Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Litigation (91)
- Courts (11)
- Criminal Law (9)
- Legal Profession (9)
- Civil Procedure (8)
-
- Law and Society (5)
- Legal Education (5)
- State and Local Government Law (5)
- Administrative Law (4)
- Civil Law (4)
- Criminal Procedure (4)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (4)
- Environmental Law (4)
- Environmental Sciences (4)
- Natural Resources Law (4)
- Natural Resources Management and Policy (4)
- Physical Sciences and Mathematics (4)
- Water Law (4)
- Water Resource Management (4)
- Agriculture Law (3)
- Constitutional Law (3)
- Earth Sciences (3)
- Energy and Utilities Law (3)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (3)
- Hydrology (3)
- Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law (3)
- Jurisprudence (3)
- Law and Economics (3)
- Institution
-
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (59)
- Pepperdine University (4)
- University of Colorado Law School (4)
- University of Georgia School of Law (4)
- Roger Williams University (3)
-
- University of Kentucky (3)
- University of Michigan Law School (3)
- Boston University School of Law (2)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (2)
- New York Law School (2)
- University of Miami Law School (2)
- University of Missouri School of Law (2)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (2)
- Barry University School of Law (1)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (1)
- Columbia Law School (1)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- Georgetown University Law Center (1)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (1)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (1)
- Seattle University School of Law (1)
- Singapore Management University (1)
- St. John's University School of Law (1)
- St. Thomas University College of Law (1)
- The University of Akron (1)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (1)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (1)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (1)
- University of Tulsa College of Law (1)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Publications (63)
- Faculty Scholarship (4)
- Scholarly Works (4)
- Articles (3)
- Groundwater: Allocation, Development and Pollution (Summer Conference, June 6-9) (3)
-
- Law Faculty Scholarly Articles (3)
- Pepperdine Law Review (3)
- Articles & Chapters (2)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (2)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (2)
- Akron Law Faculty Publications (1)
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (1)
- Articles, Chapters in Books and Other Contributions to Scholarly Works (1)
- Barry Law Review (1)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (1)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (1)
- Georgia Law Review (1)
- Indiana Law Journal (1)
- Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary (1)
- Other Publications (1)
- Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law (1)
- Scholarly Articles (1)
- School of Law Conferences, Lectures & Events (1)
- Seattle University Law Review (1)
- St. Thomas Law Review (1)
- The Appendix, Journal of Health Care Law & Policy (1)
- Touro Law Review (1)
- Uncovering the Hidden Resource: Groundwater Law, Hydrology, and Policy in the 1990s (Summer Conference, June 15-17) (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 60 of 110
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
Pretrial Discovery Of Expert Testimony, Paul C. Giannelli
Pretrial Discovery Of Expert Testimony, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Nontestimonial Identification Orders For Dna Testing, Paul C. Giannelli
Nontestimonial Identification Orders For Dna Testing, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Daubert Challenges To Firearms (“Ballistics”) Identifications, Paul C. Giannelli
Daubert Challenges To Firearms (“Ballistics”) Identifications, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
A History Of Representations Of Justice: Coincident Preoccupations Of Law And Film, Jessica Silbey
A History Of Representations Of Justice: Coincident Preoccupations Of Law And Film, Jessica Silbey
Faculty Scholarship
The American trial and the art of cinema share certain epistemological tendencies. Both stake claims to an authoritative form of knowledge based on the indubitable quality of observable phenomena. Both are preoccupied (sometimes to the point of self-defeat) with sustaining the authority that underlies the knowledge produced by visual perception. The American trial and art of cinema also increasingly share cultural space. Although the trial film (otherwise known as the courtroom drama) is as old as the medium of film the recent spate of popular trial films, be they fictional such as Runaway Jury or documentary such as Capturing the …
