Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (1332)
- Courts (765)
- Criminal Law (683)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (671)
- Administrative Law (668)
-
- Business Organizations Law (663)
- Rule of Law (659)
- Human Rights Law (654)
- Legal Education (652)
- Criminal Procedure (645)
- Civil Law (642)
- Internet Law (642)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (634)
- Conflict of Laws (634)
- Energy and Utilities Law (631)
- International Trade Law (630)
- Air and Space Law (628)
- Agriculture Law (627)
- Natural Resources Law (626)
- Law and Politics (602)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (542)
- State and Local Government Law (447)
- Supreme Court of the United States (425)
- Law and Race (387)
- First Amendment (370)
- Legislation (342)
- Fourteenth Amendment (321)
- Judges (298)
- Institution
-
- Universitas Indonesia (454)
- University of Michigan Law School (291)
- Seattle University School of Law (201)
- William & Mary Law School (135)
- Fordham Law School (98)
-
- University of Kentucky (76)
- University of Richmond (74)
- West Virginia University (67)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (57)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (57)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (56)
- Columbia Law School (53)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (53)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (52)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (52)
- University of Washington School of Law (46)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (42)
- University of Colorado Law School (41)
- Notre Dame Law School (40)
- University of Georgia School of Law (40)
- Singapore Management University (39)
- Florida State University College of Law (35)
- Pepperdine University (34)
- Duke Law (32)
- Cleveland State University (30)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (29)
- American University Washington College of Law (28)
- UIC School of Law (26)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (25)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (24)
- Keyword
-
- Elections (306)
- Voting (221)
- Election law (167)
- Voting Rights Act (151)
- Voting rights (130)
-
- Gerrymandering (118)
- Democracy (116)
- Campaign finance (113)
- Election (102)
- Supreme Court (98)
- Election Law (94)
- Redistricting (94)
- Discrimination (86)
- United States Supreme Court (86)
- Right to vote (73)
- Shelby County v. Holder (71)
- Constitution (65)
- First Amendment (59)
- Racial discrimination (58)
- Race and law (57)
- Disenfranchisement (55)
- Congress (51)
- VRA (51)
- Race (49)
- Civil rights (47)
- Constitutional law (44)
- Politics (44)
- Constitutional Law (43)
- Preclearance (43)
- Apportionment (42)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (448)
- Seattle University Law Review (192)
- Michigan Law Review (152)
- Faculty Scholarship (136)
- Articles (79)
-
- Journal Articles (61)
- University of Richmond Law Review (46)
- Kentucky Law Journal (45)
- Faculty Publications (44)
- Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum (42)
- William & Mary Law Review (39)
- Undefeated Exhibit Panels (38)
- Publications (37)
- Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity (34)
- Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law (34)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (33)
- All Faculty Scholarship (30)
- Law Faculty Scholarly Articles (30)
- Fordham Law Review (29)
- Scholarly Works (29)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (29)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (29)
- West Virginia Law Review (29)
- Indiana Law Journal (26)
- Pepperdine Law Review (25)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (24)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (23)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (23)
- UIC Law Review (22)
- Washington Law Review (22)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1501 - 1530 of 2929
Full-Text Articles in Election Law
Judging Congressional Elections, Lisa M. Manheim
Judging Congressional Elections, Lisa M. Manheim
Georgia Law Review
A pivotal clause of our Constitution suffers from
uncertainty and neglect. The result has scrambled the law
of contested congressional elections. These high-stakes
disputes turn on questions of procedure, and in particular
on questions of forum. Yet across the country, an
unpredictable and ad hoc set of regimes governs these
fundamental questions. The culprit behind the confusion
is Article I, Section 5 of the United States Constitution,
which states that "Each House shall be the Judge of the
Elections ... of its own Members." This command may
seem straightforward, if a bit unsettling-it allows
Congress to decide who has won …
Political Gerrymandering: Was Elbridge Gerry Right, C. Daniel Chill
Political Gerrymandering: Was Elbridge Gerry Right, C. Daniel Chill
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Navigating The Post-Shelby Landscape: Using Universalism To Augment The Remaining Power Of The Voting Rights Act, Jesús N. Joslin
Navigating The Post-Shelby Landscape: Using Universalism To Augment The Remaining Power Of The Voting Rights Act, Jesús N. Joslin
The Scholar: St. Mary's Law Review on Race and Social Justice
Abstract forthcoming.
Judging Congressional Elections, Lisa Marshall Manheim
Judging Congressional Elections, Lisa Marshall Manheim
Articles
This Article reveals what passes as federal constitutional law in this area: a chaotic set of ad hoc, state-based interpretations that vary drastically by jurisdiction. Some states, for example, have interpreted Article I, Section 5 to permit courts to adjudicate congressional election contests. Others have concluded the opposite. Through such conflicting interpretations, state courts have contributed to a deep, intractable split on the provision's meaning and reach.
