Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Courts (19)
- Criminal Law (13)
- Science and Technology Law (13)
- Criminal Procedure (10)
- Judges (10)
-
- Constitutional Law (6)
- Litigation (5)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (4)
- Legal History (3)
- State and Local Government Law (3)
- Supreme Court of the United States (3)
- Civil Procedure (2)
- Jurisprudence (2)
- Admiralty (1)
- Arts and Humanities (1)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Common Law (1)
- Conflict of Laws (1)
- Environmental Law (1)
- Family Law (1)
- Forensic Science and Technology (1)
- Fourth Amendment (1)
- Health Law and Policy (1)
- Immigration Law (1)
- Insurance Law (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (1)
- Law and Psychology (1)
- Institution
-
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (19)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (15)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (5)
- University of Michigan Law School (5)
- Campbell University School of Law (3)
-
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (3)
- William & Mary Law School (3)
- Fordham Law School (2)
- UC Law SF (2)
- University of Baltimore Law (2)
- University of Richmond (2)
- University of Washington School of Law (2)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (2)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Brigham Young University Law School (1)
- Brooklyn Law School (1)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- Cornell University Law School (1)
- Duke Law (1)
- Georgia State University College of Law (1)
- Mercer University School of Law (1)
- New York Law School (1)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (1)
- University of Colorado Law School (1)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (1)
- University of Kentucky (1)
- University of the District of Columbia School of Law (1)
- Valparaiso University (1)
- West Virginia University (1)
- Keyword
-
- Evidence (27)
- Testimony (13)
- Federal (11)
- New York (11)
- Courts (9)
-
- Federal Rules of Evidence (8)
- Legal Practice and Procedure (8)
- Science and Technology Law (8)
- Scientific Evidence (8)
- Admissible (7)
- Scientific Research (7)
- Defendant (6)
- Evidence law (6)
- Hearsay (6)
- Judges (6)
- Admissibility (5)
- Litigation (5)
- Witness (5)
- Confrontation clause (4)
- Daubert (4)
- Evidentiary (4)
- Witnesses (4)
- Child Abuse (3)
- Child Welfare (3)
- Codification (3)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (3)
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals (3)
- Frye (3)
- Frye v. United States (3)
- Hypnosis (3)
- Publication
-
- Cardozo Law Review (18)
- Touro Law Review (14)
- Faculty Publications (6)
- Articles (5)
- Faculty Scholarship (5)
-
- Campbell Law Review (3)
- Indiana Law Journal (3)
- All Faculty Scholarship (2)
- University of Richmond Law Review (2)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (2)
- Washington Law Review (2)
- William & Mary Law Review (2)
- American University Law Review (1)
- Articles & Chapters (1)
- BYU Law Review (1)
- Cleveland State Law Review (1)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Publications By Year (1)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (1)
- Kentucky Law Journal (1)
- Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Mercer Law Review (1)
- Michigan Law Review (1)
- Publications (1)
- Scholarly Works (1)
- UF Law Faculty Publications (1)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (1)
- University of the District of Columbia Law Review (1)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law (1)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 61 - 83 of 83
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
Supreme Court Rules On Statements Against Interest, The , Michael M. Martin
Supreme Court Rules On Statements Against Interest, The , Michael M. Martin
Faculty Scholarship
Reliability has been defined as "worthy of dependence" or "of proven consistency in producing satisfactory results." It is a common concept as well as a quality for which individuals search in their everyday transactions, such as purchasing a car or selecting an express delivery service. It similarly shapes the rules of evidence pertaining to hearsay. Beth common law and modem evidentiary codes ban the admission of extrajudicial statements offered to prove the truth of a matter asserted because they are not made under oath, in the presence of the trier of fact, and subject to cross-examination. Without these safeguards, the …
Character Impeachment Evidence: The Asymmetrical Interaction Between Personality And Situation, Richard D. Friedman
Character Impeachment Evidence: The Asymmetrical Interaction Between Personality And Situation, Richard D. Friedman
Articles
In Part I of this Comment, I present a short version of my argument against the admissibility of character impeachment evidence of criminal defendants, showing how the key elements ofthis argument are present in Professor Uviller's own Article. In Part II, I suggest that, notwithstanding Professor Uviller's comments to the contrary, an asymmetrical result-never admitting character evidence to impeach criminal defendants but admitting such evidence in some circumstances to impeach other witnesses- is perfectly reasonable. Finally, in Part III, I contend that Professor Uviller's interesting judicial surveys support the solution I have proposed for the problem of character impeachment evidence.
Polygraph Evidence: Part I, Paul C. Giannelli
Polygraph Evidence: Part I, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Money Laundering And Drug Trafficking: A Question Of Understanding The Elements Of The Crime And The Use Of Circumstantial Evidence, Thomas M. Dibiagio
Money Laundering And Drug Trafficking: A Question Of Understanding The Elements Of The Crime And The Use Of Circumstantial Evidence, Thomas M. Dibiagio
University of Richmond Law Review
Drug trafficking in the United States generates millions of dollars in cash profits daily. The cash generated from narcotics trafficking usually follows one of two distinct paths. Domestically, the profits are converted into usable currency by disguising the association between the cash and the narcotics enterprise. Monies not spent domestically are transferred back to the nar- cotics source or drug cartel to be enjoyed by the drug traffickers and to provide operating capital for the enterprise. This conversion and transfer process has become known commonly as money laundering.
