Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (3429)
- Religion Law (1016)
- Supreme Court of the United States (953)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (804)
- Communications Law (799)
-
- Internet Law (735)
- Education Law (650)
- Law and Society (622)
- Intellectual Property Law (600)
- Law and Politics (557)
- Courts (539)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (528)
- Privacy Law (507)
- Legislation (503)
- Criminal Law (497)
- Science and Technology Law (489)
- Fourteenth Amendment (487)
- State and Local Government Law (483)
- Jurisprudence (482)
- Labor and Employment Law (456)
- Law and Gender (412)
- Torts (394)
- Legal History (393)
- Human Rights Law (371)
- Administrative Law (370)
- Election Law (370)
- Computer Law (362)
- Criminal Procedure (354)
- Institution
-
- William & Mary Law School (553)
- University of Michigan Law School (422)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (389)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (262)
- Seattle University School of Law (249)
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (242)
- University of North Carolina School of Law (242)
- Brigham Young University Law School (223)
- Notre Dame Law School (209)
- Pepperdine University (203)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (194)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (177)
- University of Colorado Law School (160)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (153)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (152)
- St. John's University School of Law (150)
- Cleveland State University (149)
- UIC School of Law (145)
- University of Georgia School of Law (144)
- University of Miami Law School (134)
- Brooklyn Law School (129)
- University of Richmond (119)
- Fordham Law School (116)
- Columbia Law School (113)
- New York Law School (111)
- Roger Williams University (101)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (98)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (96)
- University of Washington School of Law (95)
- West Virginia University (95)
- Keyword
-
- First Amendment (1728)
- Freedom of speech (601)
- First amendment (562)
- Free speech (521)
- United States Constitution 1st Amendment (334)
-
- Freedom of Speech (298)
- Supreme Court (263)
- Constitutional law (255)
- Establishment Clause (214)
- Constitutional Law (206)
- Religion (206)
- Constitution (164)
- Privacy (160)
- Free Speech (159)
- United States Supreme Court (156)
- Speech (149)
- Censorship (141)
- Freedom of the press (138)
- Internet (130)
- Establishment clause (126)
- Social media (123)
- Defamation (121)
- Obscenity (118)
- Freedom of religion (112)
- Freedom of expression (110)
- Commercial speech (103)
- Religious freedom (102)
- Discrimination (98)
- Free Exercise Clause (98)
- Law (88)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (377)
- Michigan Law Review (265)
- Faculty Publications (239)
- First Amendment Law Review (238)
- Seattle University Law Review (220)
-
- Touro Law Review (202)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (193)
- Pepperdine Law Review (167)
- Articles (166)
- BYU Law Review (147)
- Publications (129)
- Scholarly Works (128)
- Journal Articles (125)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (124)
- Cardozo Law Review (123)
- William & Mary Law Review (122)
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (120)
- Scholarly Articles (107)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (98)
- Popular Media (97)
- UIC Law Review (94)
- Indiana Law Journal (93)
- West Virginia Law Review (92)
- Federal Communications Law Journal (89)
- Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology (82)
- Cleveland State Law Review (82)
- Akron Law Review (81)
- The Catholic Lawyer (75)
- Kentucky Law Journal (74)
- All Faculty Scholarship (72)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 3871 - 3900 of 7923
Full-Text Articles in First Amendment
Municipal And State Sanctuary Declarations: Innocuous Symbolism Or Improper Dictates?, Jorge L. Carro
Municipal And State Sanctuary Declarations: Innocuous Symbolism Or Improper Dictates?, Jorge L. Carro
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Journalists, Trespass, And Officials: Closing The Door On Florida Publishing Co. V. Fletcher , Kent R. Middleton
Journalists, Trespass, And Officials: Closing The Door On Florida Publishing Co. V. Fletcher , Kent R. Middleton
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Avoiding Religious Apartheid: Affording Equal Treatment For Student-Initiated Religious Expression In Public Schools , John W. Whitehead
Avoiding Religious Apartheid: Affording Equal Treatment For Student-Initiated Religious Expression In Public Schools , John W. Whitehead
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Hustler Magazine, Inc. V. Falwell: Laugh Or Cry, Public Figures Must Learn To Live With Satirical Criticism , James R. Laguzza
Hustler Magazine, Inc. V. Falwell: Laugh Or Cry, Public Figures Must Learn To Live With Satirical Criticism , James R. Laguzza
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Thornburgh V. Abbott: Slamming The Prison Gates On Constitutional Rights, Megan M. Mcdonald
Thornburgh V. Abbott: Slamming The Prison Gates On Constitutional Rights, Megan M. Mcdonald
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Descendible Right Of Publicity: Has The Time Finally Come For A National Standard?, J. Steven Bingman
A Descendible Right Of Publicity: Has The Time Finally Come For A National Standard?, J. Steven Bingman
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Texas V. Johnson: The Constitutional Protection Of Flag Desecration, Patricia Lofton
