abstract provided.
Kiddie Porn In The Gallery: Defending The Artist's Corpus Or Invading The Corporal Integrity Of The Subject, Jessica N. White
Kiddie Porn In The Gallery: Defending The Artist's Corpus Or Invading The Corporal Integrity Of The Subject, Jessica N. White
Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - )
No abstract provided.
Brand Renegades, Jeremy N. Sheff
Brand Renegades, Jeremy N. Sheff
Faculty Publications
Recent appearances of trademarks in popular culture-in rap lyrics, on reality TV shows, even in youth riots have raised the question whether the owners of those trademarks might pursue legal remedies to protect their brands from unwanted social associations. This Article argues that they cannot, and that we should understand this limitation on trademark rights as grounded in a principle that consumption of certain brands is an expressive act that First Amendment principles place outside trademark owners' control.
The Curious Life Of In Loco Parentis At American Universities, Philip Lee
The Curious Life Of In Loco Parentis At American Universities, Philip Lee
Faculty Publications
In this article I trace the legal history, through court opinions, of in loco parentis (Latin for “in the place of the parent”) as applied to the relationship between American universities and their students. I demonstrate that until the 1960s, the in loco parentis doctrine allowed universities to exercise great discretion in developing the “character” of their students without respect to their students’ constitutional rights. The demise of this doctrine forced courts, and universities themselves, to redefine the relationship of universities with their students in important ways.
Religious Freedom, Church-State Separation, And The Ministerial Exception, Thomas C. Berg, Kimberlee Wood Colby, Carl H. Esbeck, Richard W. Garnett
Religious Freedom, Church-State Separation, And The Ministerial Exception, Thomas C. Berg, Kimberlee Wood Colby, Carl H. Esbeck, Richard W. Garnett
Journal Articles
The Hosanna-Tabor case concerns the separation of church and state, an arrangement that is often misunderstood but is nevertheless a critical dimension of the freedom of religion protected by the First Amendment to our Constitution. For nearly a thousand years, the tradition of Western constitutionalism - the project of protecting political freedom by marking boundaries to the power of government - has been assisted by the principled commitment to religious liberty and to church-state separation, correctly understood. A community that respects - as ours does - both the importance of, and the distinction between, the spheres of political and religious …
A Fundamental Right To Read: Reader Privacy Protections In The U.S. Constitution, Eric Robertson
A Fundamental Right To Read: Reader Privacy Protections In The U.S. Constitution, Eric Robertson
University of Colorado Law Review
Bookstore customers and library patrons typically expect their book purchases and book-borrowing habits to remain private, but what is the legal basis for this expectation and is it justified? This Comment examines court decisions, readers' privacy scholarship, and First Amendment jurisprudence in search of a consistent answer. Although courts and scholars have taken different approaches in identifying a right to readers' privacy and what activity it encompasses, this Comment concludes that a right to reader privacy is fundamental under the First Amendment. In the end, this Comment seeks to provide a simplified solution to the complex constitutional issues that can …
Pornography As Pollution, John Copeland Nagle
Pornography As Pollution, John Copeland Nagle
Journal Articles
Pornography is often compared to pollution. But little effort has been made to consider what it means to describe pornography as a pollution problem, even as many legal scholars have concluded that the law has failed to control internet pornography. Opponents of pornography maintain passionate convictions about how sexually-explicit materials harm both those who are exposed to them and the broader cultural environment. Viewers of pornography may generally hold less fervent beliefs, but champions of free speech and of a free internet object to anti-pornography regulations with strong convictions of their own. The challenge is how to address the widespread …
Adult Websites And The Top-Level Domain Debate: Icann's Adoption Of .Xxx Dras Adult-Industry Ire, Robert D. Richards, Clay Calvert
Adult Websites And The Top-Level Domain Debate: Icann's Adoption Of .Xxx Dras Adult-Industry Ire, Robert D. Richards, Clay Calvert
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Association Of Adult Businesses With Secondary Effects: Legal Doctrine Social Theory, And Empirical Evidence, Alan C. Weinstein, Richard Mccleary
The Association Of Adult Businesses With Secondary Effects: Legal Doctrine Social Theory, And Empirical Evidence, Alan C. Weinstein, Richard Mccleary
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.