Evidence Commons^™

Domestic Relations—Custody Of Children—Per Curiam, Buffalo Law Review

Buffalo Law Review

Gluckstern v. Gluckstern, 4 N.Y.2d 521, 176 N.Y.S. 352 (1958).

Abstracts Of Recent Cases, T. E. P.

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Abstracts Of Recent Cases, G. W. H. Jr.

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Recent Cases, Law Review Staff

Vanderbilt Law Review

Contracts--Ceiling Price Legislation--Effect upon Performance

============================

Evidence--Declarations against Interest--Third-Party Confessions

============================

Family Law--Loss of Consortium of the Parent--Right of Child to Recover Against a Negligent Defendant

============================

Federal Procedure--Statutory Construction--Meaning of "Mentally Incompetent"

============================

Income Taxation--Surrender of Lease--Capital Gain to Lessee

============================

Income Taxation--Taxable Stock Dividend--Treasury Stock Held for Investment

============================

Judgment--Suit to Vacate--Insufficient Allegations of Cruelty Void Divorce Decree

============================

Labor Law--Filing Requirements--Noncompliance at Time Charges Filed

============================

Municipal Corporations--Liability for Negligence--Operation of Swimming Pool for Profit

============================

Process--Constructive Service--Tort Action Arising Without State

============================

Torts--Res Ipsa Loquitur--Application To Disappearing Airplane

Evidence—Wire Recordings Of Confidential Communications Between Husband And Wife Held Inadmissable, Gerard J. O’Brien

Buffalo Law Review

Hunter v. Hunter, 169 Pa. Super. 498, 83 A (2d) 401 (1951).

Evidence-Privilege-Confidential Communications Between Husband And Wife, James I. Huston

Michigan Law Review

Husband sued for divorce alleging that wife drank excessively and humiliated him in public by her conduct, and that she continually made false and profane accusations designed to make his life unbearable. As proof of the latter charge, plaintiff was allowed to introduce in evidence a wire recording of conversations between plaintiff and defendant in their bedroom. Plaintiff's son by a previous marriage had, by prearrangement with plaintiff, installed in their bedroom a microphone connected to a wire-recorder in the son's adjoining bedroom, with which recordings were made of four separate conversations between plaintiff and defendant. The recordings substantiated plaintiff's …

Evidence-The Use Of Blood Grouping Tests In Disputed Parentage Proceedings-A Scientific Basis For Discussion, Lewis R. Williams, Jr. S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Much has been written concerning the validity of the so-called "blood-grouping tests" in bastardy and other legal proceedings. The general tenor of the writings is in favor of wider acceptance by the courts of the results of these tests. This comment is to be no exception. However, it is the purpose here to emphasize the scientific validity of the blood-grouping tests and to acquaint the reader with the theory upon which the tests rest. If lawyers and judges understand the scientific basis of the tests, a more intelligent decision upon the validity of any given result can be formed, and …

Annulment Proceedings For Fraud—Sufficiency Of Proof—How To Prove Refusal To Have Sexual Intercourse, Morree M. Levine

Buffalo Law Review

De Baillet-Latour v. De Baillet-Latour, 301 N. Y. 428, 94 N. E. 2d 715 (1950).

Evidence-Conclusiveness Of Evidence Of Exclusionary Results Of Blood Tests In Paternity Proceedings [Jordan V. Mace, Maine 1949]

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Evidence-Extent Of Statutory Privilege In Regard To Confidential Communications Of Husband And Wife [Menefee V. Commonwealth, Va. 1949]

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Evidence-Weight To Be Given Blood Test Evidence In Paternity Proceedings. [California]

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Evidence -- Competency Of Wife To Testify Against Husband--Rules Of Evidence In Federal Court, Philip A. Hart

Michigan Law Review

The defendant was convicted of transporting a female in interstate commerce for immoral purposes. Over the defendant's objection the trial court permitted testimony against him to be given by the defendant's wife. This ruling he assigned as error but held a wife is competent as a witness against her husband. Yoder v. United States, (C. C. A. 10th, 1935) 80 F. (2d) 665.

