Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (196)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (34)
- BLR (13)
- Georgia State University College of Law (10)
- Pepperdine University (9)
-
- St. Mary's University (6)
- University of Michigan Law School (6)
- American University Washington College of Law (5)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (5)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (5)
- University of Miami Law School (5)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (5)
- Brooklyn Law School (4)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (4)
- University of Maine School of Law (4)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (4)
- Florida International University College of Law (3)
- Georgetown University Law Center (3)
- Roger Williams University (3)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (3)
- Cornell University Law School (2)
- New York Law School (2)
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (2)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (2)
- University of Richmond (2)
- University of Washington School of Law (2)
- Bemidji State University (1)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Brigham Young University Law School (1)
- Claremont Colleges (1)
- Keyword
-
- Evidence (47)
- Law and Society (27)
- Law (15)
- Constitution (11)
- Constitutional Law (11)
-
- Criminal Law and Procedure (11)
- Courts (10)
- Jurisprudence (10)
- Police (10)
- Technology (9)
- Trials (9)
- Fourth Amendment (8)
- Law Review (8)
- Legislation (8)
- Privacy (8)
- Economics (7)
- General Law (7)
- Regulation (7)
- SFFA (7)
- Testimony (7)
- Women (7)
- Administrative Law (6)
- Affirmative Action (6)
- Constitutional law (6)
- Criminal Law (6)
- ESG (6)
- Environmental Law (6)
- Federal Rules of Evidence (6)
- First Amendment (6)
- Forensic Evidence (6)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (195)
- Cardozo Law Review (20)
- ExpressO (13)
- Georgia State University Law Review (10)
- Pepperdine Law Review (6)
-
- Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal (5)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (5)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (5)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (4)
- Faculty Works (4)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (4)
- Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - ) (4)
- Articles (3)
- Faculty Publications (3)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (3)
- Maine Law Review (3)
- Michigan Law Review (3)
- Northwestern University Law Review (3)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (3)
- Arkansas Law Review (2)
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (2)
- Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law (2)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (2)
- Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Journal of Law and Policy (2)
- Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary (2)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (2)
- NYLS Law Review (2)
- University of Miami Race & Social Justice Law Review (2)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (2)
- Publication Type
Articles 301 - 330 of 366
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
Facebook, Twitter, And The Uncertain Future Of Present Sense Impressions, Jeffrey Bellin
Facebook, Twitter, And The Uncertain Future Of Present Sense Impressions, Jeffrey Bellin
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
The intricate legal framework governing the admission of out-of-court statements in American trials is premised on increasingly outdated communi- cation norms. Nowhere is this more apparent than with the hearsay exception for "present sense impressions." Changing communication practices typified by interactions on social media websites like Facebook and Twitter herald the arrival of a previously uncontemplated-and uniquely unreliable-breed of present sense impressions. This Article contends that the indiscriminate admission of these electronic present sense impressions (e-PSIs) is both normatively undesirable and inconsistent with the traditional rationale for the present sense impression exception. It proposes a reform to the exception that …
"Introduction" (Chapter 1) Of Stories About Science In Law: Literary And Historical Images Of Acquired Expertise (Ashgate 2011), David S. Caudill
"Introduction" (Chapter 1) Of Stories About Science In Law: Literary And Historical Images Of Acquired Expertise (Ashgate 2011), David S. Caudill
Working Paper Series
This is the introductory chapter of Stories About Science in Law: Literary and Historical Images of Acquired Expertise (Ashgate, 2011), explaining that the book presents examples of how literary accounts can provide a supplement to our understanding of science in law. Challenging the view that law and science are completely different, I focus on stories that explore the relationship between law and science, and identify cultural images of science that prevail in legal contexts. In contrast to other studies on the transfer and construction of expertise in legal settings, the book considers the intersection of three interdisciplinary projects-- law and …
What Will We Lose If The Trial Vanishes?, Robert P. Burns
What Will We Lose If The Trial Vanishes?, Robert P. Burns
Faculty Working Papers
The number of trials continues to decline andfederal civil trials have almost completely disappeared. This essay attempts to address the significance of this loss, to answer the obvious question, "So what?" It argues against taking a resigned or complacent attitude toward an important problem for our public culture. It presents a short description of the trial's internal structure, recounts different sorts of explanations, and offers an inventory of the kinds of wounds this development would inflict.