Truth Tales And Trial Films, Jessica Silbey
Truth Tales And Trial Films, Jessica Silbey
Faculty Scholarship
Investigations into law and popular culture preoccupy themselves with understanding how law and popular cultural forms work together to challenge or sustain community structures, identity and power. It is inevitable at this point in our cultural history that law and popular culture are intertwined. There are too many television shows, films, popular novels and web-based entertainment to withdraw "the law" (whatever that is) from the domain of popular culture. This article takes as a given the intermixing of law and popular culture, embracing it as a new feature of our popular legal consciousness. I suggest that one result of this …
Daubert Challenges To Fingerprints, Paul C. Giannelli
Daubert Challenges To Fingerprints, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Improving Criminal Jury Decision Making After The Blakely Revolution, J. J. Prescott, Sonja B. Starr
Improving Criminal Jury Decision Making After The Blakely Revolution, J. J. Prescott, Sonja B. Starr
Articles
The shift in sentencing fact-finding responsibility triggered in many states by Blakely v. Washington may dramatically change the complexity and type of questions that juries will be required to answer. Among the most important challenges confronting legislatures now debating the future of their sentencing regimes is whether juries are prepared to handle this new responsibility effectively - and, if not, what can be done about it. Yet neither scholars addressing the impact of Blakely nor advocates of jury reform have seriously explored these questions. Nonetheless, a number of limitations on juror decision making seriously threaten the accuracy of verdicts in …
Introduction To Evidence Stories, Richard O. Lempert
Introduction To Evidence Stories, Richard O. Lempert
Other Publications
An introduction to Evidence Stories, by Richard Lempert.This publication contains essays by leading evidence scholars discussing the stories behind landmark cases and illuminating principles and materials across the evidence curriculum. The seldom-told stories behind cases where evidence plays a significant role are now told with important illustrations of the development, application, and importance of the rules of evidence.
Trust Your Broker: Suitability, Modern Portfolio Theory, And Expert Witnesses, Roger Reinsch, J B. Reich, Nauzer Balsara
Trust Your Broker: Suitability, Modern Portfolio Theory, And Expert Witnesses, Roger Reinsch, J B. Reich, Nauzer Balsara
St. Thomas Law Review
The death of the "dot coms" in the late 1990's left many investors questioning investment advice. Specifically, they began to question the direction, interests, and professional competence of their stockbrokers. Investors who felt their stockbrokers failed them are increasingly resorting to litigation, pursuing what has become known as "suitability" claims, claims based on the argument that brokers recommended or purchased securities that were not suitable for an investor's profile. The issues in and surrounding suitability claims are complex, yet surprisingly little has been written on this topic. This article seeks to foster a much needed discussion and will examine the …
Empirical Evidence And Malpractice Litigation, Philip G. Peters Jr.
Empirical Evidence And Malpractice Litigation, Philip G. Peters Jr.
Faculty Publications
Critics of medical malpractice litigation believe that expert testimony is often anecdotal and biased. To remedy this problem, several have recently suggested that attorneys should provide and courts should seek reliable empirical evidence of actual clinical norms. Their suggestion should be welcomed. If our expectations are realistic and the design pitfalls are avoided, greater use of use of empirical research will improve the fairness of malpractice adjudication. At least in theory, it could be useful in both the "easy" cases (where it reveals that a consensus standard of care exists) and also some of the harder cases (where clinical practices …
The Ethics Of Evidence, J. Alexander Tanford
The Ethics Of Evidence, J. Alexander Tanford
Articles by Maurer Faculty
Professor J. Alexander Tanford offers a unique perspective on the ethics of evidence, illustrated by examples of his own personal experiences as well as excerpts from film and literature. This Article is a must read for any litigator as it addresses the issue of where the line is to be drawn regarding evidence in the courtroom.