Evidence-Alienation Of Affections-Wife's Testimony As To Statements Made To Her By Alienated Husband Concerning Defendant

Michigan Law Review

In a suit for alienation of husband's affections, plaintiff testified as to certain statements made by her husband in the absence of the defendant. These statement purported to be repetitions of statements made by the defendant to plaintiff's husband. Defendant objected to the admission of this testimony on the ground that it was hearsay. The court held that the testimony was admissible, not to prove the truth of the facts, words, or conduct embodied in the statements and chargeable to the defendant, but to show the husband's state of mind toward the plaintiff. Richards v. Lorleberg, (App. D. C. …

Evidence-Privilege-Husband And Wife-Attorney And Client

Michigan Law Review

A husband and wife are involved in marital difficulties. Together they consult an attorney in an effort to compromise their dispute, or failing in that, to arrange a property settlement prior to separation or divorce. Such a joint consultation may be for any one of a variety of purposes. In a later action, for divorce or separate maintenance for example, the question arises whether either the attorney or one of the spouses can disclose words spoken by the other spouse in the consultation. For instance, can the attorney or the husband disclose the wife's admission of adultery?

Evidence-Privileged Communications-Husband And Wife

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Evidence - Federal Practice - Competency Of Wife To Testify In Defense Of Husband In Criminal Case

Michigan Law Review

The defendant, being tried in a federal district court on an indictment for conspiracy to violate the prohibition law, offered his wife as a witness in his behalf. The district court, following what it concluded to be the established rule of the federal courts, refused to allow her to testify. The circuit court of appeals affirmed this ruling without discussing the point. Certiorari was granted by the Supreme Court, limited to the question as to what law was applicable in determining the competency of the wife. Held, that the federal courts have the power to determine for themselves the …

Evidence - Admissibility Of Blood-Group Test

Michigan Law Review

The old axiom, "blood will tell," has been given a new lease on life by the work of biochemists and hereditists in the last thirty years. At the beginning of the twentieth century a scientist, Karl Landsteiner, working on the means to make blood transfusions safe, discovered that the New Testament saying, the Almighty "hath made of one blood all nations of men," is not true. He found that human blood is divided into four groups, characterized by the possession or non-possession of certain substances in the serum and the corpuscles of the blood. If one puts a little blood …

Evidence - Privileged Communication

Michigan Law Review

In a suit for divorce on the ground of adultery, a Luthern clergyman refused to testify concerning a disclosure made to him in his religious capacity by the defendant husband, on the ground that it was a privileged communication under the Minnesota statute. The district court adjudged him in contempt of court. Upon certiorari to the supreme court of Minnesota, held, the communication was privileged, and the order was reversed. In re Swenson (Minn. 1931) 237 N.W. 589.

Evidence--Admissibility Of A Son's Admissions Against His Father, J. E. W.

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Recent Important Decisions

Michigan Law Review

A collection of recent important court decisions.

Conflicting Presumptions-Evidence-Adultery

Michigan Law Review

The statutes of Oregon prescribe certain presumptions as applicable in the trial of causes, among which are, 1st, that one charged with crime shall be presumed to be innocent, and 2nd, that "a man and a woman deporting themselves as husband and wife" shall be presumed to "have entered into a lawful contract of marriage". Subd. I and subd. 30 of sec. 799, Or. L.

Recent Important Decisions, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

Assignments- Assignment of an Expectancy - Joseph and James were two of six children. A contract witnessed "that Joseph Snyder has sold to James Snyder one undivided sixth of the real estate owned by the mother, Susan Snyder; to secure said interest to James after her death, the mother unites in the conveyance of said interest The said Joseph warrants and defends the interest from all claims." The contract was signed by Joseph and by the mother. Held, Joseph had no estate which he could convey, and the contract, though made with the consent of the mother, was unenforceable either …

Recent Important Decisions

Michigan Law Review

A collection of recent important court decisions.

Recent Important Decisions

Michigan Law Review

A collection of recent important court decisions.

Recent Important Decisions

Michigan Law Review

A collection of recent important court decisions.

Recent Important Decisions

Michigan Law Review

A collection of recent important court decisions.

Recent Important Decisions

Michigan Law Review

A collection of recent important court decisions.

Recent Important Decisions

Michigan Law Review

A collection of recent important court decisions.

Recent Important Decisions

Michigan Law Review

A collection of recent important court decisions.

Recent Important Decisions

Michigan Law Review

A collection of recent important court decisions.