Misinterpreted Justice: Problems With The Use Of Islamic Legal Experts In U.S. Trial Courts, Peter W. Beauchamp
Misinterpreted Justice: Problems With The Use Of Islamic Legal Experts In U.S. Trial Courts, Peter W. Beauchamp
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Association Of Adult Businesses With Secondary Effects: Legal Doctrine Social Theory, And Empirical Evidence, Alan C. Weinstein, Richard Mccleary
The Association Of Adult Businesses With Secondary Effects: Legal Doctrine Social Theory, And Empirical Evidence, Alan C. Weinstein, Richard Mccleary
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Introductory Note For The International Criminal Court, Susana Sacouto
Introductory Note For The International Criminal Court, Susana Sacouto
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
INTRODUCTION: On February 3, 2010, the Appeals Chamber of the International Criminal Court (ICC) issued its judgment on the appeal of the Prosecutor against the decision of the Pre-Trial Chamber (PTC) denying his application for an arrest warrant against President of Sudan, Omar Hassan Ahmad Al Bashir in relation to the crime of genocide. Holding that the PTC had applied an erroneous standard of proof, the Appeals Chamber reversed the PTC's decision and directed it to reconsider whether the warrant should be issued in light of the Appeals Chamber's discussion of the appropriate standard of proof.
When Is Lying Illegal? When Should It Be? A Critical Analysis Of The Federal False Statements Act, 43 J. Marshall L. Rev. 111 (2009), Steven R. Morrison
When Is Lying Illegal? When Should It Be? A Critical Analysis Of The Federal False Statements Act, 43 J. Marshall L. Rev. 111 (2009), Steven R. Morrison
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Detecting Lies Using Demeanor, Bias, And Context, Max Minzner
Detecting Lies Using Demeanor, Bias, And Context, Max Minzner
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Stray Remarks And Mixed-Motive Cases After Desert Palace V. Costa: A Proximity Test For Determining Minimal Causation, Ezra S. Greenberg
Stray Remarks And Mixed-Motive Cases After Desert Palace V. Costa: A Proximity Test For Determining Minimal Causation, Ezra S. Greenberg
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Cross-Examining Film, Jessica Silbey
Cross-Examining Film, Jessica Silbey
University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender and Class
No abstract provided.
The Antigone Dilemma: When The Paths Of Law And Morality Diverge, J. C. Oleson
The Antigone Dilemma: When The Paths Of Law And Morality Diverge, J. C. Oleson
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Efforts To Improve The Illinois Capital Punishment System: Worth The Cost?, Thomas P. Sullivan
Efforts To Improve The Illinois Capital Punishment System: Worth The Cost?, Thomas P. Sullivan
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Friday Night 'Lite': How De-Racialization In The Motion Picture Friday Night Lights Disserves The Movement To Eradicate Racial Discrimination From American Sport, N. Jeremi Duru
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
A Complete Property Right Amendment, John H. Ryskamp
A Complete Property Right Amendment, John H. Ryskamp
ExpressO
The trend of the eminent domain reform and "Kelo plus" initiatives is toward a comprehensive Constitutional property right incorporating the elements of level of review, nature of government action, and extent of compensation. This article contains a draft amendment which reflects these concerns.
Conversational Standing: A New Approach To An Old Privacy Problem, Christopher M. Drake
Conversational Standing: A New Approach To An Old Privacy Problem, Christopher M. Drake
ExpressO
American society has long considered certain conversations private amongst the participants in those conversations. In other words, when two or more people are conversing in a variety of settings and through a variety of media, there are times when all parties to the conversation can reasonably expect freedom from improper government intrusion, whether through direct participation or secret monitoring. This shared expectation of privacy has been slow to gain judicial recognition. Courts have indicated that the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution only protects certain elements of the conversation, such as where and how it takes place, but that …
Forgetting Freud: The Courts' Fear Of The Subconscious In Date Rape (And Other) Criminal Cases, Andrew E. Taslitz
Forgetting Freud: The Courts' Fear Of The Subconscious In Date Rape (And Other) Criminal Cases, Andrew E. Taslitz
ExpressO
Courts too often show a reluctance to learn the lessons taught by social science in criminal cases, especially where subconcious processes are involved. The subconscious is seen as rarely relevant and, in the unusual cases where it is relevant, it is viewed as a disease commandeering the conscious mind and thus helping to exculpate the accused. Drawing on the example of forensic linguistics in date rape cases as illustrative of a broader phenomenon, this article argues that the courts' misuse of social science stems from fear and misunderstanding of the workings of the subconscious mind. Accordingly, the piece contrasts the …
Bond Repudiation, Tax Codes, The Appropriations Process And Restitution Post-Eminent Domain Reform, John H. Ryskamp
Bond Repudiation, Tax Codes, The Appropriations Process And Restitution Post-Eminent Domain Reform, John H. Ryskamp
ExpressO
This brief comment suggests where the anti-eminent domain movement might be heading next.
