Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Criminal Law (61)
- Criminal Procedure (59)
- Constitutional Law (24)
- Jurisprudence (22)
- Law and Society (20)
-
- Courts (19)
- Judges (15)
- Science and Technology Law (14)
- Torts (11)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (9)
- Law and Gender (9)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (8)
- Legal Profession (8)
- Medical Jurisprudence (8)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (6)
- Communications Law (6)
- Fourteenth Amendment (6)
- Legal History (6)
- Sexuality and the Law (6)
- International Law (5)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (5)
- Legislation (5)
- Insurance Law (4)
- Civil Law (3)
- Education Law (3)
- Environmental Law (3)
- First Amendment (3)
- Fourth Amendment (3)
- Keyword
-
- Evidence (81)
- Legal Practice and Procedure (35)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (16)
- Proof (13)
- Courts (12)
-
- Testimony (10)
- Judges (9)
- Jurisprudence (9)
- Law and Society (9)
- Parents and Children (9)
- Science and Technology Law (9)
- Constitutional Law (8)
- Hearsay (8)
- Scientific Evidence (8)
- Scientific Research (8)
- Ethics (6)
- Law Enforcement (6)
- Child Welfare (5)
- Data Processing and Use (5)
- Politics (General) (5)
- Statistics (5)
- Witnesses (5)
- Child Abuse (4)
- Children (4)
- Computers (4)
- Employment (4)
- Gender and the Law (4)
- Medical Jurisprudence (4)
- Police (4)
- Trials (4)
Articles 91 - 120 of 210
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
The Blooding Of America: Privacy And The Dna Dragnet, Jeffrey S. Grand
The Blooding Of America: Privacy And The Dna Dragnet, Jeffrey S. Grand
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Respecting Pandora's Box, Erica Beecher-Monas
Respecting Pandora's Box, Erica Beecher-Monas
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Barely Opening, Then Slamming Shut, Science's "Black Box" In Law: A Response To Beecher-Monas's Heuristics, David S. Caudill
Barely Opening, Then Slamming Shut, Science's "Black Box" In Law: A Response To Beecher-Monas's Heuristics, David S. Caudill
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Witness Coaching By Prosecutors, Bennett L. Gershman
Witness Coaching By Prosecutors, Bennett L. Gershman
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Thinking Outside The Box: How The Enforcement Of Ethical Rules Can Minimize The Dangers Of Prosecutorial Leniency And Immunity Deals, Michael S. Ross
Thinking Outside The Box: How The Enforcement Of Ethical Rules Can Minimize The Dangers Of Prosecutorial Leniency And Immunity Deals, Michael S. Ross
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Introduction, Ellen Yaroshefsky
A Canadian Perspective On The Role Of Cooperators And Informants, Steven Skurka
A Canadian Perspective On The Role Of Cooperators And Informants, Steven Skurka
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
No Sauce For The Gander: Valuable Consideration For Helpful Testimony From Tainted Witnesses In Criminal Cases, H. Richard Uviller
No Sauce For The Gander: Valuable Consideration For Helpful Testimony From Tainted Witnesses In Criminal Cases, H. Richard Uviller
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
What Is True? Perspectives Of A Former Prosecutor, Steven M. Cohen
What Is True? Perspectives Of A Former Prosecutor, Steven M. Cohen
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
When Prosecutors Prepare Cooperators, Joel Cohen
When Prosecutors Prepare Cooperators, Joel Cohen
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Expanding The Evidentiary Frame For Cooperating Witnesses, Daniel Richman
Expanding The Evidentiary Frame For Cooperating Witnesses, Daniel Richman
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Closing Remarks, Barry Scheck
When Is A Parent Not A Parent? On Doma, Civil Unions, And Presumptions Of Parenthood, Mark Strasser
When Is A Parent Not A Parent? On Doma, Civil Unions, And Presumptions Of Parenthood, Mark Strasser
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
"Counselor, Proceed With Caution": The Use Of Integrated Evidence Presentation Systems And Computer-Generated Evidence In The Courtroom, Elan E. Weinreb
"Counselor, Proceed With Caution": The Use Of Integrated Evidence Presentation Systems And Computer-Generated Evidence In The Courtroom, Elan E. Weinreb
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Introduction: A Personal Perspective On "Artificial Intelligence And Judicial Proof", Peter Tillers
Introduction: A Personal Perspective On "Artificial Intelligence And Judicial Proof", Peter Tillers
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Artificial Intelligence, Mindreading, And Reasoning In Law, John A. Barnden, Donald M. Peterson
Artificial Intelligence, Mindreading, And Reasoning In Law, John A. Barnden, Donald M. Peterson
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
What Is "Common" About Common Sense?: Cautionary Tales For Travelers Crossing Disciplinary Boundaries, Marilyn Maccrimmon
What Is "Common" About Common Sense?: Cautionary Tales For Travelers Crossing Disciplinary Boundaries, Marilyn Maccrimmon
