Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (1332)
- Courts (765)
- Criminal Law (683)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (671)
- Administrative Law (668)
-
- Business Organizations Law (663)
- Rule of Law (659)
- Human Rights Law (654)
- Legal Education (652)
- Criminal Procedure (645)
- Civil Law (642)
- Internet Law (642)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (634)
- Conflict of Laws (634)
- Energy and Utilities Law (631)
- International Trade Law (630)
- Air and Space Law (628)
- Agriculture Law (627)
- Natural Resources Law (626)
- Law and Politics (602)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (542)
- State and Local Government Law (447)
- Supreme Court of the United States (425)
- Law and Race (387)
- First Amendment (370)
- Legislation (342)
- Fourteenth Amendment (321)
- Judges (298)
- Institution
-
- Universitas Indonesia (454)
- University of Michigan Law School (291)
- Seattle University School of Law (201)
- William & Mary Law School (135)
- Fordham Law School (98)
-
- University of Kentucky (76)
- University of Richmond (74)
- West Virginia University (67)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (57)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (57)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (56)
- Columbia Law School (53)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (53)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (52)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (52)
- University of Washington School of Law (46)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (42)
- University of Colorado Law School (41)
- Notre Dame Law School (40)
- University of Georgia School of Law (40)
- Singapore Management University (39)
- Florida State University College of Law (35)
- Pepperdine University (34)
- Duke Law (32)
- Cleveland State University (30)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (29)
- American University Washington College of Law (28)
- UIC School of Law (26)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (25)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (24)
- Keyword
-
- Elections (306)
- Voting (221)
- Election law (167)
- Voting Rights Act (151)
- Voting rights (130)
-
- Gerrymandering (118)
- Democracy (116)
- Campaign finance (113)
- Election (102)
- Supreme Court (98)
- Election Law (94)
- Redistricting (94)
- Discrimination (86)
- United States Supreme Court (86)
- Right to vote (73)
- Shelby County v. Holder (71)
- Constitution (65)
- First Amendment (59)
- Racial discrimination (58)
- Race and law (57)
- Disenfranchisement (55)
- Congress (51)
- VRA (51)
- Race (49)
- Civil rights (47)
- Constitutional law (44)
- Politics (44)
- Constitutional Law (43)
- Preclearance (43)
- Apportionment (42)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (448)
- Seattle University Law Review (192)
- Michigan Law Review (152)
- Faculty Scholarship (136)
- Articles (79)
-
- Journal Articles (61)
- University of Richmond Law Review (46)
- Kentucky Law Journal (45)
- Faculty Publications (44)
- Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum (42)
- William & Mary Law Review (39)
- Undefeated Exhibit Panels (38)
- Publications (37)
- Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity (34)
- Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law (34)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (33)
- All Faculty Scholarship (30)
- Law Faculty Scholarly Articles (30)
- Fordham Law Review (29)
- Scholarly Works (29)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (29)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (29)
- West Virginia Law Review (29)
- Indiana Law Journal (26)
- Pepperdine Law Review (25)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (24)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (23)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (23)
- UIC Law Review (22)
- Washington Law Review (22)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 811 - 840 of 2929
Full-Text Articles in Election Law
Working To Elect Under-Represented Groups In Public Office, Jenny Pacillo
Working To Elect Under-Represented Groups In Public Office, Jenny Pacillo
School of Professional Studies
Running for public office is a massive undertaking that is often inaccessible to marginalized groups of people including women, people of color, low income folks and members of the LGBTQIA+ community. These people, especially when they are first time candidates, face barriers that range from lack of finances to gatekeeping. Communities benefit when residents are represented by a diverse range of elected officials, as they bring unique perspectives, lived experiences and opinions to the table. This capstone will provide an overview of strategy, guidelines to follow and basic tools that are needed to run for office to assist first time …
Adversarial Election Administration, Rebecca Green
Adversarial Election Administration, Rebecca Green
Faculty Publications
As Americans, we are conditioned to believe that involving partisans in the administration of elections is inherently problematic. Understandably. The United States is a major outlier; virtually every other developed democracy mandates nonpartisan election administration. Whether on the left or right— especially since the 2020 election—we are barraged with headlines about actual or feared partisanship on the part of those who run our elections. What this narrative misses, however, is a crucial and underrecognized fact: by design, partisans have always played central roles at every level of U.S. election administration. What is more, partisans are baked into the U.S. election …
Voter Due Process And The "Independent" State Legislature, Michael P. Bellis
Voter Due Process And The "Independent" State Legislature, Michael P. Bellis
Northwestern University Law Review
In a series of opinions surrounding the 2020 presidential election, multiple U.S. Supreme Court Justices broke from precedent to signal support of the “independent state legislature theory” (ISLT), a formerly obscure interpretation of state legislatures’ power over the administration of federal elections. Proponents of the ISLT allege that the U.S. Constitution grants state legislatures plenary power in federal election contexts—including the power to discount ballots, redraw legislative maps, or appoint alternative slates of presidential electors. Although the Court denied certiorari in each case, across the denials four current Justices dissented because they considered the ISLT to be a proper interpretation …
