First Amendment Commons^™

Nsfw: An Empirical Study Of Scandalous Trademarks, Megan M. Carpenter, Mary Garner

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

This project is an empirical analysis of trademarks that have received rejections based on their "scandalous " nature. It is the first of its kind.

The Lanham Act bars registration for trademarks that are "scandalous" and "immoral." While much has been written on the morality provisions in the Lanham Act, this piece is the first scholarly project that engages an empirical analysis of the Section 2(a) rejections based on scandalousness; it contains a look behind the scenes at how the morality provisions are applied throughout the trademark registration process. This study analyzes which marks are being rejected, what evidence is …

This Book Is Not Yet Rated: Age Ratings In The Literary Market Vs. Minors' First Amendment Right To Receive Information, Nathalie De Choudens Baez

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Treating The Disease: A First Amendment Prescription For The U.S. Patent System, Stephanie A. Diehl

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Myth Of Obsolete Obscenity, Jennifer M. Kinsley

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Religious Freedom: Why States Are Unconstitutionally Burdening Their Own Citizens As They “Lower” The Burden, Jason Goldman

Cardozo Law Review de•novo

Part I of this Note traces the development of the Supreme Court’s First Amendment precedent, including a discussion of Congress’s enactment of Federal RFRA. Part II introduces the states’ legislative efforts with regard to free exercise statutes, culminating with the problematic “burden” RFRA movement. Part III outlines a brief history of both the Establishment Clause and Separation of Powers doctrine, and analyzes how “burden” RFRAs are unconstitutional in light of each, respectively. Part IV discusses the implications of this progressive trend, specifically focusing on the boundless government litigation, civil rights concerns, and the health and safety issues that have resulted. …

Are Physician-Patient Communications Protected By The First Amendment?, Martha Swartz

Cardozo Law Review de•novo

In the past several years, a number of states have enacted laws restricting physicians’ rights to speak freely with their patients. These laws go beyond informed consent laws enacted in most states in the 1960s and 1970s. While the informed consent laws require physicians to provide certain categories of information to patients prior to invasive treatment—such as the nature of the risks and benefits entailed—these new laws either prohibit physicians from discussing certain topics or mandate that they provide specific information to their patients that is only questionably supported by medical evidence. In the past several years, a number of …

Can You Work It? Or Flip It And Reverse It?: Protecting Lgbt Youth From Sexual Orientation Change Efforts, Sanam Assil

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The note advocates for raising the minimum age for Sexual Orientation Change Efforts (SOCE) from eighteen to twenty-one, arguing that individuals under twenty-one lack the emotional maturity to consent to such therapies. It emphasizes the harmful effects of SOCE, supported by findings from psychological organizations, and proposes incremental legislative changes to eventually achieve a nationwide ban on conversion therapy.

Dressed To Oppress? An Analysis Of The Legal Treatment Of The First Amendment And Its Effect On Muslim Women Who Wear Hijabs, Nida Alvi

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The note examines the legal treatment of Muslim women's right to wear hijabs in the United States, arguing that while the First Amendment protects religious expression, Muslim women often face discrimination and undue burdens in schools, employment, and public spaces. The analysis highlights how courts and institutions frequently question the sincerity of their religious beliefs and impose assimilationist pressures, undermining true religious freedom.

The Case For Evidence-Based Free Exercise Accommodation: Why The Religious Freedom Restoration Act Is Bad Public Policy, Marci A. Hamilton

Articles

No abstract provided.

The Structural Wall Of Separation And The Erroneous Claim Of Anti-Catholic Discrimination, Robert D. Goldstein

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

No abstract provided.

Dirty Secrets: The First Amendment In Protective-Order Litigation, Dustin B. Benham

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Pitfalls Of The Pittman-Robertson Act: Threats To An American Wildlife Act That Ensnare Hunters And Hikers Alike, Greg Huffaker

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

No abstract provided.

Depicting The Graphic Truth: The Heated Controversy Over Cigarette Warning Labels And The Boundaries Of First Amendment Protection, Brian Fedele

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

No abstract provided.