State legislatures have compounded the discord by enacting statutes that codify their interpretations, a move that renders their constitutional determinations practically unreviewable. Meanwhile, both Houses of Congress continue to adjudicate these congressional election …
Voting Realism, Gilda R. Daniels
Voting Realism, Gilda R. Daniels
All Faculty Scholarship
Since Shelby County v. Holder, the country has grown accustomed to life without the full strength of the Voting Rights Act. Efforts to restore Section 4 have been met with calls to ignore race conscious remedies and employ race neutral remedies for modern day voting rights violations. In this new normal, the country should adopt “voting realism” as the new approach to ensuring that law and reality work to address these new millennium methods of voter discrimination.
Electoral Evidence, Peter Nicolas
Electoral Evidence, Peter Nicolas
Articles
Each year, millions of Americans cast votes for specific candidates or on specific ballot measures. Each such vote generates potential "electoral evidence," the admissibility of which may be the subject of dispute in subsequent litigation. The evidence may take various forms, including the marked ballot itself, a voter's testimony regarding her vote, or her written or oral statements regarding her vote.
Electoral evidence is most commonly offered in litigation over the election outcome itself, with the parties seeking to determine how certain individuals voted to resolve a close election. However, its potential relevance is not limited to such proceedings. It …
Voice And Exit As Accountability Mechanisms: Can Foot-Voting Be Made Safe For The Chinese Communist Party?, Roderick M. Hills Jr., Shitong Qiao
Voice And Exit As Accountability Mechanisms: Can Foot-Voting Be Made Safe For The Chinese Communist Party?, Roderick M. Hills Jr., Shitong Qiao
Faculty Scholarship
According to Albert 0. Hirschman's famous dichotomy, citizens can express their preferences with their "voice" (by voting with ballots to elect better representatives) or by "exit" (by voting with their feet to choose better places to live). Suppose, however, that ballot-voting is ineffective: Can exit not merely aid but also replace voice? Using the People's Republic of China, a party state without elective democracy as a case study, we argue that exit is not a substitute for, but rather a complement to, voice. China's bureaucratic promotion system plays the same role that local elections do in the United States, promoting …
Questions About Election Fraud, Jana Nestlerode
Questions About Election Fraud, Jana Nestlerode
Criminal Justice Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Free Speech Matters: The Roberts Court And The First Amendment, Joel M. Gora
Free Speech Matters: The Roberts Court And The First Amendment, Joel M. Gora
Journal of Law and Policy
This article contends that the Roberts Court, in the period from 2006 to 2016, arguably became the most speech-protective Supreme Court in memory. In a series of wide-ranging First Amendment decisions, the Court sounded and strengthened classic free speech themes and principles. Taken together, the Roberts Court’s decisions have left free speech rights much stronger than they were found.
Those themes and principles include a strong libertarian distrust of government regulation of speech and presumption in favor of letting people control speech, a consistent refusal to fashion new “non-speech” categories, a reluctance to “balance” free speech away against governmental interests, …
Introduction; The Past, Present And Future Of Free Speech, Joel M. Gora
Introduction; The Past, Present And Future Of Free Speech, Joel M. Gora
Journal of Law and Policy
This short paper introduces the papers and commentary produced at two significant First Amendment occasions. First was a 40th anniversary celebration of the Supreme Court’s landmark 1976 decision in Buckley v. Valeo, the fountainhead ruling on the intersection between campaign finance restrictions and First Amendment rights. The questions were discussed provocatively by two of the leading players in that decision, James Buckley himself, now a retired United States Circuit Judge, and Ira Glasser, former head of the ACLU who helped organize a strange bedfellows, left-right coalition to challenge the new federal election campaign laws on First Amendment grounds. …
A Landmark Decision Turns Forty: A Conversation On Buckley V. Valeo, Ira Glasser, Nicholas W. Allard, James L. Buckley
A Landmark Decision Turns Forty: A Conversation On Buckley V. Valeo, Ira Glasser, Nicholas W. Allard, James L. Buckley
Journal of Law and Policy
James Buckley gives a behind the scenes description as to why he thought the Campaign Reform Act of 1974 was suspect, how the case effected his career and how the holding of the Supreme Court has since effected campaign finance law. Remarks first given regarding the Buckley V. Valeo Panel where Dean Nichola`s Allard provided commentary. Included in this commentary, Mr. Glasser explains that similar to other problems that have plagued the United States, campaign finance is a unique issue that requires not only an analysis of what the problem is, but also whether the proposed remedy will solve the …
Money And Speech: Practical Perspectives, Nicholas W. Allard
Money And Speech: Practical Perspectives, Nicholas W. Allard
Journal of Law and Policy
Dean Allard provides a practical perspective on the topic of money, politics and free speech based on his over three decades worth of experience in lobbying, campaigns and public policy. Commentary also includes opinions as to the state of politics in America and the problems with reforming campaign finance law.