An Alternative To The Independent State Legislature Doctrine, Bruce Ledewitz
An Alternative To The Independent State Legislature Doctrine, Bruce Ledewitz
Law Faculty Publications
One of the most momentous actions taken by the United States Supreme Court in the last term was not deciding a case but granting review at the end of the term in Moore v. Harper, the North Carolina congressional redistricting case. This is the case in which the Supreme Court appears likely to adopt some version of the Independent State Legislature Doctrine (Doctrine). In this essay, I will describe the actual case and the Doctrine. But I will also be offering an alternative to the Doctrine, one that I believe achieves some of the goals that the Justices who …
The Weakening Of The Voting Rights Act: A Proposal For Modernizing Preclearance, Breannan Perez
The Weakening Of The Voting Rights Act: A Proposal For Modernizing Preclearance, Breannan Perez
Brigham Young University Prelaw Review
The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was passed more than 58 years ago. However, despite its attempt to identity and address discrimination, many of its safeguards have been struck down by the Court. In fact, Section 4b aimed to eliminate voting procedures that were discriminatory in effect, but has since been deemed as unconstitutional. Such a ruling has weakened the VRA and has burdened minority voters. This article proposes a modernized preclearance formula that considers states’ voting rights violations and current voting data. Such a proposal is necessary as a disregard of any voter is a threat to the integrity …
Enhancing Rural Representation Through Electoral System Diversity, Henry L. Chambers Jr.
Enhancing Rural Representation Through Electoral System Diversity, Henry L. Chambers Jr.
University of Richmond Law Review
Rural Virginians face disparities in outcomes regarding healthcare, access to important infrastructure, and other services. Some disparities may be related to rurality. The sparseness of population in rural areas may limit the sites where people may access services, triggering the need to travel significant distances to obtain goods and services in such areas. Limited access may lead to disparities even when the quality of goods and services in rural areas is high. The disparities affect all rural Virginians, but disproportionately affect rural Virginians of color. The causes of the disparities are complex and myriad, and may be based on race, …
Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Pemberian Pendidikan Formal Bagi Anak-Anak Pengungsi Luar Negeri Di Kota Batam, Rina Shahriyani Shahrullah, Heru Susetyo, Lu Sudirman, Rendi Sahputra
Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Pemberian Pendidikan Formal Bagi Anak-Anak Pengungsi Luar Negeri Di Kota Batam, Rina Shahriyani Shahrullah, Heru Susetyo, Lu Sudirman, Rendi Sahputra
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
The entire responsibility for all children in Indonesia lies with the government, and it extends to all children in Indonesia, not only those who are Indonesian nationals but also includes children who are refugees from foreign countries. One of the fundamental rights regulated by the laws and the Convention on the Rights of the Child ratified by Indonesia is the right to receive appropriate education (formal, non-formal, and informal education). This research aims to analyze the implementation of formal education fulfillment for refugee children in Batam City, especially those accommodated at Hotel Kolekta. Therefore, the research questions are as follows: …
De-Class-Ifying Microtargeted Political Advertising, Jacob Kovacs-Goodman
De-Class-Ifying Microtargeted Political Advertising, Jacob Kovacs-Goodman
Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum
In contemporary American politics, Big Tech companies provide sophisticated advertising interfaces that enable anyone to target specific voters by demographic. These companies defend their tools as “neutral” to evade culpability for discriminatory ads. Yet, such microtargeted advertising presents a significant threat to democracy. This Article advances a possible two-pronged solution to bar online platforms from targeting political ads based on a user’s protected class. First, this Article promotes a largely unexplored tactic: extending Title II of the Civil Rights Act into the digital space so that behavior that would be impermissibly discriminatory offline is not permitted online. Second, this Article …
A Government Of Laws And Not Of Men: Why Justice Brandeis Was Right To Assume Congress Can Restrain The President's Removal Power, Danielle Rosenblum
A Government Of Laws And Not Of Men: Why Justice Brandeis Was Right To Assume Congress Can Restrain The President's Removal Power, Danielle Rosenblum
Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum
Since the Founding, the extent of the president’s power to remove executive officials from office remains unsettled. While the Appointments Clause in Article II, Section 2 empowers Congress to participate in the hiring of executive officials, the United States Constitution’s text is silent on whether Congress can limit the president’s ability to fire such employees. The debate on the proper scope of the president’s removal power is significant because it serves as a proxy for a larger constitutional question: whether constraints on presidential power advance or sit in tension with democracy. This Article argues that Justice Brandeis was right to …
A Modern-Day 3/5 Compromise: The Case For Finding Prison Gerrymandering Unconstitutional Under The Thirteenth Amendment, Shana Iden
Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum
Vestiges of slavery and systemic disenfranchisement of people of color persist in the United States. One of these remnants is the practice of prison gerrymandering, which occurs when government officials count incarcerated individuals as part of the population of the prison’s location rather than the individual’s home district. This Article argues that prison gerrymandering functions as a badge of slavery that should be prohibited under the Thirteenth Amendment.
