Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Criminal Law (37)
- Criminal Procedure (32)
- Constitutional Law (28)
- Courts (24)
- Jurisprudence (17)
-
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (15)
- Fourth Amendment (13)
- Law and Society (13)
- State and Local Government Law (13)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (12)
- Science and Technology Law (12)
- Administrative Law (11)
- Civil Procedure (11)
- Judges (11)
- Law and Race (11)
- Supreme Court of the United States (11)
- Law and Gender (10)
- Legal History (10)
- Civil Law (9)
- Common Law (9)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (9)
- Legal Education (9)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (9)
- Legal Remedies (9)
- Legislation (9)
- Jurisdiction (8)
- Legal Profession (8)
- Education Law (7)
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (9)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (6)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (6)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (5)
- Columbia Law School (4)
-
- Mercer University School of Law (4)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (4)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (4)
- William & Mary Law School (4)
- American University Washington College of Law (3)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (3)
- Roger Williams University (3)
- University of Maine School of Law (3)
- University of Michigan Law School (3)
- Cornell University Law School (2)
- Duke Law (2)
- Georgetown University Law Center (2)
- New York Law School (2)
- St. Mary's University (2)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (2)
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (2)
- University of Missouri School of Law (2)
- University of Montana (2)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (2)
- Boise State University (1)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University (1)
- Florida A&M University College of Law (1)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- Lewis & Clark Law School (1)
- Keyword
-
- Evidence (13)
- Federal Rules of Evidence (5)
- Criminal procedure (4)
- Fourth Amendment (4)
- Admissibility (3)
-
- Character evidence (3)
- Constitutional Law (3)
- Criminal Law (3)
- Expert testimony (3)
- Fourth amendment (3)
- Search and seizure (3)
- California Supreme Court (2)
- Confrontation Clause (2)
- Constitutional law (2)
- DNA (2)
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals (2)
- Discovery (2)
- Employment discrimination (2)
- Impeachment (2)
- Intent (2)
- Law enforcement (2)
- Mr. Big (2)
- Plea negotiations (2)
- Rule 410 (2)
- Rules of evidence (2)
- Sixth Amendment (2)
- Supreme Court (2)
- Warrant (2)
- 404(b) (1)
- Abusive Head Trauma (1)
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (8)
- Faculty Scholarship (6)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (5)
- Articles (4)
- Mercer Law Review (4)
-
- Maine Law Review (3)
- Oklahoma Law Review (3)
- Roger Williams University Law Review (3)
- American University Law Review (2)
- Arkansas Law Review (2)
- Cardozo Law Review (2)
- Faculty Publications (2)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (2)
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review (2)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (2)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (2)
- Touro Law Review (2)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (2)
- Akron Law Review (1)
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law (1)
- Articles & Chapters (1)
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (1)
- Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review (1)
- Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution (1)
- Cleveland State Law Review (1)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Cornell Law Review (1)
- Court Decisions (1)
- Criminal Justice Faculty Publications and Presentations (1)
- Dalhousie Law Journal (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 91 - 97 of 97
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
Sexual Contact Between A Suspect And Police Officers: How Far Should Police Go To Prove Prostitution?, Paula Del Valle Torres
Sexual Contact Between A Suspect And Police Officers: How Far Should Police Go To Prove Prostitution?, Paula Del Valle Torres
American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law
No abstract provided.