Turning Cash Into Votes: The Law And Economics Of Campaign Contributions, Brett Silverberg
Turning Cash Into Votes: The Law And Economics Of Campaign Contributions, Brett Silverberg
University of Miami Business Law Review
As a result of the recent Citizens United decision and its “Super PAC” spawn, individuals, corporations, and unions are allowed to independently spend unlimited amounts to influence elections. The ramifications of the Citizens United ruling have seemingly had a grave impact on the 2016 Presidential Election. In addition to examining the laws—and their loopholes—of political campaign contributions, this Essay will also explore the economics of campaign contributions. Ultimately, there are two reasons as to why corporations provide such large sums of money: one is rent creation, which is the attempt to gain political favors for “special interests;” the second is …
Election Law And The Presidency: An Introduction And Overview, Jerry H. Goldfeder
Election Law And The Presidency: An Introduction And Overview, Jerry H. Goldfeder
Fordham Law Review
Americans now fully appreciate that presidential candidates are vying for a majority of the Electoral College votes, rather than the individual votes of constituents. Modern campaigns are organized around this goal, and commentators are focused on this reality. As a result, there has been an increased cry to reform the electoral process. After all, if every other public official in the land is elected by receiving more votes than their competitors, why should the President of the United States be elected in this apparently undemocratic fashion? The process appears even more unusual in that electors are chosen pursuant to state …
Third-Party And Independent Presidential Candidates: The Need For A Runoff Mechanism, Edward B. Foley
Third-Party And Independent Presidential Candidates: The Need For A Runoff Mechanism, Edward B. Foley
Fordham Law Review
Consider what 2016 might have looked like if this better electoral system had been in place. Bloomberg then could have entered the race without risking being a spoiler. In a three-way race—Bloomberg, Clinton, and Trump—Bloomberg might have fizzled out, leaving a two-way race between Clinton and Trump. Since that is essentially how the election ended up anyway, the country would have been no worse off for having had a chance to consider Bloomberg as an alternative. But suppose, however, with Trump’s candidacy spinning out of control in a series of unacceptable comments (as it appeared to do in early August),11 …
Ramshackle Federalism: America’S Archaic And Dysfunctional Presidential Election System, Anthony J. Gaughan
Ramshackle Federalism: America’S Archaic And Dysfunctional Presidential Election System, Anthony J. Gaughan
Fordham Law Review
Accordingly, this Article proposes five sensible and achievable reforms to modernize the presidential election system. Each requires Congress and the federal government to play a much more proactive role in the presidential election system. The Constitution may be founded on federalist principles, but excessive decentralization is not serving us well in presidential election administration. In an age of tumultuous and accelerating change, the presidential election system must be modernized to meet the needs of twenty-first century America.
Does The Constitution Provide More Ballot Access Protection For Presidential Elections Than For U.S. House Elections?, Richard Winger
Does The Constitution Provide More Ballot Access Protection For Presidential Elections Than For U.S. House Elections?, Richard Winger
Fordham Law Review
Both the U.S. Constitution and The Federalist Papers suggest that voters ought to have more freedom to vote for the candidate of their choice for the U.S. House of Representatives than they do for the President or the U.S. Senate. Yet, strangely, for the last thirty-three years, the U.S. Supreme Court and lower courts have ruled that the Constitution gives voters more freedom to vote for the candidate of their choice in presidential elections than in congressional elections. Also, state legislatures, which have been writing ballot access laws since 1888, have passed laws that make it easier for minor-party and …
Time To End Presidential Caucuses, Sean J. Wright
Time To End Presidential Caucuses, Sean J. Wright
Fordham Law Review
Following the 2016 election cycle, there will be a great opportunity to implement reform. A major change should be to move away from presidential caucuses. They persist with, in the words of John Oliver, “complex, opaque rules.” These complex rules, which include participating in person for over an hour, negatively impacts participation in the electoral process. For example, in 2012, “participation rates in the Republican Party’s caucuses averaged 3 percent.” 3 percent. Compellingly, PolitiFact has observed that “[c]aucuses and delegate math can be incredibly confusing, and the arcane party structures don’t reflect how most people assume presidential selection works.” Yet, …
Rethinking Presidential Eligibility, Eugene D. Mazo
Rethinking Presidential Eligibility, Eugene D. Mazo
Fordham Law Review
Many aspiring American Presidents have had their candidacies challenged for failing to meet the Constitution’s eligibility requirements. Although none of these challenges have ever been successful, they have sapped campaigns of valuable resources and posed a threat to several ambitious men. This Article examines several notable presidential eligibility challenges and explains why they have often been unsuccessful. The literature on presidential eligibility traditionally has focused on the Eligibility Clause, which enumerates the age, residency, and citizenship requirements that a President must satisfy before taking office. By contrast, very little of it examines how a challenge to one’s candidacy impacts a …