Right To Counsel: People V. West
Character Evidence, James L. Kainen
Coconspirator Statements And Former Testimony In New York And Federal Courts With Some Comments On Codification, Randolph N. Jonakait
Coconspirator Statements And Former Testimony In New York And Federal Courts With Some Comments On Codification, Randolph N. Jonakait
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Expert Testimony, Barry C. Scheck
Trances, Trials, And Tribulations, Gary M. Shaw
Trances, Trials, And Tribulations, Gary M. Shaw
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Supreme Court Rules On Statements Against Interest, Michael M. Martin
The Supreme Court Rules On Statements Against Interest, Michael M. Martin
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Symposium Comparing New York And Federal Evidence Law: Introduction, Honorable George C. Pratt
Symposium Comparing New York And Federal Evidence Law: Introduction, Honorable George C. Pratt
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Federal Rule Of Evidence 407: Should It Apply To Products Liability?, Patricia A. Brass
Federal Rule Of Evidence 407: Should It Apply To Products Liability?, Patricia A. Brass
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Comparison Of The Federal And New York State Rape Shield Statutes, Deborah Stavile Bartel
A Comparison Of The Federal And New York State Rape Shield Statutes, Deborah Stavile Bartel
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Taking The Sizzle Out Of The Frye Rule: Daubert V. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Opens The Door To Novel Expert Testimony, Kimberly Ann Satterwhite
Taking The Sizzle Out Of The Frye Rule: Daubert V. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Opens The Door To Novel Expert Testimony, Kimberly Ann Satterwhite
University of Richmond Law Review
In Frye v. United States, the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia affirmed a trial court's exclusion of lie detector test results on the ground that such tests had not been "generally accepted" by the scientific community. The Frye rule, or "general acceptance" standard, quickly became the dominant test for the admission of scientific evidence. Decided in 1923, Frye governed evidentiary decisions in a majority of federal circuits for the next seventy years. The adoption of the Federal Rules of Evidence in 1975, however, prompted several judges to question the validity of Frye. Since the enactment of the …
The Hague Evidence Convention: The Need For Guidance On Procedures And Resolution Of Conflicts In Transnational Discovery, John C. Plaster
The Hague Evidence Convention: The Need For Guidance On Procedures And Resolution Of Conflicts In Transnational Discovery, John C. Plaster
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
As international commercial disputes become more common, United States courts increasingly face difficult issues involved in transnational discovery. Two frequently encountered issues are choosing whether to use the discovery procedures of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Hague Evidence Convention and whether to enforce a discovery order when the order conflicts with a law of the state in which discovery is to occur. Although the Supreme Court has addressed both of these issues, it has left lower courts considerable discretion to deal with these issues case by case. Lower courts, therefore, have not been uniform in their approaches …
Discovery In The Real World, Minna J. Kotkin
Discovery In The Real World, Minna J. Kotkin
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Consent Exception To The Warrant Requirement, H. Patrick Furman
The Consent Exception To The Warrant Requirement, H. Patrick Furman
Publications
No abstract provided.
The Meaning Of Daubert And What That Means For Forensic Science, Randolph N. Jonakait
The Meaning Of Daubert And What That Means For Forensic Science, Randolph N. Jonakait
Articles & Chapters
No abstract provided.
The Death And Transfiguration Of Frye, Richard D. Friedman
The Death And Transfiguration Of Frye, Richard D. Friedman
Articles
The rule of Frye v. United States was seventy years old, and had long dominated American law on the question of how well established a scientific principle must be for it to provide the basis for expert testimony. Even after the passage of the Federal Rules of Evidence, several of the federal circuits, as well as various states, purported to adhere to Frye's "general acceptance" standard. But now, unanimously, briefly, and with no apparent angst, the United States Supreme Court has held in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. that the Frye rule is incompatible with the Federal Rules.
Impeachment And Rehabilitation Under The Maryland Rules Of Evidence: An Attorney's Guide, Paul W. Grimm
Impeachment And Rehabilitation Under The Maryland Rules Of Evidence: An Attorney's Guide, Paul W. Grimm
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Check Your Crystal Ball At The Courthouse Door, Please: Exploring The Past, Understanding The Present, And Worrying About The Future Of Scientific Evidence, David L. Faigman, Elise Porter, Michael J. Saks
Check Your Crystal Ball At The Courthouse Door, Please: Exploring The Past, Understanding The Present, And Worrying About The Future Of Scientific Evidence, David L. Faigman, Elise Porter, Michael J. Saks
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Trances, Trials, And Tribulations; Symposium Comparing New York And Federal Evidence Law, Gary Shaw
Trances, Trials, And Tribulations; Symposium Comparing New York And Federal Evidence Law, Gary Shaw
Scholarly Works
A transcript of the author’s remarks at a 1994 symposium comparing New York and Federal Laws regarding hypnosis and witness testimony.