Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Criminal Law (92)
- Criminal Procedure (87)
- Privacy Law (80)
- Intellectual Property Law (77)
- Computer Law (76)
-
- Internet Law (76)
- Commercial Law (75)
- Courts (75)
- Air and Space Law (74)
- Communications Law (74)
- Constitutional Law (74)
- Gaming Law (74)
- Litigation (68)
- Science and Technology Law (68)
- Jurisprudence (67)
- Judges (66)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (66)
- Law and Race (66)
- Law and Society (66)
- Fourth Amendment (65)
- International Law (65)
- State and Local Government Law (65)
- Civil Procedure (64)
- Human Rights Law (63)
- Legal Education (63)
- Legal History (63)
- Legal Profession (63)
- Legislation (63)
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (58)
- National Law School of India University (17)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (7)
- Roger Williams University (6)
- University of Maine School of Law (6)
-
- University of Michigan Law School (6)
- Fordham Law School (5)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (5)
- Brigham Young University Law School (3)
- Duke Law (2)
- Lewis & Clark Law School (2)
- Marquette University Law School (2)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (2)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (2)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (2)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (2)
- University of Miami Law School (2)
- University of Washington School of Law (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Brooklyn Law School (1)
- Cornell University Law School (1)
- Fort Hays State University (1)
- Georgia State University College of Law (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- Mercer University School of Law (1)
- Mississippi Christian University School of Law (1)
- Murray State University (1)
- New York Law School (1)
- Old Dominion University (1)
- Keyword
-
- Evidence (21)
- Artificial intelligence (7)
- Regulation (7)
- Admissibility (5)
- Law (5)
-
- Privacy (5)
- Securities and exchange commission (5)
- Addiction (4)
- Constitutional law (4)
- ESG (4)
- Federal Rules of Evidence (4)
- Public health (4)
- Rules of evidence (4)
- Technology (4)
- Corporate (3)
- Discrimination (3)
- Ethics (3)
- Expert testimony (3)
- First Amendment (3)
- Hearsay (3)
- Sec (3)
- Shareholder (3)
- Testimony (3)
- AI (2)
- ASB (2)
- Ai (2)
- Algorithms (2)
- Alternative (2)
- Antitrust (2)
- Attorneys (2)
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (58)
- Indian Journal of Law and Technology (16)
- Maine Law Review (6)
- Articles (5)
- Fordham Law Review (4)
-
- Roger Williams University Law Review (4)
- Touro Law Review (4)
- BYU Law Review (3)
- Faculty Scholarship (3)
- Scholarly Works (3)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (2)
- Lewis & Clark Law Review (2)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (2)
- Mitchell Hamline Law Review (2)
- University of Cincinnati Law Review (2)
- Washington Law Review (2)
- All Faculty Publications (1)
- Amicus Briefs & Court Filings (1)
- Arkansas Law Review (1)
- Articles & Book Chapters (1)
- Articles & Chapters (1)
- Books (1)
- Brooklyn Law Review (1)
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (1)
- Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review (1)
- Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice (1)
- Cardozo Law Review (1)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Electrical & Computer Engineering Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Publications (1)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 151 - 162 of 162
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
Volume 48 Masthead, Seattle University Law Review
Volume 48 Masthead, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Volume 48 Masthead
Understanding The Big Three’S Wavering Support Of Environmental And Social Shareholder Proposals, Jeff Schwartz, Jefferson Jensen
Understanding The Big Three’S Wavering Support Of Environmental And Social Shareholder Proposals, Jeff Schwartz, Jefferson Jensen
Seattle University Law Review
Because of their substantial equity portfolios, BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street (the Big 3) are central players in corporate governance. It is, therefore, critical to understand how they vote. One puzzle is that their support for shareholder proposals on environmental and social matters appears to waiver. In 2020, for instance, BlackRock supported 11.1% of environmental proposals at S&P 500 firms. In 2021, it seemingly reversed course, supporting 55.2%. It then flipped again, supporting 32.1% in 2022. Such statistics suggest that the Big 3 are constantly changing their views on these topics. This Article seeks to better understand whether this is …
Volume 48 Masthead, Seattle University Law Review
Volume 48 Masthead, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Volume 48 Masthead
Let's Break Some Rules: Immodest Proposals For Evidence Reform, Len Niehoff
Let's Break Some Rules: Immodest Proposals For Evidence Reform, Len Niehoff
Articles
In 1975, when the American Bar Association launched LITIGATION, its editors dedicated the entirety of one of the journal's first issues to evidence. Authors included distinguished practitioners, respected judges, and academic giants like Margaret A. Berger, Irving Younger, and Jim McElhaney. Subjects varied, but the articles shared a common sensibility: The recently adopted Federal Rules of Evidence were a good thing.