Reforming The Contested Convention: Rethinking The Presidential Nomination Process, Michael T. Morley
Reforming The Contested Convention: Rethinking The Presidential Nomination Process, Michael T. Morley
Fordham Law Review
The presidential nomination process could be substantially improved through a few minor tweaks that would reduce unnecessary uncertainty, bolster its democratic underpinnings, and improve the connections among its various components. First, certain fundamental rules governing national conventions should be determined well in advance of the presidential nominating process, before any primaries or caucuses are held or delegates selected, and not be subject to change or suspension at the convention itself. Second, parties should enhance the democratic moorings of their national conventions by requiring presidential candidates to win a greater number of presidential preference votes to be placed into nomination. Third, …
“Natural Born” Disputes In The 2016 Presidential Election, Derek T. Muller
“Natural Born” Disputes In The 2016 Presidential Election, Derek T. Muller
Fordham Law Review
The 2016 presidential election brought forth new disputes concerning the definition of “natural born Citizen.” The most significant challenges surrounded the eligibility of Senator Ted Cruz, born in Canada to a Cuban father and an American mother. Unlike challenges to President Barack Obama’s eligibility, which largely turned on conspiratorial facts, challenges to Cruz’s eligibility turned principally on the law and garnered more serious attention concerning a somewhat cryptic constitutional clause. Understandably, much attention focused on the definition of “natural born citizen” and whether candidates like Cruz qualified. Administrative challenges and litigation in court revealed deficiencies in the procedures for handling …
The Politics Of Electoral Systems In The Former Yugoslav Republic Of Macedonia, Dardan Berisha
The Politics Of Electoral Systems In The Former Yugoslav Republic Of Macedonia, Dardan Berisha
Indiana Journal of Constitutional Design
The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (“FYROM”) experienced four major changes to its electoral system in the eight parliamentary elections held between 1990 and 2014. The Macedonian 1990 and 1994 parliamentary elections were held under a majority system, in which 120 members of the Parliament were elected from 120 constituencies, one member per constituency. A mixed-majority/proportional representation (“PR”) system was adopted for the 1998 elections, in which eighty-five seats were elected under the majority system from the constituencies, and thirty-five seats were elected proportionally from a nation-wide electoral district. Yet another system was adopted for the 2002 elections, in which …
Shareholder Proposal Settlements And The Private Ordering Of Public Elections, Sarah C. Haan
Shareholder Proposal Settlements And The Private Ordering Of Public Elections, Sarah C. Haan
Scholarly Articles
Reform of campaign finance disclosure has stalled in Congress and at various federal agencies, but it is steadily unfolding in a firm-by-firm program of private ordering. Today, much of what is publicly known about how individual public companies spend money to influence federal, state, and local elections—and particularly what is known about corporate “dark money”—comes from disclosures that conform to privately negotiated contracts.
The primary mechanism for this new transparency is the settlement of the shareholder proposal, in which a shareholder trades its rights under SEC Rule 14a-8—and potentially the rights of other shareholders—for a privately negotiated social policy commitment …
But First, (Don’T) Let Me Take A Selfie: New Hampshire’S Ban On Ballot Selfies And First Amendment Scrutiny, Emily Wagman
But First, (Don’T) Let Me Take A Selfie: New Hampshire’S Ban On Ballot Selfies And First Amendment Scrutiny, Emily Wagman
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Constitution Day Lectures, Maxwell L. Stearns, Paula A. Monopoli, Larry S. Gibson, Robert Koulish, David J. Maher
Constitution Day Lectures, Maxwell L. Stearns, Paula A. Monopoli, Larry S. Gibson, Robert Koulish, David J. Maher
Maryland Law Review Online
No abstract provided.
A Skeptical Optimist’S Perspective On Canada Getting To Proportional Representation As An Electoral Reform, Craig Scott
A Skeptical Optimist’S Perspective On Canada Getting To Proportional Representation As An Electoral Reform, Craig Scott
Editorials and Commentaries
No abstract provided.
Section 7: Immigration Law, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 7: Immigration Law, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 2: The Court And The 2016 Election, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 2: The Court And The 2016 Election, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Montana Judicial Elections: Does The Past Hold Lessons For Future?, A. C. Johnstone
Montana Judicial Elections: Does The Past Hold Lessons For Future?, A. C. Johnstone
Faculty Journal Articles & Other Writings
No abstract provided.
Reserved Election: Boost For Multiracialism?, Tan K. B. Eugene
Reserved Election: Boost For Multiracialism?, Tan K. B. Eugene
Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law
Singapore is on the threshold of the most significant re-engineering to its constitutional architecture since the introduction of the Elected Presidency (EP) in 1991.