Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Evidence Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Faculty Publications

Discipline
Institution
Keyword
Publication Year

Articles 151 - 180 of 186

Full-Text Articles in Evidence

Polygraph And Deception Tests, Paul C. Giannelli Jan 1985

Polygraph And Deception Tests, Paul C. Giannelli

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.


The Supreme Court And The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination: Has The Burger Court Retreated?, Paul Marcus Jan 1985

The Supreme Court And The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination: Has The Burger Court Retreated?, Paul Marcus

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.


Admissibility Of Laboratory Reports, Paul C. Giannelli Jan 1984

Admissibility Of Laboratory Reports, Paul C. Giannelli

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.


“Other Acts” Evidence, Paul C. Giannelli Jan 1984

“Other Acts” Evidence, Paul C. Giannelli

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.


Hypnotic Evidence, Paul C. Giannelli Jan 1983

Hypnotic Evidence, Paul C. Giannelli

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.


Chain Of Custody And Identification Of Real Evidence, Paul C. Giannelli Jan 1983

Chain Of Custody And Identification Of Real Evidence, Paul C. Giannelli

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.


The Hearsay Exception For Public Records In Federal Criminal Trials, Vincent C. Alexander Jan 1983

The Hearsay Exception For Public Records In Federal Criminal Trials, Vincent C. Alexander

Faculty Publications

The hearsay exception for "public records" was recognized at common law and has been further developed in most jurisdictions by statute. The reliability of public records is said to derive from the presumption of regularity and accuracy that attends the recording of events by public officials. As with the hearsay exception for recordsmade in the regular course of a private business, the reliability of many public records is enhanced by the routine and repetitive circumstancesunder which such records are made. An additional justificationfor the admission of public records is public convenience: If government employees are continually required to testify in …


The Procurement And Presentation Of Evidence In Courts-Martial: Compulsory Process And Confrontation, Fredric I. Lederer, Francis A. Gilligan Jan 1983

The Procurement And Presentation Of Evidence In Courts-Martial: Compulsory Process And Confrontation, Fredric I. Lederer, Francis A. Gilligan

Faculty Publications

Although pretrial litigation often seems to render trial on the merits something of an anti-climax, adversarial adjudication is of course the focus of the criminal justice system, military or civilian. Once trial on the merits has begun, trial and defense counsel naturally utilize the rules of evidence in the fashion most likely to make the most of the evidence available to them. Yet, as all lawyers are aware, the period since the enactment of the Uniform Code of Military Justice has brought sweeping changes not only in military criminal law, but also in the "constitutionalization" of the law of evidence. …


Constitutional Limitations On Obtaining Evidence For Scientific Analysis, Paul C. Giannelli Jan 1982

Constitutional Limitations On Obtaining Evidence For Scientific Analysis, Paul C. Giannelli

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.


The Ohio Rules Of Evidence: Part Ii, Paul C. Giannelli Jan 1981

The Ohio Rules Of Evidence: Part Ii, Paul C. Giannelli

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.


The Ohio Rules Of Evidence: Part Iv, Paul C. Giannelli Jan 1981

The Ohio Rules Of Evidence: Part Iv, Paul C. Giannelli

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.


The Ohio Rules Of Evidence: Part V, Paul C. Giannelli Jan 1981

The Ohio Rules Of Evidence: Part V, Paul C. Giannelli

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.


The Ohio Rules Of Evidence: Part Iii, Paul C. Giannelli Jan 1981

The Ohio Rules Of Evidence: Part Iii, Paul C. Giannelli

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.


The Ohio Rules Of Evidence: Part I, Paul C. Giannelli Jan 1980

The Ohio Rules Of Evidence: Part I, Paul C. Giannelli

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.


State Medical Malpractice Screening Panels In Federal Diversity Actions, Vincent C. Alexander Jan 1980

State Medical Malpractice Screening Panels In Federal Diversity Actions, Vincent C. Alexander

Faculty Publications

During the early 1970's, a medical malpractice crisis was perceived in the United States. An increasing number of costly and time-consuming lawsuits alleging medical malpractice against doctors, hospitals, and other health care providers caused malpractice insurers to raise premiums substantially, which in turn threatened to curtail the availability of adequate health care at reasonable cost. State legislatures responded to the crisis with a variety of substantive and procedural measures intended to reduce the number of litigated claims and the size of jury awards. One of the principal steps taken in a majority of states was the creation of extrajudicial panels …


Scientific Evidence - Part Ii, Paul C. Giannelli Jan 1980

Scientific Evidence - Part Ii, Paul C. Giannelli

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.