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Theories Of Uncertainty: Explaining The Possible Sources Of Error In Inferences, Vern R. Walker
Theories Of Uncertainty: Explaining The Possible Sources Of Error In Inferences, Vern R. Walker
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Saving Desdemona, Ron A. Shapira
Alternative Views Of Argument Construction From A Mass Of Evidence, David A. Schum
Alternative Views Of Argument Construction From A Mass Of Evidence, David A. Schum
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Explaining Relevance, Paolo Garbolino
Models Of Data Generation Vs. Models Of Events That Generate Data, Ward Edwards
Models Of Data Generation Vs. Models Of Events That Generate Data, Ward Edwards
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Serendipity And Abduction In Proofs, Presumptions, And Emerging Laws, Pek Van Andel, Danièle Bourcier
Serendipity And Abduction In Proofs, Presumptions, And Emerging Laws, Pek Van Andel, Danièle Bourcier
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
On The Proof Dynamics Of Inference To The Best Explanation, John R. Josephson
On The Proof Dynamics Of Inference To The Best Explanation, John R. Josephson
Cardozo Law Review
"Inference to the best explanation" - here called "abduction" - is a distinctive and recognizable pattern of evidential reasoning. It is ubiquitous at or near the surface of typical arguments offered in judicial and scientific contexts, and in ordinary life. It is part of "commonsense logic." An abductive argument is open to attack in characteristic ways, and may be defended in characteristic ways by supporting arguments. Abductive arguments are fallible, but there are only a small number of ways in which they can go wrong. This analysis provides a framework for justification, criticism, and dialogue concerning the evaluation of evidence. …
Species Of Abductive Reasoning In Fact Investigation In Law, David A. Schum
Species Of Abductive Reasoning In Fact Investigation In Law, David A. Schum
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Abductive Reasoning In Law: Taxonomy And Inference To The Best Explanation, Kola Abimbola
Abductive Reasoning In Law: Taxonomy And Inference To The Best Explanation, Kola Abimbola
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Logical Argumentation, Abduction And Bayesian Decision Theory: A Bayesian Approach To Logical Arguments And Its Application To Legal Evidential Reasoning, David Poole
Cardozo Law Review
There are good normative arguments for using Bayesian decision theory for deciding what to do. However, there are also good arguments for using logic where we want formal semantics for a language, and where we want to use the structure of logical argumentation with logical variables to represent multiple individuals (things). This Article shows how decision theory and logical argumentation can be combined into a coherent framework. The Independent Choice Logic ("ICL") can be viewed as a first-order representation of belief networks with conditional probability tables represented as first-order rules, or as a abductive/argument-based logic with probabilities over assumables. Intuitively …
Structured Deliberation For Dynamic Uncertain Inference, Paul Snow, Marianne Belis
Structured Deliberation For Dynamic Uncertain Inference, Paul Snow, Marianne Belis
Cardozo Law Review
Dynamic uncertain inference is the formation of opinions based upon evidence or argument whose availability is neither disclosed to the analyst in advance nor disclosed all at once. Normative accounts of belief change, which work well when the analyst has prior notice of well-designed experiments and their possible outcomes, may not be applicable to less tidy occasions of inference. In addition, there is the clerical challenge of keeping track of what has been observed, what relates to what, and how. This Article begins with a discussion of subjective valuation in general. An approach to deliberation, similar to what is practiced …
Computational Inference For Evidential Reasoning In Support Of Judicial Proof, Tod S. Levitt, Kathryn Blackmond Laskey
Computational Inference For Evidential Reasoning In Support Of Judicial Proof, Tod S. Levitt, Kathryn Blackmond Laskey
Cardozo Law Review
The process of judicial proof accrues evidence to confirm or deny hypotheses about world events relevant to a legal case. Software applications that seek to support this process must provide the user with sophisticated capabilities to manipulate evidential reasoning for legal cases. This requires computational techniques to represent the actors, entities, events, and context of world situations to structure alternative hypotheses interpreting evidence and to execute processes that draw inferences about the truth of hypotheses by assessing the relevance and weight of evidence to confirm or deny the hypotheses. Bayesian inference networks are combined with knowledge representations from artificial intelligence …
Othello Could Not Optimize: Economics, Hearsay, And Less Adversary Systems, Craig R. Callen
Othello Could Not Optimize: Economics, Hearsay, And Less Adversary Systems, Craig R. Callen
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.