Texas V. Johnson: The Constitutional Protection Of Flag Desecration, Patricia Lofton
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Mapping The Forms Of Expressive Association, Randall P. Bezanson, Sheila A. Bentzen, C. Michael Judd
Mapping The Forms Of Expressive Association, Randall P. Bezanson, Sheila A. Bentzen, C. Michael Judd
Pepperdine Law Review
Freedom of expressive association is a relatively new right under the First Amendment, and as a result, its key definitional aspects are continually in flux. Scholarship to- date focuses on the Supreme Court’s treatment of expressive associations, but because the Court has never truly defined what an expressive association is, the Scholarship also fails to really define the boundaries and characteristics of an expressive association. This Article begins to fill this gap in the literature and takes on the task of “mapping” the forms of expressive association. Our goal is to begin the organizing, defining, and classifying task by identifying …
Saving The First Amendment From Itself: Relief From The Sherman Act Against The Rabbinic Cartels, Barak D. Richman
Saving The First Amendment From Itself: Relief From The Sherman Act Against The Rabbinic Cartels, Barak D. Richman
Pepperdine Law Review
America’s rabbis currently structure their employment market with rules that flagrantly violate the Sherman Act. The consequences of these rules, in addition to the predictable economic outcomes of inflated wages for rabbis and restricted consumer freedoms for the congregations that employ them, meaningfully hinder Jewish communities from seeking their preferred spiritual leader. Although the First Amendment cannot combat against this privately-orchestrated (yet paradigmatic) restriction on religious expression, the Sherman Act can. Ironically, however, the rabbinic organizations implementing the restrictive policies claim that the First Amendment immunizes them from Sherman Act scrutiny, thereby claiming the First Amendment empowers them to do …
Blame It On Catholic Bishop: The Question Of Nlrb Jurisdiction Over Religious Colleges And Universities, Susan J. Stabile
Blame It On Catholic Bishop: The Question Of Nlrb Jurisdiction Over Religious Colleges And Universities, Susan J. Stabile
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Endorsement Test Is Alive And Well: A Cause For Celebration And Sorrow, Mark Strasser
The Endorsement Test Is Alive And Well: A Cause For Celebration And Sorrow, Mark Strasser
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Priority Of Law: A Response To Michael Stokes Paulsen, Eugene Volokh
The Priority Of Law: A Response To Michael Stokes Paulsen, Eugene Volokh
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Neutrality And The Good Of Religious Freedom: An Appreciative Response To Professor Koppelman, Richard W. Garnett
Neutrality And The Good Of Religious Freedom: An Appreciative Response To Professor Koppelman, Richard W. Garnett
Pepperdine Law Review
This paper is a short response to an address, “And I Don’t Care What It Is: Religious Neutrality in American Law,” delivered by Prof. Andrew Koppelman at a conference, “The Competing Claims of Law and Religion: Who Should Influence Whom?”, which was held at Pepperdine University in February of 2012. In this response, it is suggested – among other things – that “American religious neutrality” is, as Koppelman argues, “coherent and attractive” because and to the extent that it is not neutral with respect to the goal and good of religious freedom. Religious freedom, in the American tradition, is not …
The Priority Of God: A Theory Of Religious Liberty, Michael Stokes Paulsen
The Priority Of God: A Theory Of Religious Liberty, Michael Stokes Paulsen
Pepperdine Law Review
Professor Paulsen argues that religious freedom only makes entire sense as a constitutional arrangement on the premise that God exists, that God makes actual demands on human loyalty and conduct, and that those demands precede and are superior in obligation to those of the State. Religious freedom exists to protect the exercise of plausibly true understandings of God's actual commands, as against state power, and to disable state power to proscribe -- or prescribe -- religious exercise. The article explores four possible stances of society toward religious freedom, depending on whether society and state embrace the idea of religious truth …
Can We Please Stop Talking About Neutrality? Koppelman Between Scalia And Rawls, Chad Flanders
Can We Please Stop Talking About Neutrality? Koppelman Between Scalia And Rawls, Chad Flanders
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
And I Don’T Care What It Is: Religious Neutrality In American Law, Andrew Koppelman
And I Don’T Care What It Is: Religious Neutrality In American Law, Andrew Koppelman
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Symposium Introduction: The Competing Claims Of Law And Religion: Who Should Influence Whom? , Robert F. Cochran Jr., Michael A. Helfand
Symposium Introduction: The Competing Claims Of Law And Religion: Who Should Influence Whom? , Robert F. Cochran Jr., Michael A. Helfand
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The HazelwoodIng Of The First Amendment: The Deference To Authority, Erwin Chemerinsky
The HazelwoodIng Of The First Amendment: The Deference To Authority, Erwin Chemerinsky
First Amendment Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Key Word Is Student: Hazelwood Censorship Crashes The Ivy-Covered Gates, Frank D. Lomonte
The Key Word Is Student: Hazelwood Censorship Crashes The Ivy-Covered Gates, Frank D. Lomonte
First Amendment Law Review
No abstract provided.
