Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Criminal Law (335)
- Criminal Procedure (241)
- Constitutional Law (163)
- Litigation (135)
- Courts (112)
-
- Science and Technology Law (57)
- Civil Procedure (56)
- Torts (56)
- Jurisprudence (53)
- Judges (51)
- Law and Society (47)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (44)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (40)
- Legal Profession (38)
- State and Local Government Law (37)
- Fourth Amendment (35)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (33)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (31)
- Legislation (31)
- International Law (29)
- Legal History (29)
- Law and Psychology (28)
- Administrative Law (27)
- Legal Education (27)
- Civil Law (24)
- Labor and Employment Law (24)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (22)
- Supreme Court of the United States (22)
- Institution
-
- West Virginia University (114)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (96)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (91)
- William & Mary Law School (67)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (63)
-
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (63)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (60)
- Pepperdine University (47)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (47)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (47)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (44)
- BLR (43)
- University of Kentucky (35)
- American University Washington College of Law (34)
- University of Georgia School of Law (27)
- University of Miami Law School (22)
- Fordham Law School (20)
- The University of Akron (20)
- University of Baltimore Law (20)
- Boston University School of Law (19)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (19)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (17)
- University of Michigan Law School (17)
- Florida State University College of Law (15)
- University of Maine School of Law (15)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (15)
- Georgetown University Law Center (14)
- University of Richmond (14)
- Cleveland State University (13)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (13)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- West Virginia Law Review (113)
- Faculty Publications (90)
- Cardozo Law Review (81)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (71)
- Faculty Scholarship (56)
-
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (51)
- ExpressO (40)
- Indiana Law Journal (39)
- Touro Law Review (38)
- Pepperdine Law Review (37)
- Maryland Law Review (35)
- Scholarly Works (28)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (28)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (27)
- Articles (24)
- William & Mary Law Review (23)
- Akron Law Review (19)
- All Faculty Scholarship (19)
- Kentucky Law Journal (19)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (18)
- University of Miami Law Review (16)
- Fordham Law Review (15)
- Law Faculty Scholarly Articles (15)
- Maine Law Review (15)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (14)
- Scholarly Publications (13)
- Faculty Working Papers (12)
- Popular Media (12)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (12)
- Seattle University Law Review (11)
- Publication Type
Articles 691 - 720 of 1365
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
Evidence: Is Oklahoma Balancing The Scales Of Justice By Tying The Hands Of Trial Judges?: The 2002 Amendment To Section 2403 Of The Oklahoma Evidence Code Mandating Admission Of In-Life Victim Photographs In Homicide Cases, Liesa L. Richter
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Harmonizing Rules 609 And 608 (B) Of The Federal Rules Of Evidence, Donald H. Zeigler
Harmonizing Rules 609 And 608 (B) Of The Federal Rules Of Evidence, Donald H. Zeigler
Articles & Chapters
No abstract provided.
Criminal Law And Procedure, Julie E. Mcconnell, Gregory Franklin, Craig Winston Stallard
Criminal Law And Procedure, Julie E. Mcconnell, Gregory Franklin, Craig Winston Stallard
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
An Introduction To The Rules Of Evidence Applicable To Collection Cases In Maryland Trial Courts, Lynn Mclain
An Introduction To The Rules Of Evidence Applicable To Collection Cases In Maryland Trial Courts, Lynn Mclain
All Faculty Scholarship
This class handout introduces students to the basic concepts of evidence using examples and language from the Maryland Rules of Evidence.
Evidence, Robin Jean Davis, Louis J. Palmer Jr.
Evidence, Robin Jean Davis, Louis J. Palmer Jr.
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Defendant's Right To Exculpatory Evidence: Does The Constitutional Duty To Disclose Exculpatory Evidence Extend To New Evidence Discovered Post-Conviction, Todd E. Jaworksy
A Defendant's Right To Exculpatory Evidence: Does The Constitutional Duty To Disclose Exculpatory Evidence Extend To New Evidence Discovered Post-Conviction, Todd E. Jaworksy
St. Thomas Law Review
This note will first address Brady and the modifications made to the disclosure law by subsequent cases. Second, this note will explain the ethical obligations concerning a prosecutor's duty to disclose exculpatory evidence post-conviction as set out by the Model Rules of Professional Conduct. Third, this note will critically examine various case law in which the constitutional duty to disclose is seemingly extended to encompass post-conviction, newly discovered exculpatory evidence in the hands of the prosecutor. Finally, this note will conclude with an analysis and opinion of the disclosure law, discussing why the constitutional duty should be extended post-conviction.
