Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Evidence Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Witness

Discipline
Institution
Publication Year
Publication
Publication Type

Articles 31 - 60 of 73

Full-Text Articles in Evidence

Rule 405: Methods Of Proving Character Jan 1996

Rule 405: Methods Of Proving Character

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.


Rule 702: Testimony By Experts Jan 1996

Rule 702: Testimony By Experts

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.


Rule 801(D)(1): Prior Statement By Witness Jan 1996

Rule 801(D)(1): Prior Statement By Witness

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.


Rule 803(3): Then Existing Mental, Emotional, Or Physical Condition Jan 1996

Rule 803(3): Then Existing Mental, Emotional, Or Physical Condition

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.


Rule 803(4): Statements For Purposes Of Medical Diagnosis Or Treatment Jan 1996

Rule 803(4): Statements For Purposes Of Medical Diagnosis Or Treatment

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.


Rule 803(18): Learned Treatises Jan 1996

Rule 803(18): Learned Treatises

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.


Rule 901: Requirement Of Authentication Or Identification Jan 1996

Rule 901: Requirement Of Authentication Or Identification

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.


Rule 601: General Rule Of Competency Jan 1996

Rule 601: General Rule Of Competency

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.


Rule 803(1): Present Sense Impression Jan 1996

Rule 803(1): Present Sense Impression

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.


Rule 804(B)(1): Former Testimony Jan 1996

Rule 804(B)(1): Former Testimony

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.


Rule 803(8)(C): Public Records And Reports Jan 1996

Rule 803(8)(C): Public Records And Reports

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.


"X-Spurt" Witnesses, Richard H. Underwood Oct 1995

"X-Spurt" Witnesses, Richard H. Underwood

Law Faculty Scholarly Articles

In this article the author pulls together a history of expert witnesses in common law systems. Various issues are explored regarding expert witness testimony, including: the historical underpinnings of the practice, how Daubert controls that issue in modern times, rules of evidence, psychological science, and professional ethics.


A Brief Look At New York's Efforts To Codify Its Law Of Evidence, Barbara C. Salken Jan 1994

A Brief Look At New York's Efforts To Codify Its Law Of Evidence, Barbara C. Salken

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.


Character Evidence, James L. Kainen Jan 1994

Character Evidence, James L. Kainen

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.


Expert Testimony, Barry C. Scheck Jan 1994

Expert Testimony, Barry C. Scheck

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.


Trances, Trials, And Tribulations, Gary M. Shaw Jan 1994

Trances, Trials, And Tribulations, Gary M. Shaw

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Supreme Court Rules On Statements Against Interest, Michael M. Martin Jan 1994

The Supreme Court Rules On Statements Against Interest, Michael M. Martin

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Admissibility Of Hypnotically Enhanced Testimony In Criminal Trials, Gary Shaw Oct 1991

The Admissibility Of Hypnotically Enhanced Testimony In Criminal Trials, Gary Shaw

Scholarly Works

No abstract provided.


Due Process Jan 1991

Due Process

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Conflict Concerning Expert Witness And Legal Conclusions, Charles W. Ehrhardt Apr 1990

The Conflict Concerning Expert Witness And Legal Conclusions, Charles W. Ehrhardt

Scholarly Publications

No abstract provided.


Evidence - Incidents Of Shoplifting Not Probative Of Truthfulness Under Rule 608(B), Shelly Kim Kritz Apr 1983

Evidence - Incidents Of Shoplifting Not Probative Of Truthfulness Under Rule 608(B), Shelly Kim Kritz

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.


Memory Restored Or Confabulated By Hypnosis—Is It Competent?, James E. Beaver Jan 1983

Memory Restored Or Confabulated By Hypnosis—Is It Competent?, James E. Beaver

Seattle University Law Review

This article examines the scientific basis of hypnosis and concludes that previously hypnotized witnesses are incompetent to testify concerning matters discussed under hypnosis. Unbiased examination of scientific literature discloses that persons under hypnosis are highly motivated to please the hypnotist and therefore are likely to fantasize rather than accurately recall lost memories. After hypnosis these false impressions are fixed as true and the witness is unshakable on cross-examination. Therefore, the McCormick relevancy test is inadequate, and hypnosis tainted testimony, like other scientific evidence, must meet the stricter Frye standard before being presented to the finder of fact. Hypnosis presently does …


Using Convictions To Impeach Under The Florida Evidence Code, Charles W. Ehrhardt Apr 1982

Using Convictions To Impeach Under The Florida Evidence Code, Charles W. Ehrhardt

Florida State University Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Adversary Model Is Bent, William T. Pizzi, Phillip S. Figa, Kenneth E. Barnhill, Jr. Jan 1980

The Adversary Model Is Bent, William T. Pizzi, Phillip S. Figa, Kenneth E. Barnhill, Jr.

Publications

No abstract provided.


Credibility Of Witnesses, Paul C. Giannelli Jan 1978

Credibility Of Witnesses, Paul C. Giannelli

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.


Nonproduction Of Witnesses As Deliberative Evidence, James E. Beaver Jan 1978

Nonproduction Of Witnesses As Deliberative Evidence, James E. Beaver

Seattle University Law Review

The chief practical difficulty today, as always, lies in the particular application of a mass of evidentiary rules, in determining the bearing of various principles upon a given evidentiary issue of fact here and now. Nowhere has this situation continued truer than with reference to rules about evidentiary spoliation. "Indeed, after reading all there is on the subject in a recent voluminous text-book, one may well be bewildered, owing to the collection of crude, inadvertent and contradictory material."' As a result, the "request to charge which more frequently than any other is made in improper form is that dealing …


Prior Consistent Statements, Arthur H. Travers Jr. Jan 1978

Prior Consistent Statements, Arthur H. Travers Jr.

Publications

No abstract provided.


A Look At Florida's Proposed Code Of Evidence, Charles W. Ehrhardt Oct 1974

A Look At Florida's Proposed Code Of Evidence, Charles W. Ehrhardt

Scholarly Publications

The law of evidence had been codified in three states, California, New Jersey and Kansas, prior to the United States Supreme Court's promulgation of the Proposed Federal Rules of Evidence. The submission of the rules to the Congress, and their approval, as amended, by the House of Representatives served as the catalyst for renewed interest in evidence codification. Three states have recently adopted comprehensive Rules of Evidence that closely parallel the Proposed Federal Rules, and at least four other states, including Florida, have drafted or are actively considering the adoption of such a codification. During the 1974 session of the …


Evidence Code: Witnesses, Charles W. Ehrhardt Sep 1973

Evidence Code: Witnesses, Charles W. Ehrhardt

Scholarly Publications

No abstract provided.


Evidence Code: Opinions And Expert Testimony, Charles W. Ehrhardt Aug 1973

Evidence Code: Opinions And Expert Testimony, Charles W. Ehrhardt

Scholarly Publications

No abstract provided.