First Amendment Commons^™

Don't Give Your Kid That Shot!: The Public Health Threat Posed By Anti-Vaccine Speech And Why Such Speech Is Not Guaranteed Full Protection Under The First Amendment, Amanda C. Naprawa

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

The article argues that antivaccination speech poses a significant threat to public health, and the law should be utilized to regulate such speech to prevent the spread of preventable diseases and protect vulnerable populations through herd immunity. While the First Amendment protects free speech, legal measures such as the FTC regulating false advertising and potential vaccine disparagement statutes can be effective tools in curbing harmful misinformation. The article emphasizes the need for a balanced approach that respects individual rights while safeguarding community health, supported by scientific consensus on vaccine safety and legal precedents like Jacobson v. Massachusetts.

Balancing Intentional Infliction Of Emotional Distress Claims And First Amendment Protections In Snyder V. Phelps, Douglas Behrens

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

The article explores the delicate balance between First Amendment protections and Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED) claims, using the Snyder v. Phelps case as a focal point. It argues that while the Supreme Court correctly ruled in favor of Westboro Baptist Church's free speech rights, the current legal framework for balancing these interests is outdated. The author proposes an "enhanced publicity test" to modernize the analysis, ensuring that speech contributing to public discourse is protected while safeguarding individuals from severe emotional harm caused by malicious speech.

Why Can't We Be Friends?: How Far Can The State Go In Restricting Social Networking Communications Between Secondary School Teachers And Their Students?, Elise Rosen Puzio

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Is There Blood On Your Hands-Free Device?: Examining Legislative Approaches To The Conflict Minerals Problem In The Democratic Republic Of Congo, Emily Veale

Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law

The article argues that Section 1502 of the Dodd-Frank Act, which mandates SEC disclosures for conflict minerals, is insufficient to address the violence and governance issues in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). It advocates for comprehensive legislation that ties U.S. foreign assistance to specific reforms in the DRC, such as military and governance improvements, to effectively combat the conflict minerals crisis. The SEC’s role in promoting social and foreign policy goals is critiqued, and the article proposes a tiered incentive system to encourage meaningful change in the DRC’s mining sector.

Discriminating Speech: The Heterophilia Of The Freedom Of Speech Doctrine, Zvi Triger

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

In this Article, I seek to shed light on freedom ofspeech jurisprudence as it is reflected in the Snyder v. Phelps and Skokie cases, as well as in two analogous Israeli cases, namely petitions of members of the extreme right against the pride parades in Jerusalem, as well as petitions by the same petitioners for police permits to hold anti-Arab processions in the Arab town of Umm al-Fahm.

Comparing the cases, I identify the moral relativity built into the interpretation offreedom of expression doctrine in both countries. I introduce the concept of discriminating speech, which is speech that is designed …

The Law And Science Of Video Game Violence: What Was Lost In Translation?, William K. Ford

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Terry Jones And Global Free Speech In The Internet Age, G. Aaron Leibowitz

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

"A Right To Be Spared Unhappiness": Images Of Death And The Expansion Of The Relational Right Of Privacy, Catherine Leibowitz

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

@Socialmedia: Speech With A Click Of A Button? #Socialsharingbuttons, Alicia D. Sklan

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Symmetry For Symmetry’S Sake: Why Bose Does Not Require Independent Review Of A Trial Court’S First-Amendment-Favorable Findings Of Fact, Joshua Wurtzel

Cardozo Law Review de•novo

This Note argues that Bose does not support the symmetrical application of independent review of facts by appellate courts in First Amendment cases, regardless of whether the First Amendment claimant won or lost below. While symmetrical procedures and results may be desirable in most parts of the law, symmetry is not required where that symmetry will inhibit a greater constitutional interest. In the independent review context, symmetrical application of Bose results in the reversal of First Amendment wins that would otherwise be upheld under clear error review. This result is clearly antithetical to Bose’s purpose of enhancing First Amendment protections.

