Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (204)
- University of Michigan Law School (130)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (44)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (35)
- University of Colorado Law School (25)
-
- UIC School of Law (22)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (20)
- Cornell University Law School (17)
- Pepperdine University (15)
- St. Mary's University (12)
- University of Georgia School of Law (11)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (10)
- Brooklyn Law School (9)
- Georgia State University College of Law (9)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (9)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (9)
- William & Mary Law School (9)
- University of Maine School of Law (8)
- BLR (7)
- Georgetown University Law Center (7)
- University of Richmond (7)
- Duke Law (6)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (6)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (6)
- Brigham Young University Law School (5)
- Fordham Law School (5)
- North Carolina Central University School of Law (5)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (5)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (5)
- Pace University (4)
- Keyword
-
- Evidence (112)
- Testimony (66)
- Courts (49)
- Federal Rules of Evidence (49)
- Witnesses (47)
-
- Admissibility (44)
- United States Supreme Court (36)
- Sixth Amendment (35)
- Confrontation Clause (32)
- Cross-examination (32)
- Witness (28)
- Hearsay (24)
- Police (22)
- Supreme Court (21)
- Discovery (19)
- Expert testimony (19)
- Judges (19)
- Juries (19)
- Reliability (19)
- Constitution (18)
- Federal courts (18)
- Jury (18)
- Law (18)
- Crawford v. Washington (17)
- Federal (15)
- Evidence law (14)
- Expert evidence (13)
- New York (13)
- New York Evidence (13)
- Trial (13)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (201)
- Michigan Law Review (66)
- Touro Law Review (43)
- Articles (41)
- UIC Law Review (21)
-
- Cardozo Law Review (19)
- Indiana Law Journal (16)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (15)
- Faculty Scholarship (15)
- Faculty Publications (14)
- Publications (14)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (14)
- Pepperdine Law Review (11)
- Uncovering the Hidden Resource: Groundwater Law, Hydrology, and Policy in the 1990s (Summer Conference, June 15-17) (11)
- Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal (9)
- Georgia State University Law Review (9)
- Maine Law Review (8)
- Georgia Law Review (7)
- ExpressO (6)
- Faculty Articles (6)
- Faculty Working Papers (6)
- Faculty Works (6)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (6)
- Scholarly Works (6)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (6)
- University of Richmond Law Review (6)
- BYU Law Review (5)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (5)
- North Carolina Central Law Review (5)
- Scholarly Articles (5)
- Publication Type
Articles 541 - 570 of 766
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
When To Hear The Hearsay: A Proposal For A New Rule Of Evidence Designed To Protect The Constitutional Right Of The Criminally Accused To Confront The Witnesses Against Her, 32 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1287 (1999), Scott A. Smith
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Right To Inspect And Test Breath Alcohol Machines: Suspicion Ain't Proof, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1 (1999), Gil Sapir, Mark Giangrande
Right To Inspect And Test Breath Alcohol Machines: Suspicion Ain't Proof, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1 (1999), Gil Sapir, Mark Giangrande
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Arizona Jury Reform Permitting Civil Jury Trial Discussions: The View Of Trial Participants, Judges, And Jurors, Valerie P. Hans, Paula Hannaford-Agor, G. Thomas Munsterman
The Arizona Jury Reform Permitting Civil Jury Trial Discussions: The View Of Trial Participants, Judges, And Jurors, Valerie P. Hans, Paula Hannaford-Agor, G. Thomas Munsterman
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
In 1995, the Arizona Supreme Court reformed the jury trial process by allowing civil jurors to discuss the evidence presented during trial prior to their formal deliberations. This Article examines the theoretical, legal, and policy issues raised by this reform and presents the early results of a field experiment that tested the impact of trial discussions. Jurors, judges, attorneys, and litigants in civil jury trials in Arizona were questioned regarding their observations, experiences, and reactions during trial as well as what they perceived to be the benefits and drawback of juror discussions. The data revealed that the majority of judges …
Narrative Relevance, Imagined Juries, And A Supreme Court Inspired Agenda For Jury Research, Richard O. Lempert
Narrative Relevance, Imagined Juries, And A Supreme Court Inspired Agenda For Jury Research, Richard O. Lempert
Articles
This paper has its roots in Old Chief v. United States, a case the Supreme Court of the United States decided in 1997. I will begin by describing this case; then comment on its implications for the Supreme Court's conception of the jury, and conclude by examining the agenda one may draw from it for empirical jury research. Old Chief arose when Johnny Lynn Old Chief was charged not only with assault with a dangerous weapon and using a firearm in the commission of a crime of violence, but also with violating a law that precludes convicted felons from possessing …
Some Thoughts On The Evidentiary Aspects Of Technologically Produced Or Presented Evidence, Fredric I. Lederer
Some Thoughts On The Evidentiary Aspects Of Technologically Produced Or Presented Evidence, Fredric I. Lederer
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Lost Lives: Miscarriages Of Justice In Capital Cases, Samuel R. Gross
Lost Lives: Miscarriages Of Justice In Capital Cases, Samuel R. Gross
Articles
In case after case, erroneous conviction for capital murder has been proven. I contend that these are not disconnected accidents, but systematic consequences of the nature of homicice prosecution in the general and capital prosecution in particular - that in this respect, as in others, death distorts and undermines the course of the law.
