Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Colorado Law School (36)
- University of Michigan Law School (9)
- UIC School of Law (8)
- University of Baltimore Law (3)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (2)
-
- University of Missouri School of Law (2)
- Barry University School of Law (1)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (1)
- Florida State University College of Law (1)
- Georgia State University College of Law (1)
- Roger Williams University (1)
- Seattle University School of Law (1)
- Singapore Management University (1)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (1)
- University of Georgia School of Law (1)
- Valparaiso University (1)
- Keyword
-
- Groundwater allocation (18)
- Groundwater law (18)
- Groundwater pollution (17)
- Water resources development (17)
- Colorado (13)
-
- Evidence law (8)
- Evidence (6)
- Federal Rules of Evidence (6)
- Groundwater management (6)
- Hearsay (6)
- Michigan (6)
- United States Supreme Court (6)
- Admissibility (5)
- Criminal procedure (5)
- Hydrology (5)
- California (4)
- Criminal law (4)
- Groundwater quality (4)
- Legal issues (4)
- Litigation (4)
- Oklahoma (4)
- Surface water (4)
- Testimony (4)
- Trials (4)
- Witnesses (4)
- Allocating groundwater (3)
- Aquifer recharge (3)
- Arizona (3)
- Cases (3)
- Common law (3)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Groundwater: Allocation, Development and Pollution (Summer Conference, June 6-9) (17)
- Publications (14)
- UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship (8)
- Articles (5)
- Uncovering the Hidden Resource: Groundwater Law, Hydrology, and Policy in the 1990s (Summer Conference, June 15-17) (5)
-
- Book Chapters (4)
- All Faculty Scholarship (3)
- Faculty Publications (3)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (2)
- Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Faculty Publications By Year (1)
- Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (1)
- Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law (1)
- Scholarly Publications (1)
- Scholarly Works (1)
- Seattle University Law Review SUpra (1)
Articles 61 - 70 of 70
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
Evidence Problems In Criminal Cases, John W. Reed
Evidence Problems In Criminal Cases, John W. Reed
Book Chapters
The Federal Rules of Evidence, enacted by Congress, became effective on July 1, 1975. Ten states have adopted state versions of the Federal Rules to govern trials in their courts, and about half the remaining states are considering whether to follow suit. Michigan is one of these latter states. Early in 1977 a committee appointed by the Supreme Court of Michigan proposed rules of evidence for Michigan closely patterned on the Federal Rules, and, if all goes well, the Court will promulgate rules for the Michigan courts to become effective in 1977 or soon thereafter. Michigan lawyers should be aware …
Foreword: Should Wyoming Adopt These Rules?, Christopher B. Mueller
Foreword: Should Wyoming Adopt These Rules?, Christopher B. Mueller
Publications
No abstract provided.
"A Most Deplorable Paradox": Admitting Illegally Obtained Evidence In Georgia--Past, Present, And Future, Donald E. Wilkes Jr.
"A Most Deplorable Paradox": Admitting Illegally Obtained Evidence In Georgia--Past, Present, And Future, Donald E. Wilkes Jr.
Scholarly Works
This Article explores the admissibility of illegally obtained evidence in Georgia criminal cases prior to 1961 and during the post-Mapp era and endeavors to assess the future admissibility of illegally seized evidence in Georgia under both federal and state law.
Searches Without Warrants, Jerold H. Israel
Searches Without Warrants, Jerold H. Israel
Book Chapters
My primary area of concentration today is the search made without a warrant. Studies indicate that 95 percent or more of all searches are without warrants. It is quite understandable, then, that most of the search-and-seizure litigation concerns the validity of searches without warrants.
Comments And Casenotes: To Kill A Mockingbird - Star Decisis And M'Naghten In Maryland, Kenneth Lasson
Comments And Casenotes: To Kill A Mockingbird - Star Decisis And M'Naghten In Maryland, Kenneth Lasson
All Faculty Scholarship
There are certain pillars of jurisprudence which, despite the erosive elements of time and progress, remain sacred. After more than a century of judicial dialogue the venerable M'Naghten Rule survives as the prevailing test to determine criminal responsibility. The rule states: "To establish a defense on the ground of insanity, it must be clearly proved that, at the time of the committing of the act, the party accused was labouring under such a defect of reason, from disease of the mind, as not to know the nature and quality of the act he was doing; or if he did know …
Current Decision, Right To Inspect Memoranda Used To Revive Recollection, Howard Klemme
Current Decision, Right To Inspect Memoranda Used To Revive Recollection, Howard Klemme
Publications
No abstract provided.
Current Decision, Weight And Admissibility Of Chemical Tests As Evidence Of Intoxication, Howard Klemme
Current Decision, Weight And Admissibility Of Chemical Tests As Evidence Of Intoxication, Howard Klemme
Publications
No abstract provided.
Current Decision, Due Process--Use Of Blood Tests To Determine Intoxication Not Violative Of Due Process, Howard Klemme
Current Decision, Due Process--Use Of Blood Tests To Determine Intoxication Not Violative Of Due Process, Howard Klemme
Publications
No abstract provided.
Juvenile Courts And Privileged Communications, Evans Holbrook
Juvenile Courts And Privileged Communications, Evans Holbrook
Articles
In the case of Lindsey v. People, (Colo., 1919) 181 Pac. 531, the Supreme Court of Colorado has held that Judge Lindsey of the Juvenile Court of Denver could not refuse to testify as to a communication made to him by a child who was at the time of the communication suspected of crime and against whom proceedings were later taken in the Juvenile Court. The decision was by a vote of four to three, and a vigorous dissenting opinion was written by Justice Bailey and concurred in by Justices Scott and Allen.
Waiver Of The Statutory Protection To The Confidential Relation Of Physician And Patient, Harry B. Hutchins
Waiver Of The Statutory Protection To The Confidential Relation Of Physician And Patient, Harry B. Hutchins
Articles
Waiver of the Tatutory Protection of the Confidential Relation of Physician and Patient.--The subject of the disclosure by the physician upon the witness stand of confidential communications between himself and his patient has already received attention in this journal: 2 MICHIGAN LAW REVIEW, p.687; 3 MICHIGAN LAW REVIEW, p. 311. The case of Long v. Garey Investment Company, decided by the Iowa Supreme Court December 15, 1906, may be briefly noticed, as it discusses a phase of the subject in regard to which the courts are not in entire harmony, namely, the waiver of the privilege that the statute confers.