Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Criminal Law (30)
- Criminal Procedure (11)
- International Law (9)
- Law and Gender (9)
- Constitutional Law (8)
-
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (8)
- Science and Technology Law (7)
- Juvenile Law (6)
- Communications Law (5)
- Law and Society (5)
- Litigation (5)
- Jurisprudence (4)
- Legal History (4)
- Administrative Law (3)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (3)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (3)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (3)
- Health Law and Policy (3)
- Law and Race (3)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (3)
- Legal Profession (3)
- Privacy Law (3)
- Civil Law (2)
- Courts (2)
- Fourth Amendment (2)
- Human Rights Law (2)
- Immigration Law (2)
- International Trade Law (2)
- Keyword
-
- Evidence (34)
- Criminal procedure (6)
- Criminal Law (5)
- Communications Law (4)
- Constitutional law (3)
-
- Criminal law (3)
- Federal Rules of Evidence (3)
- International Law: History (3)
- Appeals (2)
- Burden of Proof (2)
- Civil rights (2)
- Confidentiality (2)
- Confrontation Clause (2)
- Courts (2)
- Discovery (2)
- Documents (2)
- Due Process (2)
- Expert witness (2)
- FRE (2)
- Federal rule of evidence (2)
- Fourth Amendment (2)
- Information Privacy (2)
- International Commercial Arbitration (2)
- Investment Treaty Arbitration (2)
- Jurisprudence (2)
- Law and Society (2)
- Legislation (2)
- Privacy (2)
- Science and Technology (2)
- Standard of proof (2)
- Publication Year
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 61 - 80 of 80
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
The 'High Crime Area' Question: Requiring Verifiable And Quantifiable Evidence For Fourth Amendment Reasonable Suspicion Analysis, Andrew Ferguson, Damien Bernache
The 'High Crime Area' Question: Requiring Verifiable And Quantifiable Evidence For Fourth Amendment Reasonable Suspicion Analysis, Andrew Ferguson, Damien Bernache
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
This article proposes a legal framework to analyze the "high crime area" concept in Fourth Amendment reasonable suspicion challenges.Under existing Supreme Court precedent, reviewing courts are allowed to consider that an area is a "high crime area" as a factor to evaluate the reasonableness of a Fourth Amendment stop. See Illinois v. Wardlow, 528 U.S. 119 (2000). However, the Supreme Court has never defined a "high crime area" and lower courts have not reached consensus on a definition. There is no agreement on what a "high-crime area" is, whether it has geographic boundaries, whether it changes over time, whether it …
Evolving Evidentiary Needs: A Neglected Responsibility, Paul Rice
Evolving Evidentiary Needs: A Neglected Responsibility, Paul Rice
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
No abstract provided.
I Am Certain He Is The Man...I Think, Tim Harris
I Am Certain He Is The Man...I Think, Tim Harris
The Modern American
No abstract provided.
Procuring The Right To An Unfair Trial: Federal Rule Of Evidence 804(B)(6) And The Due Process Implications Of The Rule's Failure To Require Standards Of Reliability For Admissible Evidence, Kelly Rutan
American University Law Review
This Comment argues that though the doctrine of forfeiture by wrongdoing allows a court to forfeit both a defendant’s right to object to the admission of hearsay statements and the right of confrontation, the current state of the law requires all out-of-court statements admitted under Rule 804(b)(6) to possess some level of reliability in order to satisfy due process. Part I of this Comment discusses the doctrine of forfeiture by wrongdoing, the courts’ treatment of this principle prior to 1997, and its codification into the Federal Rules of Evidence. Part II looks at Confrontation Clause issues unique to hearsay exceptions …
Evidence Destroyed, Innocence Lost: The Preservation Of Biological Evidence Under Innocence Protection Statutes, Cynthia Jones
Evidence Destroyed, Innocence Lost: The Preservation Of Biological Evidence Under Innocence Protection Statutes, Cynthia Jones
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
No abstract provided.