Scientific Evidence - Part I, Paul C. Giannelli Jan 1980

Scientific Evidence - Part I, Paul C. Giannelli

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.


Franks V. Delaware: A Proposed Interpretation And Application, Peter A. Alces Jan 1980

Franks V. Delaware: A Proposed Interpretation And Application, Peter A. Alces

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.


Character Evidence, Paul C. Giannelli Jan 1979

Character Evidence, Paul C. Giannelli

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.


Co-Conspirator Declarations: The Federal Rules Of Evidence And Other Recent Developments, From A Criminal Law Perspective, Paul Marcus Jan 1979

Co-Conspirator Declarations: The Federal Rules Of Evidence And Other Recent Developments, From A Criminal Law Perspective, Paul Marcus

Faculty Publications

Perhaps the most important advantage available to a prosecutor in a criminal conspiracy case is the exception to the hearsay rule for co-conspirator declarations. The exception is widely used and is often a significant part of the government presentation. In essence, it provides that otherwise inadmissible hearsay declarations of coconspirators are admissible at trial against the defendant so long as they were made during the course and in furtherance of the conspiracy. The exception typically arises when an alleged co-conspirator declarant tells the witness (often an undercover police officer) all about the conspiracy, perhaps in the hope of attracting a …


Polygraph Evidence, Paul C. Giannelli Jan 1978

Polygraph Evidence, Paul C. Giannelli

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.


The Proposed Ohio Rules Of Evidence: The General Assembly, Evidence, And Rulemaking, Paul C. Giannelli Jan 1978

The Proposed Ohio Rules Of Evidence: The General Assembly, Evidence, And Rulemaking, Paul C. Giannelli

Faculty Publications

The Ohio Supreme Court has twice promulgated and the Ohio General Assembly has twice disapproved the proposed Ohio Rules of Evidence. Moreover, the office of the Attorney General has opposed the proposed Rules in an article published in this review. The author examines the arguments against the Rules and concludes that the supreme court has the constitutional authority to prescribe most rules of evidence and that the General Assembly should accept the proposed Rules with amendments.


Eyewitness Identifications, Paul C. Giannelli Jan 1978

Eyewitness Identifications, Paul C. Giannelli

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.


The Trade Act Of 1974 Revisited: The Need For Further Reform, Scott C. Whitney Jan 1978

The Trade Act Of 1974 Revisited: The Need For Further Reform, Scott C. Whitney

Faculty Publications

Approximately four months after President Ford signed into law the Trade Act of 1974,1 the first petition for import relief was filed invoking the "liberalized" provisions of Title II.2 In the three years since the effective date of the 1974 Act, the United States International Trade Commission (ITC) has instituted investigations concerning a wide variety of commodities. 3 Nonetheless, even though Congress by enacting the 1974 Act intended to minimize the President's control over trade policy and to make import relief more accessible to both industry and labor, the lTC's recommendations have rarely been followed. This article will analyze the …


Credibility Of Witnesses, Paul C. Giannelli Jan 1978

Credibility Of Witnesses, Paul C. Giannelli

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.


Reappraising The Legality Of Post-Trial Interviews, Fredric I. Lederer Jul 1977

Reappraising The Legality Of Post-Trial Interviews, Fredric I. Lederer

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.


Replacing The Exclusionary Rule With Administrative Rulemaking, Francis A. Gilligan, Fredric I. Lederer Apr 1977

Replacing The Exclusionary Rule With Administrative Rulemaking, Francis A. Gilligan, Fredric I. Lederer

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.


The Law Of Confessions - The Voluntariness Doctrine, Fredric I. Lederer Oct 1976

The Law Of Confessions - The Voluntariness Doctrine, Fredric I. Lederer

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.


Rights Warnings In The Armed Services, Fredric I. Lederer Apr 1976

Rights Warnings In The Armed Services, Fredric I. Lederer

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.


Technical And Scientific Evidence In Administrative Adjudication, Scott C. Whitney Jan 1976

Technical And Scientific Evidence In Administrative Adjudication, Scott C. Whitney

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.