Anticipating Venezuela's Debt Crisis: Hidden Holdouts And The Problem Of Pricing Collective Action Clauses, Robert E. Scott, Stephen J. Choi, Mitu Gulati
Anticipating Venezuela's Debt Crisis: Hidden Holdouts And The Problem Of Pricing Collective Action Clauses, Robert E. Scott, Stephen J. Choi, Mitu Gulati
Faculty Scholarship
A creditor who asks for stronger enforcement rights upon its debtor’s default will rationally accept a lower interest rate reflecting the greater expected recovery the exercise of those rights provides. Over a dozen studies, however, have failed to document this basic relationship in the context of the collective action clause, a key provision in sovereign bonds. We conjecture that this failure is because enforcing the rights in question requires collective decision-making among anonymous creditors with different interests, impeding market predictions regarding future price effects. The pricing of rights that require collective enforcement thus turns on whether the market observes an …
Harassment, Workplace Culture, And The Power And Limits Of Law, Suzanne B. Goldberg
Harassment, Workplace Culture, And The Power And Limits Of Law, Suzanne B. Goldberg
Faculty Scholarship
This article asks why it remains so difficult for employers to prevent and respond effectively to harassment, especially sexual harassment, and identifies promising points for legal intervention. It is sobering to consider social-science evidence of the myriad barriers to reporting sexual harassment – from the individual-level and interpersonal to those rooted in society at large. Most of these are out of reach for an employer but workplace culture stands out as a significant arena where employers have influence on whether harassment and other discriminatory behaviors are likely to thrive. Yet employers typically make choices in this area with attention to …
Conference On Best Practices For Managing Daubert Questions, Daniel J. Capra, David G. Campbell, Debra A. Livingston, James P. Bassett, Shelly Dick, Traci L. Lovitt, Thomas Marten, Kathryn N. Nester, Thomas D. Schroeder, Elizabeth J. Shapiro, Timothy Lau, Vince Chhabria, John Z. Lee, William H. Orrick Iii, Edmund A. Sargus Jr., Sarah A. Vance, Edward K. Cheng
Conference On Best Practices For Managing Daubert Questions, Daniel J. Capra, David G. Campbell, Debra A. Livingston, James P. Bassett, Shelly Dick, Traci L. Lovitt, Thomas Marten, Kathryn N. Nester, Thomas D. Schroeder, Elizabeth J. Shapiro, Timothy Lau, Vince Chhabria, John Z. Lee, William H. Orrick Iii, Edmund A. Sargus Jr., Sarah A. Vance, Edward K. Cheng
Faculty Scholarship
This article is a transcript of the Philip D. Reed Lecture Series Conference on Best Practices for Managing Daubert Questions, held on October 25, 2019, at Vanderbilt Law School under the sponsorship of the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules. The transcript has been lightly edited and represents the panelists’ individual views only and in no way reflects those of their affiliated firms, organizations, law schools, or the judiciary.
Discrete Rent-Seeking Games With An Application To Evidence Production, Giuseppe Dari-Mattiacci, Lewis A. Kornhauser
Discrete Rent-Seeking Games With An Application To Evidence Production, Giuseppe Dari-Mattiacci, Lewis A. Kornhauser
Faculty Scholarship
Evidence production at trial, the accumulation of patents in a technological race, and lobbying are contests that often involve strategic choices over a discrete set of options. The literature has primarily focused on games with continuous effort choices. We fill this gap by studying a rent-seeking game with discrete effort choices and, for a significant class of games, derive a transformation rule that allows one to find the equilibrium of the discrete game from the equilibrium of the continuous game, which is much simpler to identify. We also discuss the limits of this approach and how well the continuous game …
Judging Eyewitness Evidence, Brandon L. Garrett
Judging Eyewitness Evidence, Brandon L. Garrett
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Rule 43(A): Remote Witness Testimony And A Judiciary Resistant To Change, Christopher Fobes
Rule 43(A): Remote Witness Testimony And A Judiciary Resistant To Change, Christopher Fobes
Lewis & Clark Law Review
Technology has improved our lives in countless ways. In 1996, it made its way into our federal courtrooms and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure when the Congress codified Rule 43(a). Rule 43(a) permits a witness to testify remotely via telephone or video transmission upon a showing of good cause. Despite this large step into the modern era, some courts are pressed to exclude a witness’s remote testimony because of Rule 43(a)’s burdensome good-cause standard and the risks implicated by such testimony. The judiciary has struggled to find cohesion in determining when remote witness testimony is permissible. This Note critiques …