Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Criminal Law (335)
- Criminal Procedure (241)
- Constitutional Law (163)
- Litigation (135)
- Courts (112)
-
- Science and Technology Law (57)
- Civil Procedure (56)
- Torts (56)
- Jurisprudence (53)
- Judges (51)
- Law and Society (47)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (44)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (40)
- Legal Profession (38)
- State and Local Government Law (37)
- Fourth Amendment (35)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (33)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (31)
- Legislation (31)
- International Law (29)
- Legal History (29)
- Law and Psychology (28)
- Administrative Law (27)
- Legal Education (27)
- Civil Law (24)
- Labor and Employment Law (24)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (22)
- Supreme Court of the United States (22)
- Institution
-
- West Virginia University (114)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (96)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (91)
- William & Mary Law School (67)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (63)
-
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (63)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (60)
- Pepperdine University (47)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (47)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (47)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (44)
- BLR (43)
- University of Kentucky (35)
- American University Washington College of Law (34)
- University of Georgia School of Law (27)
- University of Miami Law School (22)
- Fordham Law School (20)
- The University of Akron (20)
- University of Baltimore Law (20)
- Boston University School of Law (19)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (19)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (17)
- University of Michigan Law School (17)
- Florida State University College of Law (15)
- University of Maine School of Law (15)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (15)
- Georgetown University Law Center (14)
- University of Richmond (14)
- Cleveland State University (13)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (13)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- West Virginia Law Review (113)
- Faculty Publications (90)
- Cardozo Law Review (81)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (71)
- Faculty Scholarship (56)
-
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (51)
- ExpressO (40)
- Indiana Law Journal (39)
- Touro Law Review (38)
- Pepperdine Law Review (37)
- Maryland Law Review (35)
- Scholarly Works (28)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (28)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (27)
- Articles (24)
- William & Mary Law Review (23)
- Akron Law Review (19)
- All Faculty Scholarship (19)
- Kentucky Law Journal (19)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (18)
- University of Miami Law Review (16)
- Fordham Law Review (15)
- Law Faculty Scholarly Articles (15)
- Maine Law Review (15)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (14)
- Scholarly Publications (13)
- Faculty Working Papers (12)
- Popular Media (12)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (12)
- Seattle University Law Review (11)
- Publication Type
Articles 841 - 870 of 1365
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
Comment Of An Expert: Biomarker Evidence Following Exposure To Pollutants, A. C. Zahalski, P.R. Mcconnachie
Comment Of An Expert: Biomarker Evidence Following Exposure To Pollutants, A. C. Zahalski, P.R. Mcconnachie
Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - )
No abstract provided.
Grammarians At The Gate: The Rehnquist Court's Evolving Plain Meaning Approach To Bankruptcy Jurisprudence, Walter Effross
Grammarians At The Gate: The Rehnquist Court's Evolving Plain Meaning Approach To Bankruptcy Jurisprudence, Walter Effross
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
No abstract provided.
In Defense Of A Constitutional Theory Of Experts, Ronald L. Carlson
In Defense Of A Constitutional Theory Of Experts, Ronald L. Carlson
Scholarly Works
Professor Ronald Allen honors the memory of John Henry Wigmore on virtually every occasion in which he targets an aspect of evidence law for scholarly study. As Wigmore Professor of Law, Allen has consistently afforded modern evidence specialists some of the best in provocative theory as grist for review and discussion. He now places experts in his sights, and the results are no less stimulating.