First, this Article provides background on prison gerrymandering and charts its impact through history, particularly on Black communities. Moreover, this Article analyzes how litigation under the Fourteenth Amendment has not yielded meaningful …
A Constitutional Right To Early Voting, David Schultz
A Constitutional Right To Early Voting, David Schultz
Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum
Voting is a cost-benefit decision. Individuals are more likely to vote if the benefits of doing so outweigh the disadvantages. With early voting laws eased due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the 2020 election demonstrated that turnout increases when elected officials reduce voting costs. Despite all the benefits of early voting, there is no constitutional right, and it remains a privilege that state legislatures can revoke at will.
Since the 2020 election, state legislatures have proposed—and enacted—hundreds of bills to change voting rules. But with the intense partisan disagreement over voting, coupled with political polarization reaching an apex, these acts restricting …
The Looming Threat Of The Independent State Legislature Theory And The Erosion Of The Voting Rights Act: It Is Time To Enshrine The Right To Vote, Javon Davis
Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum
Over the last decade, the emergence of an imperial United States Supreme Court—currently armed with the largest conservative majority since the 1930s—has radically reshaped federal voting rights protections. During the litigation surrounding the 2020 election, however, an obscure threat reemerged. The fringe independent state legislature (“ISL”) theory is a potentially revolutionary constitutional theory that could lead to widespread voter disenfranchisement. Proponents of the theory, including Supreme Court Justices, posit, in part, that the United States Constitution vests state legislatures with plenary power to construct rules for federal elections—unbound by state constitutions and free from state judicial review.
Once a refuge …
Moore V. Harper And The Consequential Effects Of The Independent State Legislature Theory, Chase Cooper
Moore V. Harper And The Consequential Effects Of The Independent State Legislature Theory, Chase Cooper
Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum
In December 2022, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Moore v. Harper. The case addresses whether the North Carolina Supreme Court possesses the authority to strike down a redistricting map drawn by the state legislature. Petitioners contend that the state legislature has no such authority under the United States Constitution, citing a novel interpretation of the Elections Clause known as the “independent state legislature” (“ISL”) theory. The ISL theory is not a unified theory, but rather a constellation of related doctrinal positions that revolve around a core precept: ordinary governing principles by which state courts review …
Citizen Enforcement Laws Threaten Democracy, David A. Carrillo, Stephen M. Duvernay
Citizen Enforcement Laws Threaten Democracy, David A. Carrillo, Stephen M. Duvernay
Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum
No abstract provided.
Rucho In The States: Districting Cases And The Nature Of State Judicial Power, Chad M. Oldfather
Rucho In The States: Districting Cases And The Nature Of State Judicial Power, Chad M. Oldfather
Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum
No abstract provided.
