Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (183)
- University of Michigan Law School (32)
- Cleveland State University (16)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (13)
- University of Richmond (6)
-
- BLR (5)
- UIC School of Law (5)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (5)
- Pepperdine University (4)
- University of Maine School of Law (4)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (4)
- West Virginia University (3)
- Brigham Young University Law School (2)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (2)
- Roger Williams University (2)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (2)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (2)
- Association of American Law Schools (1)
- Brooklyn Law School (1)
- Claremont Colleges (1)
- Duquesne University (1)
- Florida International University College of Law (1)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- Georgia State University College of Law (1)
- SUNY Buffalo State University (1)
- St. John's University School of Law (1)
- University of Georgia School of Law (1)
- University of Miami Law School (1)
- University of Missouri School of Law (1)
- University of New Hampshire (1)
- Keyword
-
- Evidence (17)
- Law (14)
- Medical malpractice (10)
- Child abuse (9)
- Conferences (9)
-
- Expert testimony (9)
- Medical Jurisprudence (9)
- Child Abuse Evidence New Perspectives from Law Medicine Psychology and Statistics (8)
- Law reform (8)
- Criminal justice (7)
- Malpractice (7)
- SFFA (7)
- Affirmative Action (6)
- ESG (6)
- Expert evidence (6)
- Testimony (6)
- Witnesses (6)
- Children (5)
- Constitution (5)
- Diversity (5)
- Doctors (5)
- Environmental Law (5)
- Health Law and Policy (5)
- Injuries (5)
- Labor Law (5)
- Law and Economics (5)
- Law and Society (5)
- Negligence (5)
- Practice and Procedure (5)
- Privacy (5)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (183)
- Michigan Law Review (18)
- Cleveland State Law Review (16)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (10)
- Cardozo Law Review (8)
-
- Articles (6)
- University of Richmond Law Review (6)
- ExpressO (5)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (5)
- Faculty Publications (3)
- Maine Law Review (3)
- Pepperdine Law Review (3)
- UIC Law Review (3)
- West Virginia Law Review (3)
- Indiana Law Journal (2)
- Roger Williams University Law Review (2)
- UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - ) (2)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (1)
- BYU Law Review (1)
- Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law (1)
- Brooklyn Journal of International Law (1)
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (1)
- Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review (1)
- Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law (1)
- Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal (1)
- Creativity and Change Leadership Graduate Student Master's Projects (1)
- FIU Law Review (1)
- Fordham Law Review (1)
- Georgia State University Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 301 - 304 of 304
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
Witness--Competency Of An Allopathic Expert In The Field Of Homeopathy--Opinion On Very Fact The Jury Must Determine, Victor H. Lane
Witness--Competency Of An Allopathic Expert In The Field Of Homeopathy--Opinion On Very Fact The Jury Must Determine, Victor H. Lane
Articles
Van Sickle v. Doolittle, (Ia., 1918), 169 N. W. 141, was an action for malpractice against a physician of the homeopathic school of medicine. Upon the trial, a physician of the allopathic school was called, and after testifying that he was unskilled in the science of homeopathy, was allowed to testify that the treatment shown to have been given to the patient by defendant, would produce no physiological effect, and that proper treatment required the giving of such medicines as would produce such effect. This was held error upon the ground that the defendant was called to treat the patient …
The Compensation Of Medical Witnesses, Harry B. Hutchins
The Compensation Of Medical Witnesses, Harry B. Hutchins
Michigan Law Review
The power to compel testimony is inherent in every court, for without it justice could constantly be thwarted. Generally all persons may be compelled to give evidence that is relevant to the matter in controversy. If, therefore, a person who has been duly summoned as a witness at a particular trial absents himself therefrom, without just cause, or attending, refuses to give evidence or to answer questions when directed so to do by the court, he is liable to punishment for contempt. But there are limitations upon the general rule, some based upon principles of legal policy and some upon …
The Compensation Of Medical Witnesses, Harry B. Hutchins
The Compensation Of Medical Witnesses, Harry B. Hutchins
Articles
The power to compel testimony is inherent in every court, for without it justice could constantly be thwarted. Generally all persons may be compelled to give evidence that is relevant to the matter in controversy. If, therefore, a person who has been duly summoned as a witness at a particular trial absents himself therefrom, without just cause, or attending, refuses to give evidence or to answer questions when directed so to do by the court, he is liable to punishment for contempt.1 But there are limitations upon the general rule, some based upon principles of legal policy and some upon …
Note And Comment, Michigan Law Review
Note And Comment, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
Statute Requiring Examination and License as Prerequisites to Ownership or Management of a Dental Office Unconstitutional; Railroad Control of the Telegraph Business; The Need of Uniform Laws Governing "Conditional Sales"; Jurisdiction of Equity over Void Instruments; Quitclaim Deed as Affecting the Question of Good Faith; Competency of a child as a Witness; Compensation for Party Walls as Between Subsequent Grantees;