The Other Shoe Drops: Minnesota Rejects Daubert, Peter B. Knapp
The Other Shoe Drops: Minnesota Rejects Daubert, Peter B. Knapp
Faculty Scholarship
In 1991, the United States Supreme Court handed decided Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., rejecting the long-standing federal test for the admissibility of scientific testimony articulated in Frye v. United States. Unlike many states, however, which embraced Daubert within years--or even months--of the federal decision, Minnesota declined to make Daubert the law of the jurisdiction. In a pair of cases decided in 2000, Goeb v. Tharaldson and Sentinel Mgmt. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety, the court held that Minnesota would retain the general acceptance test. The court's rejection of Daubert can be read as an attempt to give the …
No Link: The Jury And The Origins Of The Confrontation Right And The Hearsay Rule, Richard D. Friedman
No Link: The Jury And The Origins Of The Confrontation Right And The Hearsay Rule, Richard D. Friedman
Book Chapters
The rule against hearsay has long been one of the most distinctive elements of the common law of evidence, and indeed— except for recent changes on the civil side in many jurisdictions— of the common law system of trial. Observers have long believed that the rule, like most of the other exclusionary rules of the common law of evidence, is "the child of the jury system". Though Edmund Morgan argued vigorously to the contrary, the received understanding is that the jury's inability to account satisfactorily for the defects of hearsay explains the rule. A famous, and perhaps seminal, expression of …
Merging Technology With Justice: How Electronic Courtrooms Shape Evidentiary Concerns, Nicole J. De Sario
Merging Technology With Justice: How Electronic Courtrooms Shape Evidentiary Concerns, Nicole J. De Sario
Cleveland State Law Review
This Note will explore the evidentiary issues raised by the Electronic Courtroom, state how they are presently handled, and highlight the need for the adaptation of the Rules to allow for the smooth integration of such technology into the courtroom. Part I explains why the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts began funding Electronic Courtrooms and how they have grown in numbers. Part II gives details about the type of equipment typically employed in the Electronic Courtroom, using Courtroom 575 as a case study. The observable impacts of technology on a trial also will be noted. Part III contains an …
The Ethics Of Evidence, J. Alexander Tanford
The Ethics Of Evidence, J. Alexander Tanford
Articles by Maurer Faculty
Professor J. Alexander Tanford offers a unique perspective on the ethics of evidence, illustrated by examples of his own personal experiences as well as excerpts from film and literature. This Article is a must read for any litigator as it addresses the issue of where the line is to be drawn regarding evidence in the courtroom.
Child Witness Policy: Law Interfacing With Social Science, Louise E. Graham, Dorothy F. Marsil, Jean Montoya, David Ross
Child Witness Policy: Law Interfacing With Social Science, Louise E. Graham, Dorothy F. Marsil, Jean Montoya, David Ross
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
The number of children testifying in court has posed serious practical and legal problems for the judicial system. One problem confronting the courts is how to protect children from experiencing the psychological trauma resulting from a face-to-face confrontation with a defendant who may have physically harmed the child or threatened future harm to the child. Another concern is that this trauma may impair children's memory performance and their willingness to disclose the truth. In response to these concerns, child witness innovations proliferated throughout the United States in the 1980s and 1990s. Among the innovations were: placing a screen between child …
Narrative Relevance, Imagined Juries, And A Supreme Court Inspired Agenda For Jury Research, Richard O. Lempert
Narrative Relevance, Imagined Juries, And A Supreme Court Inspired Agenda For Jury Research, Richard O. Lempert
Articles
This paper has its roots in Old Chief v. United States, a case the Supreme Court of the United States decided in 1997. I will begin by describing this case; then comment on its implications for the Supreme Court’s conception of the jury, and conclude by examining the agenda one may draw from it for empirical jury research. Old Chief arose when Johnny Lynn Old Chief was charged not only with assault with a dangerous weapon and using a firearm in the commission of a crime of violence, but also with violating a law that forbids convicted felons from possessing …
The Economic Analysis Of Evidence Law: Common Sense On Stilts, Richard O. Lempert
The Economic Analysis Of Evidence Law: Common Sense On Stilts, Richard O. Lempert
Articles