The Common Law Theory Of Experts: Deference Or Education?, Joseph S. Miller, Ronald J. Allen
The Common Law Theory Of Experts: Deference Or Education?, Joseph S. Miller, Ronald J. Allen
Scholarly Works
What if witness testimony emerges from, or can only be understood by reference to, an experience that the fact finder lacks? Or what if the connection between what a witness says and the full import of what the witness means is so arcane that the chances are virtually zero that the jury will understand what the spoken words are intended to convey? Both cases arise surprisingly frequently in the trial of disputes. For example, the problem arises whenever a witness is not fluent in English, as it often does when the common practice of a business or trade plays a …
Myself Alone: Individualizing Justice Through Psychological Character Evidence, Andrew E. Taslitz
Myself Alone: Individualizing Justice Through Psychological Character Evidence, Andrew E. Taslitz
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Response To The “Probative Value” Theory Of Hearsay Suggested By Hearsay From A Layperson, Eleanor Swift
A Response To The “Probative Value” Theory Of Hearsay Suggested By Hearsay From A Layperson, Eleanor Swift
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Stories Versus Theories At The Cardozo Evidence Conference: It’S Just Another Metaphor To Me, L. H. Larue
Stories Versus Theories At The Cardozo Evidence Conference: It’S Just Another Metaphor To Me, L. H. Larue
Cardozo Law Review
Cardozo Law School was host to an evidence conference on March 24-26, 1991. The papers have been published, so the conference has been duly memorialized. However, the conference had a "subtext" that differed from the "text," that is, the theme of the conference, judging from the hallway gossip, differed from the officially proclaimed theme; if one reads the published text carefully, one can see the subtext within the text, the unofficial theme alongside the official theme. I asked the editors of this Review to let me record my evaluation of the unofficial theme, so that it may have equal status …
Hearsay From A Layperson, David A. Schum
Infinite Strands, Infinitesimally Thin: Storytelling, Bayesianism, Hearsay And Other Evidence, Richard D. Friedman
Infinite Strands, Infinitesimally Thin: Storytelling, Bayesianism, Hearsay And Other Evidence, Richard D. Friedman
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Worst Evidence Principle: The Best Hypothesis As To The Logical Structure Of Evidence Law, Edward J. Imwinkelried
The Worst Evidence Principle: The Best Hypothesis As To The Logical Structure Of Evidence Law, Edward J. Imwinkelried
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
Experts As Hearsay Conduits: Confrontation Abuses In Opinion Testimony, Ronald L. Carlson
Experts As Hearsay Conduits: Confrontation Abuses In Opinion Testimony, Ronald L. Carlson
Scholarly Works
The dispute over whether litigants may use experts to run unexamined hearsay into the trial record is a microcosm of a larger debate. The larger question is whether judicial review of expert testimony should be passive, or whether the expert witness process should be marked by active judicial policing. Does the plethora of expert opinions presently being offered in modern trials merit special scrutiny by the courts?
Some scholars urge that courts must accommodate experts. Proponents of this view favor few challenges to the unrestricted rendition of opinions by an expert, whether the expert is real or self-proclaimed. Under this …
"Other Acts” & Character Evidence: Part I, Paul C. Giannelli
"Other Acts” & Character Evidence: Part I, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
"Other Acts” & Character Evidence: Part Ii, Paul C. Giannelli
"Other Acts” & Character Evidence: Part Ii, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Book Review Of Litigation Services Directory, James S. Heller
Book Review Of Litigation Services Directory, James S. Heller
Library Staff Publications
No abstract provided.
Scientific Evidence In Criminal Prosecutions, Paul C. Giannelli
Scientific Evidence In Criminal Prosecutions, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Biased Evidence Rules: A Framework For Judicial Analysis And Reform, Randolph N. Jonakait
Biased Evidence Rules: A Framework For Judicial Analysis And Reform, Randolph N. Jonakait
Articles & Chapters
No abstract provided.
Making The Law Of Factual Determinations Matter More, Randolph N. Jonakait
Making The Law Of Factual Determinations Matter More, Randolph N. Jonakait
Articles & Chapters
No abstract provided.
Testing Right - Lying In View Of Justice, Peter Fenves
Testing Right - Lying In View Of Justice, Peter Fenves
Cardozo Law Review
Walter Benjamin: Justice, Right and the Critique of Violence
Proving Your Case - Evidence And Procedure In Action, Christopher Finlayson
Proving Your Case - Evidence And Procedure In Action, Christopher Finlayson
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
The New Evidence Scholarship, William Twining
The New Evidence Scholarship, William Twining
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Some Caveats Concerning Dna As Criminal Identification Evidence: With Thanks To The Reverend Bayes, Richard Lempert
Some Caveats Concerning Dna As Criminal Identification Evidence: With Thanks To The Reverend Bayes, Richard Lempert
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Stories, Forensic Science, And Improved Verdicts, Randolph N. Jonakait
Stories, Forensic Science, And Improved Verdicts, Randolph N. Jonakait
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Five Cheers For Schum And Tillers, William Twining
Five Cheers For Schum And Tillers, William Twining
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Comment On Wasserman’S “The Morality Of Statistical Proof And The Risk Of Mistaken Liability”, L. Jonathan Cohen
A Comment On Wasserman’S “The Morality Of Statistical Proof And The Risk Of Mistaken Liability”, L. Jonathan Cohen
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Comment On Edwards: Ward Edwards And The New Bayesian Software, David T. Wasserman
Comment On Edwards: Ward Edwards And The New Bayesian Software, David T. Wasserman
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Procedural Options For Resolving Hearsay Issues, Roger C. Park
Procedural Options For Resolving Hearsay Issues, Roger C. Park
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Missing Evidence, Dale A. Nance
Comment On Nesson, Joseph Gastwirth
The Admissibility Of Dna Testing, D. H. Kaye
Decision And Inference, Peter Tillers