Consensus And Conflict Over Context: Select Criminal Law And Procedure Cases From The Supreme Court's 2024-25 Term, Eve Brensike Primus, Elena Schultz
Consensus And Conflict Over Context: Select Criminal Law And Procedure Cases From The Supreme Court's 2024-25 Term, Eve Brensike Primus, Elena Schultz
Articles
In its 2024-2025 Term, the Supreme Court emphasized the utility—and necessity—of context-based, fact-sensitive analyses throughout its criminal law and procedure cases. Though the Justices sparred over how to derive meaning from factual, structural, legal, and historical contexts, they tended to agree that courts should not be artificially restricted from considering the breadth of the record before them.
The Difference A Year Makes: The Admissibility Of Expert Opinion Testimony Under The 2023 Amendment To Federal Rule Of Evidence 702, Daniel J. Capra, Liesa L. Richter
The Difference A Year Makes: The Admissibility Of Expert Opinion Testimony Under The 2023 Amendment To Federal Rule Of Evidence 702, Daniel J. Capra, Liesa L. Richter
Other Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
A New Deepfake Detection Method With No-Reference Image Quality Assessment To Resist Image Degradation, Jiajun Jiang, Wen-Chao Yang, Chung-Hao Chen, Timothy Young
A New Deepfake Detection Method With No-Reference Image Quality Assessment To Resist Image Degradation, Jiajun Jiang, Wen-Chao Yang, Chung-Hao Chen, Timothy Young
Electrical & Computer Engineering Faculty Publications
Deepfake technology, which utilizes advanced AI models such as Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), has led to the proliferation of highly convincing manipulated media, posing significant challenges for detection. Existing detection methods often struggle with the low-quality or compressed press, which is prevalent on social media platforms. This paper proposes a novel Deepfake detection framework that leverages No-Reference Image Quality Assessment (NRIQA) techniques, specifically, BRISQUE, NIQE, and PIQUE, to extract quality-related features from facial images. These features are then classified using a Support Vector Machine (SVM) with various kernel functions. We evaluate our method under both intra-dataset and cross-dataset settings. For …
New Insights On Expert Opinion About Eyewitness Memory Research, Travis M. Seale-Carlisle, Adele Quigley-Mcbride, Jennifer E. F. Teitcher, William E. Crozier, Chad S. Dodson, Brandon L. Garrett
New Insights On Expert Opinion About Eyewitness Memory Research, Travis M. Seale-Carlisle, Adele Quigley-Mcbride, Jennifer E. F. Teitcher, William E. Crozier, Chad S. Dodson, Brandon L. Garrett
Faculty Scholarship
Experimental psychologists investigating eyewitness memory have periodically gathered their thoughts on a variety of eyewitness memory phenomena. Courts and other stakeholders of eyewitness research rely on the expert opinions reflected in these surveys to make informed decisions. However, the last survey of this sort was published more than 20 years ago, and the science of eyewitness memory has developed since that time. Stakeholders need a current database of expert opinions to make informed decisions. In this article, we provide that update. We surveyed 76 scientists for their opinions on eyewitness memory phenomena. We compared these current expert opinions to expert …
Affording Oral Tradition Evidence Due Weight Before The International Court Of Justice, Terrence Neal
Affording Oral Tradition Evidence Due Weight Before The International Court Of Justice, Terrence Neal
Faculty Scholarship
Oral traditions are irreplaceable sources of historical information, particularly with regard to Indigenous Peoples’ histories and cultures. However, when states have submitted oral traditions as evidence of historical practices, events, and circumstances in cases before the International Court of Justice (“Court”), the Court has been reluctant to afford them significant weight. This Article, which is the first detailed study on the Court’s treatment of oral traditions, examines whether the Court is failing to provide them due or appropriate weight. Based on historical, archaeological, and anthropological research, it establishes that oral traditions can be as reliable as written documents for reconstructing …
You Get The Jury You Get And You Don’T Throw A Fit, Taurus Myhand
You Get The Jury You Get And You Don’T Throw A Fit, Taurus Myhand
Scholarly Works
The proliferation of deepfake videos has resulted in rapid improvements in the technology used to create them. Although the use of fake videos and images is not new, advances in artificial intelligence have made deepfakes easier to make and harder to detect. Basic human perception is no longer sufficient to detect deepfakes. Yet, under the current construction of the Federal Rules of Evidence, trials judges are expected to do just that. Trial judges face a daunting challenge when applying the current evidence authentication standards to video evidence in this new reality of widely available deepfake videos. This article examines the …
A Conviction In Jeopardy: The Mysterious Case Against Scott Peterson, Jolie Bodner Zangari
A Conviction In Jeopardy: The Mysterious Case Against Scott Peterson, Jolie Bodner Zangari
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
The Jury Does Not Always Need Help From Lay Opinion Witnesses, Taurus Myhand
The Jury Does Not Always Need Help From Lay Opinion Witnesses, Taurus Myhand
Scholarly Works
Who is the “reasonable person”? There is little doubt that every competent legal professional, both in law practice and in the academic setting, has spent a great deal of time attempting to define the reasonable person. “Reasonableness is largely a matter of common sense.” In police encounters, the definition is certainly important to the outcome of questionable police conduct. How the reasonable person is defined often determines whether a police officer has infringed on an individual’s Fourth Amendment guarantee to be secure in their person against unreasonable searches and seizures. As the narratives of the news media shape how some …