The “Csi Effect”: Better Jurors Through Television And Science?, Michael D. Mann
The “Csi Effect”: Better Jurors Through Television And Science?, Michael D. Mann
ExpressO
This Comment discusses how television shows such as CSI and Law & Order create heightened juror expectations. This will be published in the Buffalo Public Interest Law Journal's 2005-2006 issue.
A Default-Logic Paradigm For Legal Reasoning And Factfinding, Vern R. Walker
A Default-Logic Paradigm For Legal Reasoning And Factfinding, Vern R. Walker
ExpressO
Unlike research in linguistics and artificial intelligence, legal research has not used advances in logical theory very effectively. This article uses default logic to develop a paradigm for analyzing all aspects of legal reasoning, including factfinding. The article provides a formal model that integrates legal rules and policies with the evaluation of both expert and non-expert evidence – whether the reasoning occurs in courts or administrative agencies, and whether in domestic, foreign, or international legal systems. This paradigm can standardize the representation of legal reasoning, guide empirical research into the dynamics of such reasoning, and put the representations and research …
Zoning And Eminent Domain Under The New Minimum Scrutiny, John H. Ryskamp
Zoning And Eminent Domain Under The New Minimum Scrutiny, John H. Ryskamp
ExpressO
Recently the Supreme Court has made it clearer that minimum scrutiny is a factual analysis. Whether in any government action there is a rational relation to a legitimate interest is a matter of determining whether there is a policy maintaining important facts. This has come about in the Court’s emerging emphasis on developing fact-based criteria for determining government purpose. Thus, those who want to affect zoning and eminent domain outcomes should look to what the Court sees as important facts, and whether government action is maintaining those facts with its proposed land use or eminent domain action.
To Catch A Sex Thief: The Burden Of Performance In Rape And Sexual Assault Trials, Corey Rayburn Yung
To Catch A Sex Thief: The Burden Of Performance In Rape And Sexual Assault Trials, Corey Rayburn Yung
ExpressO
Despite decades of efforts to reform American rape law, prosecution and conviction rates remain low compared to similar crimes. While activists led legislatures to adopt important statutory changes for rape and sexual assault, only modest effects in the levels of sexual violence have been observed. Nonetheless, reform-minded scholars continue to focus on statutory and rule tinkering as a means to quell sexual violence.
This article argues against the commonly-held belief that the crucial factors in determining the outcome of rape trials are substantive and procedural in nature. Rather, the issues of performance, representation, and language often pre-determine the outcomes of …
Finding New Constitutional Rights Through The Supreme Court’S Evolving “Government Purpose” Test Under Minimum Scrutiny, John H. Ryskamp
Finding New Constitutional Rights Through The Supreme Court’S Evolving “Government Purpose” Test Under Minimum Scrutiny, John H. Ryskamp
ExpressO
By now we all are familiar with the litany of cases which refused to find elevated scrutiny for so-called “affirmative” or “social” rights such as education, welfare or housing: Lindsey v. Normet, San Antonio School District v. Rodriguez, Dandridge v. Williams, DeShaney v. Winnebago County. There didn’t seem to be anything in minimum scrutiny which could protect such facts as education or housing, from government action. However, unobtrusively and over the years, the Supreme Court has clarified and articulated one aspect of minimum scrutiny which holds promise for vindicating facts. You will recall that under minimum scrutiny government’s action is …
Using Capture Theory And Chronology In Eminent Domain Proceedings, John H. Ryskamp
Using Capture Theory And Chronology In Eminent Domain Proceedings, John H. Ryskamp
ExpressO
Capture theory--in which private purpose is substituted for government purpose--sheds light on a technique which is coming into greater use post-Kelo v. New London. That case affirmed that eminent domain use need only be rationally related to a legitimate government purpose. Capture theory focuses litigators' attention on "government purpose." That is a question of fact for the trier of fact. This article shows how to use civil discovery in order to show the Court that private purpose has been substituted for government purpose. If it has, the eminent domain use fails, because the use does not meet minimum scrutiny. This …
Introduction, Barry Scheck
Introduction, Barry Scheck
Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal
The symposium aims to reform eyewitness identification procedures by fostering dialogue between law enforcement, social scientists, and legal experts. It seeks to address the high rates of mistaken identifications and improve the accuracy and reliability of eyewitness testimony through scientific research and practical implementations. The event highlights the human impact of wrongful convictions and explores evidence-based solutions to prevent such injustices.