2003 Trademark Law Decisions Of The Federal Circuit, Roberta Horton, Catherine Rowland
2003 Trademark Law Decisions Of The Federal Circuit, Roberta Horton, Catherine Rowland
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Back To The Future With Privileges Abandon Codification, Not The Common Law, Paul Rice
Back To The Future With Privileges Abandon Codification, Not The Common Law, Paul Rice
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
No abstract provided.
The Central Park Five, The Scottsboro Boys, And The Myth Of The Bestial Black Man, N. Jeremi Duru
The Central Park Five, The Scottsboro Boys, And The Myth Of The Bestial Black Man, N. Jeremi Duru
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
No abstract provided.
Peer Dialogue: The Quagmire Of Scientific Expert Testimony: Crumping The Supreme Court's Style, Paul Rice
Peer Dialogue: The Quagmire Of Scientific Expert Testimony: Crumping The Supreme Court's Style, Paul Rice
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
No abstract provided.
Testimony , Antoinette Sedillo Lopez
Testimony , Antoinette Sedillo Lopez
American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law
No abstract provided.
Why The Wto Should Require The Application Of The Evidentiary Threshold Requirement In Antidumping Investigations Tara Gingerich , Tara Gingerich
Why The Wto Should Require The Application Of The Evidentiary Threshold Requirement In Antidumping Investigations Tara Gingerich , Tara Gingerich
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Negative Effects Of Expert Testimony On The Battered Women's Syndrome, Pamela Posch
The Negative Effects Of Expert Testimony On The Battered Women's Syndrome, Pamela Posch
American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law
No abstract provided.
Beating The Prisoner At Prisoner's Dilemma: The Evidentiary Value Of A Witness's Refusal To Testify , Russell Dean Covey
Beating The Prisoner At Prisoner's Dilemma: The Evidentiary Value Of A Witness's Refusal To Testify , Russell Dean Covey
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Jaffee V. Redmond: Towards Recognition Of A Federal Counselor-Battered Woman Privilege, Fernando Laguarda, Michael B. Bressman
Jaffee V. Redmond: Towards Recognition Of A Federal Counselor-Battered Woman Privilege, Fernando Laguarda, Michael B. Bressman
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
No abstract provided.
The Proposed Amendment To Federal Rule Of Evidence 407: A Subsequent Remedial Measure That Does Not Fix The Problem , Thais L. Richardson
The Proposed Amendment To Federal Rule Of Evidence 407: A Subsequent Remedial Measure That Does Not Fix The Problem , Thais L. Richardson
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Classical Rhetoric, Practical Reasoning, And The Law Of Evidence , Eileen A. Scallen
Classical Rhetoric, Practical Reasoning, And The Law Of Evidence , Eileen A. Scallen
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Admission Of Hearsay Evidence Where Defedant Misconduct Causes The Unavailability Of A Prosecution Witness, Paul T. Markland
The Admission Of Hearsay Evidence Where Defedant Misconduct Causes The Unavailability Of A Prosecution Witness, Paul T. Markland
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Two Sherman Act Section 1 Dilemmas: Parallel Pricing, The Oligopoly Problem, And Contemporary Economic Theory, Jonathan Baker
Two Sherman Act Section 1 Dilemmas: Parallel Pricing, The Oligopoly Problem, And Contemporary Economic Theory, Jonathan Baker
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
No abstract provided.
Grammarians At The Gate: The Rehnquist Court's Evolving Plain Meaning Approach To Bankruptcy Jurisprudence, Walter Effross
Grammarians At The Gate: The Rehnquist Court's Evolving Plain Meaning Approach To Bankruptcy Jurisprudence, Walter Effross
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
No abstract provided.
Helping Jurors To Make Sense Of Expert Testimony, David Aaronson
Helping Jurors To Make Sense Of Expert Testimony, David Aaronson
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
Today's jurors frequently sit in trials where confusing and conflicting expert testimony is likely to be presented by sophisticated and highly trained individuals, using terminology unfamiliar to the average person. Proposals have been made and trial courts are experimenting with various procedures—none thoroughly evaluated— to improve jurors’ ability to cope with such testimony. My purpose here is to more clearly identify the problem and to review some of the reform proposals.