Evaluating Congress's Constitutional Basis To Abolish Felony Disenfranchisement, James E. Lauerman
Evaluating Congress's Constitutional Basis To Abolish Felony Disenfranchisement, James E. Lauerman
Washington Law Review
In the past three years, members of Congress unsuccessfully introduced a series of federal voting rights legislation, most recently the Freedom to Vote Act. One goal of the legislation is to abolish felony disenfranchisement. Felony disenfranchisement is the practice of revoking a citizen’s right to vote due to a prior felony conviction. The Freedom to Vote Act aims to restore voting rights for every citizen who has completed their prison sentence. A ban on felony disenfranchisement would be historic, as the practice stretches back to ancient Greece and Rome. Moreover, the United States Supreme Court consistently upholds the practice by …
Election Administration Concerns Meet Claims Of A Fraudulent Election: A Comprehensive Analysis Of The 2020 Presidential Election And Its Aftermath In Wisconsin, Joe Franke
Marquette Law Review
The 2020 presidential election unearthed valid questions about how the election was administered and whether various state laws were properly followed. However, President Donald Trump and his closest allies routinely fail to distinguish between questions about whether state officials correctly interpreted and applied the state’ s election code and actual fraud or malfeasance. There is a significant difference between accusing election officials of wrongly interpreting state law or incorrectly implementing election procedures, and alleging that those same officials intended to rig the outcome. Failure to make this distinction has contributed to the stolen election narrative, which continues to roil the …
Carceral Socialization As Voter Suppression, Danieli Evans
Carceral Socialization As Voter Suppression, Danieli Evans
Articles
In an era of mass incarceration, many people are socialized through interactions with the carceral state. These interactions are poweful learning experiences, and by design, they are contrary to democratic citizenship. Citizenship is about belonging to a community of equals, being entitled to mutual respect and concern. Criminal punishment deliberately harms, subordinates, and stigmatizes. Encounters with the carceral system are powerful experiences of anti-democratic socialization, and they impact peoples' sense of citizenship and trust in government. Accordingly, a large body of social science research shows that eligible voters who have carceral contact are significantly less likely to vote or to …
Defeating De Facto Disenfranchisement Of Criminal Defendants, Neil Sobol
Defeating De Facto Disenfranchisement Of Criminal Defendants, Neil Sobol
Faculty Scholarship
In a democracy, voting is not only an important civic duty but also a right that governments owe to their citizens. However, by operation of law, forty-eight states deny voting rights to individuals based on criminal convictions. Activists and scholars attack de jure disenfranchisement as an improper collateral consequence that disproportionately impacts people of color. Although recent years show substantial reforms to reenfranchise defendants, an estimated 5.17 million defendants remained ineligible to vote in 2020.
While efforts to address de jure disenfranchisement remain necessary, a problem that has received considerably less attention is the de facto disenfranchisement of criminal defendants …
Rounding Up The Three-Fifths Clause: Eradicating Prison Gerrymandering In The South, Abigail N. Falk
Rounding Up The Three-Fifths Clause: Eradicating Prison Gerrymandering In The South, Abigail N. Falk
Pepperdine Law Review
This Comment examines the phenomenon of prison gerrymandering, a practice that involves counting prisoners as residents of the counties where their state correctional facilities are located—rather than in their home communities—for redistricting and representational purposes. This practice of counting inflates the voting power of rural, white districts with large prison complexes and diminishes the voting power of minority communities. Prison gerrymandering has become especially pervasive across southern states while many of the South’s northern counterparts have eradicated this practice through legislative reform. This Comment proposes a solution to stop prison gerrymandering in the South, arguing a strategy to produce a …
The Threat Of Gerrymandering And Voter Suppression To American Democracy And Why Grassroots Activism Is The Most Viable Solution, Sabrina Pickett
The Threat Of Gerrymandering And Voter Suppression To American Democracy And Why Grassroots Activism Is The Most Viable Solution, Sabrina Pickett
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
This comment examines the threat of partisan gerrymandering, voter suppression, and election subversion in American elections. Specifically, this comment details the development of federal voting legislation and acknowledges the limits of the executive branch to implement voter equity within constitutional structure. Consequently, this comment argues that grassroots activism combined with executive enforcement of current federal law through the Department of Justice is the most viable solution to strengthen civic engagement and uphold democratic principles.
The Supreme Court In Crisis, David M. Hunt Library
The Supreme Court In Crisis, David M. Hunt Library
2023 Event Invitations
The speakers will discuss recent decisions affecting abortion and gun rights, the public’s trust and confidence in the high court and cases the Court will decide before the summer involving LGBTQ rights, affirmative action, election law and immigration policy.