There was a time when the empire of Law was not overrun by economists. The economists had their own fiefdoms to be sure-there was the Duchy of Antitrust and the Kingdom of Regulatory Law-but the economists lived in peace within these borders, welcoming many unlike themselves into their midst, only gently proselytizing their students in the first few classes of a term, and swearing fealty to the law. It is true that a few marauders from beyond the borders saw the wealth of the empire and sought to colonize it, but even the most daring, Archbishop Coase and Duke Gary …
Meaning, Intention, And The Hearsay Rule, Paul F. Kirgis
Meaning, Intention, And The Hearsay Rule, Paul F. Kirgis
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Florida Supreme Court Vs. The United States Supreme Court: The Florida Decision In Conner V. State And The Federal Interpretation Of Confrontation And Federal Rule Of Evidence 807, Stacey Schulman
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
Response, Celina E. Contreras
Reply To Professor Ehrhardt, Michael D. Sanger
Reply To Professor Ehrhardt, Michael D. Sanger
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
Has Florida Won Or Lost The Battle By Eliminating Section 90.803(4) As An Alternative Tool In Prosecuting Child Sexual Abuse?, Celina E. Contreras
Has Florida Won Or Lost The Battle By Eliminating Section 90.803(4) As An Alternative Tool In Prosecuting Child Sexual Abuse?, Celina E. Contreras
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
Throwing The Baby Out With The Bathwater: Why Child Sexual Abuse Accommodation Syndrome Should Be Allowed As A Rehabilitative Tool In The Florida Courts, Michael D. Stanger
Throwing The Baby Out With The Bathwater: Why Child Sexual Abuse Accommodation Syndrome Should Be Allowed As A Rehabilitative Tool In The Florida Courts, Michael D. Stanger
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
When Children And The Elderly Are Victims: Balancing The Rights Of The Accused Against Those Of The Victim, Professor Charles W. Ehrhardt
When Children And The Elderly Are Victims: Balancing The Rights Of The Accused Against Those Of The Victim, Professor Charles W. Ehrhardt
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
Statements Of Bystanders To Police Officers Containing An Accusation Of Criminal Conduct Offered To Explain Subsequent Police Conduct, Joëlle Hervic
Statements Of Bystanders To Police Officers Containing An Accusation Of Criminal Conduct Offered To Explain Subsequent Police Conduct, Joëlle Hervic
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
Out-Of-Court Accusations Offered For "Background": A Measured Response From The Federal Courts, Professor Daniel J. Capra
Out-Of-Court Accusations Offered For "Background": A Measured Response From The Federal Courts, Professor Daniel J. Capra
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Reply To Professor Capra, Joëlle Harvic
A Reply To Professor Capra, Joëlle Harvic
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
Compelled Dna Testing In Rape Cases: Illustrating The Necessity Of An Exception To The Self-Incrimination Clause, Stephanie A. Parks
Compelled Dna Testing In Rape Cases: Illustrating The Necessity Of An Exception To The Self-Incrimination Clause, Stephanie A. Parks
William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice
No abstract provided.
Voluntary Intoxication In Florida: Public Policy Versus Due Process And Why Florida's Intoxication Statute Cannot Withstand A Constitutional Challenge, Michael L. Elkins
Voluntary Intoxication In Florida: Public Policy Versus Due Process And Why Florida's Intoxication Statute Cannot Withstand A Constitutional Challenge, Michael L. Elkins
St. Thomas Law Review
This comment examines the substance of the opinions in Egelhoff and juxtaposes the Florida statutory scheme against the proper constitutional analysis. The Egelhoff majority has done little to provide a workable constitutional backdrop from which other state statutes banning evidence of voluntary intoxication may be categorized. Part II of this comment provides the historical background for the voluntary intoxication defense. Part I initially examines the factual and legal background of the Egelhoff case as set forth by the Montana Supreme Court. Part IV then provides an analysis of the opinions authored by the United States Supreme Court. This section will …
Character Evidence, Paul C. Giannelli
“Other Acts” Evidence: Part Ii, Paul C. Giannelli
“Other Acts” Evidence: Part Ii, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Scientific Evidence In Civil And Criminal Cases, Paul C. Giannelli
Scientific Evidence In Civil And Criminal Cases, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Causation In Toxic Tort Litigation: Which Way Do We Go, Judge, Laurie Alberts
Causation In Toxic Tort Litigation: Which Way Do We Go, Judge, Laurie Alberts
Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - )
No abstract provided.
Tales Out Of School--Spillover Confessions And Against-Interest Statements Naming Others, Christopher B. Mueller
Tales Out Of School--Spillover Confessions And Against-Interest Statements Naming Others, Christopher B. Mueller
Publications
No abstract provided.