Dna Database Searches And The Legal Consumption Of Scientific Evidence, Peter Donnelly, Richard D. Friedman
Dna Database Searches And The Legal Consumption Of Scientific Evidence, Peter Donnelly, Richard D. Friedman
Articles
DNA evidence has transformed the proof of identity in criminal litigation, but it has also introduced daunting problems of statistical analysis into the process. In this Article, we analyze a problem related to DNA evidence that is likely to be of great and increasing significance in the near future. This is the problem of whether, and how, to present evidence that the suspect has been identified through a DNA database search. In our view, the two well-known reports on DNA evidence issued by the National Research Council ("NRC"), each of which has carried great authority with the American courts on …
Lilly V. Virginia: A Chance To Reconceptualize The Confrontation Right, Richard D. Friedman
Lilly V. Virginia: A Chance To Reconceptualize The Confrontation Right, Richard D. Friedman
Articles
In Lilly v. Virginia, the Supreme Court once again has the opportunity to grapple with the meaning of the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendmel).t. The basic facts of Lilly are simple, for they present the ageold problem of accomplice confessions. Three men, Gary Barker and Ben and Mark Lilly, went on a crime spree, during which one of them shot to death a young man they had robbed and kidnaped. Ben Lilly was charged with being the triggerman, and Barker testified to that effect at Ben's trial. Mark did not testify. But Mark had made a statement to the …
In Defense Of The Character Evidence Prohibition: Foundations Of The Rule Against Trial By Character, David P. Leonard
In Defense Of The Character Evidence Prohibition: Foundations Of The Rule Against Trial By Character, David P. Leonard
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
An Outsider's View Of Common Law Evidence, Roger C. Park
An Outsider's View Of Common Law Evidence, Roger C. Park
Michigan Law Review
same line by a Newton. There have been improvements since Bentham's jeremiad. But Anglo-American evidence law is still puzzling. It rejects the common-sense principle of free proof in favor of a grotesque jumble of technicalities. It has the breathtaking aspiration of regulating inference by rule, causing it to exalt the foresight of remote rulemakers over the wisdom of on-the-spot adjudicators. It departs from tried-and-true practices of rational inquiry, as when it prohibits courts from using categories of evidence that are freely used both in everyday life and in the highest affairs of state. Sometimes it seems to fear dim light …
Economic Analysis Of The Law Of Evidence: A Caveat, Ron A. Shapira
Economic Analysis Of The Law Of Evidence: A Caveat, Ron A. Shapira
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Truth And Its Rivals In The Law Of Hearsay And Confrontation (Symposium: Truth And Its Rivals: Evidence Reform And The Goals Of Evidence Law)." , Richard D. Friedman
Truth And Its Rivals In The Law Of Hearsay And Confrontation (Symposium: Truth And Its Rivals: Evidence Reform And The Goals Of Evidence Law)." , Richard D. Friedman
Articles
In this paper, I will look at the problem of hearsay and confrontation through the lens offered by this symposium's theme of "truth and its rivals." I will ask: To what extent does the law of hearsay and confrontation aspire to achieve the goal of truth in litigation? To what extent does it, or should it, seek to achieve other goals, or to satisfy other constraints on the litigation system? And, given the ends that it seeks to achieve, what should the shape of the law in this area be? My principal conclusions are as follows: In most settings, the …
Confrontation: The Search For Basic Principles, Richard D. Friedman