Character Evidence, Paul C. Giannelli
“Other Acts” Evidence: Part Ii, Paul C. Giannelli
“Other Acts” Evidence: Part Ii, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Scientific Evidence In Civil And Criminal Cases, Paul C. Giannelli
Scientific Evidence In Civil And Criminal Cases, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Who Should Control The Decision To Call A Witness: Respecting A Criminal Defendant's Tactical Choices, Rodney J. Uphoff
Who Should Control The Decision To Call A Witness: Respecting A Criminal Defendant's Tactical Choices, Rodney J. Uphoff
Faculty Publications
A law student approached me not long ago to discuss a problem he had encountered while helping to prepare a criminal case for retrial. The defendant's first trial ended with a hung jury. The defendant, Steven Brown, now faced a second trial on the same misdemeanor charge of assaulting a police officer. Although the defendant still wanted to go to trial, Brown told defense counsel that he did not want his elderly father to have to testify again. From defense counsel's standpoint, the father's testimony was critical because he was the only witness corroborating the defendant's version of the event. …
New Developments In Scientific Evidence, Paul C. Giannelli
New Developments In Scientific Evidence, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Expert Qualifications: Traps For The Unwary, Paul C. Giannelli
Expert Qualifications: Traps For The Unwary, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Impeachment: Evidence Amendments, Paul C. Giannelli
Impeachment: Evidence Amendments, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Hearsay: Traps & Problem Issues, Paul C. Giannelli
Hearsay: Traps & Problem Issues, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
On Parol: The Construction And Interpretation Of Written Agreements And The Role Of Extrinsic Evidence In Contract Litigation, Keith A. Rowley
On Parol: The Construction And Interpretation Of Written Agreements And The Role Of Extrinsic Evidence In Contract Litigation, Keith A. Rowley
Scholarly Works
As a general rule, extrinsic evidence, whether written or oral, is not admissible to prove either the intent of the parties to a contract or the meaning of contractual terms when the parties have executed an unambiguous, fully-integrated (i.e., final and all-inclusive) written agreement. The trial court may consider various types of extrinsic evidence, however, in determining whether a particular agreement is fully integrated or ambiguous, and even in choosing among rival interpretations of an agreement where ambiguity is not present. If the trial court determines that an agreement is not fully integrated, then the trier of fact may consider …
The After-Acquired Evidence Rule: The Best Of All Possible Worlds?, Sharona Hoffman
The After-Acquired Evidence Rule: The Best Of All Possible Worlds?, Sharona Hoffman
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
"X-Spurt" Witnesses, Richard H. Underwood
"X-Spurt" Witnesses, Richard H. Underwood
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
In this article the author pulls together a history of expert witnesses in common law systems. Various issues are explored regarding expert witness testimony, including: the historical underpinnings of the practice, how Daubert controls that issue in modern times, rules of evidence, psychological science, and professional ethics.
Evidentiary Use (And Misuse) Of The Civil Defendant's Financial Status, Karen M. Grundy
Evidentiary Use (And Misuse) Of The Civil Defendant's Financial Status, Karen M. Grundy
Articles, Chapters in Books and Other Contributions to Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Junk Science, Daubert, And Ohio Rule 702, Paul C. Giannelli
Junk Science, Daubert, And Ohio Rule 702, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Employees' Admissions In New York: Time For A Change, David J. Wallman
Employees' Admissions In New York: Time For A Change, David J. Wallman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Confrontation Issues In Child Abuse Cases, Paul C. Giannelli
Confrontation Issues In Child Abuse Cases, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Polygraph Evidence: Part Ii, Paul C. Giannelli
Polygraph Evidence: Part Ii, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Polygraph Evidence: Part I, Paul C. Giannelli
Polygraph Evidence: Part I, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Proper Role Of After-Acquired Evidence In Employment Discrimination Litigation, Rebecca White, Robert D. Brussack
The Proper Role Of After-Acquired Evidence In Employment Discrimination Litigation, Rebecca White, Robert D. Brussack
Scholarly Works
A new defense to employment discrimination claims has gained acceptance in the lower courts. Employers who allegedly have discriminated against their employees because of race, sex or age are winning judgments on the basis of after-acquired evidence of employee misconduct. The evidence is “after-acquired” in the sense that the misconduct was unknown to the employer at the time the alleged discrimination occurred but was acquired later, often through the use of discovery devices in the employee's discrimination action. Lower courts have accepted the proposition that if the employer would have discharged the plaintiff on the basis of the after-acquired evidence, …
“Junk Science”: The Criminal Cases, Paul C. Giannelli
“Junk Science”: The Criminal Cases, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.