Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (189)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (37)
- University of Michigan Law School (27)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (26)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (18)
-
- University of Colorado Law School (15)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (15)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (12)
- Georgia State University College of Law (10)
- BLR (8)
- Cornell University Law School (8)
- Duke Law (8)
- American University Washington College of Law (7)
- Pepperdine University (5)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (5)
- William & Mary Law School (5)
- Florida International University College of Law (4)
- UIC School of Law (4)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (3)
- Cleveland State University (3)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (3)
- Pace University (3)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (3)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (3)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (2)
- Columbia Law School (2)
- Fordham Law School (2)
- New York Law School (2)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (2)
- The University of Akron (2)
- Keyword
-
- Evidence (57)
- Scientific evidence (43)
- DNA (19)
- Law (18)
- Admissibility (17)
-
- Testimony (17)
- Expert testimony (15)
- Scientific Evidence (15)
- Privacy (14)
- Fourth Amendment (12)
- Science and Technology (12)
- Technology (12)
- Daubert (11)
- Expert witnesses (11)
- Science and Technology Law (10)
- Courts (9)
- Federal Rules of Evidence (9)
- DNA databases (8)
- Probability (8)
- Reliability (8)
- Search and seizure (8)
- DNA evidence (7)
- Data (7)
- Expert evidence (7)
- Forensic science (7)
- Law and Society (7)
- Law and Technology (7)
- SFFA (7)
- Statistics (7)
- Affirmative Action (6)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (189)
- Faculty Scholarship (44)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (15)
- Cardozo Law Review (14)
- Michigan Law Review (12)
-
- Faculty Publications (11)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (11)
- Georgia State University Law Review (9)
- Uncovering the Hidden Resource: Groundwater Law, Hydrology, and Policy in the 1990s (Summer Conference, June 15-17) (9)
- Articles (8)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (7)
- ExpressO (7)
- Publications (6)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (6)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law (6)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (6)
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (5)
- Pepperdine Law Review (5)
- Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology (4)
- UIC Law Review (4)
- Cleveland State Law Review (3)
- Duke Law & Technology Review (3)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (3)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (3)
- Akron Law Review (2)
- All Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Articles & Chapters (2)
- Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice (2)
- Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal (2)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (2)
- Publication Type
Articles 451 - 458 of 458
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
Admissibility Of Fingerprint Evidence And Constitutional Objections To Fingerprinting Raised In Criminal And Civil Cases, Andre A. Moenssens
Admissibility Of Fingerprint Evidence And Constitutional Objections To Fingerprinting Raised In Criminal And Civil Cases, Andre A. Moenssens
Chicago-Kent Law Review
No abstract provided.
Rochin And Breithaupt In Context, James R. Richardson
Rochin And Breithaupt In Context, James R. Richardson
Vanderbilt Law Review
Modern scientific methods of fact-finding present evidentiary problems of admissibility which are grounded in reliability of the process, validity of the technique employed and desired policy objectives. In the final analysis, these three facets of the problem are all indivisibly interrelated since, in order to determine acceptable policy, scientific process and application of that process must inevitably be considered in the light of the concept of due process even though due process as such may not be posed affirmatively in any particular decision.' Moreover, it must be recognized that these factors will be present in varying degrees of intensity, dependent …
Scientific Investigation And Defendants' Rights, B. J. George Jr.
Scientific Investigation And Defendants' Rights, B. J. George Jr.
Michigan Law Review
Advances in science, medicine and industry have made much of the world a more pleasant place in which to live. In general more men are living a physically more satisfying life in more comfortable surroundings than preceding generations. But with this has come a parallel increase in criminality to the point that the term "crime wave" is heard with increasing frequency. Many crimes are facilitated in their commission by adaption or application of new scientific discoveries by criminal elements. A natural consequence is that already overburdened police departments turn as quickly as is financially possible to new scientific techniques in …
Social Scientists Take The Stand: A Review And Appraisal Of Their Testimony In Litigation, Jack Greenberg
Social Scientists Take The Stand: A Review And Appraisal Of Their Testimony In Litigation, Jack Greenberg
Michigan Law Review
"How to inform the judicial mind, as you know, is one of the most complicated problems,'' said Justice Frankfurter during argument of the school segregation cases. And as law deals more and more with issues of great public consequence the judiciary's need for knowledge increases. Much of this knowledge is within the realm of what are called the social sciences.
Although jurisprudents and social scientists have long complained of a gulf between law and social science, little notice has been given to the recent, recurrent collaboration between the two at the trial level. In a variety of cases social scientists' …
Evidence - Validity Of Statutory Presumption Of Intoxication From A Finding Of 0.15 Percent Concentration Of Alcohol In The Blood, Donald F. Oosterhouse S.Ed.
Evidence - Validity Of Statutory Presumption Of Intoxication From A Finding Of 0.15 Percent Concentration Of Alcohol In The Blood, Donald F. Oosterhouse S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Defendant was tried and convicted of the statutory crime of driving an automobile while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. The state introduced into evidence the result of a blood test, voluntarily submitted to by the defendant, which showed 0,20% concentration of alcohol in the defendant's blood. Arizona statutes established a rebuttable presumption of no intoxication if such tests showed a concentration of 0.05%, or less, of alcohol in one's blood, and of intoxication if the tests showed a concentration of 0.15%, or more. Breath, urine, and direct blood tests are authorized by the statute. Defendant argued that the statute …
Sex Offenses And Scientific Investigation, Frank Edward Horack Jr.
Sex Offenses And Scientific Investigation, Frank Edward Horack Jr.
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Blood Grouping Tests In Evidence
The Importance Of Scientific Analysis Of Evidence In The Prosecution Of Crime, E. P. Coffey
The Importance Of Scientific Analysis Of Evidence In The Prosecution Of Crime, E. P. Coffey
Indiana Law Journal
Address by E. P. Coffey, Director of Federal Technical Laboratory of the Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., before the Indiana State Bar Association, September 6, 1935.