Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (194)
- University of Michigan Law School (72)
- Cornell University Law School (19)
- University of Richmond (13)
- West Virginia University (13)
-
- Pepperdine University (12)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (11)
- UIC School of Law (10)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (9)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (8)
- Roger Williams University (8)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (8)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (8)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (7)
- University of Maine School of Law (7)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (7)
- Brigham Young University Law School (5)
- Brooklyn Law School (5)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (5)
- St. Mary's University (5)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (5)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (5)
- Duke Law (4)
- Florida International University College of Law (4)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (4)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (4)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (4)
- University of Kentucky (4)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (3)
- The University of Akron (3)
- Keyword
-
- Evidence (56)
- Discovery (31)
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (22)
- Civil procedure (20)
- Federal Rules of Evidence (20)
-
- Expert testimony (16)
- Hearsay (15)
- Witnesses (15)
- Law (14)
- Civil Procedure (13)
- Admissibility (11)
- Trial (10)
- Juries (9)
- Testimony (9)
- Trials (9)
- Daubert (8)
- Disclosure (8)
- Litigation (8)
- Pleading (8)
- Technology (8)
- Courts (7)
- First Amendment (7)
- SFFA (7)
- Affirmative Action (6)
- ESG (6)
- Expert evidence (6)
- Expert witnesses (6)
- Jury (6)
- Legislation (6)
- Procedure (6)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (194)
- Michigan Law Review (51)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (19)
- Articles (14)
- West Virginia Law Review (13)
-
- Faculty Scholarship (12)
- University of Richmond Law Review (11)
- UIC Law Review (10)
- Faculty Publications (8)
- Pepperdine Law Review (7)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (7)
- Maine Law Review (6)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (5)
- BYU Law Review (5)
- Buffalo Law Review (5)
- Faculty Articles (5)
- Roger Williams University Law Review (5)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (5)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (4)
- Kentucky Law Journal (4)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (4)
- Oklahoma Law Review (4)
- Scholarly Works (4)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (4)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (4)
- Book Chapters (3)
- Faculty Working Papers (3)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (3)
- Loyola University Chicago Law Journal (3)
- Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal (3)
- Publication Type
Articles 421 - 450 of 524
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
The Silent Revolution, Faust Rossi
The Silent Revolution, Faust Rossi
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Discovery In Illinois And Federal Courts, 15 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1 (1982), Robert G. Johnston
Discovery In Illinois And Federal Courts, 15 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1 (1982), Robert G. Johnston
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Discovery Of Retained Nontestifying Experts' Identities Under The Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure, Michigan Law Review
Discovery Of Retained Nontestifying Experts' Identities Under The Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
This Note proposes an approach to the problem of identification of rule 26(b)(4)(B) experts that differs from both of the approaches taken in the reported opinions. 9 Part I analyzes the language of rule 26(b) and rejects the majority approach. As a matter of statutory construction, rule 26(b )( 4)(B) governs the disclosure of the identity of nontestifying experts retained by a party in preparation for trial. Part II examines the underlying purposes of rules 26(b)(l) and 26(b)(4)(B) - to ensure adequate pretrial disclosure and to prevent unfairness in adversarial competition - and suggests that both interests may be accommodated. …
Civil Procedure: Commentary, Faust Rossi
Civil Procedure: Commentary, Faust Rossi
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Paradoxes, Gedanken Experiments And The Burden Of Proof: A Response To Dr. Cohen's Reply, David H. Kaye
Paradoxes, Gedanken Experiments And The Burden Of Proof: A Response To Dr. Cohen's Reply, David H. Kaye
Faculty Scholarship
This article responds to L. Jonathan Cohen's critique of the author's position regarding the problem of naked statistical evidence. Cohen argues that the kind of probability at work in litigation does not conform to the axioms of mathematical probability. The author responds by suggesting that the familiar theory of probability needs no revision to account for the reluctance of a few courts to permit plaintiffs to prevail on the strength of background statistics alone. One need not adopt Dr. Cohen's esoteric mathematical structure to explain the burden of proof in civil cases. The article shows that whether or not one …
Current Controversies Concerning Witness Immunity In The Federal Courts, Jane Duffy
Current Controversies Concerning Witness Immunity In The Federal Courts, Jane Duffy
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
The Federal Rules Of Evidence: Six Years After, Paul F. Rothstein
The Federal Rules Of Evidence: Six Years After, Paul F. Rothstein
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The Federal Rules of Evidence have been in effect since 1975. Six years of experience is not much time in which to assess such a complex and important body of law. Nevertheless, there is now some "evidence" of the impact of the Federal Rules on the various states and circuits.
