Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (31)
- Law and Politics (16)
- State and Local Government Law (15)
- Supreme Court of the United States (15)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (14)
-
- Law and Race (10)
- President/Executive Department (9)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (8)
- Courts (6)
- Fourteenth Amendment (6)
- Law and Society (6)
- Legislation (6)
- Law and Gender (5)
- Legal History (5)
- Political Science (5)
- Rule of Law (5)
- Judges (4)
- Administrative Law (3)
- American Politics (3)
- Criminal Law (3)
- Comparative Politics (2)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (2)
- First Amendment (2)
- Health Law and Policy (2)
- International and Area Studies (2)
- Labor and Employment Law (2)
- Law and Philosophy (2)
- Legal Studies (2)
- Institution
-
- Fordham Law School (10)
- University of Michigan Law School (8)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (7)
- Lewis & Clark Law School (5)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (4)
-
- Notre Dame Law School (4)
- University of Colorado Law School (4)
- William & Mary Law School (4)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (3)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (3)
- Brigham Young University Law School (2)
- Cleveland State University (2)
- Columbia Law School (2)
- Georgia State University College of Law (2)
- SJ Quinney College of Law, University of Utah (2)
- St. John's University School of Law (2)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (2)
- University of Washington School of Law (2)
- Washington University in St. Louis (2)
- Belmont University (1)
- Bemidji State University (1)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Chapman University (1)
- Claremont Colleges (1)
- Collin College (1)
- Cornell University Law School (1)
- Duke Law (1)
- Duquesne University (1)
- Florida International University College of Law (1)
- Georgetown University Law Center (1)
- Keyword
-
- Voting rights (12)
- Democracy (9)
- Elections (8)
- Election law (7)
- Voting (6)
-
- Disenfranchisement (5)
- Election (5)
- Election Law (5)
- Electoral College (5)
- Suffrage (5)
- Gerrymandering (4)
- Election administration (3)
- Electoral college (3)
- Fifteenth Amendment (3)
- Fourteenth Amendment (3)
- Partisanship (3)
- Presidential elections (3)
- Separation of powers (3)
- Supreme Court (3)
- Textualism (3)
- Voting Rights Act (3)
- Voting Rights Act of 1965 (3)
- 2020 election (2)
- Anderson-Burdick (2)
- Ballot (2)
- Constitutional Law (2)
- Donald Trump (2)
- Elections Clause (2)
- Electoral votes (2)
- Federalism (2)
- Publication
-
- Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum (9)
- Faculty Scholarship (7)
- Articles (5)
- Lewis & Clark Law Review (5)
- Publications (4)
-
- Court Briefs (3)
- Mitchell Hamline Law Review (3)
- Online Publications (3)
- Faculty Publications (2)
- Georgia State University Law Review (2)
- Journal Articles (2)
- Michigan Law Review (2)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (2)
- Scholarship@WashULaw (2)
- Utah Law Review (2)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (2)
- Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice (2)
- Akron Law Review (1)
- All Papers (1)
- Appellate Briefs (1)
- Articles & Chapters (1)
- BYU Law Review (1)
- Book Chapters (1)
- Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law (1)
- CMC Senior Theses (1)
- Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice (1)
- Cardozo Law Review de•novo (1)
- Cleveland State Law Review (1)
- Duquesne Law Review (1)
- Et Cetera (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 91 - 98 of 98
Full-Text Articles in Election Law
Corporate Capital & Legal Personality: A Marxist Account Of Citizens United Ten Years Later, Hayden E. Pendergrass
Corporate Capital & Legal Personality: A Marxist Account Of Citizens United Ten Years Later, Hayden E. Pendergrass
Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice
The article presents a Marxist critique of the Citizens United decision, arguing that it embodies the dominant capitalist ideology by granting corporations extensive First Amendment rights. This decision reflects the legal system's role in reinforcing corporate power and control over the political process, aligning with Marxist theories of law as a tool of class domination.
