Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (195)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (19)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (17)
- University of Michigan Law School (14)
- Cornell University Law School (11)
-
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (11)
- BLR (7)
- UIC School of Law (7)
- University of Colorado Law School (7)
- Pepperdine University (5)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (5)
- Duke Law (4)
- University of Richmond (4)
- Boston University School of Law (3)
- Fordham Law School (3)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (3)
- Roger Williams University (3)
- St. Mary's University (3)
- The University of Akron (3)
- University of Georgia School of Law (3)
- University of Washington School of Law (3)
- American University Washington College of Law (2)
- Barry University School of Law (2)
- Brooklyn Law School (2)
- Georgia State University College of Law (2)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (2)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (2)
- UC Law SF (2)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (2)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (2)
- Keyword
-
- Evidence (51)
- Judges (31)
- Courts (18)
- Law (17)
- Constitution (12)
-
- Supreme Court (11)
- Hearsay (10)
- Federal Rules of Evidence (9)
- Jurisprudence (9)
- Trial (9)
- Constitutional Law (8)
- Witness (8)
- Admissibility (7)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (7)
- Exclusionary rule (7)
- Federal (7)
- New York (7)
- SFFA (7)
- Sixth Amendment (7)
- Testimony (7)
- Affirmative Action (6)
- Corporations (6)
- ESG (6)
- Judge (6)
- Jury (6)
- Legislation (6)
- Securities Law (6)
- Technology (6)
- Witnesses (6)
- Administrative Law (5)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (194)
- Cardozo Law Review (15)
- Touro Law Review (15)
- Faculty Scholarship (12)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (10)
-
- Michigan Law Review (9)
- UIC Law Review (7)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (7)
- ExpressO (6)
- Scholarly Works (4)
- Uncovering the Hidden Resource: Groundwater Law, Hydrology, and Policy in the 1990s (Summer Conference, June 15-17) (4)
- University of Richmond Law Review (4)
- Akron Law Review (3)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (3)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (3)
- Publications (3)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (3)
- Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - ) (3)
- Washington Law Review (3)
- Articles (2)
- Faculty Articles (2)
- Fordham Law Review (2)
- Georgia Law Review (2)
- Georgia State University Law Review (2)
- Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary (2)
- Law Faculty Research Publications (2)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (2)
- Pepperdine Law Review (2)
- The Judges' Book (2)
- University of Cincinnati Law Review (2)
- Publication Type
Articles 361 - 374 of 374
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
Instructing The Jury Upon Presumptions In Civil Cases: Comparing Federal Rule 301 With Uniform Rule 301, Christopher B. Mueller
Instructing The Jury Upon Presumptions In Civil Cases: Comparing Federal Rule 301 With Uniform Rule 301, Christopher B. Mueller
Publications
No abstract provided.
Judicial Notice: An Exercise In Exorcism, E. F. Roberts
Judicial Notice: An Exercise In Exorcism, E. F. Roberts
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Juveniles And Their Right To A Jury Trial, Timothy E. Foley
Juveniles And Their Right To A Jury Trial, Timothy E. Foley
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Preliminary Notes Toward A Study Of Judicial Notice, E. F. Roberts
Preliminary Notes Toward A Study Of Judicial Notice, E. F. Roberts
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
The author describes the common law as a "machine," with judges and lawyers as its working parts. He explains that its successful operation requires a kind of "intellectual adrenalin" in order to keep it responsive to its changing environment. This is the function of judicial notice. The author next examines the different views of judicial notice and points out that each is a reflection of the era in which it was created. He concludes that judicial notice is not a distinct doctrine like the hearsay rule, but rather is simply the art of thinking as practiced within the legal system.