A Sample Of Witness, Crime, And Perpetrator Characteristics Affecting Eyewitness Identification Accuracy, Brian L. Cutler
A Sample Of Witness, Crime, And Perpetrator Characteristics Affecting Eyewitness Identification Accuracy, Brian L. Cutler
Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal
The article examines the impact of estimator variables on eyewitness identification accuracy, focusing on six key factors: own-race bias, exposure duration, masking of hair and hairline cues, weapon focus, eyewitness stress, and passage of time. It argues that these variables significantly influence identification accuracy and are not merely matters of common sense, emphasizing the need for expert testimony and education for legal professionals.
Law In The Digital Age: How Visual Communication Technologies Are Transforming The Practice, Theory, And Teaching Of Law, Richard K. Sherwin, Neal Feigenson, Christina Spiesel
Law In The Digital Age: How Visual Communication Technologies Are Transforming The Practice, Theory, And Teaching Of Law, Richard K. Sherwin, Neal Feigenson, Christina Spiesel
ExpressO
Law today has entered the digital age. The way law is practiced – how truth and justice are represented and assessed – is increasingly dependent on what appears on electronic screens in courtrooms, law offices, government agencies, and elsewhere. Practicing lawyers know this and are rapidly adapting to the new era of digital visual rhetoric. Legal theory and education, however, have yet to catch up. This article is the first systematic effort to theorize law's transformation by new visual and multimedia technologies and to set out the changes in legal pedagogy that are needed to prepare law students for practice …
Dangerousness And Expertise Redux, Christopher Slobogin
Dangerousness And Expertise Redux, Christopher Slobogin
ExpressO
Civil commitment, confinement under sexual predator laws, and many capital and noncapital sentences depend upon proof of a propensity toward violence. This article discusses the current state of prediction science, in particular the advantages and disadvantages of clinical and actuarial prediction, and then analyzes how the rules of evidence should be interpreted in deciding whether opinions about propensity should be admissible. It concludes that dangerousness predictions that are not based on empirically-derived probability estimates should be excluded from the courtroom unless the defense decides otherwise. This conclusion is not bottomed on the usual concern courts and commentators raise about expert …
I Am Certain He Is The Man...I Think, Tim Harris
I Am Certain He Is The Man...I Think, Tim Harris
The Modern American
No abstract provided.
Numerical Comparative Law: Do We Need Statistical Evidence In Law In Order To Reduce Complexity?, Mathias M. Siems
Numerical Comparative Law: Do We Need Statistical Evidence In Law In Order To Reduce Complexity?, Mathias M. Siems
Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law
The article explores the use of numerical methods in comparative law, questioning whether statistical approaches can effectively simplify legal complexity without oversimplification. It examines both the potential benefits and drawbacks of quantifying legal systems, arguing that while numerical methods can enhance practical utility, they must be used cautiously to avoid neglecting legal complexity and contextual factors.
Breaking The Bank: Revisiting Central Bank Of Denver After Enron And Sarbanes-Oxley, Celia Taylor
Breaking The Bank: Revisiting Central Bank Of Denver After Enron And Sarbanes-Oxley, Celia Taylor
ExpressO
No abstract provided.