Speakers:
- Tom Gerety, former President of Amherst and Trinity Colleges, former Executive Director of the Brennan Center for Justice
- Adam Liptak, New York Times Supreme Court Correspondent
- David Rudenstine, Sheldon H. Solow Professor of Law at Cardozo and former Dean
The Politics Of The Criminal Enforcement Of The U.S. Clean Water Act, 1983-2021, Dr. Joshua Ozymy, Dr. Melissa Jarrell Ozymy, Dr. Danielle Mcgurrin
The Politics Of The Criminal Enforcement Of The U.S. Clean Water Act, 1983-2021, Dr. Joshua Ozymy, Dr. Melissa Jarrell Ozymy, Dr. Danielle Mcgurrin
Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - )
No abstract provided.
Religious Gerrymandering: A New Avenue For Redistricting Challenges?, Jacqueline Rosen
Religious Gerrymandering: A New Avenue For Redistricting Challenges?, Jacqueline Rosen
Utah Law Student Scholarship
Recently, the Supreme Court significantly limited review of partisan gerrymandering claims, closing the door to a substantial portion of redistricting challenges. However, religious-based redistricting is an overlooked area that should be explored under both federal and state Constitutions. Existing redistricting standards can easily be applied to religious gerrymandering claims. In addition, the federal Establishment Clause may provide a basis for some especially egregious instances of religious gerrymandering. However, perhaps the least explored and most viable avenue for relief is through reliance on state constitutional protections, such as the unique language of Utah’s Constitution. Using Utah as a case study, I …
An Alternative To The Independent State Legislature Doctrine, Ledewitz Bruce
An Alternative To The Independent State Legislature Doctrine, Ledewitz Bruce
Duquesne Law Review
One of the most momentous actions taken by the United States Supreme Court in the last term was not deciding a case but granting review at the end of the term in Moore v. Harper, the North Carolina congressional redistricting case.1 This is the case in which the Supreme Court appears likely to adopt some version of the Independent State Legislature Doctrine (Doctrine). In this essay, I will describe the actual case and the Doctrine. But I will also be offering an alternative to the Doctrine, one that I believe achieves some of the goals that the Justices …
Federal Election Commission V. Cruz, Myles A. Roth
Federal Election Commission V. Cruz, Myles A. Roth
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
When Congress Passes The Buck: How Russia’S Invasion Of Ukraine Exposed Flaws In Granting The President Sanctioning Powers, Artem M. Joukov, Samantha M. Caspar
When Congress Passes The Buck: How Russia’S Invasion Of Ukraine Exposed Flaws In Granting The President Sanctioning Powers, Artem M. Joukov, Samantha M. Caspar
Seattle University Law Review
The United States (U.S.) Constitution provides few limitations on endowing the Executive Branch with powers to govern foreign trade, which was initially granted to the Legislature. In a world where global trade dominates, the power over foreign trade can be more important than the power over domestic matters. Leaving unrestrained trade authority to the Executive Branch may cause hazards for Americans and foreigners alike. Russia’s war in Ukraine demonstrates the flaws in permitting the Executive Branch to unilaterally sanction foreign states. This Article demonstrates how reactive Executive Branch policies infringed on the welfare and safety of American citizens and foreigners …
Pedaling Backwards: Examining The King County Board Of Health’S Choice To Repeal Its Bicycle Helmet Law, Schuyler M. Peters
Pedaling Backwards: Examining The King County Board Of Health’S Choice To Repeal Its Bicycle Helmet Law, Schuyler M. Peters
Seattle University Law Review
In Part I, this Comment will explain the Helmet Law itself and the timeline that ultimately led to its repeal. Part II will focus on the positive impact of the Helmet Law, the dangers associated with the repeal, why the repeal should not have occurred in the manner it did, and what societal costs stem from the BOH’s decision. Part III will address the actions that must be taken to revoke this repeal and the reasons behind these alternative pathways, including an Equity Impact Review study specifically on the consequences of repeal, a collaborative outreach program to bring helmets to …
Sb 129 - Amendments Regarding Time Off For Advance Voting, Cody A. Choi, Devan K.T. Knapp
Sb 129 - Amendments Regarding Time Off For Advance Voting, Cody A. Choi, Devan K.T. Knapp
Georgia State University Law Review
The Act amends several Code sections pertaining to voting, including broadening the individuals eligible to serve on an independent performance review board; allowing for employees to request time off for advance in person voting; specifying which elections may be audited; and providing election superintendents more time to report required election information.
The Stolen Election Lie And The Freedom Of Speech, Wes Henricksen
The Stolen Election Lie And The Freedom Of Speech, Wes Henricksen
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.