Controlling The Police: The Judge's Role In Making And Reviewing Law Enforcement Decisions, Wayne R. Lafave, Frank J. Remington
Controlling The Police: The Judge's Role In Making And Reviewing Law Enforcement Decisions, Wayne R. Lafave, Frank J. Remington
Michigan Law Review
We have chosen to focus here upon judicial involvement (1) in determining whether arrest and search warrants should issue and (2) in reviewing such decisions after they have been executed (and, perhaps, made) by police officials. A comparison of some recent findings respecting the actual practice at the trial level with the "ideal" as set forth in appellate opinions may allow some conclusions to be drawn both as to the present effectiveness of appellate rulings on these subjects and as to the ultimate feasibility of further implementation of those rulings. Finally, since the exclusionary rule is, theoretically at least, one …
Depositions For Discovery: The New Virginia Rule, J. Westwood Smithers
Depositions For Discovery: The New Virginia Rule, J. Westwood Smithers
University of Richmond Law Review
Important amendments to its Rules, effective April 1, 1961, were recently adopted by the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia. Perhaps the change of most interest to trial lawyers was the revision of Rule 3:23 relating to D'epositions and Discovery in Actions at Law.
Eminent Domain - Procedure - Relation Of Judge And Jury In Michigan Condemnation Proceedings, John H. Jackson S.Ed.
Eminent Domain - Procedure - Relation Of Judge And Jury In Michigan Condemnation Proceedings, John H. Jackson S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
The relationship of judge to jury in Michigan condemnation proceedings presents in many ways a merger of some of the problems and questions contained in the relationship of judge to jury in civil trials, and of court to tribunal in administrative law. Theorists as well as the practicing lawyer in Michigan and some other states" may well find in the development of the Michigan condemnation proceeding an interesting example of the growth of a procedure for adjudication, in a context of cross-fire between legislative ideas and judicial interpretation of a constitutional provision.
An Introduction To The Study Of Presumptions, E. F. Roberts
An Introduction To The Study Of Presumptions, E. F. Roberts
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Abstracts Of Recent Cases, G. H. A.
Criminal Law - Trial - Duty Of Judge To Instruct On Lesser And Included Crimes, Paul A. Heinen S.Ed.
Criminal Law - Trial - Duty Of Judge To Instruct On Lesser And Included Crimes, Paul A. Heinen S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Appellant was one of four defendants who were charged in three separate counts of an indictment with the crimes of attempted robbery in the first degree, attempted grand larceny in the first degree, and assault in the second degree with intent to commit robbery and grand larceny. After all the evidence had been entered, the trial judge submitted only the count of attempted robbery to the jury, instructing them that they return a verdict of guilty or not guilty of that crime. The defense excepted to the court's refusal to submit the other counts charged in the indictment. The defendant …
Judge And The Crime Burden, John Barker Waite
Judge And The Crime Burden, John Barker Waite
Michigan Law Review
One does not happily charge the judiciary with responsibility for the country's burden of crime, but the responsibility does in fact exist. Judges, though they may not encourage crime, interfere with its prevention in various ways. They deliberately restrict police efficiency in the discovery of criminals. They exempt from punishment many criminals who are discovered and whose guilt is evident. More seriously still, they so warp and alter the public's attitude toward crime and criminals as gravely to weaken the country's most effective crime preventive.
In Suport Of The Thayer Theory Of Presumptions, Charles V. Laughlin
In Suport Of The Thayer Theory Of Presumptions, Charles V. Laughlin
Michigan Law Review
A learned judge once said to a young lawyer, "If you are ever a trial court judge, never give reasons for your decisions. Your rulings will probably be right, but your reasons will likely be wrong." That statement may aptly apply to judicial pronouncements relating to the subject of presumptions. Decisions are largely free from criticism so far as concerns the results reached, but the reasoning processes by which they are reached appear to be in hopeless confusion. It is believed that a theory can be presented which will both reconcile these confusions of judicial techniques and explain the general …
Evidence--Right Of Presiding Judge To Ask Leading Questions Or To Testify, J. E. W.
Evidence--Right Of Presiding Judge To Ask Leading Questions Or To Testify, J. E. W.
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Recent Important Decisions, Michigan Law Review
Recent Important Decisions, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
No abstract provided.