Maddening Choices: The Tension Between Bullying And The First Amendment In Public Schools, Francisco M. Negron Jr.
Maddening Choices: The Tension Between Bullying And The First Amendment In Public Schools, Francisco M. Negron Jr.
First Amendment Law Review
No abstract provided.
University Imprimaturs On Student Speech: The Certification Cases, Emily Gold Waldman
University Imprimaturs On Student Speech: The Certification Cases, Emily Gold Waldman
First Amendment Law Review
No abstract provided.
Religious Freedom In The United States: ‘When You Come To A Fork In The Road, Take It', Charles J. Russo
Religious Freedom In The United States: ‘When You Come To A Fork In The Road, Take It', Charles J. Russo
Educational Leadership Faculty Publications
As expansive as the Supreme Court’s view of the First Amendment religion clauses has been, its jurisprudence has demonstrated that its rulings do not always achieve the outcomes desired by proponents of religious freedom.3 From the perspective of supporters of religious freedom, this realization lends credence to the preceding wry comment by Justice Scalia. This article details the Court’s inconsistent treatment of Christianity, and people of faith broadly, especially in educational settings. These inconsistent judicial outcomes run the risk of increasingly marginalizing matters of faith and conscience in the public square.4 As discussed in this article, disputes over …
Standards Of Professional Conduct As Limitations On Student Speech, R. George Wright
Standards Of Professional Conduct As Limitations On Student Speech, R. George Wright
First Amendment Law Review
No abstract provided.
The “Law Of The First Amendment” Revisited, Robert A. Sedler
The “Law Of The First Amendment” Revisited, Robert A. Sedler
Law Faculty Research Publications
No abstract provided.
Reclaiming Hazelwood: Public School Classrooms And A Return To The Supreme Court's Vision For Viewpoint-Specific Speech Regulation Policy, Brad Dickens
Richmond Journal of Law and the Public Interest
Federal and circuit courts continue to fiercely debate whether the Supreme Court's 1988 ruling in Hazelwood v. Kuhineier requires school policies regulating student speech and expression to be viewpoint neutral. However, this note suggests that the language of Hazelwood itself shows that the Circuit debate may be misguided. The Supreme Court intended Hazelwood to stand as a narrow exception to its earlier holding in Tinker, and Hazelwood only applies in instances where the government's own voice is implicated, largely in a public context. When the school, and in effect the government, is speaking with its own voice, the school must …
Justice Kennedy’S Free Speech Jurisprudence: A Quantitative And Qualitative Analysis, Ashutosh Bhagwat, Matthew Struhar
Justice Kennedy’S Free Speech Jurisprudence: A Quantitative And Qualitative Analysis, Ashutosh Bhagwat, Matthew Struhar
McGeorge Law Review
No abstract provided.
In The Turbulent Wake Of Anderson V. Bell: Protecting Core Political Speech And Utahn's Right To Initiative, Daniel W. Boyer
In The Turbulent Wake Of Anderson V. Bell: Protecting Core Political Speech And Utahn's Right To Initiative, Daniel W. Boyer
Utah OnLaw: The Utah Law Review Online Supplement
Since the court in Anderson already affirmed the validity of electronic signatures in Title 20 through statutory rules of construction and common law principles, it will likely have to address the constitutional challenges it declined to reach in that case when it is visited with new challenges to the State’s ban on e-signatures in ballot petitions and initiatives. This Note offers an alternative to the uniform operation of laws analysis, which plaintiffs have recently employed against the Lieutenant Governor and S.B. 165. Free speech analysis supplies parameters that are more closely suited to address the type of constitutional wrong that …
Justice Kennedy’S Jurisprudence On The First Amendment Religion Clauses, R. Randall Kelso
Justice Kennedy’S Jurisprudence On The First Amendment Religion Clauses, R. Randall Kelso
McGeorge Law Review
No abstract provided.
What's Religion Got To Do With It? Virtually Nothing: Hosanna-Tabor And The Unbridled Power Of The Ministerial Exemption, Marsha B. Freeman
What's Religion Got To Do With It? Virtually Nothing: Hosanna-Tabor And The Unbridled Power Of The Ministerial Exemption, Marsha B. Freeman
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Tweet Tweet: A First Amendment Wake Up Call Regarding Social Media In The Sports Arena, 30 J. Marshall J. Info. Tech. & Privacy L. 117 (2013), Samantha Levin
Tweet Tweet: A First Amendment Wake Up Call Regarding Social Media In The Sports Arena, 30 J. Marshall J. Info. Tech. & Privacy L. 117 (2013), Samantha Levin
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.