Mary Lou Graves, Nolen Breedlove, And The Nineteenth Amendment, Ellen D. Katz
Mary Lou Graves, Nolen Breedlove, And The Nineteenth Amendment, Ellen D. Katz
Articles
This close examination of two cases is part of a larger ongoing project to provide a distinct account of the Nineteenth Amendment. In 1921, the Alabama Supreme Court held the Nineteenth Amendment required that any poll tax be imposed equally on men and women. Sixteen years later, the Supreme Court disagreed. Juxtaposing these two cases, and telling their story in rich context, captures my larger claim that—contrary to the general understanding in the scholarly literature—the Nineteenth Amendment was deliberately crafted as a highly circumscribed measure that would eliminate only the exclusively male franchise while serving steadfastly to preserve and promote …
An Attack On Local Authority, Richard Briffault, Kim Haddow
An Attack On Local Authority, Richard Briffault, Kim Haddow
Faculty Scholarship
In the 2021 legislative sessions, Republican state lawmakers introduced a glut of preemption bills aimed at giving states more power over the administration of local government operations, signifying a new, deeper level of state interference into the inner workings of cities and counties. . . . Entering the 2021 legislative sessions, Republican state lawmakers used their power to respond to the events of 2020 – the pandemic, the racial justice movement, the presidential election, and what they perceived to be local government overreach (Brownstein 2021) – by introducing a surge of preemption bills aimed at appropriating the machinery of local …
Election Law Localism And Democracy, Richard Briffault
Election Law Localism And Democracy, Richard Briffault
Faculty Scholarship
American federal and state elections are largely run by local officials. Although election law is almost entirely determined by the federal government and the states, elections are actually conducted by thousands of different county and city elections offices. This decentralization of election administration has often, and fairly, been criticized as resulting in undesirable interlocal variation in the application of election rules, inefficiency, and racial discrimination. Yet, in 2020, local election administration, particularly in large urban areas, was a source of strength. Local officials proved to be resilient, innovative, and attentive to local conditions. The record-high turnout in the face of …
Felony Financial Disenfranchisement, Neel U. Sukhatme, Alexander Billy, Gaurav Bagwe
Felony Financial Disenfranchisement, Neel U. Sukhatme, Alexander Billy, Gaurav Bagwe
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Individuals with prior felony convictions often must complete all terms of their sentence before they regain voter eligibility. Many jurisdictions include legal-financial obligations (LFOs) — fines, fees, and/or restitution stemming from convictions — in the terms of the sentence. Twenty-eight states, governing over 182 million Americans, either directly or indirectly tie LFO repayment to voting privileges, a practice we call felony financial disenfranchisement.
Proponents of felony financial disenfranchisement posit that returning citizens must satisfy the financial obligations stemming from convictions to restore themselves as community equals. Moralism aside, others claim low rates of electoral participation among those with felony convictions …
Felon Re-Enfranchisement And The Problem Of “Lost” Rights, Josh Feinzig
Felon Re-Enfranchisement And The Problem Of “Lost” Rights, Josh Feinzig
Faculty Scholarship
By conditioning the restoration of political rights on financial repayment, states have prevented hundreds of thousands of citizens with felony convictions from participating politically—profoundly altering the shape of the American electorate. Courts have upheld the practice by treating restoration as an exercise of legislative grace to nonmembers of the political community. Critics argue that the practice conditions political participation on wealth status and is therefore subject to heightened review.
This Essay traces the disagreement back to an overlooked first-order question: how should the juridical status of a disenfranchised citizen’s “lost” rights be understood? The conventional position assumes that disenfranchisement casts …
The Lawfulness Of The Fifteenth Amendment, Travis Crum
The Lawfulness Of The Fifteenth Amendment, Travis Crum
Scholarship@WashULaw
One of the most provocative debates in constitutional theory concerns the lawfulness of the Reconstruction Amendments’ adoptions. Scholars have contested whether Article V permits amendments proposed by Congresses that excluded the Southern States and questioned whether those States’ ratifications were obtained through unlawful coercion. Scholars have also teased out differences in how States were counted for purposes of ratifying the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments. This debate has focused exclusively on the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments, dismissing the Fifteenth Amendment as a mere sequel.
As this Essay demonstrates, the unique issues raised by the Fifteenth Amendment’s ratification adds important nuance to …
Deregulated Redistricting, Travis Crum
Deregulated Redistricting, Travis Crum
Scholarship@WashULaw
From the civil rights movement through the Obama administration, each successive redistricting cycle involved ever-greater regulation of the mapmaking process. But in the past decade, the Supreme Court has re-written the ground rules for redistricting. For the first time in fifty years, Southern States will redistrict free of the preclearance process that long protected minorities from having their political power diminished. Political parties can now openly engage in egregious partisan gerrymandering.
The Court has withdrawn from the political thicket on every front except race. In so doing, the Court has engaged in decision-making that is both activist and restrained, but …