Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Criminal Procedure (29)
- Constitutional Law (23)
- Criminal Law (23)
- Courts (11)
- Litigation (11)
-
- Legislation (8)
- Civil Procedure (7)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (7)
- Law and Psychology (6)
- Law and Society (6)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (5)
- Juvenile Law (5)
- Legal Remedies (5)
- Science and Technology Law (5)
- State and Local Government Law (5)
- Jurisprudence (4)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (4)
- Transportation Law (4)
- Legal History (3)
- Medical Jurisprudence (3)
- Torts (3)
- Civil Law (2)
- Computer Law (2)
- Family Law (2)
- First Amendment (2)
- Human Rights Law (2)
- Intellectual Property Law (2)
- Internet Law (2)
- Keyword
-
- Evidence (37)
- Exclusionary rule (12)
- Searches and seizures (8)
- Testimony (8)
- Fourth Amendment (6)
-
- Search (6)
- Crime (5)
- Criminal (5)
- Criminal Procedure (5)
- Criminal procedure (5)
- Discovery (5)
- Privacy (5)
- Admissibility (4)
- Admissibility of evidence (4)
- California (4)
- Constitution (4)
- Federal Rules of Evidence (4)
- Jury (4)
- Law Enforcement (4)
- Police (4)
- Seizure (4)
- Trial (4)
- Witness (4)
- Admissible evidence (3)
- Character evidence (3)
- Confidential communications (3)
- Court (3)
- Criminal intent (3)
- Criminal law (3)
- Due Process (3)
Articles 61 - 68 of 68
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
The Advice-Of-Counsel Defense In Patent Infringement Cases: How Far Does Waiver Of Work Product Extend?, Cecil C. Kuhne Iii
The Advice-Of-Counsel Defense In Patent Infringement Cases: How Far Does Waiver Of Work Product Extend?, Cecil C. Kuhne Iii
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Impact Of Daubert On The Admissibility Of Behavioral Science Testimony, Henry F. Fradella, Adam Fogarty, Lauren O'Neill
The Impact Of Daubert On The Admissibility Of Behavioral Science Testimony, Henry F. Fradella, Adam Fogarty, Lauren O'Neill
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Impact Of Daubert On Forensic Science, Henry F. Fradella, Lauren O'Neill, Adam Fogarty
The Impact Of Daubert On Forensic Science, Henry F. Fradella, Lauren O'Neill, Adam Fogarty
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Accomplice Confessions And The Confrontation Clause: Crawford V. Washington Confronts Past Issues With A New Rule, Kjirstin Graham
Accomplice Confessions And The Confrontation Clause: Crawford V. Washington Confronts Past Issues With A New Rule, Kjirstin Graham
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Going After The 'Hired Guns': Is Improper Expert Witness Testimony Unprofessional Conduct Or The Negligent Practice Of Medicine?, Jennifer A. Turner
Going After The 'Hired Guns': Is Improper Expert Witness Testimony Unprofessional Conduct Or The Negligent Practice Of Medicine?, Jennifer A. Turner
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Impeachable Offenses?: Why Civil Parties In Quasi-Criminal Cases Should Be Treated Like Criminal Defendants Under The Felony Impeachment Rule, Colin Miller
Pepperdine Law Review
With one exception, every Federal Rule of Evidence dealing with propensity character evidence or evidence which can be misused as propensity character evidence makes it either: (a) as difficult to admit such evidence in civil trials as it is in criminal trials, or (b) more difficult to admit such evidence in civil trials than it is in criminal trials. The "mercy rule" falls into this latter category as it allows criminal defendants to inject the issue of character into their trials while a similar luxury is not afforded to civil parties. Before 2006, however, a substantial minority of courts extended …
The Sexual Assault Counselor-Victim Privilege: Jurisdictional Delay Into An Unclaimed Sanctuary, Armand Arabian
The Sexual Assault Counselor-Victim Privilege: Jurisdictional Delay Into An Unclaimed Sanctuary, Armand Arabian
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Lawyers Judging Experts: Oversimplifying Science And Undervaluing Advocacy To Construct An Ethical Duty?, David S. Caudill
Lawyers Judging Experts: Oversimplifying Science And Undervaluing Advocacy To Construct An Ethical Duty?, David S. Caudill
Pepperdine Law Review
My focus is on an apparent trend at the intersection of the fields of evidentiary standards for expert admissibility and professional responsibility, namely the eagerness to place more ethical responsibilities on lawyers to vet their proffered expertise to ensure its reliability. My reservations about this trend are not only based on its troubling implications for the lawyer’s duty as a zealous advocate, which already has obvious limitations (because of lawyers’ conflicting duties to the court), but are also based on the problematic aspects of many reliability determinations. To expect attorneys - and this is what the proponents of a duty …