Failing To Warn In The Context Of Rare Side Effects, Morris Dweck

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

No abstract provided.

The Adoption Of Children In Judaism And In Israel; A Conceptual And Practical Review, Mark Goldfeder

Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law

Religion has played a fairly significant role in the history of adoption law, both in the U.S. and internationally. Although there are plenty of questions raised by religion in the context of adoption, one particular issue revolves around whether or not religion should factor into a "best interests of the child" placement determination. Whether or not it should factor into the determination, in practice religion often plays a part in the legal determination of which home will provide the best and most supportive environment for an adopted child. While much has been written about the legal aspect of putting a …

The Israeli Anti-Boycott Law: Should Artists Be Worried?, Arie Peled

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

Though much has been written about the economic dimension of Arab boycotts against Israel, much less attention has been paid to the implications of wider calls for a cultural boycott against Israel. Part I of this note will outline the scope of Israel's boycott problem by looking to the history of the Palestinian Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions ("BDS") movement, while focusing in particular on the cultural aspects of this boycott. It will then discuss the current dimensions of the domestic and international cultural boycott campaigns Israel faces. Part II will analyze the Israeli legislative response to the BDS movement through …

Mandatory Ultrasound Statutes And The First Amendment, Shifting The Constitutional Perspective, Cheri D. Smith

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The jurisprudence of abortion law is replete with instances in which the concerns of the woman seeking the procedure have taken a back seat. The newest battleground in abortion regulation involves mandatory ultrasound statutes touted as informed consent regulations. The analysis of courts confronting these statutes has turned on whether the mandatory disclosures violate the physician's First Amendment right to be free from compelled speech. The particular breed of statute at issue in this paper requires a physician not only to perform an ultrasound, but also to make the images visible to the woman, to make audible the heartbeat, and …

Kill Switches, Forum Doctrine, And The First Amendment's Digital Future, Enrique Armijo

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

Governments play a growing role in providing access to digital speech spaces. This development has important consequences for free expression. Communication's migration from physical public spaces to virtual ones has increased the State's capacity for ex ante interference with speech, from targeted blocking of users, websites, and applications on its communications networks to shutting off access to those networks altogether. Contrary to the conclusions of most Speech Clause scholars, the First Amendment's public forum doctrine is ill equipped to solve these problems, in part because the doctrine under-protects speech that is not expressed in shared physical space. Accordingly, this Article …

Borrowed Fiction And The Rightful Copyright Position, Viva R. Moffat

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

Works of "borrowed fiction"-unauthorized sequels or retellings of literary works-have long prompted legal, cultural, and social backlash. With respect to copyright disputes, this is because borrowed fiction entails a range of legitimate but conflicting interests. Copyright law has historically elevated the interests of the "original" author over those of other writers and the reading public. Scholars have offered a range of proposals to counter this tendency, but these reforms have focused on the infringement analysis and the fair use doctrine. Each of those, however, involves a binary decision, one that is not amenable to accommodating the conflicting interests at stake. …

Federally Recognized Rights Of Lgbtq Students To Form Gay-Straight Alliance Organizations (Gsas), Jerry Foxhoven

Cardozo Law Review de•novo

The purpose of this article is to explore the various avenues that have been used in the federal courts to ensure the right to organize Gay Straight Alliances (GSAs), and to detail the use of the federal courts by students who assert the right to express contrary views on sexual orientation issues.