Docs Versus Glocks: N.R.A. Takes Aim At Florida Physicians’ Freedom Of Speech: Leaving Patients’ Health, Safety, And Welfare At Risk, Michelle Foody

Cardozo Law Review de•novo

Part I of this Note provides background on the Act at issue, its legislative history, the current status of the Supreme Court’s free speech jurisprudence, and it also introduces the constitutional interests at stake. Part II considers the constitutionality of the Act under the existing First Amendment standard and addresses the State’s assertions under the Second Amendment. Part III proposes that the Court’s standard ought to be recalibrated, taking into account the would-be listeners’ cognizable interest in the information. Part III goes on to legitimate the proposal by reconciling this new examination standard with existing free speech jurisprudence and justifications, …

Finding Reality In The Right Of Publicity, Lindsay Korotkin

Cardozo Law Review de•novo

This Note takes a critical look at the right of publicity in the context of the growth of the reality television industry and, for strong policy reasons, proposes a broad fair use defense to limit reality television stars’ right of publicity claims. Part I traces the formulation of the right to privacy at common law and the development of the right of publicity as a right distinct from privacy. Part II discusses whom the right of publicity protects, what reality television is, and how reality television stars are different from talent-based celebrities. Part III examines how broad publicity protection can …

Crisis Pregnancy Centers: Impeding The Right To Informed Decision Making, Alice X. Chen

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The note argues that crisis pregnancy centers (CPCs) in the United States engage in deceptive practices to deter women from obtaining abortions, often masquerading as medical facilities while providing misleading information about reproductive health. These centers receive significant funding from federal and state governments, despite their lack of regulation and medical licensure. The note contends that while local governments have attempted to regulate CPCs through ordinances requiring transparency, these efforts have largely been struck down by federal courts on First Amendment grounds. The author advocates for state-level action to protect women's rights to informed decision-making and accurate reproductive healthcare.

Who Watches The Watchmen? Big Brother's Use Of Wiretap Statutes To Place Civilians In Timeout, Travis S. Triano

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Putting State Courts In The Constitutional Driver's Seat: State Taxpayer Standing After Cuno And Winn, Edward A. Zelinsky

Articles

This article explores the implications of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decisions in DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Cuno and Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. Winn. In Cuno and Winn, the Court held that state taxpayers lacked standing in the federal courts. Because the states have more liberal taxpayer standing rules than do the federal courts, Cuno and Winn will not terminate taxpayers’ constitutional challenges to state taxes and expenditures, but will instead channel such challenges from the federal courts (where taxpayers do not have standing) to the state courts (where they do). Moreover, municipal taxpayer standing in the federal courts, which …

The Burden To Prove Libel: A Comparative Analysis Of Traditional English And U.S. Defamation Laws And The Dawn Of England's Modern Day, Elizabeth Samson

Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law

The article examines the divergence between English and U.S. defamation laws, particularly the burden of proof in libel cases. It argues that while the U.S. has evolved to prioritize free speech by shifting the burden to the plaintiff, England maintains a plaintiff-friendly approach, leading to libel tourism and chilling free speech. The author suggests that England should consider reforming its burden of proof to address these issues.

The Playground Bully Has Gone Digital: The Dangers Of Cyberbullying, The First Amendment Implications, And The Necessary Responses, Jamie Wolf

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

The note argues that cyberbullying has evolved into a significant issue in the digital age, requiring a reevaluation of First Amendment protections and legislative responses. It critiques the current legal framework, particularly the Tinker v. Des Moines standard, for failing to adequately address off-campus speech that impacts the school environment. The author advocates for a balanced approach that protects victims while ensuring due process, emphasizing the need for comprehensive statutes and proactive measures by schools and parents.

Heroism, Valor, And Deceit: False Claims Of Military Awards And The First Amendment, Robert J. Juge Iii

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

Rick Duncan always wanted to serve his country. His military career started at the United States Naval Academy at Annapolis. As a Marine Corps Captain, he served with distinction as a Nuclear Missile Launch Officer. Serving at the Pentagon during the 9/11 attacks, he quickly volunteered for a combat tour in Iraq. While commanding a Marine Battalion in Fallujah, he was struck by a roadside bomb, which resulted in permanent brain trauma and cost him his finger, forcing him to return home. After receiving a Silver Star and a Purple Heart for his gallantry, he refused to give up. If …

Tattoos, Tickets, And Other Tawdry Behavior: How Universities Use Federal Law To Hide Their Scandals, Mary Margaret Penrose