Confrontation: The Search For Basic Principles, Richard D. Friedman
Articles
The Sixth Amendment to the Constitution guarantees the accused in a criminal prosecution the right "to be confronted with the Witnesses against him."' The Confrontation Clause clearly applies to those witnesses who testify against the accused at trial. Moreover, it is clear enough that confrontation ordinarily includes the accused's right to have those witnesses brought "face-toface," in the time-honored phrase, when they testify.2 But confrontation is much more than this "face-to-face" right. It also comprehends the right to have witnesses give their testimony under oath and to subject them to crossexamination. 3 Indeed, the Supreme Court has treated the accused's …
On The Admissibility Of Expert Testimony In Kansas, Mark D. Hinderks, Steve Leben
On The Admissibility Of Expert Testimony In Kansas, Mark D. Hinderks, Steve Leben
Faculty Works
No abstract provided.
What Went Wrong With Fre Rule 609: A Look At How Jurors Really Misuse Prior Conviction Evidence, Robert D. Dodson
What Went Wrong With Fre Rule 609: A Look At How Jurors Really Misuse Prior Conviction Evidence, Robert D. Dodson
North Carolina Central Law Review
No abstract provided.
On Parol: The Construction And Interpretation Of Written Agreements And The Role Of Extrinsic Evidence In Contract Litigation, Keith A. Rowley
On Parol: The Construction And Interpretation Of Written Agreements And The Role Of Extrinsic Evidence In Contract Litigation, Keith A. Rowley
Scholarly Works
As a general rule, extrinsic evidence, whether written or oral, is not admissible to prove either the intent of the parties to a contract or the meaning of contractual terms when the parties have executed an unambiguous, fully-integrated (i.e., final and all-inclusive) written agreement. The trial court may consider various types of extrinsic evidence, however, in determining whether a particular agreement is fully integrated or ambiguous, and even in choosing among rival interpretations of an agreement where ambiguity is not present. If the trial court determines that an agreement is not fully integrated, then the trier of fact may consider …
Jaffee V. Redmond: Towards Recognition Of A Federal Counselor-Battered Woman Privilege, Fernando Laguarda, Michael B. Bressman
Jaffee V. Redmond: Towards Recognition Of A Federal Counselor-Battered Woman Privilege, Fernando Laguarda, Michael B. Bressman
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
No abstract provided.
Whoever Fights Monsters Should See To It That In The Process He Does Not Become A Monster: Hunting The Sexual Predator With Silver Bullets -- Federal Rules Of Evidence 413-415 -- And A Stake Through The Heart -- Kansas V. Hendricks, Joelle A. Moreno
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
"Lies, Damned Lies, And Statistics"? Psychological Syndrome Evidence In The Courtroom After Daubert, Krista L. Duncan
"Lies, Damned Lies, And Statistics"? Psychological Syndrome Evidence In The Courtroom After Daubert, Krista L. Duncan
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Rule 701: Opinion Testimony By Lay Witnesses
Rule 405: Methods Of Proving Character
Rule 407: Subsequent Remedial Measures
Rule 412: Sex Offense Cases; Relevance Of Alleged Victim's Past Sexual Behavior Or Alleged Sexual Disposition
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Rule 702: Testimony By Experts
Rule 704: Opinion On Ultimate Issue
Rule 801(D)(1): Prior Statement By Witness
Rule 803(3): Then Existing Mental, Emotional, Or Physical Condition
Rule 803(3): Then Existing Mental, Emotional, Or Physical Condition
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Rule 803(4): Statements For Purposes Of Medical Diagnosis Or Treatment
Rule 803(4): Statements For Purposes Of Medical Diagnosis Or Treatment
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.