The Rules do seem to have proved successful enough to stimulate widespread imitation. Approximately half the states in the United States have or will very shortly have evidence codes patterned substantially on the Rules, even down to their numbers. Many of the remaining states (e.g., Iowa, Illinois, and Pennsylvania) have …
Survey Of Developments In West Virginia Law: 1980
Survey Of Developments In West Virginia Law: 1980
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Survey Of Developments In West Virginia Law: 1979
Survey Of Developments In West Virginia Law: 1979
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
United States Of America V. Herman Raddatz, Preview Of United States Supreme Court Cases, Leroy Pernell
United States Of America V. Herman Raddatz, Preview Of United States Supreme Court Cases, Leroy Pernell
Journal Publications
No abstract provided.
The Status Of The Third Party Confession In Virginia: In Search Of A Trustworthiness Standard, Donna J. Katos
The Status Of The Third Party Confession In Virginia: In Search Of A Trustworthiness Standard, Donna J. Katos
University of Richmond Law Review
The issue of third party confessions generates great controversy. The basic inquiry is, should confessions allegedly uttered by persons other than the defendant be admitted into evidence in a criminal trial? If so, under what conditions? How much discretion should a trial judge be afforded in determining whether this evidence should be admitted to exculpate a person charged with murder, armed robbery, or rape? Should the trial judge or the jury determine the reliability of the witness, the declarant, or the content of the confession itself? These considerations, in addition to due process arguments, have troubled criminal courts, legislators, and …
Administrative Law - Internal Revenue Service (Irs) Summons Enforcement - When An Irs Investigation Has Been Coordinated By A Justice Department Strike Force, The District Court Must Determine That Each Summons Issued Was Not Used For An Improper Criminal Investigation Purpose, Angela Baker
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Survey Of Developments In West Virginia Law: 1978
Survey Of Developments In West Virginia Law: 1978
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
State Medical Malpractice Screening Panels In Federal Diversity Actions, Vincent C. Alexander
State Medical Malpractice Screening Panels In Federal Diversity Actions, Vincent C. Alexander
Faculty Publications
During the early 1970's, a medical malpractice crisis was perceived in the United States. An increasing number of costly and time-consuming lawsuits alleging medical malpractice against doctors, hospitals, and other health care providers caused malpractice insurers to raise premiums substantially, which in turn threatened to curtail the availability of adequate health care at reasonable cost. State legislatures responded to the crisis with a variety of substantive and procedural measures intended to reduce the number of litigated claims and the size of jury awards. One of the principal steps taken in a majority of states was the creation of extrajudicial panels …
A Practitioner's Guide To The Management And Use Of Expert Witnesses In Washington Civil Litigation, Thomas V. Harris
A Practitioner's Guide To The Management And Use Of Expert Witnesses In Washington Civil Litigation, Thomas V. Harris
Seattle University Law Review
The Washington litigation process places a premium on the skillful management of expert witnesses. Testimony presented by such witnesses is both readily admissible and virtually unlimited in scope. Washington's adoption of the new Rules of Evidence can only serve to reinforce the current practice. Since most litigated cases involve substantial factual disputes, the development and presentation of expert testimony should be a major concern of all trial attorneys. The importance of trial examination has never been underrated. That part of the litigation process is one that all attorneys relish. The skillful management of expert witnesses, however, involves far more than …
Impeachment Of One's Own Witness By Prior Inconsistent Statements Under The Federal And Arkansas Rules Of Evidence, Samuel A. Perroni
Impeachment Of One's Own Witness By Prior Inconsistent Statements Under The Federal And Arkansas Rules Of Evidence, Samuel A. Perroni
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Survey Of Developments In West Virginia Law: 1976
Survey Of Developments In West Virginia Law: 1976
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Numbers Game - The Use And Misuse Of Statistics In Civil Rights Litigation, Marcy M. Hallock
The Numbers Game - The Use And Misuse Of Statistics In Civil Rights Litigation, Marcy M. Hallock