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Do Religious Tax Exemptions Entangle In Violation Of The Establishment Clause? The Constitutionality Of The Parsonage Allowance Exclusion And The Religious Exemptions Of The Individual Health Care Mandate And The Fica And Self-Employment Taxes, Edward A. Zelinsky

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Bring In The Nerds: Secrecy, National Security, And The Creation Of International Intellectual Property Law, David S. Levine

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The negotiations of the international Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement and Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement have been conducted largely in secret, elevating intellectual property piracy to the level of national security concerns for purposes of accessing information through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). However, the level of actual secrecy has been tiered, with corporate interests enjoying far more access to negotiation information than the general public. At the same time, similar intellectual property issues were negotiated in the relative transparency of Congress' debate over the Stop Online Piracy Act and PROTECT IP Act, allowing for much greater public involvement. With national …

Switching The Flip: Questioning The Government's Authority To Shut Down Communication Networks In Furtherance Of Public Safety, Eric B. Einisman

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Demise Of The Federal Shield Law, William E. Lee

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Internet Advertising After Sorrell V. Ims Health: A Discussion On Data Privacy & The First Amendment, Agatha M. Cole

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Cartoons Aren't Real People, Too: Does The Regulation Of Virtual Child Pornography Violate The First Amendment And Criminalize Subversive Thought?, Keisha April

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The note argues that the government's regulation of virtual child pornography, particularly under the Obscene Visual Representations of the Sexual Abuse of Children (OVR) provision of the PROTECT Act, raises significant First Amendment concerns. While the provision aims to protect children, it criminalizes depictions that do not involve real children, undermining free expression. The analysis critiques the OVR provision's overbreadth and vagueness, asserting that it chills artistic expression and fails to serve a compelling government interest. The note advocates for narrowing the provision to focus on actual harm rather than fictional depictions.

Collateral Censorship And The Limits Of Intermediary Immunity, Felix T. Wu

Articles

The law often limits the liability of an intermediary for the speech it carries. And rightly so, because imposing liability on intermediaries can induce them to filter out questionable content and this “collateral censorship” risks suppressing much lawful, even highly beneficial, speech. The “collateral censorship” rationale has its limits, though, and correspondingly, so should the applicability of intermediary immunity. The worry with collateral censorship is not just that intermediaries censor, but that they censor more than an original speaker would in the face of potential liability. Increased censorship, in turn, is the product of applying liability targeted at original speakers …

Religious Freedom In Private Lawsuits: Untangling When Rfra Applies To Suits Involving Only Private Parties, Sara Lunsford Kohen

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

The article argues that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) should apply to private suits involving government action, proposing a framework where RFRA creates a claim against private defendants acting under federal law and serves as a defense when religious freedom is substantially burdened. It advocates for a state actor analysis to determine liability, ensuring religious freedom is protected while balancing public interests.

Stop With The Exceptions: A Narrow Interpretation Of Tinker For All Student Speech Claims, Matthew Sheffield

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

The article examines the evolution of First Amendment rights for students in public schools, focusing on the landmark *Tinker v. Des Moines Independent School District* decision and its subsequent interpretations. While Tinker established that students retain their constitutional rights in schools, later Supreme Court rulings, such as Fraser, Hazelwood, and Morse, have narrowed its application, balancing student free speech against school administrative concerns. The article argues that these post-Tinker decisions are consistent with the original intent of Tinker and advocate for a narrow application of its principles to maintain equilibrium between student rights and school authority.

Isn't It Ironic? The Undermining Of American Public Policy By American Tax Law, And The Ramifications On Middle East Peace, Amanda Berman

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

The note critiques the broad and vague definition of "charitable" under U.S. tax law, particularly in the context of domestic organizations operating internationally. It argues that the current system allows organizations to act contrary to U.S. public policy while receiving tax-exempt status, and it calls for reform to prevent the misuse of tax-deductible funds for activities that undermine government policies. The analysis focuses on the IRS's oversight failures and the need for clearer guidelines to ensure charitable organizations align with public interest and policy goals.

The Religion Clauses As Mutually Reinforcing Mandates: Why The Arguments For Rigorously Enforcing The Free Exercise Clause And Establishment Clause Are Stronger When Both Clauses Are Taken Seriously, Alan Brownstein

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.