College Students’ Online Speech: Searching For The Appropriate Standards Within First Amendment Case Principles, Jeffrey C. Sun, Neal H. Hutchens

Cardozo Law Review de•novo

College student free speech cases, particularly as applied to student online speech challenges, suffer from conflicting legal principles. This paper highlights empirically noted problems in resolving disputes between a college student’s free speech rights and a public college’s authority to maintain order and campus safety. In Part I of this paper, the authors present the established legal principles from two foundational cases addressing issues of student speech in the educational context. In Part II, the authors demonstrate how courts have used PK12 education cases and public employment cases as sources that address legal principles for college student speech cases—particularly to …

The Basic Logic Of Post-Tinker Jurisprudence, R. George Wright

Cardozo Law Review de•novo

Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District is rightly regarded as a landmark student speech case. At this point, however, it is fair and important to ask about the likely consequences of radically abandoning Tinker and the succeeding case law. What might it mean, at this historical point, to abandon Tinker along with its qualifying and limiting cases? The discussion briefly pursues this question and endorses a radical abandonment of Tinker and the succeeding cases as binding case law.

Steubenville And Beyond: The Constitutional Case For Comprehensive Sex Education, Kelly E. Mannion

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The article argues that states are constitutionally required to provide comprehensive sex education to minors, as it is essential for their ability to exercise their constitutional rights to privacy, liberty, and autonomy. The denial of adequate sex education constitutes an undue burden on these rights and fails to meet legal standards for rationality and pedagogical interest. The right to receive information under the First Amendment, combined with the liberty right in sexual and reproductive choice under the Fourteenth Amendment, compels recognition of a state duty to provide such education.

Give Me Internet Or Give Me Death: Analyzing The Constitutionality Of Internet Restrictions As A Condition Of Supervised Release For Child Pornography Offenders, Laura Tatelman

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The note argues that blanket bans on internet and internet-capable devices as a condition of supervised release for child pornography offenders are unconstitutional under the doctrine of unconstitutional conditions. These bans infringe on fundamental liberties such as speech, association, and access to information, disproportionately affecting offenders’ ability to reintegrate into society. The analysis advocates for a balanced approach that prioritizes public safety while respecting constitutional rights, suggesting alternatives like supervised release rather than outright internet prohibition.

In The Name Of The Son: The Strategic Importance Of Prenatal Personhood In Abortion Law, Alejandro Madrazo

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

Prenatal personhood has been used as a vehicle for restricting abortion rights and other reproductive rights. This Article explores how, through narrative, the question of the status of prenatal life shapes the structure of debates over abortion law and reproductive rights. Whether prenatal hfe is deemed a person or not determines the narrative structures that can be deployed around abortion and, in consequence, strategically orients these debates by determining the key questions that must be addressed and the scope of answers that can be provided. By carrying out a comparative analysis of opinions of local, national and international courts from …

The Aftermath Of Hobby Lobby: Hsas And Hras As The Least Restrictive Means, Edward A. Zelinsky

Articles

In Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., the United States Supreme Court held that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (RFRA) does not require closely-held corporations’ employer-sponsored medical plans to provide forms of contraception that shareholders of such corporations object to on religious grounds. The question now raised is how the President, Congress, and the departments of Health and Human Services (HHS), Treasury and Labor, ought to respond to the Hobby Lobby decision.

Curbing Overzealous Prosecution Of The Espionage Act: Thomas Andrews Drake And The Case For Judicial Intervention At Sentencing, Pamela Takefman

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Art Or Signage?: The Regulation Of Outdoor Murals And The First Amendment, Christina Chloe Orlando

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Disclaimer Dichotomy: A First Amendment Analysis Of Compelled Speech In Disclosure Ordinances Governing Crisis Pregnancy Centers And Laws Mandating Biased Physician Counseling, Molly Duane

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Physician Speech And Mandatory Ultrasound Laws: The First Amendment's Limit On Compelled Ideological Speech, Jennifer M. Keighley

Cardozo Law Review

Since Planned Parenthood v. Casey opened the door to more pervasive state regulation of abortions, states have increasingly used their regulatory power to coerce physician speech. The Supreme Court has not yet explained, however, whether and how physicians' First Amendment rights limit such attempts to coerce state-mandated speech. This Article argues that while the precise contours of physicians' First Amendment rights have yet to be articulated, physicians certainly retain the core First Amendment right to refuse to speak the state's ideological messages. I then evaluate whether mandatory ultrasound laws, which require a physician to perform an ultrasound exam and to …