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Survey Of Developments In West Virginia Law: 1975-1976, Lloyd George Jackson Ii, John Burdick Koch, Alan Dale Moats, Thomas A. Vorbach
Survey Of Developments In West Virginia Law: 1975-1976, Lloyd George Jackson Ii, John Burdick Koch, Alan Dale Moats, Thomas A. Vorbach
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Discovery Of Expert Information Under The Federal Rules
Discovery Of Expert Information Under The Federal Rules
University of Richmond Law Review
With the adoption of extensive pretrial discovery mechanisms, preparation for trial in the federal system underwent a dramatic alteration. Instead of relying upon pleadings to perform the tasks of notice-giving, issue formulation, and fact-revelation, the various discovery devices available under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allow the parties "to obtain the fullest possible knowledge of the issues and facts before trial."' Discovery was created to promote the just, speedy, and inexpensive disposal of litigation. To this end, discovery serves to (1) facilitate the formulation and narrowing of issues; (2) protect against unfair surprise during trial; (3) detect any superflous …
Evidence Admissible During The Punishment Stage Of A Criminal Trial., Joseph F. Smith
Evidence Admissible During The Punishment Stage Of A Criminal Trial., Joseph F. Smith
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Corning Glass Works V. Brennan, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Corning Glass Works V. Brennan, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Georgia V. United States, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Georgia V. United States, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Recent Cases, Law Review Staff
Recent Cases, Law Review Staff
Vanderbilt Law Review
Civil Procedure--Class Actions--Order Dismissing Class Action that Leaves Plaintiff To Litigate a Small Monetary Claim Is Not a Final Appealable Order Under 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Plaintiff consumer, claiming to represent one and one-half million purchasers of defendants" products, filed a class action under section 4 of the Clayton Act, seeking treble damages, costs, and attorney's fees from defendants for alleged antitrust violations. Defendants successfully moved for a stay of proceedings pending the district court's determination of whether the case could be maintained as a class action.The court found the class unmanageable and, in accordance with Rule 23(c)(1) of the …
The Role Of Eyewitness Accounts In Establishing Probable Cause For The Issuance Of Search Warrants
The Role Of Eyewitness Accounts In Establishing Probable Cause For The Issuance Of Search Warrants
University of Richmond Law Review
The legality of entry gained through the use of a search warrant is dependent upon the legality of the means used to obtain the warrant. To justify the issuance of a search warrant the affiant must show the existence of probable cause.
Recent Developments, Various Editors
Recent Developments, Various Editors
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Books Received
University of Richmond Law Review
These are the books received by the Law School in 1970.
An Evaluation Of The Rule Of Comparative Damages, Bruce D. Drucker
An Evaluation Of The Rule Of Comparative Damages, Bruce D. Drucker
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Effective Instructions To The Federal Jury In Civil Cases: A Consideration In Microcosm, George P. Smith Ii
Effective Instructions To The Federal Jury In Civil Cases: A Consideration In Microcosm, George P. Smith Ii
Scholarly Articles
One of the most intriguing topics of current conversation among today's experienced, as well as inexperienced, trial lawyers is the preparation and use of jury instructions. This interest is initiated within the law school setting, where professors teaching courses in evidence and procedure will invariably seek to impart in one lecture-or implicitly consider throughout the entire course-what they consider to be the rationale for effective and successful jury instructions. Yet it has only been recently that the federal bench has expressed itself with convincing clarity on this timely matter. Previously, unrecorded comments and ideas concerning the preparation of jury instructions …
Evidence—Res Ipsa Loquitur In Accidents Involving Skidding And Swerving Vehicles, David C. Horan
Evidence—Res Ipsa Loquitur In Accidents Involving Skidding And Swerving Vehicles, David C. Horan
Buffalo Law Review
Pfaffenbach v. White Plains Express Corp., 17 N.Y.2d 132, 216 N.E.2d 324, 269 N.Y.S.2d 115 (1966).